In view of Gigabyte memories, a lot of interference could also be
avoided, if BL WORD were entitled to ALLOT the space.
A permanent region could serve as a transient region, so
from the users of WORD there is no problem.
: WORD WORD DUP COUNT ALLOT ALIGN ; \ Or some such.
Is this in conflict with the standard?
albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl writes:
In view of Gigabyte memories, a lot of interference could also be
avoided, if BL WORD were entitled to ALLOT the space.
A permanent region could serve as a transient region, so
from the users of WORD there is no problem.
: WORD WORD DUP COUNT ALLOT ALIGN ; \ Or some such.
Is this in conflict with the standard?
Yes. In
create foo bl word bar drop 1234 ,
foo @ .
the standard specifies that this prints "1234", but with your
redefinition of WORD, it does not.
More formally, the standard specifies that the memory allocated by ,
is contiguous with the data space of FOO, and WORD is not one of the
words that terminates a contiguous region.
- antonGroetjes Albert
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 475 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 19:23:57 |
Calls: | 9,487 |
Calls today: | 6 |
Files: | 13,617 |
Messages: | 6,121,093 |