XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.tesla, talk.politics.misc
XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh

Lawyers for Tesla filed a motion in court Friday to throw out a jury
verdict that found the company’s Autopilot software had contributed to
the death of a woman in a crash from 2019.

Earlier this month, a jury found Tesla partially responsible for the
death of 22-year-old Naibel Benavides, who was killed by a Model S
driver who plowed into her and her boyfriend Dillon Angulo. Tesla was
ordered to pay the families of the victims $243 million in compensatory
and punitive damages, a stunning outcome for a company that has managed
to avoid taking responsibility for crashes involving its partially
autonomous software.

In the filing, Tesla’s legal team said the Model S driver bore all the responsibility for the crash. And they are requesting the court
invalidate the verdict, or at least order a new jury trial.

“The $243 million judgment against Tesla flies in the face of basic
Florida tort law, the Due Process Clause, and common sense,” the
company’s lawyers write, noting that McGee had pressed the accelerator
to override Autopilot in the seconds before the crash. “Auto
manufacturers do not insure the world against harms caused by reckless drivers.”

The lawyers also claim that the plaintiffs should not have been allowed
to enter into evidence statements from Tesla CEO Elon Musk, who has long claimed that the company’s vehicles are capable of higher levels of
autonomy than they actually are. And they called claims about data
coverup on the part of Tesla — the company was accused of withholding
camera data from police investigating the crash — were false and “inflamed” the jury against the company.

The motion was filed by attorneys from Gibson Dunn, a firm that
represented Tesla in a lawsuit against a former employee and a tech
startup accused of stealing trade secrets for a robotic hand.

https://platform.theverge.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2025/08/Angulo-Benavides-2025-08-29-DE-568-Teslas-Renewed-Motion-for-Judgment-as-a-Matter-of-Law-32457875.1.pdf

Update August 29th: A spokesperson for plaintiff attorney Brett
Schreiber sent the following statement:

“This motion is the latest example of Tesla and Musk’s complete
disregard for the human cost of their defective technology. The jury
heard all the facts and came to the right conclusion that this was a
case of shared responsibility, but that does not discount the integral
role Autopilot and the company’s misrepresentations of its capabilities played in the crash that killed Naibel and permanently injured Dillon.
We are confident the court will uphold this verdict, which serves not as
an indictment of the autonomous vehicle industry, but of Tesla’s
reckless and unsafe development and deployment of its Autopilot system.”

https://www.theverge.com/news/768068/tesla-wrongful-death-verdict-court-toss

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)