XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, can.politics, alt.politics.liberalism
XPost: alt.politics.democrats, alt.politics.usa.republican
On 7/6/25 21:03, AlleyCat wrote:
On Sat, 5 Jul 2025 23:48:44 -0600, Gronk says...
Pentagon Says U.S. Strikes Delayed Iran?s
Nuclear Program by Up to Two Years
That IS obliteration.
Not when it failed to destroy the refined material.
How long it take to enrich Uranium, once you already have the technology?
Depends on what one wants to do, because the current 60% purity is
already more than adequate to make a dirty bomb.
For going higher (eg, 90%), the scale for number of centrifuges goes
down, not up because there's less total material and less remaining
undesired material that needs to be removed: a small pilot plant can
handle 800kg is adequate. Plus because most of the refining work has
already been done, the timescale is closer to months than years because
the reduced industrial scale also reduces infrastructure needs.
Jeez, you liberals is stoopit.
Not to worry: you're up in the Panhandle, so you'll be far enough away
from Mar-A-Lago to be outside of the fallout.
-hh
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)