• Last October: GOPer tries to explain PresiFELON saying Lincoln should h

    From Gronk@21:1/5 to All on Sat Aug 16 22:56:46 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.democrats.d, or.politics

    https://www.mediaite.com/tv/scott-jennings-undertakes-herculean-task-of-explaining-what-trump-meant-when-he-said-lincoln-shouldve-settled-the-civil-war/
    Oct 18th, 2024,

    CNN’s Scott Jennings attempted the unenviable
    task of translating what he thought former
    President Donald Trump meant earlier in the
    day when he suggested Abraham Lincoln could
    have “settled” the American Civil War.

    Trump told Fox News on Friday morning that
    he believed the country’s 16th president
    could have found a solution beyond a
    four-year armed conflict that remains the
    bloodiest war in American history.

    “Lincoln was probably a great president,
    although I’ve always said, why wasn’t that
    settled?” Trump said. “You know, I’m a guy
    that – it doesn’t make sense we had a Civil
    War… You’d almost say, like, why wasn’t
    that–? As an example, Ukraine would have
    never happened, and Russia, if I were
    president. Israel would have never happened.
    October 7 would have never happened, as you
    know.”

    Trump made the comment in response to a
    question from a child who asked who his
    favorite president was when he was “little.”
    Trump initially cited Ronald Reagan – who
    was elected while the then-New York real
    estate developer was in his thirties.

    On AC360 Friday night, host Anderson Cooper
    welcomed Jennings and Bakari Sellers to
    discuss Trump’s Fox News comments. Sellers
    commented that he believed Trump had no
    “grasp” on American history and was not fit
    to be president.

    He added, “No matter what pretzel anybody
    turns himself into our eyes can tell the truth.”

    Cooper then pivoted to Jennings, a veteran GOP
    strategist, to explain what he thought Trump
    meant by the comment. Jennings teed up the
    following response:

    I mean, look, I think he has a general
    disposition that war is bad and that he’s
    running as an anti-war type candidate, and he
    believes that you should try to avoid war. So,
    I think that’s a general baseline position of
    his. I know he said this earlier this year as
    well. Lots of politicians did try to settle it,
    and never compromises, and punts, and all the
    way down the field. And then obviously we had
    the Civil War for the very obvious reason of
    eradicating slavery.

    (follow link to read more of him digging himself
    deeper and deeper into a hole)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chine.bleu@21:1/5 to Gronk on Sun Aug 17 02:45:08 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.democrats.d, or.politics

    Gronk wrote:
    Trump told Fox News on Friday morning that
    he believed the country’s 16th president
    could have found a solution beyond a
    four-year armed conflict that remains the
    bloodiest war in American history.

    The solution was easy. Let slavery spread throughout the west. TACO
    would approve this solution.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
    Thank goodness my iron lung is working again! /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)