• 24 years after Steve Jobs was told stores won't work

    From Retrograde@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jun 1 21:24:14 2025
    From the «ask a pro» department:
    Title: 24 Years After ‘Sorry, Steve: Here’s Why the Apple Stores Won’t Work’
    Author: John Gruber
    Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 21:04:54 +0000
    Link: https://ritholtz.com/2025/05/sorry-steve/

    Barry Ritholtz, in an excerpt from his brand-new book, How Not to Invest[1], marking the occasion of the 24th anniversary of Cliff Edwards’s claim chowder hall of famer[2], predicting doom for Apple’s then-new foray into its own chain
    of retail stores:

    There are many genuinely revolutionary products and services that, when they come along, change everything. Pick your favorite: the iPod and iPhone, Tesla Model S, Netflix streaming, Amazon Prime, AI, perhaps even Bitcoin. Radical products break the mold; their difference and unfamiliarity challenge us. We (mostly) cannot foretell the impact of true innovation. Then, once it’s a wild success, we have a hard time recalling how life was before that product existed.

    The Apple Store was clearly one of those game-changers: By 2020, Apple had opened over 500 stores in 25 countries. They are among the top-tier retailers and the fastest to reach a billion dollars in annual sales. They achieved the highest sales per square foot in 2012 among all retailers. By 2017, they were generating $5,546 per square foot in revenues, twice the dollar amount of Tiffany’s, their closest competitor. Apple no longer breaks out the specifics of its stores in its quarterly reports, but estimates of store revenue are about $2.4 billion per month.

    May 2001 is so long ago, Daring Fireball hadn’t yet launched. So I can’t say I
    predicted the success of Apple’s retail stores. But what I recall thinking, at
    the time, was that it might work, and was definitely worth trying. Here’s the nut of Edwards’s 2001 piece:

    Since PC retailing gross margins are normally 10% or less, Apple would have
    to sell $12 million a year per store to pay for the space. Gateway does about $8 million annually at each of its Country Stores. Then there’s the cost of construction, hiring experienced staff. “I give them two years before they’re
    turning out the lights on a very painful and expensive mistake,” says Goldstein. [...]

    What’s more, Apple’s retail thrust could be one step forward, two steps back
    in terms of getting Macs in front of customers. Since most Mac fans already know where to buy, much of the sales from Apple’s stores could come out of the hides of existing Mac dealers. That would bring its already damaged relations with partners to new lows. In early 1999, Best Buy Co. dropped the iMac line after refusing a Jobs edict that it stock all eight colors. Sears, Roebuck & Co. late last year dumped Apple, sources say, after concluding that sales were too hit or miss. And in recent weeks, Mac-only chains such as The Computer Store and ComputerWare have closed down, citing weak margins. Now, faced with competition from Apple, others may cut back. “When you choose to compete with your retailers, clearly that’s not a comfortable situation,” says CompUSA Chief Operating Officer Lawrence N. Mondry.

    Two decades later, talking about the importance of Sears as a retail partner looks pretty dumb. But to me, the obvious problem with this argument in 2001 is that if Apple’s existing retail partners in 2001 were doing an even vaguely good job, why was the Mac’s market share so low? At the time they were only a handful of years past the crisis where the company almost went bankrupt. Apple, in the old days, had some fantastic small mom-and-pop official retailers, but they were small. And the big partners, like CompUSA, absolutely sucked at showcasing the Mac. Their demo machines were frequently broken.

    If you understood and believed that the Mac was a superior product, it was easy to conclude that its relatively low market share must have been a function of problems with its marketing and retail strategy. Gateway’s fundamental problem
    had nothing to do with the fact that it was running its own retail stores — it
    was that they were selling shitty computers. Apple was selling great computers, but had shitty retail partners.

    (I’m a longtime fan of Ritholtz’s writing; I’ve got a copy of How Not to Invest[1]
     — here’s a make-me-rich Bookshop.org link[3] — and it’s next on my reading
    list after I finish Patrick McGee’s Apple in China[4].)
    ★ [5]

    Links:
    [1]: https://www.hownottoinvestbook.com/ (link)
    [2]: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2001-05-20/commentary-sorry-steve-heres-why-apple-stores-wont-work (link)
    [3]: https://bookshop.org/a/56320/9781804091197 (link)
    [4]: https://bookshop.org/a/56320/9781668053379 (link)
    [5]: https://daringfireball.net/linked/2025/05/22/ritholtz-sorry-steve (link)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to Retrograde on Mon Jun 2 03:09:57 2025
    On 01 Jun 2025 21:24:14 GMT, Retrograde wrote:

    If you understood and believed that the Mac was a superior product, it
    was easy to conclude that its relatively low market share must have been
    a function of problems with its marketing and retail strategy.

    That market share hasn’t really improved, though, has it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Retrograde on Tue Jun 3 11:43:00 2025
    Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid> wrote:
    Since PC retailing gross margins are normally 10% or less, Apple would have to sell $12 million a year per store to pay for the space. Gateway does about $8 million annually at each of its Country Stores. Then there’s the cost of construction, hiring experienced staff. “I give them two years before they’re
    turning out the lights on a very painful and expensive mistake,” says Goldstein. [...]

    What this author didn't know is that later in 2001 Apple were to release the iPod. Which turned them from a 'computer' brand into a 'consumer' brand. That's why the Apple Store succeeded - iPods, iPhones, iPads etc - not just Macs (beige, aqua or otherwise).

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Retrograde@21:1/5 to Theo on Thu Jun 5 18:26:16 2025
    On 03 Jun 2025 11:43:00 +0100 (BST)
    Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:

    What this author didn't know is that later in 2001 Apple were to release the iPod. Which turned them from a 'computer' brand into a 'consumer' brand. That's why the Apple Store succeeded - iPods, iPhones, iPads etc - not just Macs (beige, aqua or otherwise).

    Theo

    That's an excellent point. Goes back to that same era when the
    'experts' were totally convinced Apple had no business in the cellphone
    market because it was too stitched up by the likes of Nokia (etc.) and
    there was no room for a new, outside player. Funny how wrong that was,
    now that we see how it turned out.

    Steve Jobs sure was a step ahead of the 'experts' all the time.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to Retrograde on Fri Jun 6 05:39:34 2025
    On Thu, 5 Jun 2025 18:26:16 -0600, Retrograde wrote:

    Goes back to that same era when the 'experts' were totally convinced
    Apple had no business in the cellphone market because it was too
    stitched up by the likes of Nokia (etc.) and there was no room for a
    new, outside player. Funny how wrong that was, now that we see how
    it turned out.

    Steve Jobs sure was a step ahead of the 'experts' all the time.

    Yeah, copying the LG Prada also helped ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)