... Biden LET the Russia/Ukraine War happen and failed to end it in the 1,061 days he was President?And Trump claimed he could end the war in 24 hours...
Biden Made Consequences Of Ukraine Invasion "Crystal Clear" In Call With Russia's Putin
And war kept onnnnn going.
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 15:39:28 -0700, Alan says...
And war kept onnnnn going.
And Trump claimed he could end the war in 24 hours...
Did you believe he could? What's wrong with being optimistic?
Doesn't matter... Biden let it happen.
His fault.
Putin said the war would never have happened if Trump had been President. Why would he say that, if he didn't believe it to be
true?
Go ahead... rationalize. "Whah whah... Putin's lyyyinnnng!" Prove it.
Still not Trump's fault the war started. That the war goes on, is still Biden's fault.
Because Trump SAID he could stop it, makes him what, for not?
Unlike you Drag Queen-loving left-wingers, he's an optimist. At least he's trying.
Wanna know how many times Biden tried, and failed?
On 2025-08-17 19:04, AlleyCat wrote:
And Trump claimed he could end the war in 24 hours...
... Biden LET the Russia/Ukraine War happen and failed to end it in the
1,061 days he was President?
Biden Made Consequences Of Ukraine Invasion "Crystal Clear" In Call
With Russia's Putin
And war kept onnnnn going.
...and the war is still onnnnn going.
On 2025-08-19, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 15:39:28 -0700, Alan says...
And war kept onnnnn going.
And Trump claimed he could end the war in 24 hours...
Did you believe he could? What's wrong with being optimistic?
Doesn't matter... Biden let it happen.
His fault.
Putin said the war would never have happened if Trump had been President. Why would he say that, if he didn't believe it to be
true?
Go ahead... rationalize. "Whah whah... Putin's lyyyinnnng!" Prove it.
Still not Trump's fault the war started. That the war goes on, is still Biden's fault.
Because Trump SAID he could stop it, makes him what, for not?
Unlike you Drag Queen-loving left-wingers, he's an optimist. At least he's trying.
Wanna know how many times Biden tried, and failed?
It's all the left has to attack Trump with.
On 2025-08-19 05:56, pothead wrote:
On 2025-08-19, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 15:39:28 -0700, Alan says...
And war kept onnnnn going.
And Trump claimed he could end the war in 24 hours...
Did you believe he could? What's wrong with being optimistic?
Doesn't matter... Biden let it happen.
His fault.
Putin said the war would never have happened if Trump had been President. Why would he say that, if he didn't believe it to be
true?
Go ahead... rationalize. "Whah whah... Putin's lyyyinnnng!" Prove it.
Still not Trump's fault the war started. That the war goes on, is still Biden's fault.
Because Trump SAID he could stop it, makes him what, for not?
Unlike you Drag Queen-loving left-wingers, he's an optimist. At least he's trying.
Wanna know how many times Biden tried, and failed?
It's all the left has to attack Trump with.
"the left"?
And you think attacking Trump for his lies is somehow unfair?
On 2025-08-19, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-19 05:56, pothead wrote:
On 2025-08-19, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 15:39:28 -0700, Alan says...
And war kept onnnnn going.
And Trump claimed he could end the war in 24 hours...
Did you believe he could? What's wrong with being optimistic?
Doesn't matter... Biden let it happen.
His fault.
Putin said the war would never have happened if Trump had been President. Why would he say that, if he didn't believe it to be
true?
Go ahead... rationalize. "Whah whah... Putin's lyyyinnnng!" Prove it.
Still not Trump's fault the war started. That the war goes on, is still Biden's fault.
Because Trump SAID he could stop it, makes him what, for not?
Unlike you Drag Queen-loving left-wingers, he's an optimist. At least he's trying.
Wanna know how many times Biden tried, and failed?
It's all the left has to attack Trump with.
"the left"?
And you think attacking Trump for his lies is somehow unfair?
No.
I think that attacking Trump for insignificant statements and holding him
to them word for word is unfair
On 2025-08-19, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-19 05:56, pothead wrote:
On 2025-08-19, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 15:39:28 -0700, Alan says...
And war kept onnnnn going.
And Trump claimed he could end the war in 24 hours...
Did you believe he could? What's wrong with being optimistic?
Doesn't matter... Biden let it happen.
His fault.
Putin said the war would never have happened if Trump had been
President. Why would he say that, if he didn't believe it to
be true?
Go ahead... rationalize. "Whah whah... Putin's lyyyinnnng!"
Prove it.
Still not Trump's fault the war started. That the war goes on,
is still Biden's fault.
Because Trump SAID he could stop it, makes him what, for not?
Unlike you Drag Queen-loving left-wingers, he's an optimist.
At least he's trying.
Wanna know how many times Biden tried, and failed?
It's all the left has to attack Trump with.
"the left"?
And you think attacking Trump for his lies is somehow unfair?
No. I think that attacking Trump for insignificant statements and
holding him to them word for word is unfair especially when the left
gave Biden a pass on all the idiocy he spewed for 4 years. You
leftists have nothing else so you focus on minor semantic points.
ie:I will reduce inflation on day one.
Done with this topic. Move on because nobody but the left that have
nothing to present care.
On 2025-08-19 14:32, pothead wrote:
On 2025-08-19, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-19 05:56, pothead wrote:
On 2025-08-19, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 15:39:28 -0700, Alan says...
And war kept onnnnn going.
And Trump claimed he could end the war in 24 hours...
Did you believe he could? What's wrong with being optimistic?
Doesn't matter... Biden let it happen.
His fault.
Putin said the war would never have happened if Trump had been
President. Why would he say that, if he didn't believe it to
be true?
Go ahead... rationalize. "Whah whah... Putin's lyyyinnnng!"
Prove it.
Still not Trump's fault the war started. That the war goes on,
is still Biden's fault.
Because Trump SAID he could stop it, makes him what, for not?
Unlike you Drag Queen-loving left-wingers, he's an optimist.
At least he's trying.
Wanna know how many times Biden tried, and failed?
It's all the left has to attack Trump with.
"the left"?
And you think attacking Trump for his lies is somehow unfair?
No. I think that attacking Trump for insignificant statements and
holding him to them word for word is unfair especially when the left
gave Biden a pass on all the idiocy he spewed for 4 years. You
leftists have nothing else so you focus on minor semantic points.
ie:I will reduce inflation on day one.
Whenever one of his statements becomes obviously a lie, you say it's insignificant.
Done with this topic. Move on because nobody but the left that have
nothing to present care.
On 2025-08-19, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-19 14:32, pothead wrote:
On 2025-08-19, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-19 05:56, pothead wrote:
On 2025-08-19, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 15:39:28 -0700, Alan says...
And war kept onnnnn going.
And Trump claimed he could end the war in 24 hours...
Did you believe he could? What's wrong with being optimistic?
Doesn't matter... Biden let it happen.
His fault.
Putin said the war would never have happened if Trump had been
President. Why would he say that, if he didn't believe it to
be true?
Go ahead... rationalize. "Whah whah... Putin's lyyyinnnng!"
Prove it.
Still not Trump's fault the war started. That the war goes on,
is still Biden's fault.
Because Trump SAID he could stop it, makes him what, for not?
Unlike you Drag Queen-loving left-wingers, he's an optimist.
At least he's trying.
Wanna know how many times Biden tried, and failed?
It's all the left has to attack Trump with.
"the left"?
And you think attacking Trump for his lies is somehow unfair?
No. I think that attacking Trump for insignificant statements and
holding him to them word for word is unfair especially when the left
gave Biden a pass on all the idiocy he spewed for 4 years. You
leftists have nothing else so you focus on minor semantic points.
ie:I will reduce inflation on day one.
Whenever one of his statements becomes obviously a lie, you say it's
insignificant.
Yawwn.
Nope.
Example: I will end the war in Ukraine on day one.
Only you leftists take that literally.
He began working on ending the war in Ukraine on day one and here we are today.
If he fails to end the war, he owns it.
Same for inflation day one.
Prices day one.
etc.
You leftist lunatics are playing word for word instead of looking at what Trump is doing and trying to do.
It's pathetic that this is all you have.
You simply cannot name a single POTUS in history who has come out of the gate on day one working on fulfilling his promises.
You can't and THAT is what is driving you left wing lunatics crazy.
I think that attacking Trump for insignificant statements and holding him
to them word for word is unfair
He said literally *dozens* of times he was going to end the war in less
than 24 hours. He's been in office for 210 days and the war is still
raging unabated.
On 2025-08-19 15:13, pothead wrote:
On 2025-08-19, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-19 14:32, pothead wrote:
On 2025-08-19, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-19 05:56, pothead wrote:
On 2025-08-19, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 15:39:28 -0700, Alan says...
And war kept onnnnn going.
And Trump claimed he could end the war in 24 hours...
Did you believe he could? What's wrong with being optimistic?
Doesn't matter... Biden let it happen.
His fault.
Putin said the war would never have happened if Trump had been
President. Why would he say that, if he didn't believe it to
be true?
Go ahead... rationalize. "Whah whah... Putin's lyyyinnnng!"
Prove it.
Still not Trump's fault the war started. That the war goes on,
is still Biden's fault.
Because Trump SAID he could stop it, makes him what, for not?
Unlike you Drag Queen-loving left-wingers, he's an optimist.
At least he's trying.
Wanna know how many times Biden tried, and failed?
It's all the left has to attack Trump with.
"the left"?
And you think attacking Trump for his lies is somehow unfair?
No. I think that attacking Trump for insignificant statements and
holding him to them word for word is unfair especially when the left
gave Biden a pass on all the idiocy he spewed for 4 years. You
leftists have nothing else so you focus on minor semantic points.
ie:I will reduce inflation on day one.
Whenever one of his statements becomes obviously a lie, you say it's
insignificant.
Yawwn.
Nope.
Example: I will end the war in Ukraine on day one.
Only you leftists take that literally.
He began working on ending the war in Ukraine on day one and here we are today.
If he fails to end the war, he owns it.
You think that the same people who post that he's new Messiah didn't
believe it?
Same for inflation day one.
Prices day one.
etc.
You leftist lunatics are playing word for word instead of looking at what
Trump is doing and trying to do.
You mean taxing ordinary citizens in the form of tariffs?
Or cutting Medicare while giving huge tax breaks to the rich?
It's pathetic that this is all you have.
You simply cannot name a single POTUS in history who has come out of the gate
on day one working on fulfilling his promises.
You can't and THAT is what is driving you left wing lunatics crazy.
Is that what he's doing on all those weekends he spends playing golf?
'Donald Trump has golfed 51 days out of 212 days since returning to
office (24.1% of the presidency spent golfing).'
<https://didtrumpgolftoday.com/>
You do admit that he said he'd be far too busy to play golf, right?
On 2025-08-19, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-19 15:13, pothead wrote:
On 2025-08-19, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-19 14:32, pothead wrote:
On 2025-08-19, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-19 05:56, pothead wrote:
On 2025-08-19, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 15:39:28 -0700, Alan says...
And war kept onnnnn going.
And Trump claimed he could end the war in 24 hours...
Did you believe he could? What's wrong with being optimistic?
Doesn't matter... Biden let it happen.
His fault.
Putin said the war would never have happened if Trump had been >>>>>>>> President. Why would he say that, if he didn't believe it to
be true?
Go ahead... rationalize. "Whah whah... Putin's lyyyinnnng!"
Prove it.
Still not Trump's fault the war started. That the war goes on, >>>>>>>> is still Biden's fault.
Because Trump SAID he could stop it, makes him what, for not?
Unlike you Drag Queen-loving left-wingers, he's an optimist.
At least he's trying.
Wanna know how many times Biden tried, and failed?
It's all the left has to attack Trump with.
"the left"?
And you think attacking Trump for his lies is somehow unfair?
No. I think that attacking Trump for insignificant statements and
holding him to them word for word is unfair especially when the left >>>>> gave Biden a pass on all the idiocy he spewed for 4 years. You
leftists have nothing else so you focus on minor semantic points.
ie:I will reduce inflation on day one.
Whenever one of his statements becomes obviously a lie, you say it's
insignificant.
Yawwn.
Nope.
Example: I will end the war in Ukraine on day one.
Only you leftists take that literally.
He began working on ending the war in Ukraine on day one and here we are today.
If he fails to end the war, he owns it.
You think that the same people who post that he's new Messiah didn't
believe it?
I speak for myself.
I don't care what others think.
Stop moving the goal posts.
Both parties have their fair share of crazys.
Here is one of yours. https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/08/new-york-woman-was-dc-attending-far-left/
Same for inflation day one.
Prices day one.
etc.
You leftist lunatics are playing word for word instead of looking at what >>> Trump is doing and trying to do.
You mean taxing ordinary citizens in the form of tariffs?
Tariffs are necessary in order to level set and return to fair trade.
Up until this point, the US has been paying far higher tariffs than they
have been charging imports.
Wake up.
Or cutting Medicare while giving huge tax breaks to the rich?
Are you still pushing that ancient nugget?
Tossing people, illegals, fraudsters and so forth off the system does not effect those legally entitled to the program.
In fact, it allows for more funding to go to those who actually need the help.
You sound like an NPR house organ.
It's pathetic that this is all you have.
You simply cannot name a single POTUS in history who has come out of the gate
on day one working on fulfilling his promises.
You can't and THAT is what is driving you left wing lunatics crazy.
Is that what he's doing on all those weekends he spends playing golf?
ROTFLMAO!
You just proved my points.
'Donald Trump has golfed 51 days out of 212 days since returning to
office (24.1% of the presidency spent golfing).'
<https://didtrumpgolftoday.com/>
You do admit that he said he'd be far too busy to play golf, right?
Again ROTFLMAO!!!
You have nothing.
And I could bring up the past POTUS lying on the beach weekend after weekend like a beached whale but there is no need to.
As I have stated, you left wing lunatics have ZERO to campaign on other than attackingThey're not my party, asshole.
Trump for trivial crap that nobody but you lunatics cares about.
Why not tell us all what your democrat party is doing / going to do? ROTFLMAO!
I dare you.
On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 14:55:37 -0700, Rudy the Runt Canoza says...You can Google it.
He said literally *dozens* of times he was going to end the war in less than 24
hours
Prove it.
Let's see those "dozens" of times in videos.
On Mon, 18 Aug 2025 15:39:28 -0700, Alan says...You did:
And war kept onnnnn going.
And Trump claimed he could end the war in 24 hours...
Did you believe he could?
On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 22:09:26 -0500, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 02:16:50 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:1083024$nbh$1@dont-email.me:
Tariffs are necessary in order to level set and return to fair trade.
Up until this point, the US has been paying far higher tariffs than
they have been charging imports.
We enjoy a trade SURPLUS with Brazil!
Why is Trump slapping tariffs on them?
To KEEP it that way.
So . . . you penalize a country that sells you too much stuff. Then
you penalize them for not selling you enough stuff?
<snip>
On Tue, 19 Aug 2025 22:09:26 -0500, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 02:16:50 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:1083024$nbh$1@dont-email.me:
Tariffs are necessary in order to level set and return to fair trade.
Up until this point, the US has been paying far higher tariffs than
they have been charging imports.
We enjoy a trade SURPLUS with Brazil!
Why is Trump slapping tariffs on them?
To KEEP it that way.
So . . . you penalize a country that sells you too much stuff. Then
you penalize them for not selling you enough stuff?
<snip>
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 02:16:50 +0000, Mitchell Holman says...
pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:1083024$nbh$1@dont-email.me:
Tariffs are necessary in order to level set and return to fair trade.
Up until this point, the US has been paying far higher tariffs than
they have been charging imports.
We enjoy a trade SURPLUS with Brazil!
Why is Trump slapping tariffs on them?
To KEEP it that way.
Are there no tariffs on US goods going into Brazil?
Nope.
What are the current tariffs imposed by Brazil on goods and products imported from the U.S.?
As of the latest available information, Brazil imposes tariffs on various goods and products imported from the U.S. The specific
tariff rates can vary depending on the type of product, but some examples include:
1. Brazil imposes a 20% tariff on imported motor vehicles from the U.S.
2. There is a 14% tariff on imported pharmaceutical products.
3. Agricultural products such as soybeans can face tariffs of up to 8%.
4. Machinery and equipment may be subject to tariffs ranging from 14% to 16%.
It's essential for businesses and individuals engaging in trade between the U.S. and Brazil to be aware of these tariff rates to
accurately assess the cost implications of importing goods into Brazil. Additionally, staying up-to-date with any changes in tariff
rates is crucial for effective trade planning and compliance with import regulations.
Brazil's tariff policy is largely determined by its membership in Mercosur, and it applies a Common External Tariff (CET) to most
imports. However, in response to recent U.S. tariffs, Brazil has implemented new reciprocal measures.
Based on the latest available information, here are the current tariffs imposed by Brazil on goods and products imported from the
U.S.:
Reciprocal Tariffs: Brazil's President has stated that the country will likely impose a 50% reciprocal tariff on U.S.-origin goods
if the United States proceeds with its 50% tariffs. This is based on Brazil's Economic Reciprocity Act, which allows for matching
retaliatory measures.
Motor Vehicles: Tariffs on motor vehicles imported into Brazil, which were already high, could now be subject to this retaliatory
rate. While the user-provided figure of 20% was a previous rate, the new, threatened reciprocal tariff would likely be much higher.
Agricultural Products: The tariff on agricultural goods like soybeans can vary. While Brazil often imports very few soybeans from
the U.S., as it is a major producer itself, tariffs on many agricultural goods, including beef and coffee, are now subject to the
potential 50% reciprocal tariff as a retaliatory measure. The 8% tariff you mentioned is an outdated figure.
Pharmaceuticals: The tariff on imported pharmaceutical products is generally around 14%, but this could also be impacted by the new
reciprocal tariff regime.
Machinery and Equipment: Tariffs on machinery and equipment can vary widely depending on the specific product. These products may
also be subject to the new reciprocal tariff, which could increase the rate significantly from the 14-16% range you mentioned.
In short, the overall tariff situation has become highly volatile due to the new trade dispute. Brazil's current tariffs on U.S.
goods are in a state of flux, but they are generally expected to be much higher than historical norms due to a planned retaliatory
50% reciprocal tariff.
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 07:16:12 -0400, -hh says...
So . . . you penalize a country that sells you too much stuff. Then
you penalize them for not selling you enough stuff?
<snip>
Still waiting for the justification for Trump's Tariff on Penguins...
This has already been explained to you, through this group. I can't help it if you missed it.
This has already been explain to you and the others, pretending to be economically stupid. If you don't tariff those you have a trade surplus
with, or tariff them with a very low number, or not at all, countries
that ARE tariffed higher, will simply sell their goods to THOSE countries
and go around paying America the tariffs.
(I know it's the importers who actually pay the tariffs, but there's nothing to prevent them from countries, like China, from selling to the Penguin Islands
and the importers buying from them)
Remember the idiots who cried when Trump tariffed the Penguin Islands?
"If you leave (any countries) off the list, countries that try to basically arbitrage America, will go through those (countries) to us." - Howard Lutnick
On 8/20/25 21:22, AlleyCat wrote:Don't forget their bonkers "formula" for calculating tariff rates.
On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 07:16:12 -0400, -hh says...
So . . . you penalize a country that sells you too much
stuff. Then you penalize them for not selling you enough
stuff? <snip>
Still waiting for the justification for Trump's Tariff on
Penguins...
This has already been explained to you, through this group. I
can't help it if you missed it.
Oh, I already know the explanation: the "geniuses" who originally
put together the list used AI to generate countries, which used the
domain registry list instead of actual real countries. That's how
they got an uninhabited island.
Now MAGAs did try to spin a defense by postulating that countries
could dodge tariffs by passing goods through that remote
destination. The problem with this narrative attempt is that it
doesn't work, because tariffs are based on origin. Examples have
already been noted on Vietnam exports which have high China content
levels.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 35:02:22 |
| Calls: | 10,391 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,064 |
| Messages: | 6,417,141 |