Quote:
Specifically, journalists and editors are prohibited from:
* Filming or broadcasting images from impact sites, particularly
near military installations.
* Using drones or wide-angle cameras to show impact areas.
* Detailing the precise location of affected areas near security
installations.
* Broadcasting images of Israeli missiles being launched or of
Iranian missiles being intercepted.
* The directive also bans the sharing of videos from social
media without prior review by the censor, cautioning – as a
side note – that some may be “enemy-generated fake news”.
It's a country at WAR ...
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 23:23:24 +0000 (UTC), hello there wrote:
It's a country at WAR ...
A war that it started.
“The only democracy in the Middle East”, it proclaims -- not like
all those other authoritarian regimes, it keeps insisting ... only
it’s not so different after all, is it?
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in news:1032c12$81tr$1@dont-email.me:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 23:23:24 +0000 (UTC), hello there wrote:
It's a country at WAR ...
A war that it started.
“The only democracy in the Middle East”, it proclaims -- not like
all those other authoritarian regimes, it keeps insisting ... only
it’s not so different after all, is it?
Hamas attacked Israel. Hamas is funded by Iranian leaders. Israel is defending itself from Hamas and other Iranian terror groups. This has
gone on so long that Israel will finish another fight that it didn't
start. You can tell from all the responses that much planning has gone
into this.
Hamas attacked Israel. Hamas is funded by Iranian leaders. Israel is defending itself from Hamas and other Iranian terror groups. This has
gone on so long that Israel will finish another fight that it didn't
start. You can tell from all the responses that much planning has gone
into this.
IMHO they have been very tolerant and peaceful in their response to people all around them who want to murder them.
I and my country are also hated by Iran. We side with Israel. Do not provoke us further. If you continue God will eventually help us. Accept peace so you can have tomorrow.
How would you respond to an enemy that clearly wants to murder you?
Not sure it has. The pretext for the attack on Iran was to stop them developing a nuclear weapon -- but both US intelligence and the IAEA are agreed that Iran is nowhere near capable of doing such a thing.
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 23:23:24 +0000 (UTC), hello there wrote:
It's a country at WAR ...
A war that it started.
In article <1032o8b$e9r1$2@dont-email.me>,also
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Not sure it has. The pretext for the attack on Iran was to stop them
developing a nuclear weapon -- but both US intelligence and the IAEA are
agreed that Iran is nowhere near capable of doing such a thing.
That's BS.
"Findings include 2003 tests of detonator for nuclear bomb; UN watchdog
says Tehran now has enough uranium, if enriched further, for 9 bombs."
etc. etc. etc.
They are clearly going for a bomb, there's no "peaceful purpose" this enrichment program serves.
I'm no Netanyahu fan, but he's not the major problem.
The major problem is a nation which declared, 46 years ago, that
its most important goal is to annihilate Israel, and which had
been working towards that goal ever since.
So far they did it by proxy, making others suffer, laughing on the
sidelines while others die -- in Israel, Lebanon, Gaza, Yemen...
No more.
It does look like [Iran] could build a bomb.
In article <1032c12$81tr$1@dont-email.me>,
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 19 Jun 2025 23:23:24 +0000 (UTC), hello there wrote:
It's a country at WAR ...
A war that it started.
A lie, and irrelevant even if it were true.
In article <1032o8b$e9r1$2@dont-email.me>,
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Not sure it has. The pretext for the attack on Iran was to stop them
developing a nuclear weapon -- but both US intelligence and the IAEA
are agreed that Iran is nowhere near capable of doing such a thing.
That's BS.
"Findings include 2003 tests of detonator for nuclear bomb..."
It was Israel
Both US intelligence and the IAEA show no signs of getting anywhere close
to a bomb since then.
In article <1034sjn$amsq$6@dont-email.me>, Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
Both US intelligence and the IAEA show no signs of getting anywhere
close to a bomb since then.
Liar.
Both US intelligence and the IAEA show no signs of getting anywhere
close to a bomb since then.
Liar.
Are you really that incapable of reading news reports for yourself?
Iran is behind all the death and destruction in the Middle East.
Are you really stupid enough to believe that Iran isn't pursuing a
nuclear weapon?
Iran's use of criminal networks as terrorist proxies in Europe
...
Iran behind basically every terror organization in the Middle East
[blah blah blah]
On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 06:21:41 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Sun, 22 Jun 2025 05:22:22 +0000 (UTC), hello there wrote:
https://isis-online.org/isis-reports/analysis-of-iaea-iran-verification-and-monitoring-report-may-2025/
Where do they get info that US intelligence doesn’t have?
[no answer]
https://isis-online.org/isis-reports/analysis-of-iaea-iran-verification-and-monitoring-report-may-2025/
Do you believe Iran is pursuing nuclear weapons?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 49:56:26 |
| Calls: | 10,397 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 14,067 |
| Messages: | 6,417,314 |
| Posted today: | 1 |