• Re: if constexpr as it should be

    From Marcel Mueller@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jul 17 21:50:18 2025
    Am 17.07.25 um 14:41 schrieb Bonita Montero:
    I think if constexpr should be extended in a way that the not compiled
    branch is only syntactically analyzed but not semantically; currently
    this holds true only for generic code. With that you could have opera-
    tions that are only meaningful if that branch is actually compiled.

    -v

    Do you have an example, that is _not_ working with the current
    implementation?


    Marcel

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)