• KY: (Opinion) Our 9-1-1 system desperately needs federal money for upgr

    From Bill Horne@21:1/5 to All on Tue Sep 13 15:50:15 2022
    Since its inception, 9-1-1 has been a victim of its own success.
    Ninety-nine percent of the time, it just works, and people ignore it. Government leaders have an “if it’s not broke, why fix it” mentality.

    Unfortunately, this approach is short-sighted and puts lives at risk.
    Simply put, 9-1-1 will increasingly fail to meet the needs of
    Kentuckians and Americans unless it is upgraded to Next Generation 9-1-1 technology (NG911) — and this can only be achieved through an infusion
    of federal funding.

    https://www.kentucky.com/opinion/op-ed/article265431066.html

    --
    (Please remove QRM from my email address to write to me directly, and
    note that the Telecom Digest email address must be changed in an
    obvious way to send replies to the Digest)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bill Horne@21:1/5 to Bill Horne on Wed Sep 14 18:29:52 2022
    On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 03:50:15PM -0400, Bill Horne wrote:
    Since its inception, 9-1-1 has been a victim of its own success. Ninety-nine percent of the time, it just works, and people ignore it. Government leaders have an “if it’s not broke, why fix it” mentality.

    Unfortunately, this approach is short-sighted and puts lives at risk. Simply put, 9-1-1 will increasingly fail to meet the needs of Kentuckians and Americans unless it is upgraded to Next Generation 9-1-1 technology (NG911) — and this can only be achieved through an infusion of federal funding.

    I am always leery of "VoIP" networks, and this author's opinion notwithstanding, I don't think they are a good idea for carrying /any/
    kind of emergency communications.

    There are at least two things wrong with the idea of using IP-based
    connections to carry 911 traffic:

    1. The basic, fundamental, underlying premise of the Internet's design
    is that any particular packet can wait until a route is available,
    and the packets that transport a 911 Voice-over-Internet-Protocal
    (VoIP) connection *MUST* be given priority over other traffic - but
    there is no mechanism in place to do that. VoIP is fine for my home
    phone (if my ISP ever stops blocking it), but it's *NOT* a reliable
    way to provide the "always on" connections needed for a PSAP to
    talk to those in need of help.

    2. Deep down in the glib come-on for the IP network which is supposed
    to provide the virtual circuits that 911 must have, there is a tiny
    little tell-all that gives the project's *REAL* purpose away. The
    NSInet details say that all traffic will be carried over "private"
    or "virtually private" paths. We all know what Virtual Private
    Networks are - but what they are *NOT* is a virtual circuit, and
    the fact that they're going to be used for the "new 911" tells me
    that this allegedly "advanced" system will be composed of a few
    concentrated cubicle farms in each state (if even that), trying to
    use technology to relieve the ever-more-hungry politicians of any
    obligation to hire and pay the multi-lingual, multi-cultural
    specialists that currect E911 PSAPs are supposed to have on duty at
    all times. Of course, if multi-lingual labor can't be found, there
    will always be the temptation to "offshore" the centers overseas ...

    You heard it here first.

    Bill Horne

    --
    (Please remove QRM from my email address to write to me directly, and
    please note that the Telecom Digest's email address must be modified
    in an obvious way to reply to this post via email.)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)