-- https://hackaday.com/2025/05/27/a-forth-os-in-46-bytes/
[Please do not mail me a copy of your followup]
Alexis <flexibeast@gmail.com> spake the secret code <875xhmdyhp.fsf@gmail.com> thusly:
-- https://hackaday.com/2025/05/27/a-forth-os-in-46-bytes/
[...] A reason Moore gives
for leaving Forth Inc was 'Forth started simple, gradually accreting layers >of complexity and that became the culture'. If there's a gene for simplicity >it hasn't passed down the generations.
Are customers driving obsolescence - or it's forced on them by manufacturers?
I could go for 10 years without upgrading phones, computers etc. But I'm not >given the chance.
My phone is from 2009. Nobody forces me to abandon it. What chance
are you not given.
E.g., our web server was bought in 2021 and replaced one from 2005.
But the 2005-vintage machine is still there and can be used when the
need arises.
My phone is from 2009. Nobody forces me to abandon it. What chance
are you not given.
3G seems to already be phased out here, 2G will follow[0]
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) writes:
My phone is from 2009. Nobody forces me to abandon it. What chance
are you not given.
You can't use a 2009 phone in the US. All the 2G and 3G networks are
shut down.
For servers you can run pretty much the same software as before, but on
the client side you have to use web browsers to get by in today's world,
and those browsers have to run awful bloaty Javascript monstrosities
that are on everyone's web sites now.
I think my laptop in 2005 was a Pentium 3 with 512MB of ram.
It would be almost unusable now.
On my desktop I have JavaScript disabled. There are lots of websites
the work fine without JavaScript. And many of those that don't work
fine without JavaScript are a disappointment with JavaScript, too.
I think my laptop in 2005 was a Pentium 3 with 512MB of ram.
It would be almost unusable now.
The Pentium 3 was introduced in 1999, with new models introduced up to
2003. As for using it, you might look at ><https://medium.com/@techrefreshing02/low-on-ram-try-these-5-lightweight-linux-distros-under-512mb-55e689ada854>
- anton--
What takes the chance from you to use your hardware for longer if you
want to?
T-Mobile commenced the shutdown of 2G on 9 Feb 2025...
On my laptop I have a web browser running that has JavaScript enabled,
with hundreds of open tabs. On this laptop currently 11GB of ram are
used. I am sure it could run in 8GB using some swap space
I think my laptop in 2005 was a Pentium 3 with 512MB of ram.
It would be almost unusable now.
The Pentium 3 was introduced in 1999, with new models introduced up to
2003.
As for using it, you might look at ...
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) writes:
T-Mobile commenced the shutdown of 2G on 9 Feb 2025...
I'm on T-mobile and my old phone definitely stopped working when they
shut off 3G here. Is it possible that the phone didn't have 2G?
I can run older and smaller distros on those machines reasonably well, I >think. That's fine for text editing but it's not so feasible to browse
the web with them.
It's also hard to get PATA solid state disks for
them
I can run older and smaller distros on those machines reasonably well, I >think. That's fine for text editing but it's not so feasible to browse
the web with them. It's also hard to get PATA solid state disks for
them, so they'd still have spinny drives of quite low capacity by
today's standards. The main use I could think of for them is as console >terminals for otherwise headless machines.
anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) writes:
My phone is from 2009. Nobody forces me to abandon it. What chance
are you not given.
You can't use a 2009 phone in the US. All the 2G and 3G networks are
shut down. Even my old 2016 phone was very marginal (I had to install
some kind of unreliable patch to get it to use LTE for voice) and I
upgraded to a 2023 phone that is pretty good.
E.g., our web server was bought in 2021 and replaced one from 2005.
But the 2005-vintage machine is still there and can be used when the
need arises.
For servers you can run pretty much the same software as before, but on
the client side you have to use web browsers to get by in today's world,
and those browsers have to run awful bloaty Javascript monstrosities
that are on everyone's web sites now. It used to be Microsoft Word
driving a "Wintel" upgrade loop, but now it's the web, and it's harder
to escape. I think my laptop in 2005 was a Pentium 3 with 512MB of ram.
It would be almost unusable now.
- Links/Dillo Mainline as a browser
- Dillectory: https://alex.envs.net/dillectory/
Thought this community might be interested in this:
"[Philippe] doesn’t take a strong stance on whether this should
technically qualify as a Forth implementation, given that the base implementation lacks stacks, dictionaries, and the ability to define
words. However, it does have an outer and inner interpreter, the ability
to compile and execute code, and most importantly, 'the simplicity and
hacky feeling of Forth.'"
-- https://hackaday.com/2025/05/27/a-forth-os-in-46-bytes/
d 100 l3016AD:0100 50 B8 8E 00-31 D8 E8 FF-00 17 00 3C-05 75 00 EA P...1......<.u.. 16AD:0110 50 00 3C 00-74 01 EB 02-E8 EE 00 05-05 88 EB 47 P.<.t..........G 16AD:0120 B8 E6 02 00-D2 31 14 CD-E4 80 75 80-C3 F4 .....1....u.....
q
Your laptop with GNU/Linux/OpenBSD would be perfectly fine
for tons of tasks:
"For tons of tasks" - sure, but not for
browsing the WWW in the state it's today.
About ten years ago I had to give up using
my old Athlon 3200+ machine used for the
"surfing", because it turned out, that after
next "upgrade" in my bank I wasn't able to
operate my bank account (and still more and
more websites became incredibly slow, when
browsing their contents). Yes, everyone
prefer to push the burden on your machine
by using that JS (that should be banned),
instead making their server doing that by
using PHP, for example.
I used to use Lynx for browsing the
Web, to read news etc. as long, as it was
still possible - to not even glance at all
that shiny fluff, to avoid pop-up windows
etc. - but that time is over since almost
20 years ago today. Try to use Lynx today
with any site. Maybe 5-10% of them can be
browsed such way.
--
anthk <anthk@openbsd.home> writes:
- Links/Dillo Mainline as a browser
- Dillectory: https://alex.envs.net/dillectory/
You can't browse the real web that way. Consider the JS-based captchas
in front of almost everything right now, to slow down AI scrapers. Then
look at the crap on actual web sites. The other stuff is mostly still workable. Web browsers are the bottleneck.
20 years ago today. Try to use Lynx today
with any site. Maybe 5-10% of them can be
browsed such way.
You can't browse the real web that way.The Dillectory has tons of alternatives.
On Fri, 6 Jun 2025 13:21:44 +0000
zbigniew2011@gmail.com (LIT) wrote:
I know Links, I know Netrik and Dillo - and not since yesterday - but
nothing below Firefox is usable anymore within that WWW of today,
unfortunately.
Depends on what you're trying to get to. Wikipedia's still perfectly
usable with ELinks, and somehow it doesn't trip Google's new "screw you
for not having JS enabled" detector. Maddeningly, gutenberg.org ruined
their search interface in the last few years, but thankfully the texts themselves are still perfectly readable. Some forums I've been unable
to browse due to SSL restrictions, but I think that's due to using an outdated version on an outdated distro; newer builds seem to handle it better.
anthk <anthk@openbsd.home> writes:
You can't browse the real web that way.The Dillectory has tons of alternatives.
You are missing the point. The "real web" means the web that exists in
the real world and that was built without taking usability by
non-bloated browsers on board. Quite a lot of the real web simply
doesn't work without Javascript, and heavyweight Javascript at that.
If you want to (or have to) use those sites in your everyday life, the Dillectory stuff won't help.
Yes, it's possible to live your life without using those sites, just as
it's possible to live without indoor plumbing or refrigeration at home.
But it's a lifestyle change that most people can't be expected to make
just for the sake of continuing to use their 2006-era computer.
What if you decide to look for anything on eBay, for example?
What about bank account? Can you operate it with JS disabled?
zbigniew2011@gmail.com (LIT) writes:
What about bank account? Can you operate it with JS disabled?
Certainly, and I do that. I don't do any banking through the Web,
however.
- anton
In article <2025Jun9.082717@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at>,
Anton Ertl <anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> wrote:
zbigniew2011@gmail.com (LIT) writes:
What about bank account? Can you operate it with JS disabled?
Certainly, and I do that. I don't do any banking through the Web,
however.
I would like to too. How do you do that?
Certainly, and I do that. I don't do any banking through the Web,I would like to too. How do you do that?
however.
Most of these "web sites" are irrelevant to me.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 503 |
Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
Uptime: | 222:56:45 |
Calls: | 9,880 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 13,791 |
Messages: | 6,206,180 |
Posted today: | 1 |