XPost: alt.language.latin, alt.usage.english

I met Wirth only once, and of course he told the story that Europeans
called him by name and Americans called him by value.

---------- This quip was familiar to me, 30+ years ago.
(lambda() (Thunks (for reminding me!)))


"The numerical notation of 4 is IV in Roman numerals. You probably think
so, too. However, there are many cases where IIII is used at the 4:00 position on the dial plates of clocks that use Roman numerals."

Brought to you by the Seiko museum.
https://museum.seiko.co.jp/en/knowledge/trivia02/

The question is about "numeral", not "number".

When Alfred Bester, in /The Demolished Man/,spelled "Quartermaine" as
"1/4maine", or when Prince wrote "I Would Die 4 U" and "Nothing Compares
2 U", they playfully used numerals to spell words. There are no

numbers in

sight, but those are still numerals.

Latin (and ancient Greek and Hebrew) used letters as numerals. They're
numerals when they represent numbers, and that's true even if the number
represents something else, such as a word that sounds like the number.

According to Wikipedia, the origin of the "XIIII" in "Vilain XIIII"

isn't

known, though in the two theories it mentions, it's a number (the
fourteenth quarter of somebody's escutcheon, or fourteen acres given

to an

illegitimate son), not some word that sounds like [katorz]. But "XIIII"
is a numeral there because it refers to "quatorze", whether or not
"quatorze" refers in turn to something other than 14.

It is called by name, not by value,

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

HenHanna <HenHanna@devnull.tb> writes:

"The numerical notation of 4 is IV in Roman numerals. You probably think
so, too. However, there are many cases where IIII is used at the 4:00 position on the dial plates of clocks that use Roman numerals."

Brought to you by the Seiko museum.
https://museum.seiko.co.jp/en/knowledge/trivia02/

Stand-up Maths
How Roman numerals broke the official dog database. <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jMxoGqsmk5Y>

;-D

--
I do not bite, I just want to play.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.language.latin, alt.usage.english

On 20/03/2024 10:43, Ed Cryer wrote:

HenHanna wrote:

I met Wirth only once, and of course he told the story that Europeans
called him by name and Americans called him by value.

             ---------- This quip was familiar to me,  30+ years ago.
                                (lambda() (Thunks (for reminding me!)))


"The numerical notation of 4 is IV in Roman numerals. You probably think
so, too.    However, there are many cases where IIII is used at the 4:00 >> position on the dial plates of clocks that use Roman numerals."

                   Brought to you by the Seiko museum.
                      https://museum.seiko.co.jp/en/knowledge/trivia02/

The question is about "numeral", not "number".
;
When Alfred Bester, in /The Demolished Man/,spelled "Quartermaine" as >>  >> "1/4maine", or when Prince wrote "I Would Die 4 U" and "Nothing

Compares

2 U", they playfully used numerals to spell words.  There are no

numbers in

sight, but those are still numerals.
;

Latin (and ancient Greek and Hebrew) used letters as numerals.

They're

numerals when they represent numbers, and that's true even if the

number

represents something else, such as a word that sounds like the

number.

According to Wikipedia, the origin of the "XIIII" in "Vilain

XIIII" isn't

known, though in the two theories it mentions, it's a number (the
fourteenth quarter of somebody's escutcheon, or fourteen acres

given to an

illegitimate son), not some word that sounds like [katorz].  But

"XIIII"

is a numeral there because it refers to "quatorze", whether or not
"quatorze" refers in turn to something other than 14.

It is called by name, not by value,

The Romans wrote their supreme deity's name as "IVPPITER". Perhaps "IV"
on a sundial seemed rather blasphemous.

Ed

Ancient texts give "iiij" with the "j" meaning ending symbol but
functioning as "i". The notation "IV" is more modern.

--
Richard van Schaik
f.m.a.vanschaikREMOVE@THISgmail.com
http://www.fmavanschaik.nl/
The world is one big madhouse and this is main office.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.language.latin, alt.usage.english

SGVuSGFubmEgd3JvdGU6DQo+IA0KPiBJIG1ldCBXaXJ0aCBvbmx5IG9uY2UsIGFuZCBvZiBj b3Vyc2UgaGUgdG9sZCB0aGUgc3RvcnkgdGhhdCBFdXJvcGVhbnMNCj4gY2FsbGVkIGhpbSBi eSBuYW1lIGFuZCBBbWVyaWNhbnMgY2FsbGVkIGhpbSBieSB2YWx1ZS4NCj4gDQo+ICDCoMKg wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgIC0tLS0tLS0tLS0gVGhpcyBxdWlwIHdhcyBmYW1pbGlhciB0 byBtZSzCoCAzMCsgeWVhcnMgYWdvLg0KPiAgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDC oMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgIChsYW1iZGEoKSAoVGh1bmtzIChm b3IgcmVtaW5kaW5nIG1lISkpKQ0KPiANCj4gDQo+ICJUaGUgbnVtZXJpY2FsIG5vdGF0aW9u IG9mIDQgaXMgSVYgaW4gUm9tYW4gbnVtZXJhbHMuIFlvdSBwcm9iYWJseSB0aGluaw0KPiBz bywgdG9vLsKgwqDCoCBIb3dldmVyLCB0aGVyZSBhcmUgbWFueSBjYXNlcyB3aGVyZSBJSUlJ IGlzIHVzZWQgYXQgdGhlIDQ6MDANCj4gcG9zaXRpb24gb24gdGhlIGRpYWwgcGxhdGVzIG9m IGNsb2NrcyB0aGF0IHVzZSBSb21hbiBudW1lcmFscy4iDQo+IA0KPiAgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKg wqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoCBCcm91Z2h0IHRvIHlvdSBieSB0aGUgU2Vpa28gbXVz ZXVtLg0KPiAgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoMKgwqDCoCBodHRw czovL211c2V1bS5zZWlrby5jby5qcC9lbi9rbm93bGVkZ2UvdHJpdmlhMDIvDQo+IA0KPiAN Cj4gID4+IFRoZSBxdWVzdGlvbiBpcyBhYm91dCAibnVtZXJhbCIsIG5vdCAibnVtYmVyIi4N Cj4gID4+DQo+ICA+PiBXaGVuIEFsZnJlZCBCZXN0ZXIsIGluIC9UaGUgRGVtb2xpc2hlZCBN YW4vLHNwZWxsZWQgIlF1YXJ0ZXJtYWluZSIgYXMNCj4gID4+ICIxLzRtYWluZSIsIG9yIHdo ZW4gUHJpbmNlIHdyb3RlICJJIFdvdWxkIERpZSA0IFUiIGFuZCAiTm90aGluZyANCj4gQ29t cGFyZXMNCj4gID4+IDIgVSIsIHRoZXkgcGxheWZ1bGx5IHVzZWQgbnVtZXJhbHMgdG8gc3Bl bGwgd29yZHMuwqAgVGhlcmUgYXJlIG5vIA0KPiBudW1iZXJzIGluDQo+ICA+PiBzaWdodCwg YnV0IHRob3NlIGFyZSBzdGlsbCBudW1lcmFscy4NCj4gID4+DQo+IA0KPiANCj4gID4+IExh dGluIChhbmQgYW5jaWVudCBHcmVlayBhbmQgSGVicmV3KSB1c2VkIGxldHRlcnMgYXMgbnVt ZXJhbHMuwqAgVGhleSdyZQ0KPiAgPj4gbnVtZXJhbHMgd2hlbiB0aGV5IHJlcHJlc2VudCBu dW1iZXJzLCBhbmQgdGhhdCdzIHRydWUgZXZlbiBpZiB0aGUgDQo+IG51bWJlcg0KPiAgPj4g cmVwcmVzZW50cyBzb21ldGhpbmcgZWxzZSwgc3VjaCBhcyBhIHdvcmQgdGhhdCBzb3VuZHMg bGlrZSB0aGUgbnVtYmVyLg0KPiANCj4gDQo+ICA+PiBBY2NvcmRpbmcgdG8gV2lraXBlZGlh LCB0aGUgb3JpZ2luIG9mIHRoZSAiWElJSUkiIGluICJWaWxhaW4gWElJSUkiIA0KPiBpc24n dA0KPiAgPj4ga25vd24sIHRob3VnaCBpbiB0aGUgdHdvIHRoZW9yaWVzIGl0IG1lbnRpb25z LCBpdCdzIGEgbnVtYmVyICh0aGUNCj4gID4+IGZvdXJ0ZWVudGggcXVhcnRlciBvZiBzb21l Ym9keSdzIGVzY3V0Y2hlb24sIG9yIGZvdXJ0ZWVuIGFjcmVzIGdpdmVuIA0KPiB0byBhbg0K PiAgPj4gaWxsZWdpdGltYXRlIHNvbiksIG5vdCBzb21lIHdvcmQgdGhhdCBzb3VuZHMgbGlr ZSBba2F0b3J6XS7CoCBCdXQgDQo+ICJYSUlJSSINCj4gID4+IGlzIGEgbnVtZXJhbCB0aGVy ZSBiZWNhdXNlIGl0IHJlZmVycyB0byAicXVhdG9yemUiLCB3aGV0aGVyIG9yIG5vdA0KPiAg Pj4gInF1YXRvcnplIiByZWZlcnMgaW4gdHVybiB0byBzb21ldGhpbmcgb3RoZXIgdGhhbiAx NC4NCj4gDQo+IA0KPiAgPiBJdCBpcyBjYWxsZWQgYnkgbmFtZSwgbm90IGJ5IHZhbHVlLA0K PiANCg0KVGhlIFJvbWFucyB3cm90ZSB0aGVpciBzdXByZW1lIGRlaXR5J3MgbmFtZSBhcyAi SVZQUElURVIiLiBQZXJoYXBzICJJViIgDQpvbiBhIHN1bmRpYWwgc2VlbWVkIHJhdGhlciBi bGFzcGhlbW91cy4NCg0KRWQNCg0K

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.language.latin, alt.usage.english

Richard van Schaik wrote:

On 20/03/2024 10:43, Ed Cryer wrote:

HenHanna wrote:

I met Wirth only once, and of course he told the story that Europeans
called him by name and Americans called him by value.

             ---------- This quip was familiar to me,  30+ years ago.
                                (lambda() (Thunks (for reminding me!)))


"The numerical notation of 4 is IV in Roman numerals. You probably think >>> so, too.    However, there are many cases where IIII is used at the 4:00 >>> position on the dial plates of clocks that use Roman numerals."

                   Brought to you by the Seiko museum. >>>                       https://museum.seiko.co.jp/en/knowledge/trivia02/

The question is about "numeral", not "number".
;
When Alfred Bester, in /The Demolished Man/,spelled "Quartermaine" as >>>  >> "1/4maine", or when Prince wrote "I Would Die 4 U" and "Nothing

Compares

2 U", they playfully used numerals to spell words.  There are no

numbers in

sight, but those are still numerals.
;

Latin (and ancient Greek and Hebrew) used letters as numerals.

They're

numerals when they represent numbers, and that's true even if the

number

represents something else, such as a word that sounds like the

number.

According to Wikipedia, the origin of the "XIIII" in "Vilain

XIIII" isn't

known, though in the two theories it mentions, it's a number (the
fourteenth quarter of somebody's escutcheon, or fourteen acres

given to an

illegitimate son), not some word that sounds like [katorz].  But

"XIIII"

is a numeral there because it refers to "quatorze", whether or not
"quatorze" refers in turn to something other than 14.

It is called by name, not by value,

The Romans wrote their supreme deity's name as "IVPPITER". Perhaps "IV"
on a sundial seemed rather blasphemous.

Ed

Ancient texts give "iiij" with the "j" meaning ending symbol but
functioning as "i". The notation "IV" is more modern.

-------- both great points!!!


It was common not to associate time with Jupiter as his father Saturn was the God of Time and a cannibal tyrant. It was perpetrated so frequently in Roman times that it was traditional not to use IV when referring to time even centuries
after belief of Jupiter faded into obscurity.


________________________________


Since the Middle Ages, a "j" has sometimes been substituted for the final "i" of a "lower-case" Roman numeral, such as "iij" for 3 or "vij" for 7.

This "j" can be considered a swash variant of "i". Into the early 20th century, the use of a final "j" was still sometimes used in medical prescriptions to prevent tampering with or misinterpretation of a number after it was written.[63]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.language.latin, alt.usage.english

On 20/03/2024 11:04, Richard van Schaik wrote:

On 20/03/2024 10:43, Ed Cryer wrote:

The Romans wrote their supreme deity's name as "IVPPITER". Perhaps
"IV" on a sundial seemed rather blasphemous.

Historians always have to extrapolate, interpolate, or simply guess
about these things. So it is important not to be too fixed on any theories.

As I understand it, it is simply a matter of the Romans often using
"iiii" for 4, and "viiii" for 9, and so on, when working with numbers in general. This makes arithmetic far easier, and the numbers are clearer.
(Sometimes people re-arranged the order, such as "IIXX" meaning the
same as "XXII".) Various abbreviations were used in different
circumstances - if you were chiselling numbers in stone, it is nice to
have shorter versions!

It is also important to remember that Roman society lasted a /long/
time, from its early beginnings until the end of the Eastern Roman
Empire. And it covered a large area with lots of people, languages, and writing systems. So it would be a mistake to assume that "the Romans"
always wrote their numbers in the same way.

Regarding clock dials, as clocks with dials became common, "VIIII" was abbreviated to "IX" to fit better on the dial. Then "IIII" was later
shorten to "IV", more as a mistaken idea about consistency (since it
does not save much space).

Ancient texts give "iiij" with the "j" meaning ending symbol but
functioning as "i". The notation "IV" is more modern.

The Romans didn't have a letter "j" at all - they used "i". The
development of "j" as a distinct letter, rather than just a way of
writing "i", came much later than the Romans (though Roman numerals were
still in heavy usage).

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.language.latin, alt.usage.english

When Alfred Bester, in /The Demolished Man/,spelled "Quartermaine" as
"1/4maine" ...

That one was easy to decipher. Another one was “@kins”, also “T8”. But I
got stymied by “$$on”.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

XPost: alt.language.latin, alt.usage.english

On Wed, 27 Mar 2024 15:19:08 +0000, jerryfriedman wrote:

Never mind, it was supposed to be "Jackson". Pretty obscure.

I thought “$$on” was “Jefferson”, as in the President on the two-dollar bill.

Two “$”, get it?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)