https://www.imore.com/apple/apples-market-value-jumps-by-a-record-breaking-dollar191-billion-in-one-day
“Apple's market cap jumped by a whopping $190.9 billion on Thursday,
making it the biggest single-day jump from a US-listed company.
Apple's surge beat the previously held record by Amazon from February
2022, when the company's valuation had jumped by $190.8 billion, says >Bloomberg. Apple also now has four spots in the top five list of the
biggest daily market cap gains, with Amazon taking the leftover spot.”
Apple is doomed! DOOMED I say! 🤣
Bob Campbell wrote:
https://www.imore.com/apple/apples-market-value-jumps-by-a-record-breaking-dollar191-billion-in-one-day
“Apple's market cap jumped by a whopping $190.9 billion on Thursday,
making it the biggest single-day jump from a US-listed company.
Apple's surge beat the previously held record by Amazon from February
2022, when the company's valuation had jumped by $190.8 billion, says
Bloomberg. Apple also now has four spots in the top five list of the
biggest daily market cap gains, with Amazon taking the leftover spot.”
Apple is doomed! DOOMED I say! 🤣
Market capitalization is a measure of investor greed, not necessarily corporate innovation or practices. Just look at GE or Enron.
Bob Campbell wrote:
https://www.imore.com/apple/apples-market-value-jumps-by-a-record-breaking-dollar191-billion-in-one-day
“Apple's market cap jumped by a whopping $190.9 billion on Thursday,
making it the biggest single-day jump from a US-listed company.
Apple's surge beat the previously held record by Amazon from February
2022, when the company's valuation had jumped by $190.8 billion, says
Bloomberg. Apple also now has four spots in the top five list of the
biggest daily market cap gains, with Amazon taking the leftover spot.”
Apple is doomed! DOOMED I say! 🤣
Market capitalization is a measure of investor greed, not necessarily corporate innovation or practices. Just look at GE or Enron.
Bob Campbell wrote:
https://www.imore.com/apple/apples-market-value-jumps-by-a-record-breaking-dollar191-billion-in-one-day
“Apple's market cap jumped by a whopping $190.9 billion on Thursday,
making it the biggest single-day jump from a US-listed company.
Apple's surge beat the previously held record by Amazon from February
2022, when the company's valuation had jumped by $190.8 billion, says
Bloomberg. Apple also now has four spots in the top five list of the
biggest daily market cap gains, with Amazon taking the leftover spot.”
Apple is doomed! DOOMED I say! 🤣
Market capitalization is a measure of investor greed, not necessarily corporate innovation or practices. Just look at GE or Enron.
On 11/15/2022 7:10 AM, badgolferman wrote:
Bob Campbell wrote:
"Apple's market cap jumped by a whopping $190.9 billion on ThursdayMarket capitalization is a measure of investor greed, not necessarily
corporate innovation or practices. Just look at GE or Enron.
A growing market-cap indicates a financially well-managed company.
sms wrote:
On 11/15/2022 7:10 AM, badgolferman wrote:
Bob Campbell wrote:
"Apple's market cap jumped by a whopping $190.9 billion on ThursdayMarket capitalization is a measure of investor greed, not necessarily
corporate innovation or practices. Just look at GE or Enron.
A growing market-cap indicates a financially well-managed company.
While there's nothing wrong with Apple having a high market capitalization, what's rather peculiar is the iKooks always gloat that "their choice" is Apple and that "their choice" makes those ungodly profits off the iKooks.
Bearing in mind sheep led to slaughter, you can't make those ungodly profit margins on the iPhone and Apple advertising revenue off intelligent people.
When you _study_ why iKooks gloat over Apple's profit margins, you realize that the iKooks are using Apple's success as their confirmation bias datum. --
Posted out of the goodness of my heart to disseminate useful information which, in this case, is to outline why iKooks love being gouged by Apple.
Bob Campbell wrote
https://www.imore.com/apple/apples-market-value-jumps-by-a-record-breaking-dollar191-billion-in-one-day
“Apple's market cap jumped by a whopping $190.9 billion on Thursday,
making it the biggest single-day jump from a US-listed company.
Apple's surge beat the previously held record by Amazon from February
2022, when the company's valuation had jumped by $190.8 billion, says
Bloomberg. Apple also now has four spots in the top five list of the
biggest daily market cap gains, with Amazon taking the leftover spot.”
Apple is doomed! DOOMED I say! 🤣
Market capitalization is a measure of investor greed,
not necessarily corporate innovation or practices. Just look at GE or
Enron.
badgolferman <REMOVETHISbadgolferman@gmail.com> wrote:
Bob Campbell wrote:
https://www.imore.com/apple/apples-market-value-jumps-by-a-record-breaking-dollar191-billion-in-one-day
“Apple's market cap jumped by a whopping $190.9 billion on Thursday,
making it the biggest single-day jump from a US-listed company.
Apple's surge beat the previously held record by Amazon from February
2022, when the company's valuation had jumped by $190.8 billion, says
Bloomberg. Apple also now has four spots in the top five list of the
biggest daily market cap gains, with Amazon taking the leftover spot.” >>>
Apple is doomed! DOOMED I say! 🤣
Market capitalization is a measure of investor greed, not necessarily
corporate innovation or practices.
AKA investor confidence. Given that many other bigtech are making massive layoffs investors are looking towards stable companies which make real
money. Apple is one such company.
Bob Campbell wrote:
https://www.imore.com/apple/apples-market-value-jumps-by-a-record-breaking-dollar191-billion-in-one-day
“Apple's market cap jumped by a whopping $190.9 billion on Thursday,
making it the biggest single-day jump from a US-listed company.
Apple's surge beat the previously held record by Amazon from February
2022, when the company's valuation had jumped by $190.8 billion, says
Bloomberg. Apple also now has four spots in the top five list of the
biggest daily market cap gains, with Amazon taking the leftover spot.”
Apple is doomed! DOOMED I say! 🤣
Market capitalization is a measure of investor greed, not necessarily corporate innovation or practices.
On 11/15/2022 7:10 AM, badgolferman wrote:
Bob Campbell wrote:
Market capitalization is a measure of investor greed, not necessarily
https://www.imore.com/apple/apples-market-value-jumps-by-a-record-breaking-dollar191-billion-in-one-day
“Apple's market cap jumped by a whopping $190.9 billion on Thursday,
making it the biggest single-day jump from a US-listed company.
Apple's surge beat the previously held record by Amazon from February
2022, when the company's valuation had jumped by $190.8 billion, says
Bloomberg. Apple also now has four spots in the top five list of the
biggest daily market cap gains, with Amazon taking the leftover spot.” >>>
Apple is doomed! DOOMED I say! 🤣
corporate innovation or practices. Just look at GE or Enron.
A growing market-cap indicates a financially well-managed company.
A growing market-cap indicates a financially well-managed company.
Not necessarily, most obviously with Enron.
On 2022-11-15 12:09, Chris wrote:
badgolferman <REMOVETHISb...@gmail.com> wrote:
Bob Campbell wrote:
https://www.imore.com/apple/apples-market-value-jumps-by-a-record-breaking-dollar191-billion-in-one-day
“Apple's market cap jumped by a whopping $190.9 billion on Thursday, >>> making it the biggest single-day jump from a US-listed company.
Apple's surge beat the previously held record by Amazon from February >>> 2022, when the company's valuation had jumped by $190.8 billion, says >>> Bloomberg. Apple also now has four spots in the top five list of the
biggest daily market cap gains, with Amazon taking the leftover spot.” >>>
Apple is doomed! DOOMED I say! 🤣
Market capitalization is a measure of investor greed, not necessarily
corporate innovation or practices.
AKA investor confidence. Given that many other bigtech are making massive layoffs investors are looking towards stable companies which make real money. Apple is one such company.Making real products which many, many people value highly.
farter wrote:
A growing market-cap indicates a financially well-managed company.
Not necessarily, most obviously with Enron.
Market cap is a function of what investors _believe_ about Apple.
If investors believe Apple customers are beguiled ignorant uneducated unquestioning sheep led to slaughter, then the market cap will be higher
than if investors believe Apple customers own a modicum of intelligence.
The higher the profit margins, the more ignorant the customer base when the product being sold is a mere commodity (which a smartphone clearly is).
Market capitalization is a measure of investor greed, not necessarily
corporate innovation or practices.
AKA investor confidence. Given that many other bigtech are making massive layoffs investors are looking towards stable companies which make real
money. Apple is one such company.
Chris wrote:
Market capitalization is a measure of investor greed, not necessarily
corporate innovation or practices.
AKA investor confidence. Given that many other bigtech are making massive
layoffs investors are looking towards stable companies which make real
money. Apple is one such company.
Market cap isn't "only" investor confidence though, as nobody would have a market cap less than the value of assets they own in typical circumstances.
Given Apple's ungodly profit margins coupled with extremely high
advertising and the absolute lowest R&D in the entire industry...
And given the fact Apple pays _billions_ every single year in penalties for public lies (e.g., throttling where Apple admitted _criminal guilt_)...
*It's clear what Apple is to those who own a modicum of intelligence.*
Chris wrote:
Market capitalization is a measure of investor greed, not necessarily
corporate innovation or practices.
AKA investor confidence. Given that many other bigtech are making massive
layoffs investors are looking towards stable companies which make real
money. Apple is one such company.
Market cap isn't "only" investor confidence though, as nobody would have a market cap less than the value of assets they own in typical circumstances.
Given Apple's ungodly profit margins coupled with extremely high
advertising and the absolute lowest R&D in the entire industry...
And given the fact Apple pays _billions_ every single year in penalties for public lies (e.g., throttling where Apple admitted _criminal guilt_)...
*It's clear what Apple is to those who own a modicum of intelligence.*
Isn't it interesting that you'll declare Apple's R&D the lowest, because
of the percentage of its revenues...
...but not apply the same kind of calculation to any fines Apple pays?
:-)
On 2022-11-15 16:16, Andy Burnelli wrote:
farter wrote:
A growing market-cap indicates a financially well-managed company.
Not necessarily, most obviously with Enron.
Market cap is a function of what investors _believe_ about Apple.
If investors believe Apple customers are beguiled ignorant uneducated
unquestioning sheep led to slaughter, then the market cap will be higher
than if investors believe Apple customers own a modicum of intelligence.
The higher the profit margins, the more ignorant the customer base
when the
product being sold is a mere commodity (which a smartphone clearly is).
Because you saying "clearly" decides it.
You know what: there are lots and lots of people smarter than you are
who choose to use Apple's devices.
Deal with it.
Am 16.11.22 um 01:48 schrieb Alan:
On 2022-11-15 16:16, Andy Burnelli wrote:
farter wrote:
A growing market-cap indicates a financially well-managed company.
Not necessarily, most obviously with Enron.
Market cap is a function of what investors _believe_ about Apple.
If investors believe Apple customers are beguiled ignorant uneducated
unquestioning sheep led to slaughter, then the market cap will be higher >>> than if investors believe Apple customers own a modicum of intelligence. >>>
The higher the profit margins, the more ignorant the customer base
when the
product being sold is a mere commodity (which a smartphone clearly is).
Because you saying "clearly" decides it.
You know what: there are lots and lots of people smarter than you are
who choose to use Apple's devices.
And the truth is also: there are lots and lots of people much dumber
than bread who choose to use Apple's devices.
Deal with it.
Right. Intelligence (or any other non-hard fact) is simply no way to
chose apple or non-apple
AKA investor confidence. Given that many other bigtech are making massive layoffs investors are looking towards stable companies which make real
money. Apple is one such company.
On 11/15/2022 7:10 AM, badgolferman wrote:
Bob Campbell wrote:
https://www.imore.com/apple/apples-market-value-jumps-by-a-record-breaking-dollar191-billion-in-one-day
“Apple's market cap jumped by a whopping $190.9 billion on Thursday,
making it the biggest single-day jump from a US-listed company.
Apple's surge beat the previously held record by Amazon from February
2022, when the company's valuation had jumped by $190.8 billion, says
Bloomberg. Apple also now has four spots in the top five list of the
biggest daily market cap gains, with Amazon taking the leftover spot.” >>>
Apple is doomed! DOOMED I say! 🤣
Market capitalization is a measure of investor greed, not necessarily
corporate innovation or practices. Just look at GE or Enron.
A growing market-cap indicates a financially well-managed company.
And the truth is also: there are lots and lots of people much dumber
than bread who choose to use Apple's devices.
Aren't iOS devices marketed exclusively to people who don't know much and
who then want Apple to make all their decisions for them to protect them?
The facts remain. Apple is selling loads of high-quality products that people actually line up to buy. Thus, they make huge profits.
Thus, investor confidence has never been higher.
Thus, Apple is the
highest-valued company in the history of Wall Street.
Apple is structured to be pretty insulated from competition,
apple has intense competition, including from windows, android,
smartwatches, video streaming and various other segments.
The facts remain. Apple is selling loads of high-quality products that people actually line up to buy. Thus, they make huge profits.
There are many pyramid schemes making billions off innocent victims.
Aren't iOS devices marketed exclusively to people who don't know much and
who then want Apple to make all their decisions for them to protect them?
nope. not even close to correct.
In article <qlfoxvgn1bj1.dlg@news.solani.org>, RonTheGuy
<ron@null.invalid> wrote:
Apple is structured to be pretty insulated from competition,
apple has intense competition, including from windows, android,
smartwatches, video streaming and various other segments.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/apple-ceo-tim-cook-being-very-deliberate-on-hirin
g-economic-uncertainty/
Apple, the world's most valuable company, has slowed some hiring, according >> to CEO Tim Cook, amid a wave of layoffs in Silicon Valley and an
unpredictable economic future.
that is entirely unrelated to what you quoted above.
Apple is structured to be pretty insulated from competition,
On Nov 15, 2022, Bob Campbell wrote
(in article<news:uGWdnUv2Zd4k-en-nZ2dnZfqnPadnZ2d@supernews.com>):
The facts remain. Apple is selling loads of high-quality products that
people actually line up to buy. Thus, they make huge profits.
There are many pyramid schemes making billions off innocent victims.
On 16 Nov 2022 at 8:49:06 AM, <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
And the truth is also: there are lots and lots of people much dumber
than bread who choose to use Apple's devices.
Aren't iOS devices marketed exclusively to people who don't know much and
who then want Apple to make all their decisions for them to protect them?
On 16 Nov 2022 at 7:25:10 AM, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
Aren't iOS devices marketed exclusively to people who don't know much and >>> who then want Apple to make all their decisions for them to protect them? >>nope. not even close to correct.
If you don't know by now iPhones cater to the clueless, then it's you who
is clueless.
The iPhone appeals to clueless people who want Apple to make all their decisions for them.
People buy the iPhone because Apple makes them feel safe when they do.
nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
In article <qlfoxvgn1bj1.dlg@news.solani.org>, RonTheGuy
<ron@null.invalid> wrote:
Apple is structured to be pretty insulated from competition,
apple has intense competition, including from windows, android,
smartwatches, video streaming and various other segments.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/apple-ceo-tim-cook-being-very-deliberate-on-hirin
g-economic-uncertainty/
Apple, the world's most valuable company, has slowed some hiring, according >>> to CEO Tim Cook, amid a wave of layoffs in Silicon Valley and an
unpredictable economic future.
that is entirely unrelated to what you quoted above.
Once again, a link is posted that does not support the claim.
On 2022-11-16 07:14, RJH wrote:
On 16 Nov 2022 at 8:49:06 AM, <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
And the truth is also: there are lots and lots of people much dumber
than bread who choose to use Apple's devices.
Aren't iOS devices marketed exclusively to people who don't know much and
who then want Apple to make all their decisions for them to protect them?
Ah.
The "I need to feel superior" argument!
On Nov 16, 2022, nospam wrote
(in article<news:161120221025096842%nospam@nospam.invalid>):
Apple is structured to be pretty insulated from competition,
apple has intense competition, including from windows, android,
smartwatches, video streaming and various other segments.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/apple-ceo-tim-cook-being-very-deliberate-on-hiring-economic-uncertainty/
Apple, the world's most valuable company, has slowed some hiring, according to CEO Tim Cook, amid a wave of layoffs in Silicon Valley and an unpredictable economic future.
You can see how insulated Apple is from competition by the extremely low migration rate to Android.
Android's market share is between 70% and 75%
while iOS's market share is between 25% and 30%. It varies slightly from quarter to quarter based on when the major players release new models.
The same applies now to Macs where new application programs are written
for the M1 so once you buy applications you're not likely to move
between platforms.
Recently I was needing an open-source video editor and Kdenlive is
available for Linux, Windows, and Intel-based Macs, see <https://kdenlive.org/en/download/>. If you have an M1 based Mac then
you would need to purchase something like Final Cut Pro.
Once you
purchase expensive applications for a Mac you're unlikely to move to a Windows-based platform.
You can see how insulated Apple is from competition by the extremely low migration rate to Android. Android's market share is between 70% and 75% while iOS's market share is between 25% and 30%. It varies slightly from quarter to quarter based on when the major players release new models.
On 11/16/2022 7:30 AM, RonTheGuy wrote:
On Nov 16, 2022, nospam wrote
(in article<news:161120221025096842%nospam@nospam.invalid>):
Apple is structured to be pretty insulated from competition,
apple has intense competition, including from windows, android,
smartwatches, video streaming and various other segments.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/apple-ceo-tim-cook-being-very-deliberate-on-hiring-economic-uncertainty/
Apple, the world's most valuable company, has slowed some hiring,
according
to CEO Tim Cook, amid a wave of layoffs in Silicon Valley and an
unpredictable economic future.
You can see how insulated Apple is from competition by the extremely low migration rate to Android. Android's market share is between 70% and 75% while iOS's market share is between 25% and 30%. It varies slightly from quarter to quarter based on when the major players release new models.
The same applies now to Macs where new application programs are written
for the M1 so once you buy applications you're not likely to move
between platforms.
Recently I was needing an open-source video editor and Kdenlive is
available for Linux, Windows, and Intel-based Macs, see <https://kdenlive.org/en/download/>. If you have an M1 based Mac then
you would need to purchase something like Final Cut Pro. Once you
purchase expensive applications for a Mac you're unlikely to move to a Windows-based platform.
sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
You can see how insulated Apple is from competition by the extremely low
migration rate to Android. Android's market share is between 70% and 75%
while iOS's market share is between 25% and 30%. It varies slightly from
quarter to quarter based on when the major players release new models.
In the U.S. it is iOS 54%, Android 45%.
You can see how insulated Apple is from competition by the extremely low >> migration rate to Android. Android's market share is between 70% and 75% >> while iOS's market share is between 25% and 30%. It varies slightly from >> quarter to quarter based on when the major players release new models.
In the U.S. it is iOS 54%, Android 45%.
Thank goodness! Need to get those numbers up in the rest of the world.
China is the real challenge.
The iPhone 15, if it has USB-C, is predicted to result in both an
upgrade super-cycle for existing iPhone owners as well as a small
increase in Android users moving to iOS.
There's also a rumor that the Pro Ultra will have a 10x optical
periscope lens similar to the Galaxy S22 Ultra. Camera capability is a
big factor in the reluctance of some Android users to move to iPhone.
On 11/16/2022 4:20 PM, Bob Campbell wrote:
sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
You can see how insulated Apple is from competition by the extremely low >>> migration rate to Android. Android's market share is between 70% and 75% >>> while iOS's market share is between 25% and 30%. It varies slightly from >>> quarter to quarter based on when the major players release new models.
In the U.S. it is iOS 54%, Android 45%.
Thank goodness! Need to get those numbers up in the rest of the world.
China is the real challenge.
In the U.S. it is iOS 54%, Android 45%.
Thank goodness! Need to get those numbers up in the rest of the world. China is the real challenge.
The numbers ARE up in the rest of the world. 5 years ago iOS was at 20% globally.
But I really dont think Apple cares about that.
It would take $150
iPhones to take over markets like China and India.
Apple is not
interested in competing at the low end. In fact, in Apples 45 year
history, they never have competed at the low end.
This is why phone app developers make 80% of their money from iOS app
sales. The vast majority of Android phones in use globally are low end models, where users are not interested/cant afford to buy apps.
In article <rAOdnRZzF9EmCuj-nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@supernews.com>, Bob
Campbell <nunya@none.none> wrote:
It would take $150
iPhones to take over markets like China and India.
apparently not:
<https://appleinsider.com/articles/22/08/24/apples-iphone-dominant-in-ch ina-samsung-falls-out-of-second-place>
The iPhone is consistently the most popular smartphone in China,
with half of all smartphones sold during the 6.18 Festival being
Apple's.
there is also very little reluctance for android users to switch from
android to iphone. according to apple, the rate of switching continues
to increase. the reverse, ios->android is far lower.
The global iPhone numbers will continue to rise.
Bob Campbell wrote:
The global iPhone numbers will continue to rise.
Most people just want to text and play games on their phones.
If people cared about functionality, Apple would go out of business.
But most people are stupid so the iPhone sells rather well to them.
The iPhone is not designed so much as it's marketed to stupid people.
But I really don’t think Apple cares about that. It would take $150 iPhones to take over markets like China and India. Apple is not
interested in competing at the low end. In fact, in Apple’s 45 year history, they never have competed at the low end.
<snip>
...which is completely ignorant.
Not at all ignorant, especially when it comes to open-source software as
well as software written for x86.
Also, remember that an Intel/Mac user
can dual boot Windows, or run Parallels, and take advantage of a lot of applications for which there has never been an OS-X version of any kind.
A lot of college students can't use M1 based Macbooks because the applications needed in their major are simply not available in OS-X for
the M1.
...which is completely ignorant.
nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
In article <rAOdnRZzF9EmCuj-nZ2dnZfqn_qdnZ2d@supernews.com>, Bob
Campbell <nunya@none.none> wrote:
It would take $150
iPhones to take over markets like China and India.
apparently not:
<https://appleinsider.com/articles/22/08/24/apples-iphone-dominant-in-ch
ina-samsung-falls-out-of-second-place>
The iPhone is consistently the most popular smartphone in China,
with half of all smartphones sold during the 6.18 Festival being
Apple's.
Wow, that’s amazing.
I guess my knowledge of China is outdated. So the global iPhone numbers
will continue to rise.
It would take $150
iPhones to take over markets like China and India.
apparently not:
<https://appleinsider.com/articles/22/08/24/apples-iphone-dominant-in-ch >> ina-samsung-falls-out-of-second-place>
The iPhone is consistently the most popular smartphone in China,
with half of all smartphones sold during the 6.18 Festival being
Apple's.
Wow, thats amazing.
I guess my knowledge of China is outdated. So the global iPhone numbers will continue to rise.
It would be even more amazing if it were true! But of course it's not.
You can see the actual statistics here: <https://www.counterpointresearch.com/china-smartphone-share/>
If people cared about functionality, Apple would go out of business.
The iPhone is not designed so much as it's marketed to stupid people.
iphone growing by 63% while samsung dropped and the market itself
contracted is quite a feat.
There are probably a hundred sources of Android
applications (but NOT the Google Play Store)
On Nov 17, 2022, sms wrote (in article
<news:tl5o78$2m7u5$2@dont-email.me>):
There are probably a hundred sources of Android
applications (but NOT the Google Play Store)
Why can't chinese people use the google play store in china?
And aren't all the google play store apps on the internet anyway?
On 11/16/2022 5:41 PM, Alan wrote:
<snip>
...which is completely ignorant.
Not at all ignorant...
nospam wrote:
iphone growing by 63% while samsung dropped and the market itself
contracted is quite a feat.
If people cared about functionality, Apple would go out of business.
The iPhone is not designed so much as it's marketed to stupid people.
Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> wrote:
nospam wrote:
iphone growing by 63% while samsung dropped and the market itself
contracted is quite a feat.
If people cared about functionality, Apple would go out of business.
The iPhone is not designed so much as it's marketed to stupid people.
Repeating your opinion does not make it true. 🙄
There are probably a hundred sources of Android
applications (but NOT the Google Play Store)
Why can't chinese people use the google play store in china?
And aren't all the google play store apps on the internet anyway?
The Play Store, as well as Gmail, are blocked in China. It's possible to
get around "The Great Firewall" (GFW) by the use of a VPN. See <https://www.vpndada.com/access-google-play-store-china/>.
The last two times I was in China I used a Hong Kong China Unicom
data-only SIM card which bypassed the GFW, but that was back in 2018 and 2019, by now this may no longer work. I also had a VPN that seemed to
work when using the hotel's Wi-Fi, but some hotels let foreign guests
access sites that are normally blocked.
If china blocked google because google wouldn't self censoring search
output as the article said, why is apple's play store available in china?
The article doesn't say what apple agreed to do that google wouldn't do.
If china blocked google because google wouldn't self censoring search
output as the article said, why is apple's play store available in china?
The article doesn't say what apple agreed to do that google wouldn't do.
See <https://www.nytimes.com/2021/05/17/technology/apple-china-censorship-data.html>.
But it can be behind a paywall depending on your browser and if you've exceeded the free article limit.
Why don't more people know about this betrayal of Apple's core principles?
I think that most people know about it but it's just not something that
they spend time worrying about, especially since so many other companies
have acceded to the same demands.
On Nov 18, 2022, sms wrote (in article
<news:tl8gje$301r6$1@dont-email.me>):
I think that most people know about it but it's just not something that
they spend time worrying about, especially since so many other companies
have acceded to the same demands.
Maybe "so many other companies" acceded privacy to China but not Google.
How can Apple advertise privacy over Google when it's Apple and not Google who acceded its customer's smartphone privacy to China's monetary demands?
On 16 Nov 2022 at 8:49:06 AM, <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote:
And the truth is also: there are lots and lots of people much dumber
than bread who choose to use Apple's devices.
Aren't iOS devices marketed exclusively to people who don't know much and
who then want Apple to make all their decisions for them to protect them?
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
| Uptime: | 165:46:13 |
| Calls: | 10,385 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,057 |
| Messages: | 6,416,528 |
