Until a few minutes ago, I didn't know that something named "open RAN" existed, or what it is.
I came across a story on the subject, and I've included the URL for
the story, and one for a "white paper" that gives technical details,
below. However, I think we telecom types need to talk - not about the technical topic, but about the political and regulatory environment
that the "Open RAN" concept will create.
"Open" standards which *MIGHT* allow communication - even short-range peer-to-peer communication - between disparate devices? The Congressmen
who had to run for their lives on January 6th of 2001 will discard the
idea out-of-hand. They don't want, and will not allow, any change that removes control of the cellular network from the hands of government
"EMCOM" specialists who are able to shut down cell networks in any
area they choose.
Communication without paying a monthly fee to the powers-that-be?
Heaven Forfend! That's C-C-C-C-Communist! Look, in the corner! It's
the ghost of Joe McCarthy, standing next to the devil in a J. Edgar
Hoover costume! We must act quickly!
Bill "Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean they're not out to get
you" Horne
Understanding Open RAN: https://www.5gamericas.org/understanding-open-ran/?gclid=Cj0KCQjwtsCgBhDEARIsAE7RYh0OwV571xOIxtxT9ifH7QZgVWwhWXEeIqtlUW6uepvg9T1QWKOuhjwaAtIBEALw_wcB
“Transition Towards Open and Interoperable Networks:” https://www.5gamericas.org/transition-toward-open--interoperable-networks/
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 11:30:02 |
Calls: | 10,389 |
Calls today: | 4 |
Files: | 14,061 |
Messages: | 6,416,868 |
Posted today: | 1 |