• SOUNDS Like the Big Meeting Went OK

    From c186282@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 18 20:59:28 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Trump said he was now calling Putin to update
    on what's possible and what's not.

    Details are not clear yet on what the proposed
    'international security support' thing for Ukraine
    is going to look like, or where the money comes
    from. Basically I figure the idea is to put some
    mil guys from a number of EU countries physically
    inside Ukraine - so blow them up and you've
    kind of attacked those countries. Such tricks
    aren't new.

    Anyway - Ukraine is MESSY, Trump isn't Dumbledore,
    Putin reminds of Voldemort, Zel is kinda freakin'
    and the Euros still don't believe they might
    actually have to DO STUFF.

    But some things are just like that - no neat
    tidy TV endings by the end of the hour.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Seth Meyers@21:1/5 to XvWcnbAerKLkUT71nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@gi on Tue Aug 19 12:20:53 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    In <XvWcnbAerKLkUT71nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com> c186282 wrote:

    Trump said he was now calling Putin to update
    on what's possible and what's not.

    Details are not clear yet on what the proposed
    'international security support' thing for Ukraine
    is going to look like, or where the money comes
    from. Basically I figure the idea is to put some
    mil guys from a number of EU countries physically
    inside Ukraine - so blow them up and you've
    kind of attacked those countries. Such tricks
    aren't new.

    Anyway - Ukraine is MESSY, Trump isn't Dumbledore,
    Putin reminds of Voldemort, Zel is kinda freakin'
    and the Euros still don't believe they might
    actually have to DO STUFF.

    But some things are just like that - no neat
    tidy TV endings by the end of the hour.

    Wars are tough to end. Will the Democrats be held accountable for
    starting this one?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to All on Sun Aug 24 23:28:14 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    c186282 wrote:
    Trump said he was now calling Putin to update
    on what's possible and what's not.

    AH, how sweet

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to Trump Advocate on Wed Aug 27 00:12:57 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Seth Meyers, Trump Advocate wrote:


    Wars are tough to end. Will the Democrats be held accountable for
    starting this one?

    How did they start it?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to All on Wed Aug 27 12:15:03 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 00:12:57 -0600, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid>
    wrote:

    Seth Meyers, Trump Advocate wrote:


    Wars are tough to end. Will the Democrats be held accountable for
    starting this one?

    How did they start it?

    AI summary:

    During Bill Clinton's presidency, NATO expanded eastward to include
    former Eastern Bloc countries like the Czech Republic, Hungary, and
    Poland, which joined in 1999. This expansion aimed to promote
    stability and democracy in Europe following the Cold War, although it
    has been a source of tension with Russia, which viewed it as a threat
    to its security interests.

    And see here: <https://direct.mit.edu/isec/article/44/1/7/12232/How-to-Enlarge-NATO-The-Debate-inside-the-Clinton>

    And it remains the primary condition Russia makes for ending the war
    -- Ukraine should stay out of Nato, and Nato should stay out of
    Ukraine.

    If that could be agreed by all parties to the conflict, then it might
    be possible to have a ceasefire while other contentious matters are
    discussed.





    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From chine.bleu@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Wed Aug 27 06:24:13 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Steve Hayes wrote:
    And it remains the primary condition Russia makes for ending the war
    -- Ukraine should stay out of Nato, and Nato should stay out of
    Ukraine.

    If that could be agreed by all parties to the conflict, then it might
    be possible to have a ceasefire while other contentious matters are discussed.

    NATO expansion is due to USSR/Russia being so vicious to its own
    members. Russia has already violated at least one agreement to honour
    Ukraine's sovereignty when it gave its nuclear weapons to Russia. Putin
    has given no reassurance he would honour another agreement. No NATO
    member has been invaded by Russia: this would be the strongest assurance
    of their sovereignty.

    --
    Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. @
    Thank goodness my iron lung is working again! /|\
    The Church of the Holey Apple .signature 3.2 / \
    of Discordian Mysteries. This post insults Islam. Mohamed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From super70s@21:1/5 to Governor Swill on Wed Aug 27 16:20:30 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: talk.politics.misc

    In article <s38uakhkol25fg0ojah9bl2t6ha60850rq@4ax.com>,
    Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 12:15:03 +0200, Steve Hayes
    <hayesstw@telkomsa.net> wrote:

    On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 00:12:57 -0600, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid>
    wrote:

    Seth Meyers, Trump Advocate wrote:


    Wars are tough to end. Will the Democrats be held accountable for
    starting this one?

    How did they start it?

    AI summary:

    During Bill Clinton's presidency, NATO expanded eastward to include
    former Eastern Bloc countries like the Czech Republic, Hungary, and
    Poland, which joined in 1999. This expansion aimed to promote
    stability and democracy in Europe following the Cold War, although it
    has been a source of tension with Russia, which viewed it as a threat
    to its security interests.

    And see here: ><https://direct.mit.edu/isec/article/44/1/7/12232/How-to-Enlarge-NATO-The-Deb
    ate-inside-the-Clinton>

    And it remains the primary condition Russia makes for ending the war
    -- Ukraine should stay out of Nato, and Nato should stay out of
    Ukraine.

    If that could be agreed by all parties to the conflict, then it might
    be possible to have a ceasefire while other contentious matters are >discussed.

    So, it's perfectly ok for Russia to kill a million people in a years
    long war in order to dictate it's neighbors foreign policy and NATO's
    own rules?

    Here's what really happened: Putin knew that Biden would support
    Ukraine's entry into the EU and NATO and that's why he attacked when
    he did.

    And Trump's always saying Putin would've never invaded if he'd been
    president instead of Biden. Yeah he would've handed Ukraine over to
    Russia on a silver platter (like he wants to do now).

    His plan failed but he's too embarrassed by the Russian militiary's
    many shortcomings to admit defeat and withdraw.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Hayes@21:1/5 to governor.swill@gmail.com on Thu Aug 28 08:40:34 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa

    On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 11:17:42 -0400, Governor Swill
    <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 06:24:13 -0700, "chine.bleu"
    <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:

    Steve Hayes wrote:
    And it remains the primary condition Russia makes for ending the war
    -- Ukraine should stay out of Nato, and Nato should stay out of
    Ukraine.

    If that could be agreed by all parties to the conflict, then it might
    be possible to have a ceasefire while other contentious matters are
    discussed.

    NATO expansion is due to USSR/Russia being so vicious to its own
    members. Russia has already violated at least one agreement to honour >>Ukraine's sovereignty when it gave its nuclear weapons to Russia. Putin
    has given no reassurance he would honour another agreement. No NATO
    member has been invaded by Russia: this would be the strongest assurance
    of their sovereignty.

    Putin thought NATO was weak and that he could spoof it. He didn't
    realize that NATO members can operate on their own outside NATO. He
    intended to limit NATO's growth by invading Ukraine but that backfired
    when that invasion prodded Finland and Sweden to join.

    The question was how the US Democratic Party contributed to the
    current war.

    The answer goes back to 1989-90, when Mikhail Gorbachev, then leader
    of the USSR, agreed to German reunification, and even a united
    Germany's membership of Nato, provided Nato did not expand further
    east.

    This agreement was broken by US President Bill Clinton, of the
    Democratic Party, long before Putin was ever president of Russia. And
    that started the process that led step by step to the current war, a
    process that subsequent US presidents, both Democratic and Republican,
    have also contributed to.



    .






    --
    Steve Hayes from Tshwane, South Africa
    Web: http://www.khanya.org.za/stevesig.htm
    Blog: http://khanya.wordpress.com
    E-mail - see web page, or parse: shayes at dunelm full stop org full stop uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From c186282@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Thu Aug 28 05:38:52 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa

    On 8/28/25 2:40 AM, Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 11:17:42 -0400, Governor Swill
    <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:

    On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 06:24:13 -0700, "chine.bleu"
    <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:

    Steve Hayes wrote:
    And it remains the primary condition Russia makes for ending the war
    -- Ukraine should stay out of Nato, and Nato should stay out of
    Ukraine.

    If that could be agreed by all parties to the conflict, then it might
    be possible to have a ceasefire while other contentious matters are
    discussed.

    NATO expansion is due to USSR/Russia being so vicious to its own
    members. Russia has already violated at least one agreement to honour
    Ukraine's sovereignty when it gave its nuclear weapons to Russia. Putin
    has given no reassurance he would honour another agreement. No NATO
    member has been invaded by Russia: this would be the strongest assurance >>> of their sovereignty.

    Putin thought NATO was weak and that he could spoof it. He didn't
    realize that NATO members can operate on their own outside NATO. He
    intended to limit NATO's growth by invading Ukraine but that backfired
    when that invasion prodded Finland and Sweden to join.

    The question was how the US Democratic Party contributed to the
    current war.

    Ummm ... mostly by being "do-nothing" ... it just
    let Vlad have his way. LATER resistance, WAY too
    late folks. Both Barry and Joe fucked up big here.

    Look the 'West' has LONG been very averse to "Doing
    Anything". That'd take BALLS, that'd take MONEY,
    that'd take from the 'free money' socialist shit
    that gets you re-elected.

    NOT sure Trump can solve it - NASTY issue - but at least
    he's TRYING. Normal diplomacy does not seem to be working
    so MORE is required, a LOT more.

    The Russian Oil clamp on India is a good first step.
    MORE will be required, soon. No money, Vlad can't
    have his war.

    Oh wait, you probably don't WANT rational discussion ...
    just TDS all the way forever ......

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to Steve Hayes on Mon Sep 1 23:17:17 2025
    XPost: talk.politics.misc, alt.politics, alt.politics.usa
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

    Steve Hayes wrote:
    On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 00:12:57 -0600, Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid>
    Seth Meyers, Trump Advocate wrote:
    Wars are tough to end. Will the Democrats be held accountable for
    starting this one?

    How did they start it?

    AI summary:

    During Bill Clinton's presidency, NATO expanded eastward to include
    former Eastern Bloc countries like the Czech Republic, Hungary, and
    Poland, which joined in 1999. This expansion aimed to promote
    stability and democracy in Europe following the Cold War, although it
    has been a source of tension with Russia, which viewed it as a threat
    to its security interests.

    And see here: <https://direct.mit.edu/isec/article/44/1/7/12232/How-to-Enlarge-NATO-The-Debate-inside-the-Clinton>

    And it remains the primary condition Russia makes for ending the war
    -- Ukraine should stay out of Nato, and Nato should stay out of
    Ukraine.

    If that could be agreed by all parties to the conflict, then it might
    be possible to have a ceasefire while other contentious matters are discussed.

    So, you're saying something that happened in
    the last century made Pootin invade Ukraine?

    Finland and Sweden joined NATO. When does
    Pootin invade them?????

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)