• Re: An empty correspondence with the CEO of Adobe Systems

    From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 26 03:10:44 2024
    On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:58:41 -0800 (PST), jdaw1 wrote:

    With Google access to Usenet coming to an end, I want to bump this, to increase the probability that one day it is noticed by Adobe.

    I would say, Adobe stopped caring about PostScript a long time ago. It’s
    no longer the money-earner it once was.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Newall@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Tue Feb 6 09:40:27 2024
    On 26/1/24 14:10, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 12:58:41 -0800 (PST), jdaw1 wrote:
    With Google access to Usenet coming to an end, I want to bump this, to
    increase the probability that one day it is noticed by Adobe.

    I would say, Adobe stopped caring about PostScript a long time ago. It’s
    no longer the money-earner it once was.

    I think they care very much. PostScript is very much part of their
    business. Many of their proprietary file types embed it.

    What I think Adobe don't care about is how, or even if, Google engage
    with hobbyists or other randoms like us. Other than their advertising
    platform and their search engine, Google are irrelevant to Adobe.

    I take that view, too. Google neither started USENET, nor control it,
    and no longer even participate. News of USENET's death is greatly
    exaggerated.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to David Newall on Mon Feb 5 23:19:24 2024
    On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 09:40:27 +1100, David Newall wrote:

    PostScript is very much part of their
    business. Many of their proprietary file types embed it.

    But there’s no money to be made from it any more. It’s a commodity.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)