XPost: nz.politics, soc.culture.israel
Denial, denial, denial. That seems to be the policy of this
US-sponsored aid agency in response to any mention of the ongoing
killings of innocent civilians around their aid distribution points.
<
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c20rz63g1zko>:
For his part, the head of the GHF said "100% of the casualties are
being attributed to the IDF - as best as we can tell that's also
not true".
In statements over the past month, the IDF have several times said
they fired "warning shots" at individuals who they described as
"suspects" or claimed posed a threat.
"We spend an extended period of time trying to understand what
actually happened, if anything actually happened and whether
there's a way that we can make it less likely to happen," Mr Moore
said.
"In most circumstances we haven't been able to identify anything
happening."
"People need to understand that it is disinformation that people
going to GHF sites are being killed, we have no evidence of that
happening in proximity to our sites," he added.
...
Mr Moore alleged that prior to GHF's operations the majority of UN
aid trucks were being hijacked at gunpoint.
The UN has said there is no evidence for a large-scale hijacking
of its aid trucks. When told this, Mr Moore said the "UN is not
being honest".
Whom would you believe? Some organization set up by supporters of
Donald Trump, with an obvious religious-ideological agenda behind
their “aid” deliveries? Or international aid groups (the UN and
others) with a track record of helping people without leaving a trail
of carnage behind them?
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)