Interesting reading.
" At the center of the Justice Department’s reopened probe of John
Bolton is whether President Donald Trump’s former national security adviser, and more recently staunch critic, broke the law when he
shared what Trump administration officials believe was classified
information with people not authorized to have it.
A 2020 criminal investigation into Bolton originated from
allegations that Bolton had shared portions of his book draft with
people not authorized to handle sensitive information before he
obtained final approval from the government that is required ahead
of publishing any book, according to a person briefed on the probe.
The FBI obtained emails that appeared to show Bolton was working on
his book manuscript while still at the White House, and that he was
sharing early portions with his representatives who were helping to
get it published, according to the person.
The early manuscript portions included material that was restricted
by federal law governing classified documents, the person said.
CNN has reached out to Bolton and his attorney for comment on the
FBI emails. "
https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/23/politics/john-bolton-2020-
investigation
Interesting reading.
CNN has reached out to Bolton and his attorney for comment on the
FBI emails. "
https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/23/politics/john-bolton-2020-
investigation
And 4 year long investigation found...
...what?
On 2025-08-23 11:26, NoBody wrote:
Interesting reading.
" At the center of the Justice Departments reopened probe of John
Bolton is whether President Donald Trumps former national security
adviser, and more recently staunch critic, broke the law when he
shared what Trump administration officials believe was classified
information with people not authorized to have it.
A 2020 criminal investigation into Bolton originated from
allegations that Bolton had shared portions of his book draft with
people not authorized to handle sensitive information before he
obtained final approval from the government that is required ahead
of publishing any book, according to a person briefed on the probe.
The FBI obtained emails that appeared to show Bolton was working on
his book manuscript while still at the White House, and that he was
sharing early portions with his representatives who were helping to
get it published, according to the person.
The early manuscript portions included material that was restricted
by federal law governing classified documents, the person said.
CNN has reached out to Bolton and his attorney for comment on the
FBI emails. "
https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/23/politics/john-bolton-2020-
investigation
And 4 year long investigation found...
...what?
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 11:33:45 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-23 11:26, NoBody wrote:
Interesting reading.
" At the center of the Justice Department’s reopened probe of John
Bolton is whether President Donald Trump’s former national security
adviser, and more recently staunch critic, broke the law when he
shared what Trump administration officials believe was classified
information with people not authorized to have it.
A 2020 criminal investigation into Bolton originated from
allegations that Bolton had shared portions of his book draft with
people not authorized to handle sensitive information before he
obtained final approval from the government that is required ahead
of publishing any book, according to a person briefed on the probe.
The FBI obtained emails that appeared to show Bolton was working on
his book manuscript while still at the White House, and that he was
sharing early portions with his representatives who were helping to
get it published, according to the person.
The early manuscript portions included material that was restricted
by federal law governing classified documents, the person said.
CNN has reached out to Bolton and his attorney for comment on the
FBI emails. "
https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/23/politics/john-bolton-2020-
investigation
And 4 year long investigation found...
...what?
The Biden administration shut it down as it wasn't in their interest.
Duh.
On 2025-08-24 07:24, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 11:33:45 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-23 11:26, NoBody wrote:
Interesting reading.
" At the center of the Justice Departments reopened probe of John
Bolton is whether President Donald Trumps former national security
adviser, and more recently staunch critic, broke the law when he
shared what Trump administration officials believe was classified
information with people not authorized to have it.
A 2020 criminal investigation into Bolton originated from
allegations that Bolton had shared portions of his book draft with
people not authorized to handle sensitive information before he
obtained final approval from the government that is required ahead
of publishing any book, according to a person briefed on the probe.
The FBI obtained emails that appeared to show Bolton was working on
his book manuscript while still at the White House, and that he was
sharing early portions with his representatives who were helping to
get it published, according to the person.
The early manuscript portions included material that was restricted
by federal law governing classified documents, the person said.
CNN has reached out to Bolton and his attorney for comment on the
FBI emails. "
https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/23/politics/john-bolton-2020-
investigation
And 4 year long investigation found...
...what?
The Biden administration shut it down as it wasn't in their interest.
Duh.
Of course!
The deep state!
LOL!
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 09:18:03 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-24 07:24, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 11:33:45 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-23 11:26, NoBody wrote:
Interesting reading.
" At the center of the Justice Department’s reopened probe of John >>>>> Bolton is whether President Donald Trump’s former national security >>>>> adviser, and more recently staunch critic, broke the law when he
shared what Trump administration officials believe was classified
information with people not authorized to have it.
A 2020 criminal investigation into Bolton originated from
allegations that Bolton had shared portions of his book draft with
people not authorized to handle sensitive information before he
obtained final approval from the government that is required ahead
of publishing any book, according to a person briefed on the probe.
The FBI obtained emails that appeared to show Bolton was working on
his book manuscript while still at the White House, and that he was
sharing early portions with his representatives who were helping to
get it published, according to the person.
The early manuscript portions included material that was restricted
by federal law governing classified documents, the person said.
CNN has reached out to Bolton and his attorney for comment on the
FBI emails. "
https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/23/politics/john-bolton-2020-
investigation
And 4 year long investigation found...
...what?
The Biden administration shut it down as it wasn't in their interest.
Duh.
Of course!
The deep state!
LOL!
CNN is the deepstate? That fact is contained later in the article I
cited
Dang dude...
On 2025-08-25 04:30, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 09:18:03 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-24 07:24, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 11:33:45 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-23 11:26, NoBody wrote:
Interesting reading.
" At the center of the Justice Departments reopened probe of John >>>>>> Bolton is whether President Donald Trumps former national security >>>>>> adviser, and more recently staunch critic, broke the law when he
shared what Trump administration officials believe was classified
information with people not authorized to have it.
A 2020 criminal investigation into Bolton originated from
allegations that Bolton had shared portions of his book draft with >>>>>> people not authorized to handle sensitive information before he
obtained final approval from the government that is required ahead >>>>>> of publishing any book, according to a person briefed on the probe. >>>>>>
The FBI obtained emails that appeared to show Bolton was working on >>>>>> his book manuscript while still at the White House, and that he was >>>>>> sharing early portions with his representatives who were helping to >>>>>> get it published, according to the person.
The early manuscript portions included material that was restricted >>>>>> by federal law governing classified documents, the person said.
CNN has reached out to Bolton and his attorney for comment on the
FBI emails. "
https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/23/politics/john-bolton-2020-
investigation
And 4 year long investigation found...
...what?
The Biden administration shut it down as it wasn't in their interest.
Duh.
Of course!
The deep state!
LOL!
CNN is the deepstate? That fact is contained later in the article I
cited
Dang dude...
CNN reporting on it being shut down doesn't make them the ones who shut
it, does it?
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 05:28:25 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-25 04:30, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 09:18:03 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-24 07:24, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 11:33:45 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-23 11:26, NoBody wrote:
Interesting reading.
" At the center of the Justice Department’s reopened probe of John >>>>>>> Bolton is whether President Donald Trump’s former national security >>>>>>> adviser, and more recently staunch critic, broke the law when he >>>>>>> shared what Trump administration officials believe was classified >>>>>>> information with people not authorized to have it.
A 2020 criminal investigation into Bolton originated from
allegations that Bolton had shared portions of his book draft with >>>>>>> people not authorized to handle sensitive information before he
obtained final approval from the government that is required ahead >>>>>>> of publishing any book, according to a person briefed on the probe. >>>>>>>
The FBI obtained emails that appeared to show Bolton was working on >>>>>>> his book manuscript while still at the White House, and that he was >>>>>>> sharing early portions with his representatives who were helping to >>>>>>> get it published, according to the person.
The early manuscript portions included material that was restricted >>>>>>> by federal law governing classified documents, the person said.
CNN has reached out to Bolton and his attorney for comment on the >>>>>>> FBI emails. "
https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/23/politics/john-bolton-2020-
investigation
And 4 year long investigation found...
...what?
The Biden administration shut it down as it wasn't in their interest. >>>>>
Duh.
Of course!
The deep state!
LOL!
CNN is the deepstate? That fact is contained later in the article I
cited
Dang dude...
CNN reporting on it being shut down doesn't make them the ones who shut
it, does it?
Looks like you've lost your marbles for sure. No one said anything
about the deep state but you.
On 2025-08-26 07:32, NoBody wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 05:28:25 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-25 04:30, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 09:18:03 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-24 07:24, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 11:33:45 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-23 11:26, NoBody wrote:
Interesting reading.
" At the center of the Justice Departments reopened probe of John >>>>>>>> Bolton is whether President Donald Trumps former national security >>>>>>>> adviser, and more recently staunch critic, broke the law when he >>>>>>>> shared what Trump administration officials believe was classified >>>>>>>> information with people not authorized to have it.
A 2020 criminal investigation into Bolton originated from
allegations that Bolton had shared portions of his book draft with >>>>>>>> people not authorized to handle sensitive information before he >>>>>>>> obtained final approval from the government that is required ahead >>>>>>>> of publishing any book, according to a person briefed on the probe. >>>>>>>>
The FBI obtained emails that appeared to show Bolton was working on >>>>>>>> his book manuscript while still at the White House, and that he was >>>>>>>> sharing early portions with his representatives who were helping to >>>>>>>> get it published, according to the person.
The early manuscript portions included material that was restricted >>>>>>>> by federal law governing classified documents, the person said. >>>>>>>>
CNN has reached out to Bolton and his attorney for comment on the >>>>>>>> FBI emails. "
https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/23/politics/john-bolton-2020-
investigation
And 4 year long investigation found...
...what?
The Biden administration shut it down as it wasn't in their interest. >>>>>>
Duh.
Of course!
The deep state!
LOL!
CNN is the deepstate? That fact is contained later in the article I
cited
Dang dude...
CNN reporting on it being shut down doesn't make them the ones who shut
it, does it?
Looks like you've lost your marbles for sure. No one said anything
about the deep state but you.
And you're the one who said the "Biden administration shut it down" as
if that wasn't because there was nothing to be found.
On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 15:18:22 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-26 07:32, NoBody wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 05:28:25 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-25 04:30, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 09:18:03 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-24 07:24, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 11:33:45 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
On 2025-08-23 11:26, NoBody wrote:
Interesting reading.
" At the center of the Justice Department’s reopened probe of John >>>>>>>>> Bolton is whether President Donald Trump’s former national security >>>>>>>>> adviser, and more recently staunch critic, broke the law when he >>>>>>>>> shared what Trump administration officials believe was classified >>>>>>>>> information with people not authorized to have it.
A 2020 criminal investigation into Bolton originated from
allegations that Bolton had shared portions of his book draft with >>>>>>>>> people not authorized to handle sensitive information before he >>>>>>>>> obtained final approval from the government that is required ahead >>>>>>>>> of publishing any book, according to a person briefed on the probe. >>>>>>>>>
The FBI obtained emails that appeared to show Bolton was working on >>>>>>>>> his book manuscript while still at the White House, and that he was >>>>>>>>> sharing early portions with his representatives who were helping to >>>>>>>>> get it published, according to the person.
The early manuscript portions included material that was restricted >>>>>>>>> by federal law governing classified documents, the person said. >>>>>>>>>
CNN has reached out to Bolton and his attorney for comment on the >>>>>>>>> FBI emails. "
https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/23/politics/john-bolton-2020-
investigation
And 4 year long investigation found...
...what?
The Biden administration shut it down as it wasn't in their interest. >>>>>>>
Duh.
Of course!
The deep state!
LOL!
CNN is the deepstate? That fact is contained later in the article I >>>>> cited
Dang dude...
CNN reporting on it being shut down doesn't make them the ones who shut >>>> it, does it?
Looks like you've lost your marbles for sure. No one said anything
about the deep state but you.
And you're the one who said the "Biden administration shut it down" as
if that wasn't because there was nothing to be found.
In your dreams.
"After President Joe Biden took office in 2021, the Bolton probe was
shut down that June “for political reasons,” a senior US official told The Post Friday." https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/how-john-bolton-s-controversial-2020-memoir-sparked-first-federal-probe-of-ex-trump-national-security-adviser/ar-AA1L2xOW
On 2025-08-27 07:27, NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 15:18:22 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-26 07:32, NoBody wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 05:28:25 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-25 04:30, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 09:18:03 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-24 07:24, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 11:33:45 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>
On 2025-08-23 11:26, NoBody wrote:
Interesting reading.
" At the center of the Justice Departments reopened probe of John >>>>>>>>>> Bolton is whether President Donald Trumps former national security >>>>>>>>>> adviser, and more recently staunch critic, broke the law when he >>>>>>>>>> shared what Trump administration officials believe was classified >>>>>>>>>> information with people not authorized to have it.
A 2020 criminal investigation into Bolton originated from
allegations that Bolton had shared portions of his book draft with >>>>>>>>>> people not authorized to handle sensitive information before he >>>>>>>>>> obtained final approval from the government that is required ahead >>>>>>>>>> of publishing any book, according to a person briefed on the probe. >>>>>>>>>>
The FBI obtained emails that appeared to show Bolton was working on >>>>>>>>>> his book manuscript while still at the White House, and that he was >>>>>>>>>> sharing early portions with his representatives who were helping to >>>>>>>>>> get it published, according to the person.
The early manuscript portions included material that was restricted >>>>>>>>>> by federal law governing classified documents, the person said. >>>>>>>>>>
CNN has reached out to Bolton and his attorney for comment on the >>>>>>>>>> FBI emails. "
https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/23/politics/john-bolton-2020-
investigation
And 4 year long investigation found...
...what?
The Biden administration shut it down as it wasn't in their interest. >>>>>>>>
Duh.
Of course!
The deep state!
LOL!
CNN is the deepstate? That fact is contained later in the article I >>>>>> cited
Dang dude...
CNN reporting on it being shut down doesn't make them the ones who shut >>>>> it, does it?
Looks like you've lost your marbles for sure. No one said anything
about the deep state but you.
And you're the one who said the "Biden administration shut it down" as
if that wasn't because there was nothing to be found.
In your dreams.
"After President Joe Biden took office in 2021, the Bolton probe was
shut down that June for political reasons, a senior US official told
The Post Friday."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/how-john-bolton-s-controversial-2020-memoir-sparked-first-federal-probe-of-ex-trump-national-security-adviser/ar-AA1L2xOW
An anonymous "senior US official" told the NY Post?
Could you choose a more biased source?
And reporting this in 2025 and you don't think that that's at the behest
of Trump?
Read what's in the very next paragraph, doofus:
'A Justice Department effort to recoup profits from the book was also
set aside after attorneys for Knight submitted a letter to the federal
judge overseeing that case, claiming she had been pressured by the Trump >White House to falsely declare The Room Where It Happened contained >classified information.'
That's someone speaking without the cloak of anonymity.
More:
'In an 18-page letter submitted in the case on Tuesday, Knight claimed
that after she and her team went through several rounds of reviewing the >manuscript with the help of Bolton's attorneys, they were able to remove
all of the classified information. But soon thereafter political
appointees in the executive branch took "extraordinary actions" to
pressure her into reversing that assessment.
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 10:06:25 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-27 07:27, NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 15:18:22 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-26 07:32, NoBody wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 05:28:25 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-25 04:30, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 09:18:03 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
On 2025-08-24 07:24, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 11:33:45 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>
On 2025-08-23 11:26, NoBody wrote:
Interesting reading.
" At the center of the Justice Departments reopened probe of John >>>>>>>>>>> Bolton is whether President Donald Trumps former national security >>>>>>>>>>> adviser, and more recently staunch critic, broke the law when he >>>>>>>>>>> shared what Trump administration officials believe was classified >>>>>>>>>>> information with people not authorized to have it.
A 2020 criminal investigation into Bolton originated from >>>>>>>>>>> allegations that Bolton had shared portions of his book draft with >>>>>>>>>>> people not authorized to handle sensitive information before he >>>>>>>>>>> obtained final approval from the government that is required ahead >>>>>>>>>>> of publishing any book, according to a person briefed on the probe. >>>>>>>>>>>
The FBI obtained emails that appeared to show Bolton was working on >>>>>>>>>>> his book manuscript while still at the White House, and that he was >>>>>>>>>>> sharing early portions with his representatives who were helping to >>>>>>>>>>> get it published, according to the person.
The early manuscript portions included material that was restricted >>>>>>>>>>> by federal law governing classified documents, the person said. >>>>>>>>>>>
CNN has reached out to Bolton and his attorney for comment on the >>>>>>>>>>> FBI emails. "
https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/23/politics/john-bolton-2020- >>>>>>>>>>> investigation
And 4 year long investigation found...
...what?
The Biden administration shut it down as it wasn't in their interest. >>>>>>>>>
Duh.
Of course!
The deep state!
LOL!
CNN is the deepstate? That fact is contained later in the article I >>>>>>> cited
Dang dude...
CNN reporting on it being shut down doesn't make them the ones who shut >>>>>> it, does it?
Looks like you've lost your marbles for sure. No one said anything
about the deep state but you.
And you're the one who said the "Biden administration shut it down" as >>>> if that wasn't because there was nothing to be found.
In your dreams.
"After President Joe Biden took office in 2021, the Bolton probe was
shut down that June for political reasons, a senior US official told
The Post Friday."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/how-john-bolton-s-controversial-2020-memoir-sparked-first-federal-probe-of-ex-trump-national-security-adviser/ar-AA1L2xOW
An anonymous "senior US official" told the NY Post?
Could you choose a more biased source?
Are you now denying that the probe was not dropped by the Biden >administration???
And reporting this in 2025 and you don't think that that's at the behest
of Trump?
Laughter!
Because the media is so friendly to Trump...
Read what's in the very next paragraph, doofus:
'A Justice Department effort to recoup profits from the book was also
set aside after attorneys for Knight submitted a letter to the federal >>judge overseeing that case, claiming she had been pressured by the Trump >>White House to falsely declare The Room Where It Happened contained >>classified information.'
So?
That's someone speaking without the cloak of anonymity.
More:
'In an 18-page letter submitted in the case on Tuesday, Knight claimed
that after she and her team went through several rounds of reviewing the >>manuscript with the help of Bolton's attorneys, they were able to remove >>all of the classified information. But soon thereafter political
appointees in the executive branch took "extraordinary actions" to
pressure her into reversing that assessment.
So classified information was made available to the publishers???
That itself is a crime.
Game over.
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 10:06:25 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-27 07:27, NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 15:18:22 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-26 07:32, NoBody wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 05:28:25 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-25 04:30, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 09:18:03 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
On 2025-08-24 07:24, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 11:33:45 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>
On 2025-08-23 11:26, NoBody wrote:
Interesting reading.
" At the center of the Justice Department’s reopened probe of John
Bolton is whether President Donald Trump’s former national security
adviser, and more recently staunch critic, broke the law when he >>>>>>>>>>> shared what Trump administration officials believe was classified >>>>>>>>>>> information with people not authorized to have it.
A 2020 criminal investigation into Bolton originated from >>>>>>>>>>> allegations that Bolton had shared portions of his book draft with >>>>>>>>>>> people not authorized to handle sensitive information before he >>>>>>>>>>> obtained final approval from the government that is required ahead >>>>>>>>>>> of publishing any book, according to a person briefed on the probe. >>>>>>>>>>>
The FBI obtained emails that appeared to show Bolton was working on >>>>>>>>>>> his book manuscript while still at the White House, and that he was >>>>>>>>>>> sharing early portions with his representatives who were helping to >>>>>>>>>>> get it published, according to the person.
The early manuscript portions included material that was restricted >>>>>>>>>>> by federal law governing classified documents, the person said. >>>>>>>>>>>
CNN has reached out to Bolton and his attorney for comment on the >>>>>>>>>>> FBI emails. "
https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/23/politics/john-bolton-2020- >>>>>>>>>>> investigation
And 4 year long investigation found...
...what?
The Biden administration shut it down as it wasn't in their interest. >>>>>>>>>
Duh.
Of course!
The deep state!
LOL!
CNN is the deepstate? That fact is contained later in the article I >>>>>>> cited
Dang dude...
CNN reporting on it being shut down doesn't make them the ones who shut >>>>>> it, does it?
Looks like you've lost your marbles for sure. No one said anything
about the deep state but you.
And you're the one who said the "Biden administration shut it down" as >>>> if that wasn't because there was nothing to be found.
In your dreams.
"After President Joe Biden took office in 2021, the Bolton probe was
shut down that June “for political reasons,” a senior US official told >>> The Post Friday."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/how-john-bolton-s-controversial-2020-memoir-sparked-first-federal-probe-of-ex-trump-national-security-adviser/ar-AA1L2xOW
An anonymous "senior US official" told the NY Post?
Could you choose a more biased source?
Are you now denying that the probe was not dropped by the Biden administration???
And reporting this in 2025 and you don't think that that's at the behest
of Trump?
Laughter!
Because the media is so friendly to Trump...
Read what's in the very next paragraph, doofus:
'A Justice Department effort to recoup profits from the book was also
set aside after attorneys for Knight submitted a letter to the federal
judge overseeing that case, claiming she had been pressured by the Trump
White House to falsely declare “The Room Where It Happened” contained
classified information.'
So?
That's someone speaking without the cloak of anonymity.
More:
'In an 18-page letter submitted in the case on Tuesday, Knight claimed
that after she and her team went through several rounds of reviewing the
manuscript with the help of Bolton's attorneys, they were able to remove
all of the classified information. But soon thereafter political
appointees in the executive branch took "extraordinary actions" to
pressure her into reversing that assessment.
So classified information was made available to the publishers???
That itself is a crime.
Game over.
On 2025-08-28 07:14, NoBody wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 10:06:25 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-27 07:27, NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 15:18:22 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-26 07:32, NoBody wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 05:28:25 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-25 04:30, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 09:18:03 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>
On 2025-08-24 07:24, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 11:33:45 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>
On 2025-08-23 11:26, NoBody wrote:
Interesting reading.
" At the center of the Justice Departments reopened probe of John >>>>>>>>>>>> Bolton is whether President Donald Trumps former national security
adviser, and more recently staunch critic, broke the law when he >>>>>>>>>>>> shared what Trump administration officials believe was classified >>>>>>>>>>>> information with people not authorized to have it.
A 2020 criminal investigation into Bolton originated from >>>>>>>>>>>> allegations that Bolton had shared portions of his book draft with >>>>>>>>>>>> people not authorized to handle sensitive information before he >>>>>>>>>>>> obtained final approval from the government that is required ahead >>>>>>>>>>>> of publishing any book, according to a person briefed on the probe.
The FBI obtained emails that appeared to show Bolton was working on
his book manuscript while still at the White House, and that he was
sharing early portions with his representatives who were helping to
get it published, according to the person.
The early manuscript portions included material that was restricted
by federal law governing classified documents, the person said. >>>>>>>>>>>>
CNN has reached out to Bolton and his attorney for comment on the >>>>>>>>>>>> FBI emails. "
https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/23/politics/john-bolton-2020- >>>>>>>>>>>> investigation
And 4 year long investigation found...
...what?
The Biden administration shut it down as it wasn't in their interest.
Duh.
Of course!
The deep state!
LOL!
CNN is the deepstate? That fact is contained later in the article I >>>>>>>> cited
Dang dude...
CNN reporting on it being shut down doesn't make them the ones who shut >>>>>>> it, does it?
Looks like you've lost your marbles for sure. No one said anything >>>>>> about the deep state but you.
And you're the one who said the "Biden administration shut it down" as >>>>> if that wasn't because there was nothing to be found.
In your dreams.
"After President Joe Biden took office in 2021, the Bolton probe was
shut down that June for political reasons, a senior US official told >>>> The Post Friday."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/how-john-bolton-s-controversial-2020-memoir-sparked-first-federal-probe-of-ex-trump-national-security-adviser/ar-AA1L2xOW
An anonymous "senior US official" told the NY Post?
Could you choose a more biased source?
Are you now denying that the probe was not dropped by the Biden
administration???
And reporting this in 2025 and you don't think that that's at the behest >>> of Trump?
Laughter!
Because the media is so friendly to Trump...
Read what's in the very next paragraph, doofus:
'A Justice Department effort to recoup profits from the book was also
set aside after attorneys for Knight submitted a letter to the federal
judge overseeing that case, claiming she had been pressured by the Trump >>> White House to falsely declare The Room Where It Happened contained
classified information.'
So?
That's someone speaking without the cloak of anonymity.
More:
'In an 18-page letter submitted in the case on Tuesday, Knight claimed
that after she and her team went through several rounds of reviewing the >>> manuscript with the help of Bolton's attorneys, they were able to remove >>> all of the classified information. But soon thereafter political
appointees in the executive branch took "extraordinary actions" to
pressure her into reversing that assessment.
So classified information was made available to the publishers???
That itself is a crime.
Game over.
I'm sorry, but where does it say that any classified information got as
far as the publishers.
What it DOES say is that Knight and her team reviewed the manuscript
BEFORE it was sent to the publishers.
On Sat, 30 Aug 2025 12:46:46 -0400, Alan says...
So classified information was made available to the
publishers???
That itself is a crime.
Game over.
I'm sorry, but where does it say that any classified information
got as far as the publishers.
That doesn't matter at all. He had it and was going to put it in a
fucking book, for all to read. And, let's not forget about his
private email server and sending CLASSIFIED information to
RELATIVES.
You have GOT to stop whining and crying about everything Trump. This
has NOTHING to DO with Trump. If anything, it's all about Biden.
What it DOES say is that Knight and her team reviewed the
manuscript BEFORE it was sent to the publishers.
Again... what does THAT matter? It WAS being attempted to go to a
publisher.
Ever heard of Conspiracy? Whether the manuscript made it to the
publisher or not, is moot. It was an attempt BY Bolton, to GET it
there.
What about emailed classified docs to family?
WASHINGTON - Former Trump National Security Adviser John Bolton
should face criminal charges over his alleged emailing of highly
sensitive classified materials through a private server, high
ranking FBI officials told The Post Saturday, as they questioned why
the Biden administration shelved the case in the first place.
That, alone, should garner jail time for Bolton, and whomever
dropped the ball in the Biden administration.
WHY are you trying to defend Bolton? He's a war-mongering social conservative, who was probably trying to nail BIDEN to the wall, re:
Ukraine.
On Sat, 30 Aug 2025 12:46:46 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-28 07:14, NoBody wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 10:06:25 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-27 07:27, NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 15:18:22 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-26 07:32, NoBody wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 05:28:25 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
On 2025-08-25 04:30, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 09:18:03 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>
On 2025-08-24 07:24, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 11:33:45 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>
On 2025-08-23 11:26, NoBody wrote:
Interesting reading.
" At the center of the Justice Department’s reopened probe of John
Bolton is whether President Donald Trump’s former national security
adviser, and more recently staunch critic, broke the law when he >>>>>>>>>>>>> shared what Trump administration officials believe was classified >>>>>>>>>>>>> information with people not authorized to have it.
A 2020 criminal investigation into Bolton originated from >>>>>>>>>>>>> allegations that Bolton had shared portions of his book draft with
people not authorized to handle sensitive information before he >>>>>>>>>>>>> obtained final approval from the government that is required ahead
of publishing any book, according to a person briefed on the probe.
The FBI obtained emails that appeared to show Bolton was working on
his book manuscript while still at the White House, and that he was
sharing early portions with his representatives who were helping to
get it published, according to the person.
The early manuscript portions included material that was restricted
by federal law governing classified documents, the person said. >>>>>>>>>>>>>
CNN has reached out to Bolton and his attorney for comment on the >>>>>>>>>>>>> FBI emails. "
https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/23/politics/john-bolton-2020- >>>>>>>>>>>>> investigation
And 4 year long investigation found...
...what?
The Biden administration shut it down as it wasn't in their interest.
Duh.
Of course!
The deep state!
LOL!
CNN is the deepstate? That fact is contained later in the article I >>>>>>>>> cited
Dang dude...
CNN reporting on it being shut down doesn't make them the ones who shut
it, does it?
Looks like you've lost your marbles for sure. No one said anything >>>>>>> about the deep state but you.
And you're the one who said the "Biden administration shut it down" as >>>>>> if that wasn't because there was nothing to be found.
In your dreams.
"After President Joe Biden took office in 2021, the Bolton probe was >>>>> shut down that June “for political reasons,” a senior US official told
The Post Friday."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/how-john-bolton-s-controversial-2020-memoir-sparked-first-federal-probe-of-ex-trump-national-security-adviser/ar-AA1L2xOW
An anonymous "senior US official" told the NY Post?
Could you choose a more biased source?
Are you now denying that the probe was not dropped by the Biden
administration???
Silence (of course).
And reporting this in 2025 and you don't think that that's at the behest >>>> of Trump?
Laughter!
Because the media is so friendly to Trump...
Read what's in the very next paragraph, doofus:
'A Justice Department effort to recoup profits from the book was also
set aside after attorneys for Knight submitted a letter to the federal >>>> judge overseeing that case, claiming she had been pressured by the Trump >>>> White House to falsely declare “The Room Where It Happened” contained >>>> classified information.'
So?
Silence (of course).
That's someone speaking without the cloak of anonymity.
More:
'In an 18-page letter submitted in the case on Tuesday, Knight claimed >>>> that after she and her team went through several rounds of reviewing the >>>> manuscript with the help of Bolton's attorneys, they were able to remove >>>> all of the classified information. But soon thereafter political
appointees in the executive branch took "extraordinary actions" to
pressure her into reversing that assessment.
So classified information was made available to the publishers???
That itself is a crime.
Game over.
I'm sorry, but where does it say that any classified information got as
far as the publishers.
Isn't that what the investigation is about???
What it DOES say is that Knight and her team reviewed the manuscript
BEFORE it was sent to the publishers.
The investigation will tell us.
On 2025-08-31 09:59, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2025 12:46:46 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-28 07:14, NoBody wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 10:06:25 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-27 07:27, NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 15:18:22 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-26 07:32, NoBody wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 05:28:25 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>
On 2025-08-25 04:30, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 09:18:03 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>
On 2025-08-24 07:24, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 11:33:45 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2025-08-23 11:26, NoBody wrote:
Interesting reading.
" At the center of the Justice Departments reopened probe of John
Bolton is whether President Donald Trumps former national security
adviser, and more recently staunch critic, broke the law when he >>>>>>>>>>>>>> shared what Trump administration officials believe was classified
information with people not authorized to have it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
A 2020 criminal investigation into Bolton originated from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> allegations that Bolton had shared portions of his book draft with
people not authorized to handle sensitive information before he >>>>>>>>>>>>>> obtained final approval from the government that is required ahead
of publishing any book, according to a person briefed on the probe.
The FBI obtained emails that appeared to show Bolton was working on
his book manuscript while still at the White House, and that he was
sharing early portions with his representatives who were helping to
get it published, according to the person.
The early manuscript portions included material that was restricted
by federal law governing classified documents, the person said. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
CNN has reached out to Bolton and his attorney for comment on the
FBI emails. "
https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/23/politics/john-bolton-2020- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> investigation
And 4 year long investigation found...
...what?
The Biden administration shut it down as it wasn't in their interest.
Duh.
Of course!
The deep state!
LOL!
CNN is the deepstate? That fact is contained later in the article I >>>>>>>>>> cited
Dang dude...
CNN reporting on it being shut down doesn't make them the ones who shut
it, does it?
Looks like you've lost your marbles for sure. No one said anything >>>>>>>> about the deep state but you.
And you're the one who said the "Biden administration shut it down" as >>>>>>> if that wasn't because there was nothing to be found.
In your dreams.
"After President Joe Biden took office in 2021, the Bolton probe was >>>>>> shut down that June for political reasons, a senior US official told >>>>>> The Post Friday."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/how-john-bolton-s-controversial-2020-memoir-sparked-first-federal-probe-of-ex-trump-national-security-adviser/ar-AA1L2xOW
An anonymous "senior US official" told the NY Post?
Could you choose a more biased source?
Are you now denying that the probe was not dropped by the Biden
administration???
Silence (of course).
Because it's moot.
Do you suppose they could have dropped the investigation because there
was nothing there to find?
After all, it's not like Bolton was a friend to Biden's administration,
now was it?
And reporting this in 2025 and you don't think that that's at the behest >>>>> of Trump?
Laughter!
Because the media is so friendly to Trump...
Read what's in the very next paragraph, doofus:
'A Justice Department effort to recoup profits from the book was also >>>>> set aside after attorneys for Knight submitted a letter to the federal >>>>> judge overseeing that case, claiming she had been pressured by the Trump >>>>> White House to falsely declare The Room Where It Happened contained >>>>> classified information.'
So?
Silence (of course).
So you don't think there's a problem with someone being pressured by the >Trump's administration to declare something she knows to be false, and
that the administration fired her for that?
Knight has been in your federal government since 2011, and was promoted
to the position first the position of Director and then Senior Director
of the National Security Council...
...BY DONALD TRUMP.
And then she won't say what he wants her to say and she's suddenly fired.
That's someone speaking without the cloak of anonymity.
More:
'In an 18-page letter submitted in the case on Tuesday, Knight claimed >>>>> that after she and her team went through several rounds of reviewing the >>>>> manuscript with the help of Bolton's attorneys, they were able to remove >>>>> all of the classified information. But soon thereafter political
appointees in the executive branch took "extraordinary actions" to
pressure her into reversing that assessment.
So classified information was made available to the publishers???
That itself is a crime.
Game over.
I'm sorry, but where does it say that any classified information got as
far as the publishers.
Isn't that what the investigation is about???
Is it? Because if there actually WAS classified information IN THE BOOK,
this would already be a slam-dunk.
So why isn't Bolton already arrested?
What it DOES say is that Knight and her team reviewed the manuscript
BEFORE it was sent to the publishers.
The investigation will tell us.
No, it won't. An investigation into Bolton will not tell you when Knight
and her team reviewed the manuscript...
...but this letter will:
'The review started with Ambassador Bolton's submission of the
manuscript on December 30, 2019. Upon the first reading, it was apparent
to Ms. Knight that the manuscript contained voluminous amounts of
classified information and that it would take a significant effort to
put it into publishable shape. The ensuing review ultimately became the
most intensive pre-publication review process in recent memory at the NSC.'
<https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/7216196/Letter-Re-US-v-John-Bolton.pdf>
On Sun, 31 Aug 2025 22:35:57 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-31 09:59, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2025 12:46:46 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-28 07:14, NoBody wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 10:06:25 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-27 07:27, NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 15:18:22 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>
On 2025-08-26 07:32, NoBody wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 05:28:25 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>
On 2025-08-25 04:30, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 09:18:03 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>
On 2025-08-24 07:24, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 11:33:45 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2025-08-23 11:26, NoBody wrote:
Interesting reading.
" At the center of the Justice Department’s reopened probe of John
Bolton is whether President Donald Trump’s former national security
adviser, and more recently staunch critic, broke the law when he
shared what Trump administration officials believe was classified
information with people not authorized to have it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
A 2020 criminal investigation into Bolton originated from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> allegations that Bolton had shared portions of his book draft with
people not authorized to handle sensitive information before he >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> obtained final approval from the government that is required ahead
of publishing any book, according to a person briefed on the probe.
The FBI obtained emails that appeared to show Bolton was working on
his book manuscript while still at the White House, and that he was
sharing early portions with his representatives who were helping to
get it published, according to the person.
The early manuscript portions included material that was restricted
by federal law governing classified documents, the person said. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
CNN has reached out to Bolton and his attorney for comment on the
FBI emails. "
https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/23/politics/john-bolton-2020- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> investigation
And 4 year long investigation found...
...what?
The Biden administration shut it down as it wasn't in their interest.
Duh.
Of course!
The deep state!
LOL!
CNN is the deepstate? That fact is contained later in the article I
cited
Dang dude...
CNN reporting on it being shut down doesn't make them the ones who shut
it, does it?
Looks like you've lost your marbles for sure. No one said anything >>>>>>>>> about the deep state but you.
And you're the one who said the "Biden administration shut it down" as >>>>>>>> if that wasn't because there was nothing to be found.
In your dreams.
"After President Joe Biden took office in 2021, the Bolton probe was >>>>>>> shut down that June “for political reasons,” a senior US official told
The Post Friday."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/how-john-bolton-s-controversial-2020-memoir-sparked-first-federal-probe-of-ex-trump-national-security-adviser/ar-AA1L2xOW
An anonymous "senior US official" told the NY Post?
Could you choose a more biased source?
Are you now denying that the probe was not dropped by the Biden
administration???
Silence (of course).
Because it's moot.
Good grief. And you still barely acknowledge the fact of the matter.
Do you suppose they could have dropped the investigation because there
was nothing there to find?
Laughter!
You're more than welcome to cite your theory.
After all, it's not like Bolton was a friend to Biden's administration,
now was it?
You were whining previously about "the deep state"...
And reporting this in 2025 and you don't think that that's at the behest >>>>>> of Trump?
Laughter!
Because the media is so friendly to Trump...
Read what's in the very next paragraph, doofus:
'A Justice Department effort to recoup profits from the book was also >>>>>> set aside after attorneys for Knight submitted a letter to the federal >>>>>> judge overseeing that case, claiming she had been pressured by the Trump >>>>>> White House to falsely declare “The Room Where It Happened” contained
classified information.'
So?
Silence (of course).
So you don't think there's a problem with someone being pressured by the
Trump's administration to declare something she knows to be false, and
that the administration fired her for that?
You are welcome to present evidence that her claim is true.
Knight has been in your federal government since 2011, and was promoted
to the position first the position of Director and then Senior Director
of the National Security Council...
...BY DONALD TRUMP.
So?
And then she won't say what he wants her to say and she's suddenly fired.
Laughter!
That's someone speaking without the cloak of anonymity.
More:
'In an 18-page letter submitted in the case on Tuesday, Knight claimed >>>>>> that after she and her team went through several rounds of reviewing the >>>>>> manuscript with the help of Bolton's attorneys, they were able to remove >>>>>> all of the classified information. But soon thereafter political
appointees in the executive branch took "extraordinary actions" to >>>>>> pressure her into reversing that assessment.
So classified information was made available to the publishers???
That itself is a crime.
Game over.
I'm sorry, but where does it say that any classified information got as >>>> far as the publishers.
Isn't that what the investigation is about???
Is it? Because if there actually WAS classified information IN THE BOOK,
this would already be a slam-dunk.
Oh look goal post move noted. Back to the information that was shared
with the publishers please.
So why isn't Bolton already arrested?
Aren't you in favor of ful investigations before arrest?
My...
What it DOES say is that Knight and her team reviewed the manuscript
BEFORE it was sent to the publishers.
The investigation will tell us.
No, it won't. An investigation into Bolton will not tell you when Knight
and her team reviewed the manuscript...
The crime would be sharing it with the publishes, whether read or not.
But you know that.No. It is NOT a crime to write a manuscript and then have it reviewed by
...but this letter will:
'The review started with Ambassador Bolton's submission of the
manuscript on December 30, 2019. Upon the first reading, it was apparent
to Ms. Knight that the manuscript contained voluminous amounts of
classified information and that it would take a significant effort to
put it into publishable shape. The ensuing review ultimately became the
most intensive pre-publication review process in recent memory at the NSC.' >>
<https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/7216196/Letter-Re-US-v-John-Bolton.pdf>
So Michael John apparently has committed a crime. When will you call
for his arrest?
On 2025-09-01 09:18, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 31 Aug 2025 22:35:57 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-31 09:59, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 30 Aug 2025 12:46:46 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-28 07:14, NoBody wrote:
On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 10:06:25 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-27 07:27, NoBody wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2025 15:18:22 -0400, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>
On 2025-08-26 07:32, NoBody wrote:
On Mon, 25 Aug 2025 05:28:25 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>
On 2025-08-25 04:30, NoBody wrote:
On Sun, 24 Aug 2025 09:18:03 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>
On 2025-08-24 07:24, NoBody wrote:
On Sat, 23 Aug 2025 11:33:45 -0700, Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On 2025-08-23 11:26, NoBody wrote:
Interesting reading.
" At the center of the Justice Departments reopened probe of John
Bolton is whether President Donald Trumps former national security
adviser, and more recently staunch critic, broke the law when he
shared what Trump administration officials believe was classified
information with people not authorized to have it. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
A 2020 criminal investigation into Bolton originated from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> allegations that Bolton had shared portions of his book draft with
people not authorized to handle sensitive information before he
obtained final approval from the government that is required ahead
of publishing any book, according to a person briefed on the probe.
The FBI obtained emails that appeared to show Bolton was working on
his book manuscript while still at the White House, and that he was
sharing early portions with his representatives who were helping to
get it published, according to the person.
The early manuscript portions included material that was restricted
by federal law governing classified documents, the person said.
CNN has reached out to Bolton and his attorney for comment on the
FBI emails. "
https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/23/politics/john-bolton-2020- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> investigation
And 4 year long investigation found...
...what?
The Biden administration shut it down as it wasn't in their interest.
Duh.
Of course!
The deep state!
LOL!
CNN is the deepstate? That fact is contained later in the article I
cited
Dang dude...
CNN reporting on it being shut down doesn't make them the ones who shut
it, does it?
Looks like you've lost your marbles for sure. No one said anything >>>>>>>>>> about the deep state but you.
And you're the one who said the "Biden administration shut it down" as
if that wasn't because there was nothing to be found.
In your dreams.
"After President Joe Biden took office in 2021, the Bolton probe was >>>>>>>> shut down that June for political reasons, a senior US official told >>>>>>>> The Post Friday."
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/how-john-bolton-s-controversial-2020-memoir-sparked-first-federal-probe-of-ex-trump-national-security-adviser/ar-AA1L2xOW
An anonymous "senior US official" told the NY Post?
Could you choose a more biased source?
Are you now denying that the probe was not dropped by the Biden
administration???
Silence (of course).
Because it's moot.
Good grief. And you still barely acknowledge the fact of the matter.
It's a fact that the investigation was dropped.
It is not a fact that it was dropped for any improper reason.
Do you suppose they could have dropped the investigation because there
was nothing there to find?
Laughter!
You're more than welcome to cite your theory.
That IS my theory, and you have nothing that contradicts it.
After all, it's not like Bolton was a friend to Biden's administration,
now was it?
You were whining previously about "the deep state"...
No, you'll find I was making fun of those who claim there is a "deep state".
And reporting this in 2025 and you don't think that that's at the behest
of Trump?
Laughter!
Because the media is so friendly to Trump...
Read what's in the very next paragraph, doofus:
'A Justice Department effort to recoup profits from the book was also >>>>>>> set aside after attorneys for Knight submitted a letter to the federal >>>>>>> judge overseeing that case, claiming she had been pressured by the Trump
White House to falsely declare The Room Where It Happened contained >>>>>>> classified information.'
So?
Silence (of course).
So you don't think there's a problem with someone being pressured by the >>> Trump's administration to declare something she knows to be false, and
that the administration fired her for that?
You are welcome to present evidence that her claim is true.
You are welcome to present any evidence that it isn't.
She was writing to a judge in a legal proceeding and that is more than
your anonymous sources, isn't it?
Knight has been in your federal government since 2011, and was promoted
to the position first the position of Director and then Senior Director
of the National Security Council...
...BY DONALD TRUMP.
So?
And then she won't say what he wants her to say and she's suddenly fired. >>Laughter!
It's what happened.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 48:53:35 |
| Calls: | 10,397 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 14,066 |
| Messages: | 6,417,286 |
| Posted today: | 1 |