with this stuff?
Am Dienstag, 14. März 2017 08:59:14 UTC+1 schrieb polymorph self:
with this stuff?
of course you can't. It's obvious that a lot more users fit into 64 bits than into 32 bits. If you want to scale, you better go 128 or even 32k bits.
On Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 10:33:10 AM UTC-4, Joachim wrote:
Am Dienstag, 14. März 2017 08:59:14 UTC+1 schrieb polymorph self:
with this stuff?
of course you can't. It's obvious that a lot more users fit into 64 bits than into 32 bits. If you want to scale, you better go 128 or even 32k bits.
are you a commnuist?
On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 6:15:20 PM UTC-4, polymorph self wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 10:33:10 AM UTC-4, Joachim wrote:
Am Dienstag, 14. März 2017 08:59:14 UTC+1 schrieb polymorph self:
with this stuff?
of course you can't. It's obvious that a lot more users fit into 64 bits than into 32 bits. If you want to scale, you better go 128 or even 32k bits.
are you a commnuist?
No, he's just an idiot.
On Wednesday, March 15, 2017 at 6:15:20 PM UTC-4, polymorph self wrote:
On Tuesday, March 14, 2017 at 10:33:10 AM UTC-4, Joachim wrote:
Am Dienstag, 14. März 2017 08:59:14 UTC+1 schrieb polymorph self:
with this stuff?
of course you can't. It's obvious that a lot more users fit into 64 bits than into 32 bits. If you want to scale, you better go 128 or even 32k bits.
are you a commnuist?
No, he's just an idiot.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 05:15:28 |
Calls: | 10,386 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 14,058 |
Messages: | 6,416,630 |