In article <
0f5ec645511128c21c90fb0688247e60@www.novabbs.com>,
m137 <
learningcpp1@gmail.com> wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 21:34:53 +0000, Keith Thompson wrote:
The message being referred to is one I posted Sun 2021-05-23, with
Message-ID <87tums515a.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>. It's visible on
Google Groups at
<https://groups.google.com/g/comp.lang.c/c/4FUlV_XkmXg/m/OG8WeUCfAwAJ>.
As others have suggested, please include attribution information when
posting a followup. You don't need to quote the entire message,
but provide at least some context, particularly when the parent
message is old.
Hi Keith,
Sorry for the confusion, I am new to the platform and had not realised
that I needed to quote your post in my reply.
You don't need to (in the sense that the world would end if you don't do
it), but it makes things easier for your readers if you do.
It is common in CLC to way overstate the case for various things. This
seems to be an instance of that.
--
Res ipsa loquitur.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)