• Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innova

    From Marion@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jun 11 16:24:57 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating which isn't a bad thing - it just proves that Apple can't innovate.

    *Apple sherlocked these apps at WWDC 2025*
    <https://www.macrumors.com/2025/06/11/apple-sherlocked-these-apps-at-wwdc-2025/>

    MacRumors specifically talks about how Apple sherlocked several apps at
    WWDC 2025 by introducing new features in iOS 26 and macOS Tahoe that offer similar functionality to existing third-party solutions. Examples mentioned include enhanced Spotlight replacing features of Raycast and Launch Bar,
    Call Assist acting like Robokiller and Truecaller, and Notes app for Apple Watch replacing various third-party note-taking apps on the watch.

    I repeat that it's not necessarily a bad thing when Apple developers are
    forced to copy existing functionality because htey can't innovate, but it
    does provide more evidence that Apple long ago lost the ability to
    innovate.

    All Apple can do now to "innovate" is remove basic functionality so that
    the poor Apple customer is forced to figure out a way to buy it back.

    Oh, and Apple usually innovates a half dozen "exciting new emojis" too!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Marion on Wed Jun 11 10:00:36 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2025-06-11 09:24, Marion wrote:
    Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of innovating which isn't a bad thing - it just proves that Apple can't innovate.

    *Apple sherlocked these apps at WWDC 2025*
    <https://www.macrumors.com/2025/06/11/apple-sherlocked-these-apps-at-wwdc-2025/>

    MacRumors specifically talks about how Apple sherlocked several apps at
    WWDC 2025 by introducing new features in iOS 26 and macOS Tahoe that offer similar functionality to existing third-party solutions. Examples mentioned include enhanced Spotlight replacing features of Raycast and Launch Bar,
    Call Assist acting like Robokiller and Truecaller, and Notes app for Apple Watch replacing various third-party note-taking apps on the watch.

    I repeat that it's not necessarily a bad thing when Apple developers are forced to copy existing functionality because htey can't innovate, but it does provide more evidence that Apple long ago lost the ability to
    innovate.

    All Apple can do now to "innovate" is remove basic functionality so that
    the poor Apple customer is forced to figure out a way to buy it back.

    Oh, and Apple usually innovates a half dozen "exciting new emojis" too!

    Subsuming functionality that exists in third party apps isn't
    necessarily "sherlocking" them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Wed Jun 11 15:48:32 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2025-06-11 15:46, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 6/11/2025 1:00 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2025-06-11 09:24, Marion wrote:
    Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of
    innovating
    which isn't a bad thing - it just proves that Apple can't innovate.

      *Apple sherlocked these apps at WWDC 2025*
      <https://www.macrumors.com/2025/06/11/apple-sherlocked-these-apps-
    at-wwdc-2025/>

    MacRumors specifically talks about how Apple sherlocked several apps at
    WWDC 2025 by introducing new features in iOS 26 and macOS Tahoe that
    offer
    similar functionality to existing third-party solutions. Examples
    mentioned
    include enhanced Spotlight replacing features of Raycast and Launch Bar, >>> Call Assist acting like Robokiller and Truecaller, and Notes app for
    Apple
    Watch replacing various third-party note-taking apps on the watch.

    I repeat that it's not necessarily a bad thing when Apple developers are >>> forced to copy existing functionality because htey can't innovate,
    but it
    does provide more evidence that Apple long ago lost the ability to
    innovate.

    All Apple can do now to "innovate" is remove basic functionality so that >>> the poor Apple customer is forced to figure out a way to buy it back.

    Oh, and Apple usually innovates a half dozen "exciting new emojis" too!

    Subsuming functionality that exists in third party apps isn't
    necessarily "sherlocking" them.

    Alan, Apple has been taking ideas from other companies, improving them,
    and making noise about their "innovation" for decades. Of course, same
    is true of Google!

    I never said that they hadn't, asshole.

    Learn to read.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Thu Jun 12 14:25:43 2025
    XPost: comp.sys.mac.advocacy, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2025-06-11 22:46:24 +0000, Tom Elam said:
    On 6/11/2025 1:00 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2025-06-11 09:24, Marion wrote:
    Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of
    innovating which isn't a bad thing - it just proves that Apple can't
    innovate.

      *Apple sherlocked these apps at WWDC 2025*
      <https://www.macrumors.com/2025/06/11/apple-sherlocked-these-apps-
    at-wwdc-2025/>

    MacRumors specifically talks about how Apple sherlocked several apps at
    WWDC 2025 by introducing new features in iOS 26 and macOS Tahoe that offer >>> similar functionality to existing third-party solutions. Examples
    mentioned include enhanced Spotlight replacing features of Raycast and
    Launch Bar, Call Assist acting like Robokiller and Truecaller, and
    Notes app for Apple Watch replacing various third-party note-taking
    apps on the watch.

    I repeat that it's not necessarily a bad thing when Apple developers are >>> forced to copy existing functionality because htey can't innovate, but it >>> does provide more evidence that Apple long ago lost the ability to
    innovate.

    All Apple can do now to "innovate" is remove basic functionality so that >>> the poor Apple customer is forced to figure out a way to buy it back.

    Oh, and Apple usually innovates a half dozen "exciting new emojis" too!

    Subsuming functionality that exists in third party apps isn't
    necessarily "sherlocking" them.

    Alan, Apple has been taking ideas from other companies, improving them,
    and making noise about their "innovation" for decades. Of course, same
    is true of Google!

    Bill Gates / Microsoft didn't even write DOS either. They bought it
    from a real developer named Tim Patterson.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Tom Elam on Fri Jun 13 17:36:02 2025
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2025-06-13 17:21, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 6/11/2025 6:48 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2025-06-11 15:46, Tom Elam wrote:
    On 6/11/2025 1:00 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2025-06-11 09:24, Marion wrote:
    Yet again - Apple sherlocks functionality - copying - instead of
    innovating
    which isn't a bad thing - it just proves that Apple can't innovate.

      *Apple sherlocked these apps at WWDC 2025*
      <https://www.macrumors.com/2025/06/11/apple-sherlocked-these-
    apps- at-wwdc-2025/>

    MacRumors specifically talks about how Apple sherlocked several
    apps at
    WWDC 2025 by introducing new features in iOS 26 and macOS Tahoe
    that offer
    similar functionality to existing third-party solutions. Examples
    mentioned
    include enhanced Spotlight replacing features of Raycast and Launch
    Bar,
    Call Assist acting like Robokiller and Truecaller, and Notes app
    for Apple
    Watch replacing various third-party note-taking apps on the watch.

    I repeat that it's not necessarily a bad thing when Apple
    developers are
    forced to copy existing functionality because htey can't innovate,
    but it
    does provide more evidence that Apple long ago lost the ability to
    innovate.

    All Apple can do now to "innovate" is remove basic functionality so
    that
    the poor Apple customer is forced to figure out a way to buy it back. >>>>>
    Oh, and Apple usually innovates a half dozen "exciting new emojis"
    too!

    Subsuming functionality that exists in third party apps isn't
    necessarily "sherlocking" them.

    Alan, Apple has been taking ideas from other companies, improving
    them, and making noise about their "innovation" for decades. Of
    course, same is true of Google!

    I never said that they hadn't, asshole.

    Learn to read.

    You have denied that Apple copies others since the went to larger phones since, well, Apple introduced a plus-size phone. At the time you stated
    Apple was just "following consumer trends" when larger Android phones
    had been out for years?

    Quote any such, asshole.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)