• Re: Trump Right... Again! (3/3)

    From Anonymous American@21:1/5 to Gronk on Sun Aug 17 23:12:13 2025
    [continued from previous message]

    former Secretary of State in Arizona and former governor, who was running a distant fifth in the primary election for governor before he signed the $100 million contract with an electronic voting machine company, and all of a
    sudden he won the election, or the same thing that happened with Kemp in Georgia.

    Those speculations have been floating out there that their bribery was not
    cash into their bank account but votes in their upcoming primary elections.
    I do not know whether that is true or not. Those allegations have been
    floated. It would not surprise me .

    Stacey Abrams certainly thought Kemp stole the election. There was a whole litigation on it. That is why Halderman was doing his expert reports in that case.

    More troubling, though, are the people that knew that there was something
    amiss and refused to do anything about it because they did not like Trump,
    or they do not like the Trump populist uprising movement that Trump is
    leading.

    Remember, Trump did not create this movement. We need to date it back to the Tea Party movement in 2010 after Obamacare comes down. The Republicans in charge in Congress thought that was a bigger threat to them than the
    Democrats were.

    They wanted to do everything they could to shut down that movement. The movement just took on a new guise when a new leader stepped up to get ahead
    of it, and it is the MAGA movement now.

    Either they do not like those people in flyover country -- that may be part
    of it from our release in DC -- or they do not like anybody questioning the utter corruption that is making them all multimillionaires with having government jobs or some combination of both.

    What was most discouraging was finding people saying, "Oh, I wish we could
    do something about this election illegality," and then, on the back side,
    doing everything they could to stop it.

    Former Attorney General William Barr is the primary example of this. Barr
    goes out on December 1st, and said, "We've been investigating, and we found
    no evidence of significant enough fraud to affect the outcome of the
    election."

    One of the charges against me in California is, "You continue to insist
    there was illegality even after Bill Barr made that statement. Why didn't
    you bow to him?" Well, we subsequently learned that despite Barr's public statement that US attorneys could investigate election illegality, anytime somebody did, he called him on the phone and order them not to.

    In Pennsylvania, the US attorney in Pennsylvania, McSwain, was looking at
    the truck driver incident. Barr told him, "You hand all that over to the attorney general of the state" -- a Democrat who was part of the problem.

    One of the FBI investigators who was actually getting to the bottom of this
    got a call that said, "Stand down."

    The investigation of the ballots coming out from under the table and being counted after everybody was sent home down in Atlanta, the FBI did
    investigate that. Guess what the purpose of their investigation was. To determine that the statement that there were suitcases of ballots rather
    than bins of ballots was false. They did not do any other investigation
    about whether in fact people had been sent home.

    You have people out there saying, "Oh, we're investigating. Everything's
    fine," while behind the scenes ordering people not to do the investigation
    that would actually get to the bottom of it.

    I call it the uniparty. You can call it the deep state. You can call it the administrative state. You can call it the corrupt state, but it sees the
    MAGA movement as the biggest threat to its syndicators. It is going to do everything it can to destroy the people who are going to try and publicize
    what is going on.

    That is what we are dealing with, and we are $2 million in. One of the
    lawsuits that was filed against me by this guy down in North Carolina, I
    don't know why he picked me as the lead defendant, but other defendants are
    all billionaire oligarchs who are using their own wealth. That is the kind
    of nonsense I'm dealing with.

    This article is based on a briefing from John Eastman to Gatestone
    Institute.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)