On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 07:00:52 -0500, super70s says...
My isn't that ironic.
Not at all.
Why should Democrats get away with the shit they do out of spite for
Trump. Trump needs to KICK them back.
Every prosecution against Trump was done with malice, and not the
law.
Democrats have only themselves to blame for Trump's historic
landslide. The party's establishment stuck by the clearly incapable
incumbent president for too long, burning credibility with the
American people, and then foisted upon us an equally unqualified and unpalatable hard left alternative. The simplistic "It's Hitler or
us" shtick didn't work. At all. AND THE DEMOCRATS' OBSESSION WITH
EXACTING REVENGE ON DONALD TRUMP following his 2020 loss THROUGH THE
CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM was a key ingredient to his political
resurrection.
Americans won't stand for political lawfare.
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 07:00:52 -0500, super70s says...
My isn't that ironic.
Not at all.
Why should Democrats get away with the shit they do out of spite for Trump. Trump needs to KICK them back.
Every prosecution against Trump was done with malice, and not the law.
Democrats have only themselves to blame for Trump's historic landslide. The party's establishment stuck by the clearly incapable
incumbent president for too long, burning credibility with the American people, and then foisted upon us an equally unqualified and
unpalatable hard left alternative. The simplistic "It's Hitler or us" shtick didn't work. At all. AND THE DEMOCRATS' OBSESSION
WITH EXACTING REVENGE ON DONALD TRUMP following his 2020 loss THROUGH THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM was a key ingredient to his
political resurrection.
Americans won't stand for political lawfare.
As Richard Nixon stated as he resigned the presidency: "Always remember, others may hate you, but those who hate you don't win
unless you hate them, and then you destroy yourself." Wise words for us all - and particularly today for those Democrats who have
been preoccupied with Trump these past (eight) years.
So... when Obama, Holder and Biden do it, it's just fine, but when Trump does it, it somehow violates ethics?
HOW does that work, EXACTLY?
Michelle Obama: "When they go low, we go high."
IOW: revenge
Holder: "No. No. When they go low, we kick them."
IOW: revenge
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 14:38:04 -0700, Alan says...
On 2025-08-22 14:31, AlleyCat wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 07:00:52 -0500, super70s says...
My isn't that ironic.
Not at all.
Why should Democrats get away with the shit they do out of spite for
Trump. Trump needs to KICK them back.
Bolton was a member of Trump's administration, Loser.
A Republican.
So?
And?
And a never-Trumper.
And a weasel.
It does not matter. Bolton is a war-hawk, bent on keeping us in wars. Trump doesn't.
Trump does not want any more killing. Bolton wants to nuke the Middle east out of existence, and YOU'RE fine with that, JUST
because he has TDS, like you.
Gotcha.
Bolton is a political enemy. He deserves whatever retribution Trump can throw at him.
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 16:31:46 -0500, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 07:00:52 -0500, super70s says...
My isn't that ironic.
Not at all.
Why should Democrats get away with the shit they do out of spite for Trump. Trump needs to KICK them back.
If it weren't for doublestandards libs would have no standards at all.
Every prosecution against Trump was done with malice, and not the law.
Democrats have only themselves to blame for Trump's historic landslide. The party's establishment stuck by the clearly incapable
incumbent president for too long, burning credibility with the American people, and then foisted upon us an equally unqualified and
unpalatable hard left alternative. The simplistic "It's Hitler or us" shtick didn't work. At all. AND THE DEMOCRATS' OBSESSION
WITH EXACTING REVENGE ON DONALD TRUMP following his 2020 loss THROUGH THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM was a key ingredient to his
political resurrection.
Americans won't stand for political lawfare.
I don't support it but no one should be shocked when the goose meets
gander.
As Richard Nixon stated as he resigned the presidency: "Always remember, others may hate you, but those who hate you don't win
unless you hate them, and then you destroy yourself." Wise words for us all - and particularly today for those Democrats who have
been preoccupied with Trump these past (eight) years.
So... when Obama, Holder and Biden do it, it's just fine, but when Trump does it, it somehow violates ethics?
HOW does that work, EXACTLY?
Michelle Obama: "When they go low, we go high."
IOW: revenge
Holder: "No. No. When they go low, we kick them."
IOW: revenge
Add in Newsome trying to change California's constitution to
gerrymander to bring us up to date.
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:36:42 -0700, Alan says...
I don't support it but no one should be shocked when the goose meets
gander.
I'm not shocked by your hypocrisy.
No hypocrisy. Bolton's been trying to screw Trump every time he can.
You're defending it this time.
You misunderstand, as usual. Yes, we railed against lawfare, going so far to say it was wrong, but that was to get the Democrats to
stop it. They didn't, so we're perfectly happy to do it to them.
On 2025-08-23 06:10, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 16:31:46 -0500, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 07:00:52 -0500, super70s says...
My isn't that ironic.
Not at all.
Why should Democrats get away with the shit they do out of spite for Trump. Trump needs to KICK them back.
If it weren't for doublestandards libs would have no standards at all.
Every prosecution against Trump was done with malice, and not the law.
Democrats have only themselves to blame for Trump's historic landslide. The party's establishment stuck by the clearly incapable
incumbent president for too long, burning credibility with the American people, and then foisted upon us an equally unqualified and
unpalatable hard left alternative. The simplistic "It's Hitler or us" shtick didn't work. At all. AND THE DEMOCRATS' OBSESSION
WITH EXACTING REVENGE ON DONALD TRUMP following his 2020 loss THROUGH THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM was a key ingredient to his
political resurrection.
Americans won't stand for political lawfare.
I don't support it but no one should be shocked when the goose meets
gander.
I'm not shocked by your hypocrisy.
You're defending it this time.
Bolton is undergoing this for one reason, and one reason only: he was >critical of Trump.
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:36:42 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-23 06:10, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 16:31:46 -0500, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 07:00:52 -0500, super70s says...
My isn't that ironic.
Not at all.
Why should Democrats get away with the shit they do out of spite for Trump. Trump needs to KICK them back.
If it weren't for doublestandards libs would have no standards at all.
Every prosecution against Trump was done with malice, and not the law. >>>>
Democrats have only themselves to blame for Trump's historic landslide. The party's establishment stuck by the clearly incapable
incumbent president for too long, burning credibility with the American people, and then foisted upon us an equally unqualified and
unpalatable hard left alternative. The simplistic "It's Hitler or us" shtick didn't work. At all. AND THE DEMOCRATS' OBSESSION
WITH EXACTING REVENGE ON DONALD TRUMP following his 2020 loss THROUGH THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM was a key ingredient to his
political resurrection.
Americans won't stand for political lawfare.
I don't support it but no one should be shocked when the goose meets
gander.
I'm not shocked by your hypocrisy.
You're defending it this time.
You can't read. I didn't defend it. I pointed out reality.
Bolton is undergoing this for one reason, and one reason only: he was
critical of Trump.
Laughter!
That will depend upon the outcome of the raid. If he had classified documents that blows your theory right up.
On 2025-08-24 06:51, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:36:42 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-23 06:10, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 16:31:46 -0500, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 07:00:52 -0500, super70s says...
My isn't that ironic.
Not at all.
Why should Democrats get away with the shit they do out of spite for >>>>> Trump. Trump needs to KICK them back.
If it weren't for doublestandards libs would have no standards at all. >>>>
Every prosecution against Trump was done with malice, and not the law. >>>>>
Democrats have only themselves to blame for Trump's historic landslide. >>>>> The party's establishment stuck by the clearly incapable
incumbent president for too long, burning credibility with the American >>>>> people, and then foisted upon us an equally unqualified and
unpalatable hard left alternative. The simplistic "It's Hitler or us" >>>>> shtick didn't work. At all. AND THE DEMOCRATS' OBSESSION
WITH EXACTING REVENGE ON DONALD TRUMP following his 2020 loss THROUGH >>>>> THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM was a key ingredient to his
political resurrection.
Americans won't stand for political lawfare.
I don't support it but no one should be shocked when the goose meets
gander.
I'm not shocked by your hypocrisy.
You're defending it this time.
You can't read. I didn't defend it. I pointed out reality.
Bolton is undergoing this for one reason, and one reason only: he was
critical of Trump.
Laughter!
That will depend upon the outcome of the raid. If he had classified
documents that blows your theory right up.
Nope.
Intent still matters.
Bolton spent decades in the federal government, and there is difference between deliberately taking classified documents (as Trump most
definitely did), and inadvertently having some in your possession.
On 2025-08-24 19:08:42 +0000, Alan said:
On 2025-08-24 06:51, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:36:42 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-23 06:10, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 16:31:46 -0500, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 07:00:52 -0500, super70s says...
My isn't that ironic.
Not at all.
Why should Democrats get away with the shit they do out of spite for >>>>>> Trump. Trump needs to KICK them back.
If it weren't for doublestandards libs would have no standards at all. >>>>>
Every prosecution against Trump was done with malice, and not the law. >>>>>>
Democrats have only themselves to blame for Trump's historic landslide. >>>>>> The party's establishment stuck by the clearly incapable
incumbent president for too long, burning credibility with the American >>>>>> people, and then foisted upon us an equally unqualified and
unpalatable hard left alternative. The simplistic "It's Hitler or us" >>>>>> shtick didn't work. At all. AND THE DEMOCRATS' OBSESSION
WITH EXACTING REVENGE ON DONALD TRUMP following his 2020 loss THROUGH THE
CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM was a key ingredient to his
political resurrection.
Americans won't stand for political lawfare.
I don't support it but no one should be shocked when the goose meets >>>>> gander.
I'm not shocked by your hypocrisy.
You're defending it this time.
You can't read. I didn't defend it. I pointed out reality.
Bolton is undergoing this for one reason, and one reason only: he was
critical of Trump.
Laughter!
That will depend upon the outcome of the raid. If he had classified
documents that blows your theory right up.
Nope.
Intent still matters.
Bolton spent decades in the federal government, and there is difference
between deliberately taking classified documents (as Trump most definitely >> did), and inadvertently having some in your possession.
Right, the latter is what they determined Biden and Mike Pence did.
That was back when we had an independent DOJ though. The same DOJ that prosecuted Hunter Biden, Eric Adams, Bob Menendez, TJ Cox, Henry Cuellar, Andrew
Gillam and Michael Madigan (all Democrats) for all you rightwing doubters.
Now the DOJ is a fully owned political arm of the Trump regime primarily concerned with prosecuting his real or perceived political enemies.
Right, the latter is what they determined Biden and Mike Pence did.
Exactly right. Neither Biden nor Pence hauled off hundreds of boxes of documents *after* they were out of office. Trump did.
Trump Is A Rapist wrote:We do know that Trump took documents with him when he left the White House.
Exactly right. Neither Biden nor Pence hauled off hundreds of boxes of
documents *after* they were out of office. Trump did.
We do not know he did. To prove a crime it has to be beyond reasonable
doubt. There is doubt how they came into his possession. Where there is
no doubt is the FBI found documents that had been subpoenaed.
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 22:24:58 -0500, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:36:42 -0700, Alan says...
I don't support it but no one should be shocked when the goose meets
gander.
I'm not shocked by your hypocrisy.
No hypocrisy. Bolton's been trying to screw Trump every time he can.
You're defending it this time.
You misunderstand, as usual. Yes, we railed against lawfare, going so far to say it was wrong, but that was to get the Democrats to
stop it. They didn't, so we're perfectly happy to do it to them.
Alan is the hypocrite here as I never saw him speak against the
endless lawfare that was used against Trump.
On 2025-08-24 14:07, chine.bleu wrote:
Trump Is A Rapist wrote:We do know that Trump took documents with him when he left the White House.
Exactly right. Neither Biden nor Pence hauled off hundreds of boxes of
documents *after* they were out of office. Trump did.
We do not know he did. To prove a crime it has to be beyond reasonable
doubt. There is doubt how they came into his possession. Where there is
no doubt is the FBI found documents that had been subpoenaed.
That is not conjecture: that is FACT.
We know that some of those documents were classified.
That is not conjecture: that is FACT.
On 2025-08-24, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-24 14:07, chine.bleu wrote:
Trump Is A Rapist wrote:We do know that Trump took documents with him when he left the White House. >>
Exactly right. Neither Biden nor Pence hauled off hundreds of boxes of >>>> documents *after* they were out of office. Trump did.
We do not know he did. To prove a crime it has to be beyond reasonable
doubt. There is doubt how they came into his possession. Where there is
no doubt is the FBI found documents that had been subpoenaed.
That is not conjecture: that is FACT.
We know that some of those documents were classified.
That is not conjecture: that is FACT.
And the fact is that as POTUS he has the right to declassify said documents unlike
Biden who unlawfully removed documents from the SCIF or Bolton who obtained the documents from who knows where and who may have shared them with who knows who.
I say, let's see what happens.
We do know that Trump took documents with him when he left the White House.
That is not conjecture: that is FACT.
But he DIDN'T declassify them.
On 2025-08-24 15:00, pothead wrote:
On 2025-08-24, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-24 14:07, chine.bleu wrote:
Trump Is A Rapist wrote:We do know that Trump took documents with him when he left the White House. >>>
Exactly right. Neither Biden nor Pence hauled off hundreds of boxes of >>>>> documents *after* they were out of office. Trump did.
We do not know he did. To prove a crime it has to be beyond reasonable >>>> doubt. There is doubt how they came into his possession. Where there is >>>> no doubt is the FBI found documents that had been subpoenaed.
That is not conjecture: that is FACT.
We know that some of those documents were classified.
That is not conjecture: that is FACT.
And the fact is that as POTUS he has the right to declassify said documents unlike
Biden who unlawfully removed documents from the SCIF or Bolton who obtained >> the documents from who knows where and who may have shared them with who knows who.
But he DIDN'T declassify them.
That is also a fact.
"Unlawfully" implies "knowingly". It isn't "unlawful" to shoot someone
in the head if you had know way of knowing that's what was about to happen.
I say, let's see what happens.
And when it doesn't come out your way, you'll claim it's the deep state.
On 2025-08-24, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-24 15:00, pothead wrote:
On 2025-08-24, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-24 14:07, chine.bleu wrote:
Trump Is A Rapist wrote:We do know that Trump took documents with him when he left the White House.
Exactly right. Neither Biden nor Pence hauled off hundreds of boxes of >>>>>> documents *after* they were out of office. Trump did.
We do not know he did. To prove a crime it has to be beyond reasonable >>>>> doubt. There is doubt how they came into his possession. Where there is >>>>> no doubt is the FBI found documents that had been subpoenaed.
That is not conjecture: that is FACT.
We know that some of those documents were classified.
That is not conjecture: that is FACT.
And the fact is that as POTUS he has the right to declassify said documents unlike
Biden who unlawfully removed documents from the SCIF or Bolton who obtained >>> the documents from who knows where and who may have shared them with who knows who.
But he DIDN'T declassify them.
That is also a fact.
Possibly but either way, Trump is on far more solid ground that Biden or Bolton are.
"Unlawfully" implies "knowingly". It isn't "unlawful" to shoot someone
in the head if you had know way of knowing that's what was about to happen.
Huh?
I say, let's see what happens.
And when it doesn't come out your way, you'll claim it's the deep state.
You and your compadres have been claiming the deep state is a conspiracy theory
and now the truth is coming out that it is indeed real.
Same with the Hunter laptop.
Same with the Russian collusion hoax promoted by Hillary.
And I'm sitting back relaxing, laughing and having a nice glass of Pago de CarraovejasAh! A little brag!
wine along with some NY well aged cheddar cheese while you keep dancing.
Alan wrote:
We do know that Trump took documents with him when he left the White
House.
That is not conjecture: that is FACT.
Irrelevant unless you can prove beyond reasonable doubt.
We can prove beyond reasonable doubt he defied a subpoena which is obstruction of justice.Due process was NOT taken away from him.
Due to the Bill of Rights, we cannot do anything because a person might
have committed a crime. We have to prove through due process a crime was committed. Just because TACO is denying others due process, taking that
away from him is hypoccrisy.
On 2025-08-24 06:52, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 22:24:58 -0500, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:36:42 -0700, Alan says...
I don't support it but no one should be shocked when the goose meets >>>>> gander.
I'm not shocked by your hypocrisy.
No hypocrisy. Bolton's been trying to screw Trump every time he can.
You're defending it this time.
You misunderstand, as usual. Yes, we railed against lawfare, going so far to say it was wrong, but that was to get the Democrats to
stop it. They didn't, so we're perfectly happy to do it to them.
Alan is the hypocrite here as I never saw him speak against the
endless lawfare that was used against Trump.
There was no "lawfare" used against Trump.
On 2025-08-24 06:51, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:36:42 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-23 06:10, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 16:31:46 -0500, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 07:00:52 -0500, super70s says...
My isn't that ironic.
Not at all.
Why should Democrats get away with the shit they do out of spite for Trump. Trump needs to KICK them back.
If it weren't for doublestandards libs would have no standards at all. >>>>
Every prosecution against Trump was done with malice, and not the law. >>>>>
Democrats have only themselves to blame for Trump's historic landslide. The party's establishment stuck by the clearly incapable
incumbent president for too long, burning credibility with the American people, and then foisted upon us an equally unqualified and
unpalatable hard left alternative. The simplistic "It's Hitler or us" shtick didn't work. At all. AND THE DEMOCRATS' OBSESSION
WITH EXACTING REVENGE ON DONALD TRUMP following his 2020 loss THROUGH THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM was a key ingredient to his
political resurrection.
Americans won't stand for political lawfare.
I don't support it but no one should be shocked when the goose meets
gander.
I'm not shocked by your hypocrisy.
You're defending it this time.
You can't read. I didn't defend it. I pointed out reality.
Bolton is undergoing this for one reason, and one reason only: he was
critical of Trump.
Laughter!
That will depend upon the outcome of the raid. If he had classified
documents that blows your theory right up.
Nope.
Intent still matters.
Bolton spent decades in the federal government, and there is difference >between deliberately taking classified documents (as Trump most
definitely did), and inadvertently having some in your possession.
On 2025-08-24, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-24 14:07, chine.bleu wrote:
Trump Is A Rapist wrote:We do know that Trump took documents with him when he left the White House. >>
Exactly right. Neither Biden nor Pence hauled off hundreds of boxes of >>>> documents *after* they were out of office. Trump did.
We do not know he did. To prove a crime it has to be beyond reasonable
doubt. There is doubt how they came into his possession. Where there is
no doubt is the FBI found documents that had been subpoenaed.
That is not conjecture: that is FACT.
We know that some of those documents were classified.
That is not conjecture: that is FACT.
And the fact is that as POTUS he has the right to declassify said documents unlike
Biden who unlawfully removed documents from the SCIF or Bolton who obtained >the documents from who knows where and who may have shared them with who knows who.
I say, let's see what happens.
On 2025-08-24, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-24 15:00, pothead wrote:
On 2025-08-24, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-24 14:07, chine.bleu wrote:
Trump Is A Rapist wrote:We do know that Trump took documents with him when he left the White House.
Exactly right. Neither Biden nor Pence hauled off hundreds of boxes of >>>>>> documents *after* they were out of office. Trump did.
We do not know he did. To prove a crime it has to be beyond reasonable >>>>> doubt. There is doubt how they came into his possession. Where there is >>>>> no doubt is the FBI found documents that had been subpoenaed.
That is not conjecture: that is FACT.
We know that some of those documents were classified.
That is not conjecture: that is FACT.
And the fact is that as POTUS he has the right to declassify said documents unlike
Biden who unlawfully removed documents from the SCIF or Bolton who obtained >>> the documents from who knows where and who may have shared them with who knows who.
But he DIDN'T declassify them.
That is also a fact.
Possibly but either way, Trump is on far more solid ground that Biden or Bolton are.
"Unlawfully" implies "knowingly". It isn't "unlawful" to shoot someone
in the head if you had know way of knowing that's what was about to happen.
Huh?
I say, let's see what happens.
And when it doesn't come out your way, you'll claim it's the deep state.
You and your compadres have been claiming the deep state is a conspiracy theory
and now the truth is coming out that it is indeed real.
Same with the Hunter laptop.
Same with the Russian collusion hoax promoted by Hillary.
And I'm sitting back relaxing, laughing and having a nice glass of Pago de Carraovejas
wine along with some NY well aged cheddar cheese while you keep dancing.
On 2025-08-24 16:34, pothead wrote:
On 2025-08-24, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-24 15:00, pothead wrote:
On 2025-08-24, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-24 14:07, chine.bleu wrote:
Trump Is A Rapist wrote:We do know that Trump took documents with him when he left the White House.
Exactly right. Neither Biden nor Pence hauled off hundreds of boxes of >>>>>>> documents *after* they were out of office. Trump did.
We do not know he did. To prove a crime it has to be beyond reasonable >>>>>> doubt. There is doubt how they came into his possession. Where there is >>>>>> no doubt is the FBI found documents that had been subpoenaed.
That is not conjecture: that is FACT.
We know that some of those documents were classified.
That is not conjecture: that is FACT.
And the fact is that as POTUS he has the right to declassify said documents unlike
Biden who unlawfully removed documents from the SCIF or Bolton who obtained
the documents from who knows where and who may have shared them with who knows who.
But he DIDN'T declassify them.
That is also a fact.
Possibly but either way, Trump is on far more solid ground that Biden or Bolton are.
Absolutely not.
"Unlawfully" implies "knowingly". It isn't "unlawful" to shoot someoneHuh?
in the head if you had know way of knowing that's what was about to happen. >>
That confounds you, does it?
I say, let's see what happens.
And when it doesn't come out your way, you'll claim it's the deep state.
You and your compadres have been claiming the deep state is a conspiracy theory
and now the truth is coming out that it is indeed real.
Same with the Hunter laptop.
Where nothing of substance was ever shown.
Same with the Russian collusion hoax promoted by Hillary.
Trump's campaign DID collude with Russia.
And I'm sitting back relaxing, laughing and having a nice glass of Pago de Carraovejas
wine along with some NY well aged cheddar cheese while you keep dancing. >Ah! A little brag!
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 14:57:28 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-24 06:52, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 22:24:58 -0500, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:36:42 -0700, Alan says...
I don't support it but no one should be shocked when the goose meets >>>>>> gander.
I'm not shocked by your hypocrisy.
No hypocrisy. Bolton's been trying to screw Trump every time he can.
You're defending it this time.
You misunderstand, as usual. Yes, we railed against lawfare, going so
far to say it was wrong, but that was to get the Democrats to
stop it. They didn't, so we're perfectly happy to do it to them.
Alan is the hypocrite here as I never saw him speak against the
endless lawfare that was used against Trump.
There was no "lawfare" used against Trump.
Laugher!
No more needs to be said.
On 2025-08-24 16:32, chine.bleu wrote:
Alan wrote:
We do know that Trump took documents with him when he left the White
House.
That is not conjecture: that is FACT.
Irrelevant unless you can prove beyond reasonable doubt.
Not irrelevant.
Facts remain facts, and the simple lack of a successful conviction
doesn't change a fact into a falsehood.
We can prove beyond reasonable doubt he defied a subpoena which isDue process was NOT taken away from him.
obstruction of justice.
Due to the Bill of Rights, we cannot do anything because a person might
have committed a crime. We have to prove through due process a crime was
committed. Just because TACO is denying others due process, taking that
away from him is hypoccrisy.
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 14:57:28 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-24 06:52, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 22:24:58 -0500, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:36:42 -0700, Alan says...
I don't support it but no one should be shocked when the goose meets >>>>>> gander.
I'm not shocked by your hypocrisy.
No hypocrisy. Bolton's been trying to screw Trump every time he can.
You're defending it this time.
You misunderstand, as usual. Yes, we railed against lawfare, going so far to say it was wrong, but that was to get the Democrats to
stop it. They didn't, so we're perfectly happy to do it to them.
Alan is the hypocrite here as I never saw him speak against the
endless lawfare that was used against Trump.
There was no "lawfare" used against Trump.
Laugher!
No more needs to be said.
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 14:57:28 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-24 06:52, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 22:24:58 -0500, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:36:42 -0700, Alan says...
I don't support it but no one should be shocked when the goose meets >>>>>> gander.
I'm not shocked by your hypocrisy.
No hypocrisy. Bolton's been trying to screw Trump every time he can.
You're defending it this time.
You misunderstand, as usual. Yes, we railed against lawfare, going so far to say it was wrong, but that was to get the Democrats to
stop it. They didn't, so we're perfectly happy to do it to them.
Alan is the hypocrite here as I never saw him speak against the
endless lawfare that was used against Trump.
There was no "lawfare" used against Trump.
Laugher!
No more needs to be said.
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 12:08:42 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-24 06:51, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 08:36:42 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-23 06:10, NoBody wrote:
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 16:31:46 -0500, AlleyCat <katt@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>
On Fri, 22 Aug 2025 07:00:52 -0500, super70s says...
My isn't that ironic.
Not at all.
Why should Democrats get away with the shit they do out of spite for Trump. Trump needs to KICK them back.
If it weren't for doublestandards libs would have no standards at all. >>>>>
Every prosecution against Trump was done with malice, and not the law. >>>>>>
Democrats have only themselves to blame for Trump's historic landslide. The party's establishment stuck by the clearly incapable
incumbent president for too long, burning credibility with the American people, and then foisted upon us an equally unqualified and
unpalatable hard left alternative. The simplistic "It's Hitler or us" shtick didn't work. At all. AND THE DEMOCRATS' OBSESSION
WITH EXACTING REVENGE ON DONALD TRUMP following his 2020 loss THROUGH THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM was a key ingredient to his
political resurrection.
Americans won't stand for political lawfare.
I don't support it but no one should be shocked when the goose meets >>>>> gander.
I'm not shocked by your hypocrisy.
You're defending it this time.
You can't read. I didn't defend it. I pointed out reality.
Bolton is undergoing this for one reason, and one reason only: he was
critical of Trump.
Laughter!
That will depend upon the outcome of the raid. If he had classified
documents that blows your theory right up.
Nope.
Yep.
Intent still matters.
Not really.
Bolton spent decades in the federal government, and there is difference >>between deliberately taking classified documents (as Trump most
definitely did), and inadvertently having some in your possession.
Ooops I accidentally took confidential documents home?
Are you serious?
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 14:57:28 -0700, Alan says...
Alan is the hypocrite here as I never saw him speak against the
endless lawfare that was used against Trump.
There was no "lawfare" used against Trump.
So, why are they thinking of prosecuting Letitia James for the same
thing they did Trump, and the Democrats are CALLING it LAWFARE?
Your OPINION means shit.
You know damn well, Mar-a-Lago is worth a helluva lot more than what
the crooked prosecutor and judge said.
(EIGHTEEN million!!!???)
THAT'S lawfare.
https://youtu.be/Mp-dMDn9AfwYou'll still run away?
Forbes: Worth $300-$700 million
If you whine about it being on "Joe Rogan"... prove him OR his
guests wrong... orrr...
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 18:26:12 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-24 16:34, pothead wrote:
On 2025-08-24, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-24 15:00, pothead wrote:
On 2025-08-24, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-24 14:07, chine.bleu wrote:
Trump Is A Rapist wrote:We do know that Trump took documents with him when he left the White House.
Exactly right. Neither Biden nor Pence hauled off hundreds of boxes of >>>>>>>> documents *after* they were out of office. Trump did.
We do not know he did. To prove a crime it has to be beyond reasonable >>>>>>> doubt. There is doubt how they came into his possession. Where there is >>>>>>> no doubt is the FBI found documents that had been subpoenaed.
That is not conjecture: that is FACT.
We know that some of those documents were classified.
That is not conjecture: that is FACT.
And the fact is that as POTUS he has the right to declassify said documents unlike
Biden who unlawfully removed documents from the SCIF or Bolton who obtained
the documents from who knows where and who may have shared them with who knows who.
But he DIDN'T declassify them.
That is also a fact.
Possibly but either way, Trump is on far more solid ground that Biden or Bolton are.
Absolutely not.
Stomps feet.
Laughter!
"Unlawfully" implies "knowingly". It isn't "unlawful" to shoot someone >>>> in the head if you had know way of knowing that's what was about to happen.
Huh?
That confounds you, does it?
Explain your thoughts.
This should be amusing.
You and your compadres have been claiming the deep state is a conspiracy theory
I say, let's see what happens.
And when it doesn't come out your way, you'll claim it's the deep state. >>>
and now the truth is coming out that it is indeed real.
Same with the Hunter laptop.
Where nothing of substance was ever shown.
Same with the Russian collusion hoax promoted by Hillary.
Trump's campaign DID collude with Russia.
Laughter!
On 2025-08-25 21:51, AlleyCat wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 14:57:28 -0700, Alan says...
Alan is the hypocrite here as I never saw him speak against the
endless lawfare that was used against Trump.
There was no "lawfare" used against Trump.
So, why are they thinking of prosecuting Letitia James for the same
thing they did Trump, and the Democrats are CALLING it LAWFARE?
You mean why is the DoJ, controlled by Trump, thinking of prosecuting
Letitia James, don't you?
Your OPINION means shit.
You know damn well, Mar-a-Lago is worth a helluva lot more than what
the crooked prosecutor and judge said.
(EIGHTEEN million!!!???)
THAT'S lawfare.
No. That's the fact that there are covenants on the property to prevent >higher valuations from being realized.
You'll still run away?
https://youtu.be/Mp-dMDn9Afw
Forbes: Worth $300-$700 million
If you whine about it being on "Joe Rogan"... prove him OR his
guests wrong... orrr...
"The reality of Mar-a-Lago's value is not straightforward. The historic
Palm Beach property has deed restrictions which mean it can only be used
as a private club.
On 2025-08-25 06:59, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 18:26:12 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-24 16:34, pothead wrote:
On 2025-08-24, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-24 15:00, pothead wrote:
On 2025-08-24, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-24 14:07, chine.bleu wrote:
Trump Is A Rapist wrote:We do know that Trump took documents with him when he left the White House.
Exactly right. Neither Biden nor Pence hauled off hundreds of boxes of
documents *after* they were out of office. Trump did.
We do not know he did. To prove a crime it has to be beyond reasonable >>>>>>>> doubt. There is doubt how they came into his possession. Where there is
no doubt is the FBI found documents that had been subpoenaed.
That is not conjecture: that is FACT.
We know that some of those documents were classified.
That is not conjecture: that is FACT.
And the fact is that as POTUS he has the right to declassify said documents unlike
Biden who unlawfully removed documents from the SCIF or Bolton who obtained
the documents from who knows where and who may have shared them with who knows who.
But he DIDN'T declassify them.
That is also a fact.
Possibly but either way, Trump is on far more solid ground that Biden or Bolton are.
Absolutely not.
Stomps feet.
Laughter!
"Unlawfully" implies "knowingly". It isn't "unlawful" to shoot someone >>>>> in the head if you had know way of knowing that's what was about to happen.
Huh?
That confounds you, does it?
Explain your thoughts.
Sure. If you're at a shooting range, and you fire your weapon downrange,
and someone is walking where they should not be, and you kill them as a >result...
...is that murder?
This should be amusing.
You and your compadres have been claiming the deep state is a conspiracy theory
I say, let's see what happens.
And when it doesn't come out your way, you'll claim it's the deep state. >>>>
and now the truth is coming out that it is indeed real.
Same with the Hunter laptop.
Where nothing of substance was ever shown.
Same with the Russian collusion hoax promoted by Hillary.
Trump's campaign DID collude with Russia.
Laughter!
There is no doubt about this.
On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 18:54:47 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-25 21:51, AlleyCat wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 14:57:28 -0700, Alan says...
Alan is the hypocrite here as I never saw him speak against the
endless lawfare that was used against Trump.
There was no "lawfare" used against Trump.
So, why are they thinking of prosecuting Letitia James for the same
thing they did Trump, and the Democrats are CALLING it LAWFARE?
You mean why is the DoJ, controlled by Trump, thinking of prosecuting
Letitia James, don't you?
That prescident has already been set and it wasn't Trump who did it.
Why are you only concerned now?
Your OPINION means shit.
You know damn well, Mar-a-Lago is worth a helluva lot more than what
the crooked prosecutor and judge said.
(EIGHTEEN million!!!???)
THAT'S lawfare.
No. That's the fact that there are covenants on the property to prevent
higher valuations from being realized.
Citation?
Which can only be used as a private club and which cannot be sub-divided.
You'll still run away?
https://youtu.be/Mp-dMDn9Afw
Forbes: Worth $300-$700 million
If you whine about it being on "Joe Rogan"... prove him OR his
guests wrong... orrr...
"The reality of Mar-a-Lago's value is not straightforward. The historic
Palm Beach property has deed restrictions which mean it can only be used
as a private club.
Perhaps you can provide an independent analysis of what it is worth?
It's a huge piece of land.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 547 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 60:25:00 |
| Calls: | 10,398 |
| Calls today: | 6 |
| Files: | 14,067 |
| Messages: | 6,417,476 |
| Posted today: | 1 |