• Google says it will delete location history for visits to abortion clin

    From But fuck the rest of you@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 3 02:48:25 2022
    XPost: alt.abortion, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.republican

    However, we will continue to enable homosexuals to stalk / track your male children and kidnap them for rape.

    Google said late Friday that it will work to quickly delete location
    history for people going to abortion sites and other medical sites
    following the Supreme Court’s overturning of Roe v. Wade last week.

    “Today, we’re announcing that if our systems identify that someone has
    visited one of these places, we will delete these entries from Location
    History soon after they visit,” wrote Jen Fitzpatrick, Google’s senior
    vice president of core systems and experiences, in a blog post.

    Fitzpatrick noted that visits to places like counseling centers, domestic violence shelters, abortion clinics and fertility centers “can be
    particularly personal.” Google parent Alphabet owns highly popular devices
    and data services, including Android, Fitbit, Search and Google Maps.
    That’s become a greater concern since the Supreme Court ruling, because of uncertainty surrounding whether sensitive data could be used to target
    what is now potentially criminal activity.

    Google’s post says, “Fitbit users who have chosen to track their menstrual cycles in the app can currently delete menstruation logs one at a time,
    and we will be rolling out updates that let users delete multiple logs at once.”

    The decision from the nation’s highest court overturned nearly 50 years of legal precedent by reversing its original opinion that women have a constitutional right to an abortion. For weeks, Google and other tech
    companies have avoided answering questions from the media and legislators
    about their data storage and practices as well as how they will comply
    with potential law enforcement requests.

    Google, which sent an email to employees with resources for its own
    employees amid the ruling, has also faced questions about its search
    results in addition to data privacy.

    Even before the decision became official, lawmakers called on Google and
    the Federal Trade Commission to ensure data for online consumers seeking
    care would be protected in the event that the landmark ruling was
    overturned.

    In May, a group of 42 Democratic lawmakers urged Google CEO Sundar Pichai
    in a letter to stop collecting and keeping unnecessary or non-aggregated location data that could be used to identify people seeking abortions.

    Google’s Friday post didn’t say how it would respond to potential requests
    from law enforcement. Instead, the company said it would “continue to
    oppose demands that are overly broad or otherwise legally objectionable.”

    Google also said the the responsibility is shared by many institutions.

    “Given that these issues apply to healthcare providers, telecommunications companies, banks, tech platforms, and many more, we know privacy
    protections cannot be solely up to individual companies or states acting individually,” the post said.

    https://www.cnbc.com/2022/07/01/google-will-delete-location-history-for- visits-to-abortion-clinics.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marco Moock@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 3 09:37:43 2022
    XPost: alt.abortion, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.republican

    Am Sonntag, 03. Juli 2022, um 02:48:25 Uhr schrieb But fuck the rest of
    you:

    Google said late Friday that it will work to quickly delete location
    history for people going to abortion sites and other medical sites
    following the Supreme Court_s overturning of Roe v. Wade last week.

    Google users should think about this. I don't want to be spied out by
    Google, so I don't own an Android smartphone that can be used to spy me
    out.
    Much more interesting for me is the fact that Google seems to fear
    something. If not, they wouldn't delete that data.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From governor.swill@gmail.com@21:1/5 to Marco Moock on Sun Jul 3 15:15:08 2022
    XPost: alt.abortion, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.republican

    On Sun, 3 Jul 2022 09:37:43 +0200, Marco Moock <mo01@posteo.de> wrote:

    Am Sonntag, 03. Juli 2022, um 02:48:25 Uhr schrieb But fuck the rest of
    you:

    Google said late Friday that it will work to quickly delete location
    history for people going to abortion sites and other medical sites
    following the Supreme Court_s overturning of Roe v. Wade last week.

    Google users should think about this. I don't want to be spied out by
    Google, so I don't own an Android smartphone that can be used to spy me
    out.
    Much more interesting for me is the fact that Google seems to fear
    something. If not, they wouldn't delete that data.

    You think Apple doesn't record and sell their user's location data?

    Swill
    --

    Republican congressman Andrew Clyde (GA):
    "You know, if you didn't know the tv footage was video from
    January 6, you'd actually think it was a normal tourist visit."

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marco Moock@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jul 3 21:42:03 2022
    XPost: alt.abortion, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.republican

    Am Sonntag, 03. Juli 2022, um 15:15:08 Uhr schrieb
    governor.swill@gmail.com:

    You think Apple doesn't record and sell their user's location data?

    I assume that Apple also collects data, therefore I also don't have
    any Apple products. I don't have a mobile phone at all.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to Marco Moock on Fri Jul 8 23:55:00 2022
    XPost: alt.abortion, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.republican

    Marco Moock wrote:
    Am Sonntag, 03. Juli 2022, um 02:48:25 Uhr schrieb But fuck the rest of
    you:

    Google said late Friday that it will work to quickly delete location
    history for people going to abortion sites and other medical sites
    following the Supreme Court_s overturning of Roe v. Wade last week.

    Google users should think about this. I don't want to be spied out by
    Google, so I don't own an Android smartphone that can be used to spy me
    out.
    Much more interesting for me is the fact that Google seems to fear
    something. If not, they wouldn't delete that data.


    What would Google have to fear? It's women who have to fear republicans.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruise@21:1/5 to Gronk on Fri Jul 8 23:42:35 2022
    XPost: alt.abortion, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.republican

    In article <tab57i$vhgi$3@dont-email.me>,
    Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    What would Google have to fear? It's women who have to fear republicans.

    Any records google keeps are subject to subpoena. Records they
    didn't keep before subpoena are neither subpoenable or a
    perversion of justice. They only have to keep such records the
    law says they have to keep.

    --
    :-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\ Discordia: not just a religion but also a parody. This post / \
    I am an Andrea Chen sockpuppet. insults Islam. Mohammed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marco Moock@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 9 09:32:39 2022
    XPost: alt.abortion, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.republican

    Am Freitag, 08. Juli 2022, um 23:55:00 Uhr schrieb Gronk:

    What would Google have to fear? It's women who have to fear
    republicans.

    Why should Google care about that?
    They already collect very much data about everybody who uses their
    service, they track movement data, health data etc., why should they
    make an exception here?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pyotr filipivich@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 9 08:24:35 2022
    XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.abortion

    Let the Record show that Marco Moock <mo01@posteo.de> on or about Sat,
    9 Jul 2022 09:32:39 +0200 did write, type or otherwise cause to appear
    in talk.politics.guns the following:
    Am Freitag, 08. Juli 2022, um 23:55:00 Uhr schrieb Gronk:

    What would Google have to fear? It's women who have to fear
    republicans.

    Why should Google care about that?
    They already collect very much data about everybody who uses their
    service, they track movement data, health data etc., why should they
    make an exception here?

    Politics.

    Google is evil, it is woke, and the only question remaining is: is Google a subsidiary of the DNC, or vice versa? And have the proper
    fillings been made with the respective "oversight" organizations?
    --
    pyotr filipivich
    "The Democrats smell blood and don't want to be told that it's their own."
    - Mark Steyn

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gronk@21:1/5 to Marco Moock on Thu Jul 14 21:51:12 2022
    XPost: alt.abortion, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.republican

    Marco Moock wrote:
    Am Freitag, 08. Juli 2022, um 23:55:00 Uhr schrieb Gronk:

    What would Google have to fear? It's women who have to fear
    republicans.

    Why should Google care about that?

    To protect women from republicans.

    They already collect very much data about everybody who uses their
    service, they track movement data, health data etc., why should they
    make an exception here?


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Marco Moock@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 16 09:50:32 2022
    XPost: alt.abortion, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.republican

    Am Thu, 14 Jul 2022 21:51:12 -0600
    schrieb Gronk <invalide@invalid.invalid>:

    Marco Moock wrote:
    Am Freitag, 08. Juli 2022, um 23:55:00 Uhr schrieb Gronk:

    What would Google have to fear? It's women who have to fear
    republicans.

    Why should Google care about that?

    To protect women from republicans.

    I don't think that Google give such data to the republican party. Maybe
    they fear that their own employees may abuse such data.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Siri Cruise@21:1/5 to Marco Moock on Sat Jul 16 02:35:22 2022
    XPost: alt.abortion, talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
    XPost: alt.politics.usa.republican

    In article <20220716095032.6ad63bc1@x40>,
    Marco Moock <mo01@posteo.de> wrote:

    I don't think that Google give such data to the republican party. Maybe
    they fear that their own employees may abuse such data.

    If they have the records, they can be subpeonaed. If they don't,
    and have no record keeping law, what they don't have can't be
    subpeonaed. They can fight a subpeona, but the sure way to keep
    their records private is to never have them. (Destroying records
    to resist a subpeona is obstruction of justice.)

    --
    :-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
    'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\ Discordia: not just a religion but also a parody. This post / \
    I am an Andrea Chen sockpuppet. insults Islam. Mohammed

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)