XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics.usa, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14818479/MAGA-turns-Trump-appointed-Justice-Amy-Coney-Barrett-SCOTUS.html
. . .
Though appointed by Trump, ACB has been more of
a "swing vote" in the USSC.
I do NOT see this as a bad thing. The USSC is not
supposed to be 'partisan' overall - but stick to
The Law and Original Intent.
SOME of the cases coming in of late - they have
little to do with either of those things.
So, I'm gonna SUPPORT ACB. There NEEDS to be
some objective, Original Intent, No BS, justices
on the Court. The WokieComs kept going Too Far,
but SO HAVE some of the new MAGA people.
The good function of the USA, the Land Of The Free,
DEPENDS on the USSC to NOT be very partisan.
Seems like every generation - esp after WW2 - has
the New Perfect Ideology which generally involves
CRUSHING un-believers. "Red-Menace" onwards ...
the USA spawned MUCH more extreme, stupid, factions
with viewpoints closer to The Inquisition than
anything else.
The USSC is supposed to stand in the way of such
extremes, preserving the Original Vision so the
most people can have the most freedom most of
the time.
In short, ACB seems to "get it".
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)