• Re: patents, threat or menace, was Restartable sequences on Linux

    From John Levine@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 28 19:48:38 2025
    According to Anton Ertl <anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>:
    George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> writes:
    But then if someone else patents it, you can be accused of infringing
    your own invention. The "first to file" rule has changed the
    calculation significantly.

    You're disadvantaged either way: a patent can be revoked if you don't >>actively defend it.

    I have never heard that about patents, only about trademarks. Can you
    cite a case?

    Patents require periodic maintenance fees. If you don't pay the fee,
    your patent is abandoned. Here's the EPO's fee schedule: https://www.epo.org/en/legal/official-journal/2022/04/a42.html

    Then there are countries that either don't recognize Public Domain, or
    make it very difficult to add something into it.

    Public domain is a concept from copyright. Why should it play a role
    for patents?

    He presumably means prior art. Publishing in a way that patent examiners
    will find is surprisingly hard. IBM used to have a publications specifically for stuff they didn't want to patent:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Technical_Disclosure_Bulletin

    --
    Regards,
    John Levine, johnl@taugh.com, Primary Perpetrator of "The Internet for Dummies",
    Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From OrangeFish@21:1/5 to John Levine on Sun Jun 29 10:10:17 2025
    On 2025-06-28 15:48, John Levine wrote (in part):
    Patents require periodic maintenance fees. If you don't pay the fee,
    your patent is abandoned. Here's the EPO's fee schedule: https://www.epo.org/en/legal/official-journal/2022/04/a42.html

    In the olden days, there was also the laches defence (in the US).

    He presumably means prior art. Publishing in a way that patent examiners will find is surprisingly hard. IBM used to have a publications specifically for stuff they didn't want to patent:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Technical_Disclosure_Bulletin

    There are some other companies that do that (for a fee) but memory fails
    me as to names.

    OF

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jseigh@21:1/5 to John Levine on Sun Jun 29 11:19:24 2025
    On 6/28/25 15:48, John Levine wrote:
    According to Anton Ertl <anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>:

    Public domain is a concept from copyright. Why should it play a role
    for patents?

    He presumably means prior art. Publishing in a way that patent examiners will find is surprisingly hard. IBM used to have a publications specifically for stuff they didn't want to patent:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IBM_Technical_Disclosure_Bulletin


    I and someone else have something in there. It was on lazy back
    linking of a forward lined list. Got a whole invention point out
    of that.

    Joe Seigh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)