XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.computer.workshop, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
XPost: alt.atheism

On 24 Dec 2023, "james g. keegan jr." <jgkeegan@gma l.con> posted some news:TXZhN.81452$PuZ9.53337@fx11.iad:

On 12/22/2023 9:39 PM, On every date, oozing scarlet red maxipad,
whose mouth waters at the thought of his mommy's warm mackerel-reeking snatch, tried — and *failed* — to bullshit:

In news:6mi5oi1k1799htnjl79rkn2aa4nge6ldid@4ax.com, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> typed:

On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 22:42:59 -0800, "max headroom"
<maximusheadroom@gmx.com> wrote:

In news:gkm2oi9ljvm2cg0et7iv8ukvvg4paaoc6d@4ax.com, Governor Swill
<governor.swill@gmail.com> typed:

On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 18:59:45 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

On 2023-12-18, Mitchell Holman <noemail@verizon.net> wrote:

Paul Ragna <tpragna@gmail.com> wrote in
news:XnsB0DE7692A7C1F882000099222@ 135.181.20.170:

This is juicy!
This family is really sick.
Seriosly sick.

For those of you, like Rudy, who are unable to read, you can
look at the pictures.

https://bidenlaptopmedia.com/index.php?/category/laptop

So what is on this laptop that is
relevant to.....anything?

Plenty.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/hunter-biden-laptop-data-analysis/

"Brian Della Rocca, the lawyer for the shop owner, provided to CBS
News what he called an "exact copy" of the laptop data provided to
federal investigators nearly three years ago. Della Rocca said he
considers it "clean" because it predates versions that were widely
circulated by Republican operatives to attack then-candidate Joe
Biden before the 2020 presidential election. "

Iow, the laptop "data" used by the right against Hunter was
fabricated?

Where exactly does Della Rocca say that?

He doesn't. I was asking a question based on other information
about it.

This article is about a clean copy and doesn't say what was on it
that's problematic.

See?

I see it doesn't say there was no problematic info on it.

It doesn't say all kinds of things, o oozing scarlet red maxipad, you
fucking Nazi dope. It doesn't say how many rivets are in the Eiffel
Tower or how many liters are in a gallon or who was Treasury Secretary
in 1897. You may not logically infer *anything* from what it *doesn't*
say, o oozing scarlet red maxipad, you fucking Nazi dope.

That's not true as there is a logical conclusion for what you just
described.

You remind me of a scene from "Catch-22," o oozing scarlet red
maxipad, you fucking Nazi dope. The scene is the "action board"
hearing in which Yossarian's pal Clevinger is up on a bunch of bogus
charges. An angry colonel has been bawling him out.

the colonel: “Just what the hell did you mean, you bastard,
when you said we couldn't punish you?"

Clevinger: "I didn't say you couldn't punish me, sir."

"When?" asked the colonel.

"When what, sir?"

"Now you're asking me questions again."

"I'm sorry, sir. I'm afraid I don't understand your question."

"When didn't you say we couldn't punish you? . . . Now suppose you
answer my
question."

"But how can I answer it?"

"That's another question you're asking me."

" . . . I never said you couldn't punish me."

"Now you're telling us when you did say it. I'm asking you to tell
us when you didn't say it."

Clevinger took a deep breath. "I always didn't say you couldn't
punish me, sir."

You are such a dull plodding Nazi dope, o oozing scarlet red maxipad.

Is that what you saw as you stood there staring up your mom's dress?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)