The function f in 'braces' NARS language

f{leftarrow}{leftbrace}{alpha}=1:{omega}{diamond}r{leftarrow}1{downarrow}w{leftarrow}{omega}{diamond}{quad}{leftarrow}"(1{rightshoe}w)
r="{diamond}{quad}{leftarrow}{quad}fmt 1{rightshoe}w{diamond}{quad}{leftarrow}{quad}fmt r{diamond}{quad}{leftarrow}{quad}fmt t{leftarrow}{leftbrace}(1{rightshoe}w){omega}{rightbrace}{dieresis}r{diamond}{quad}{leftarrow}t{diamond}t{rightbrace}

the line of the call in text form
3 f (0 0)(1 2)(3 ¯4)(4 ¯5)

its output mixed braces and text

(1{rightshoe}w) r=
+2---+
¦ 0 0¦
+~---+
+3---------------------+
¦+2---+ +2----+ +2----+¦
¦¦ 1 2¦ ¦ 3 ¯4¦ ¦ 4 ¯5¦¦
¦+~---+ +~----+ +~----+2
+?---------------------+
+3------------------------------------------------+
¦+2------------+ +2-------------+ +2-------------+¦
¦¦+2---+ +2---+¦ ¦+2---+ +2----+¦ ¦+2---+ +2----+¦¦
¦¦¦ 1 2¦ ¦ 1 2¦¦ ¦¦ 1 2¦ ¦ 3 ¯4¦¦ ¦¦ 1 2¦ ¦ 4 ¯5¦¦¦
¦¦+~---+ +~---+2 ¦+~---+ +~----+2 ¦+~---+ +~----+2¦
¦+?------------+ +?-------------+ +?-------------+3 +?------------------------------------------------+
1 2 1 2 1 2 3 ¯4 1 2 4 ¯5
1 2 1 2 1 2 3 ¯4 1 2 4 ¯5

The function g in 'braces' NARS language

g{leftarrow}{leftbrace}{alpha}=1:{omega}{diamond}r{leftarrow}1{downarrow}w{leftarrow}{omega}{diamond}{quad}{leftarrow}"(1{rightshoe}w)
r="{diamond}{quad}{leftarrow}1{rightshoe}w{diamond}{quad}{leftarrow}r{diamond}{quad}{leftarrow}
t{leftarrow}{leftbrace}(1{rightshoe}w){omega}{rightbrace}{dieresis}r{diamond}{quad}{leftarrow}t{diamond}t{rightbrace}

the line of the call in text form
3 g (0 0)(1 2)(3 ¯4)(4 ¯5)

(1{rightshoe}w) r=
0 0
1 2 3 ¯4 4 ¯5
0 0 1 2 0 0 3 ¯4 0 0 4 ¯5
0 0 1 2 0 0 3 ¯4 0 0 4 ¯5
0 0 1 2 0 0 3 ¯4 0 0 4 ¯5

Has you note the only change is the use or not use of "{quad}fmt" and
the what return
the same function is different (with the same imput)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)