• Additions to the iOS/Android Features Document

    From sms@21:1/5 to All on Wed May 15 17:10:24 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Quite a few updates to the document recently.

    iOS Features
    ------------
    54i eSIM Transfer Between iPhones ✓
    55i Convert physical SIM to eSIM ✓
    56i Satellite SOS on iPhone 14 and 15 models. ✓


    Android Features
    ----------------
    226a. Ability to disable the use of cell towers, Bluetooth, and Wi-Fi
    when determining location. ✓
    227a. Change the “Wake” Word for Google Assistant ✓
    228a. Migrating Apps to a New Device ✓
    229a. Ability to Generate a List of All Apps on Device ✓
    230a. Data Measurement, Data Warnings, and Data Stops ✓
    231a. PDANet Support for Hotspot on Plans with No Hotspot ✓
    232a. MMS (Photos & Group Text) Support on AT&T MVNOs ✓


    ✓ 56 iOS & iPhone Features Which [many] Android Users Wish they Had &
    ✓ 232 Android & Android Phone Features Which [many] iOS Users Wish they
    Had ✓

    <https://tinyurl.com/iOS-Android-Features>
    ✓ 123 Pages of Extensively Referenced Information with Hundreds of
    Citations ✓

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jan K.@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 16 04:03:40 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    W Wed, 15 May 2024 17:10:24 -0700, sms napisal:

    Quite a few updates to the document recently.

    iOS Features
    ------------
    54i eSIM Transfer Between iPhones
    55i Convert physical SIM to eSIM
    56i Satellite SOS on iPhone 14 and 15 models.

    Android Features
    ----------------
    226a. Ability to disable the use of cell towers, Bluetooth, and Wi-Fi
    when determining location.
    227a. Change the "Wake" Word for Google Assistant
    228a. Migrating Apps to a New Device
    229a. Ability to Generate a List of All Apps on Device
    230a. Data Measurement, Data Warnings, and Data Stops
    231a. PDANet Support for Hotspot on Plans with No Hotspot
    232a. MMS (Photos & Group Text) Support on AT&T MVNOs

    56 iOS & iPhone Features Which [many] Android Users Wish they Had &
    232 Android & Android Phone Features Which [many] iOS Users Wish they
    Had

    <https://tinyurl.com/iOS-Android-Features>
    123 Pages of Extensively Referenced Information with Hundreds of
    Citations

    That's a well researched list of differences between the platforms.

    The ability to list the apps to a file is useful because most of the APK organizers ask you if you want to create a URL out of that list, so you can send it to other people (or use it yourself) by just clicking on the Google Play Store links to each app on your system.

    It's very convenient & efficient for archiving your apps and for migration.

    Migrating the apps is a big feature of Android, as the original APK is
    stored on the device for every app installed, even default system apps.

    This is useful when the app is no longer on the Google Play Store (which happens) or if the version you like is no longer on the Google Play Store (which happens even more often). You'll never lose your app APK this way.

    Unfortunately, iOS can't do any of that, and it's all automated on Android.

    So you always have the original APK and it always works on another phone.
    The only problem is the APK for every app is named "base.apk" but the app extractors take care of the renaming base.apk to the original app names.

    The app extractors copy & rename that APK which you can then use on any
    Android phone. With iOS, the IPA isn't saved on the device so you have to manually save it using iTunes and even then it won't work on any phone.

    You can also migrate the exact placement of each folder and app icons (shortcuts) with Android, such as how Nova will save your entire homescreen
    to a file which can be read into any other phone for the exact placement.

    If the app isn't yet installed, there are no worries. the launcher takes
    care of that by graying out the icon which when you tap on it, it goes and
    gets the correct app off the Google Play Store (or whatever store you want
    to get it from).

    On the new phone, you don't do anything but load the homescreen saved file
    & tap on the grayed out icons, and soon, you've duplicated the phone setup.

    In addition, for organizing, if you want, Android can have any app shortcut
    in multiple locations on your homescreen, which can't be done on iOS. You
    can also hide the app shortuct if you want, and you can rename any app shortcut, which also can't be done on iOS (for example, you can rename
    system apps that have similar names such as phone to samsungphone or
    whatever you want). None of that organization is possible with iOS.

    You can also lock the screen location of all folders and app icons.
    I don't know if iOS can do that though.

    Some people don't like docks, where with Android launchers, you can remove
    the dock, but with iOS, you have to have a dock even if nothing is in it.

    I didn't check if all of that is in your document. Is it?
    If you need to ask questions, let me know as I've done everything above.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Your Name@21:1/5 to Jan K. on Thu May 16 14:25:56 2024
    On 2024-05-16 02:03:40 +0000, Jan K. said:

    W Wed, 15 May 2024 17:10:24 -0700, sms napisal:

    Quite a few updates to the document recently.

    iOS Features
    ------------
    54i eSIM Transfer Between iPhones 55i Convert physical SIM to eSIM
    56i Satellite SOS on iPhone 14 and 15 models.
    Android Features
    ----------------
    226a. Ability to disable the use of cell towers, Bluetooth, and Wi-Fi
    when determining location. 227a. Change the "Wake" Word for Google
    Assistant 228a. Migrating Apps to a New Device 229a. Ability to
    Generate a List of All Apps on Device 230a. Data Measurement, Data
    Warnings, and Data Stops 231a. PDANet Support for Hotspot on Plans
    with No Hotspot 232a. MMS (Photos & Group Text) Support on AT&T MVNOs
    56 iOS & iPhone Features Which [many] Android Users Wish they Had &
    232 Android & Android Phone Features Which [many] iOS Users Wish they Had
    <https://tinyurl.com/iOS-Android-Features>
    123 Pages of Extensively Referenced Information with Hundreds of Citations

    That's a well researched list of differences between the platforms.

    The ability to list the apps to a file is useful because most of the APK organizers ask you if you want to create a URL out of that list, so you can send it to other people (or use it yourself) by just clicking on the Google Play Store links to each app on your system.
    It's very convenient & efficient for archiving your apps and for migration.

    Migrating the apps is a big feature of Android, as the original APK is
    stored on the device for every app installed, even default system apps.

    This is useful when the app is no longer on the Google Play Store (which happens) or if the version you like is no longer on the Google Play Store (which happens even more often). You'll never lose your app APK this way.

    Unfortunately, iOS can't do any of that, and it's all automated on Android.

    So you always have the original APK and it always works on another phone.
    The only problem is the APK for every app is named "base.apk" but the app extractors take care of the renaming base.apk to the original app names.

    The app extractors copy & rename that APK which you can then use on any Android phone. With iOS, the IPA isn't saved on the device so you have to manually save it using iTunes and even then it won't work on any phone.

    You can also migrate the exact placement of each folder and app icons (shortcuts) with Android, such as how Nova will save your entire homescreen to a file which can be read into any other phone for the exact placement.

    If the app isn't yet installed, there are no worries. the launcher takes
    care of that by graying out the icon which when you tap on it, it goes and gets the correct app off the Google Play Store (or whatever store you want
    to get it from).
    On the new phone, you don't do anything but load the homescreen saved file
    & tap on the grayed out icons, and soon, you've duplicated the phone setup.

    In addition, for organizing, if you want, Android can have any app shortcut in multiple locations on your homescreen, which can't be done on iOS. You
    can also hide the app shortuct if you want, and you can rename any app shortcut, which also can't be done on iOS (for example, you can rename
    system apps that have similar names such as phone to samsungphone or
    whatever you want). None of that organization is possible with iOS.

    You can also lock the screen location of all folders and app icons.
    I don't know if iOS can do that though.

    Some people don't like docks, where with Android launchers, you can remove the dock, but with iOS, you have to have a dock even if nothing is in it.

    I didn't check if all of that is in your document. Is it?
    If you need to ask questions, let me know as I've done everything above.

    [iPhone newsgroup creosspost removed]

    If you want to use an iPhone, use an iPhone.
    If you want to use an Android phone, use an Android phone.

    If a personal choice.

    Idiot trolls continually whining on about what the iPhone *supposedly*
    can't do are not wanted in the iPhone newsgroup. Take your pointless
    crap elsewhere.

    Another moronic troll joins the killfile. :-\

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@21:1/5 to Jan K. on Thu May 16 09:49:37 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 16.05.24 04:03, Jan K. wrote:
    W Wed, 15 May 2024 17:10:24 -0700, sms napisal:

    Quite a few updates to the document recently.

    iOS Features
    ------------
    54i eSIM Transfer Between iPhones
    55i Convert physical SIM to eSIM
    56i Satellite SOS on iPhone 14 and 15 models.

    Android Features
    ----------------
    226a. Ability to disable the use of cell towers, Bluetooth, and Wi-Fi
    when determining location.
    227a. Change the "Wake" Word for Google Assistant
    228a. Migrating Apps to a New Device
    229a. Ability to Generate a List of All Apps on Device
    230a. Data Measurement, Data Warnings, and Data Stops
    231a. PDANet Support for Hotspot on Plans with No Hotspot
    232a. MMS (Photos & Group Text) Support on AT&T MVNOs

    56 iOS & iPhone Features Which [many] Android Users Wish they Had &
    232 Android & Android Phone Features Which [many] iOS Users Wish they
    Had

    <https://tinyurl.com/iOS-Android-Features>
    123 Pages of Extensively Referenced Information with Hundreds of
    Citations

    That's a well researched list of differences between the platforms.

    That's skewed bullshit by a sociopath.
    Kindergarten crap like almost everything in the two groups addressed.

    --
    "Alea iacta est." (Julius Caesar)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Thu May 16 13:28:00 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    badgolferman wrote on Thu, 16 May 2024 10:28:32 -0000 (UTC) :

    I wonder if nospam has gone missing because he's busy writing 123 pages
    of refutations for your document...

    I've read Steve's document in the past and the reason all the uneducated ignorant Apple religious zealots hated it was it was almost all true.

    The only thing is Steve doesn't know Android all that well, but he uses
    both daily (as do I) so he reasonably well versed in what iOS should be
    able to do (because all operating systems other than iOS easily do them).

    It's no longer shocking that thousands upon thousands of very simple things that every other OS easily does - are completely impossible on iOS - all of which nospam would have said in his ignorant way, as you very well know...

    "Nobody (using Apple products) needs functionality"
    "Nobody (using Apple products) wants functionality"
    --
    nospam's contract to defend Apple to the death apparently wasn't renewed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Thu May 16 19:29:27 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    badgolferman wrote on Thu, 16 May 2024 15:32:59 -0000 (UTC) :

    "Nobody (using Apple products) needs functionality"
    "Nobody (using Apple products) wants functionality"

    To be fair, nospam would say "it's not needed" or "no one wants it".

    Yes. I knew you knew that. But when nospam said something was "not needed
    and not wanted", it's always something that all the other platforms have.

    Except Apple.

    nospam's contract to defend Apple to the death apparently wasn't
    renewed.

    Considering nospam's Shift keys were broken and he worked overtime to
    defend Apple

    You may be right as nospam was also using an old iPhone, as I recall.

    He did repeatedly claim to be an app developer but I doubted that since he didn't know the simplest things that even I knew, and I never claimed to be
    a developer (because I'm not). I just dabbled in writing Android code.

    maybe he was asking for more than Apple felt was worth
    defending their name.

    While nospam's denial of facts about Apple were numerous, the one value he brought to the group was he did understand the radio technology rather
    well.

    I miss that information from him, as he knew some of it even better than I
    did (as did Steve, who is also an EE), which is a welcome occurrence on
    this Apple newsgroup to be able to learn something from the people posting.

    Steve's document is hated by zealots because it's actually mostly correct.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordinator@21:1/5 to sms on Thu May 16 20:22:13 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 16/05/2024 01:10, sms wrote:
    Quite a few updates to the document recently.

    iOS Features
    ------------
    54i eSIM Transfer Between iPhones ✓
    55i Convert physical SIM to eSIM ✓
    56i Satellite SOS on iPhone 14 and 15 models. ✓


    Android Features
    ----------------
    226a. Ability to disable the use of cell towers, Bluetooth, and Wi-Fi
    when determining location. ✓
    227a. Change the “Wake” Word for Google Assistant ✓
    228a. Migrating Apps to a New Device ✓
    229a. Ability to Generate a List of All Apps on Device ✓
    230a. Data Measurement, Data Warnings, and Data Stops ✓
    231a. PDANet Support for Hotspot on Plans with No Hotspot ✓
    232a. MMS (Photos & Group Text) Support on AT&T MVNOs ✓


    ✓ 56 iOS & iPhone Features Which [many] Android Users Wish they Had &
    ✓ 232 Android & Android Phone Features Which [many] iOS Users Wish they Had  ✓

    <https://tinyurl.com/iOS-Android-Features>
    ✓ 123 Pages of Extensively Referenced Information with Hundreds of Citations ✓

    I'm gonna point out some issues with your document:

    4i. Battery replacement ✓

    Apple devices **do not** have user-replaceable batteries. In fact, the
    iPhone was the first phone to ditch the feature. Most Android phones
    don't either, so I guess it's fair, in a twisted and stupid way. Even
    better, iPhones have led the way for making less repairable phones, so
    stop talking nonsense.

    9i. No bloatware ✓

    I beg to differ. What is Apple Podcasts doing? Apple Wallet? Apple
    Music? Stocks? Apple TV? Tips? Watch? I could go on and on: https://www.makeuseof.com/every-pre-installed-app-iphone/

    10i. Privacy ✓

    This is incorrect. The Apple TOS specifically states that location data
    can be collected and shared by Apple:

    To provide location-based services on Apple products, Apple and our partners and licensees, such as maps data providers, may collect, use, and share precise location data, including the real-time geographic location of your Apple computer or device.

    11i. Support and help from Apple Stores ✓

    As if Android doesn't have that. Most smartphone brands do the same
    thing (Samsung, Google, etc.). Also, have you *ever* been to the
    "Genius" Bar? They're useless. The most they can do is tell you to
    reboot your iPhone or reset your stupid iCloud.

    17i. eSIM¹ ✓
    eSIM is NOT a feature. It introduces the ability for the carrier to not
    allow you to switch, meaning you're locked into their services. This is
    because the carrier is responsible for switching you away, and guess
    what, carriers *hate* losing customers to their competitors.

    20i. Face Recognition ✓

    Biometric security is inherently flawed. If it gets stolen, you cannot
    change it, unlike a password. A dead corpse can still be read with Face
    ID or fingerprint ID.

    22i. Apple Credit Card with 3% discount and 0% financing on purchases direct from Apple ✓

    Why not encourage credit card debt, which is at an all-time high (here's
    a clue, it's in the _trillions_)?

    23i. Native hearing aid support ✓

    I wear hearing aids, and I don't _need_ this feature, because it does
    *nothing* Bluetooth Audio cannot.

    30i Speakerphone on by default ✓

    So you can annoy people on the bus/train/street?

    35i. Automatic sorting of AAC audio files based on type of usage ✓

    AAC sucks. I say that as someone with a lot of knowledge on digital
    audio (for the record, I can spectrally analyse an audio file to
    determine if it was encoded correctly).

    37i. MagSafe ✓

    Magnetic wireless charging isn't a big deal. Wireless charging isn't a
    big deal. It's inefficient, wasteful, and damages the battery by
    producing more heat.

    38i. Dynamic Island ✓
    Gimmick.

    39i. Crash Detection ✓

    False positives lead to useless 999/911/112 calls that cost taxpayer
    money and hold up the phone line for someone having a *real* emergency.

    40i. Physical Silent Mode Switch ✓

    Physical volume buttons exist.

    41i. Old iPhone models remain in production for several years ✓

    So do Androids. Moot point.

    42i. Battery health indication and battery optimization ✓

    Didn't iPhones not display percentages until last year? Also smartphones
    have optimised and displayed battery health since their inception. It's
    not an iPhone exclusive. My Samsung Galaxy S8 from 2017 can do it.

    43i. Ability to check the production date ✓

    That's just so that Apple can fuck you over by breaking your device two
    days after the warranty period ends.

    44i. Region restricted app stores ✓

    Because that's a benefit and not DRM.

    45i. AirTags ✓

    Tile existed for a decade before AirTags did.

    46i. Bluetooth Audio Sharing ✓

    Many Android phones also allow multiple audio sources. A lot of devices
    aimed towards hard-of-hearing users allow for Bluetooth and also wired connectivity simultaneously.

    47i. Shutdown Protection ✓

    This needs jailbreaking. In other words, a rooted Android phone can do
    it too. You even admitted that you're referring to a feature that _does
    not exist_ on vanilla iOS.

    48i. Realistic Replica Devices ✓

    Yes, because I want a knock-off phone. If a design is easy to copy, it's
    a bad design. End of.

    49i. iPhones Can Improve Your Love Life ✓

    If someone likes you more because of a green bubble, they're not the
    kind of person to be around.

    50i. iPhone acts as an AirTag when turned off ✓

    Modern Androids also do this.

    51i. Seamless Updates ✓
    Literally who cares. Updates download in the background, and install
    with a reboot in less than 5 minutes. Again, NOBODY CARES.

    52i. Less Fragmentation ✓

    Fragmentation --> Competition

    53i. Place and receive phone calls on Mac or iPad ✓

    Why would you want to take calls on a laptop? Also, the Windows Phone
    Link, and also KDE Connect can do that, I am quite sure.

    55i Convert physical SIM to eSIM ✓

    Convert a SIM with freedom to a SIM with DRM, why not.

    56i Satellite SOS on iPhone 14 and 15 models. ✓

    Android has had this for _years_. You could press power a certain number
    of times, and a preconfigured list of ICE contacts would get a text with
    your location, and (optionally) a five-second voice clip.

    To conclude, your list sucks.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Gordinator on Thu May 16 20:12:41 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Gordinator wrote on Thu, 16 May 2024 20:22:13 +0100 :

    4i. Battery replacement

    Apple devices **do not** have user-replaceable batteries. In fact, the
    iPhone was the first phone to ditch the feature. Most Android phones
    don't either, so I guess it's fair, in a twisted and stupid way. Even
    better, iPhones have led the way for making less repairable phones, so
    stop talking nonsense.

    This was posted in this newsgroup a while ago (cut and pasted) which
    showed Android still has superior functionality hardware over the iPhone
    but the replaceable battery is still in very few Androids unfortunately).

    Of the total of 2,548 Android models offered for sale from 2019 to today...
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?nYearMin=2019&sAvailabilities=1,2&sOSes=2>

    For the AUX jack, 1,907 (75%) of current Android models meet this standard.
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?nYearMin=2019&chk35mm=selected&sAvailabilities=1,2&sOSes=2>

    As for FM Radio, 1,257 Androids (50%) have the FM radio emergency feature.
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?nYearMin=2019&chkFMradio=selected&sAvailabilities=1,2&sOSes=2>

    Where 1,163 (46%) have both the emergency FM radio & the standard AUX jack.
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?nYearMin=2019&chk35mm=selected&chkFMradio=selected&sAvailabilities=1,2&sOSes=2>

    Let's look at the 1,801 (71%) with the all-important portable-memory slot.
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?nYearMin=2019&sAvailabilities=1,2&sOSes=2&idCardslot=1>

    But only 112 with a removable battery, which is less than 5% unfortunately.
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3?nYearMin=2019&sAvailabilities=1,2&sOSes=2&idBatRemovable=1>

    Compare those choices Android users have to those of the poor Apple user.
    AUX <https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3?nYearMin=2019&chk35mm=selected&sAvailabilities=1,2&sOSes=3>
    FM <https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3?nYearMin=2019&chkFMradio=selected&sAvailabilities=1,2&sOSes=3>
    SD <https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3?nYearMin=2019&chkFMradio=selected&sAvailabilities=1,2&sOSes=3&idCardslot=1>

    In summary, the choices for Android are:
    a. 75% AUX
    b. 50% FM Radio
    c. 71% SD SLOT

    That's a _lot_ of choices (especially compared to Apple choices):
    a. 0% AUX
    b. 0% FM Radio
    c. 0% SD SLOT

    The lack of basic hardware functionality on iPhones is yet another reason
    why anyone claiming to "compare" the two platforms, has to ignore
    everything that makes a phone useful - as the iPhone lacks basic hardware.

    9i. No bloatware

    I beg to differ. What is Apple Podcasts doing? Apple Wallet? Apple
    Music? Stocks? Apple TV? Tips? Watch? I could go on and on: https://www.makeuseof.com/every-pre-installed-app-iphone/

    As you said, Apple adds bloatware, it's just Apple bloatware,
    and not carrier bloatware.

    What's worse about Apple bloatware is most of it is unremovable.
    By stark contrast EVERY APP is removable on Android (non root).

    Many people don't realize what I just said is true on Android.
    Every app can be removed from the user partition without being root.
    <https://www.xda-developers.com/uninstall-carrier-oem-bloatware-without-root-access/>

    So it's actually Android that, if you're smart, has zero bloatware.
    Meanwhile even if you're smart, you can't remove most Apple bloatware.

    10i. Privacy

    This is incorrect. The Apple TOS specifically states that location data
    can be collected and shared by Apple:

    Apple doesn't have privacy. As with Ashley Madison, they advertise
    they have privacy. But it doesn't exist for a number of reasons.

    Remember when they were listening to your actual conversations
    in Ireland? They still do that. There is no privacy on iPhones.

    In addition, Apple won't allow the privacy of the Tor Browser.
    <https://support.torproject.org/tormobile/tormobile-3/>
    "Can I run Tor Browser on an iOS device? Apple requires all
    browsers on iOS to use something called Webkit,
    which prevents any iOS browser from having the same privacy
    protections as Tor Browser."

    Another of which is Apple inserts a unique tracking ID into
    every app - which no other operating system but Apple does.

    In addition, Apple requires you to log into the Apple mainframes
    for most of the functionality (e.g., the App Store) which Google
    doesn't require (you can download apps off the Google Play Store
    without creating an account on the phone for example).

    There are very many ways Apple devices don't have privacy.
    And there are many ways that Android does.

    For the author to re-spout Apple's marketing bullshit is wrong.
    Privacy isn't possible on an iPhone.




    To provide location-based services on Apple products, Apple
    and our partners and licensees, such as maps data providers,
    may collect, use, and share precise location data, including
    the real-time geographic location of your Apple computer or device.

    11i. Support and help from Apple Stores

    As if Android doesn't have that. Most smartphone brands do the same
    thing (Samsung, Google, etc.). Also, have you *ever* been to the
    "Genius" Bar? They're useless. The most they can do is tell you to
    reboot your iPhone or reset your stupid iCloud.

    I can vouch for the fact that the Genius Bar people are useless.

    I went to them asking them to test why the iPad had far worse
    radio reception than Android and they didn't even know what a
    decibel was.

    All they did was use an UV light on the water detection strip
    (no water) and ensure that it had the latest operating system.

    That's all they can do.

    17i. eSIM
    eSIM is NOT a feature. It introduces the ability for the carrier to not
    allow you to switch, meaning you're locked into their services. This is because the carrier is responsible for switching you away, and guess
    what, carriers *hate* losing customers to their competitors.

    I don't know anything about eSIM so I'll let the two of you work it out.
    We benefit from that if Steve responds to your suggestions about his doc.

    But in general, Steve ignores most suggestions, so it's amazing that
    his document is as good as it is even as he doesn't take much advice.

    Still... the Apple people can't refute a word he says about iOS.

    20i. Face Recognition

    Biometric security is inherently flawed. If it gets stolen, you cannot
    change it, unlike a password. A dead corpse can still be read with Face
    ID or fingerprint ID.

    Biometric security is a (brilliant) marketing gimmick.
    People feel) their face is unique and only about them (even twins).

    The real threat to a phone isn't that we all live in slums where
    people steal our phones out of our hands, so I don't even have
    a PIN on mine - but since Apple requires people to log into the
    Apple mainframes, people need to add these security locks as if
    all Apple iPhone owners live in the abject squalor of the slums.

    While Apple touts biometric gimmicks (remember, their users are ALWAYS
    logged into Apple mainframe servers!) the real security hole is exploits.

    And the iPhone has ten times the active exploits than any other phone!
    <https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog>

    22i. Apple Credit Card with 3% discount and 0% financing on
    purchases direct from Apple

    Why not encourage credit card debt, which is at an all-time high (here's
    a clue, it's in the _trillions_)?

    The author of that document buys everything on credit,
    and he engages in finding the best "rewards" credit cards.

    To be fair, Steve finds some good deals but he spends way more
    energy looking for those rewards dollars than any of us do.

    23i. Native hearing aid support

    I wear hearing aids, and I don't _need_ this feature, because it does *nothing* Bluetooth Audio cannot.

    I let you and Steve work that out as I know nothing about it.

    30i Speakerphone on by default

    So you can annoy people on the bus/train/street?

    Android has an app for that but it never worked for me.
    <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.hanan.android.ramkol>

    What I want is when I dial a number, the speaker is automatically
    on and I can turn it off - but Android doesn't work that way.

    So he's actually right. Although the app may work for others,
    and then he'd be wrong, which is why Android does more than iOS.

    a. Developers create most functionality people want
    b. Apple severely limits what functionality developers can provide
    c. Google can't (or won't stop it)

    35i. Automatic sorting of AAC audio files based on type of usage

    AAC sucks. I say that as someone with a lot of knowledge on digital
    audio (for the record, I can spectrally analyse an audio file to
    determine if it was encoded correctly).

    Again, I leave that to you and Steve to flesh out as all I care
    is that I can utilize the codec on any platform for portability.

    37i. MagSafe

    Magnetic wireless charging isn't a big deal. Wireless charging isn't a
    big deal. It's inefficient, wasteful, and damages the battery by
    producing more heat.

    What the author of that document doesn't know is that the iPhone
    has puny batteries compared to Android phones where that's why
    I've often said if someone is charging every night, they're on an iPhone (because Android phones can typically go a few days between charges).


    38i. Dynamic Island
    Gimmick.

    Agree.

    39i. Crash Detection

    False positives lead to useless 999/911/112 calls that cost taxpayer
    money and hold up the phone line for someone having a *real* emergency.

    Apple sells mostly to people who are scared.

    40i. Physical Silent Mode Switch

    Physical volume buttons exist.

    Agree. Android can assign actions to the buttons.

    41i. Old iPhone models remain in production for several years

    So do Androids. Moot point.

    Agree. I don't know what he's talking about on this one.

    42i. Battery health indication and battery optimization

    Didn't iPhones not display percentages until last year? Also smartphones
    have optimised and displayed battery health since their inception. It's
    not an iPhone exclusive. My Samsung Galaxy S8 from 2017 can do it.

    Android has battery health monitors also.
    <com.darshancomputing.BatteryIndicatorPro> Battery Bot Pro (free)
    <com.gsamlabs.bbm> GSam Battery Monitor (free)
    <com.darshancomputing.BatteryIndicator> Battery Bot (free)
    <com.asksven.betterbatterystats> BBS Better Battery Stats (free)
    <net.sf.andbatdog.batterydog> Android Battery Dog (free)

    43i. Ability to check the production date

    That's just so that Apple can fuck you over by breaking your device two
    days after the warranty period ends.

    WTF? Android can't check the production date?
    I googled and found many articles on finding the manufacturing date.

    This one covers both Android and iOS. https://www.androidauthority.com/check-phone-manufacturer-date-907445/

    So he's wrong on production date.
    Both can do it.

    But on Android, every manufacturer does it differently.
    However, that's the same for Apple only it's the only manufacturer.

    The simplest correction for the author of that document is that
    they both do it the same in that you have to know the code.

    So I agree with you that the author is wrong on this one too.

    44i. Region restricted app stores

    Because that's a benefit and not DRM.

    Having restrictions is a disadvantage in my book.


    45i. AirTags

    Tile existed for a decade before AirTags did.

    And both Apple and Google recently signed a joint agreement
    so that mutual software will find them.

    46i. Bluetooth Audio Sharing

    Many Android phones also allow multiple audio sources. A lot of devices
    aimed towards hard-of-hearing users allow for Bluetooth and also wired connectivity simultaneously.

    I'll leave that up to you and the author as I rarely use bluetooth.

    47i. Shutdown Protection

    This needs jailbreaking. In other words, a rooted Android phone can do
    it too. You even admitted that you're referring to a feature that _does
    not exist_ on vanilla iOS.

    He should omit functionality that requires jailbreaking or rooting
    since most people don't do it and the OEMs actively prevent it.

    48i. Realistic Replica Devices

    Yes, because I want a knock-off phone. If a design is easy to copy, it's
    a bad design. End of.

    I don't even understand this one. A phone is a commodity.
    They all do the same things, even as iOS does fewer of them.

    49i. iPhones Can Improve Your Love Life

    If someone likes you more because of a green bubble, they're not the
    kind of person to be around.

    Agreed. The iPhone sells to gullible people who are herd animals.

    50i. iPhone acts as an AirTag when turned off

    Modern Androids also do this.

    My Android can check for airtags but I didnt' check how it does it
    when the power is turned off - but I don't care about airtags.

    51i. Seamless Updates
    Literally who cares. Updates download in the background, and install
    with a reboot in less than 5 minutes. Again, NOBODY CARES.

    This is actually false. Android A/B updates are completely seamless.
    As is Project Mainline completely seamless.

    Project MainLine (since renamed a few times) for asynchronous updates: https://www.androidcentral.com/android-12-features-we-love-android-runtime-now-part-project-mainline
    https://www.xda-developers.com/android-project-mainline-modules-explanation/ https://www.hexnode.com/blogs/android-project-mainline-everything-you-need-to-know/


    52i. Less Fragmentation

    Fragmentation --> Competition

    Agreed. Fragmentation is good because it keeps the prices down and
    it keeps the functionality up.

    Even so, Samsung has the lion's share of Android anyway,
    which negates the fragmentation issue.

    53i. Place and receive phone calls on Mac or iPad

    Why would you want to take calls on a laptop? Also, the Windows Phone
    Link, and also KDE Connect can do that, I am quite sure.

    The author of that doc is dead wrong on this item.

    You can do that with Android too - so the author is ignorant
    of the fact all you need is to log into the Internet (which
    the iPhone always does and which Android has no problem doing).
    <https://home.pulsesms.app/overview/>

    Notice this is why I say the author doesn't know Android well.

    55i Convert physical SIM to eSIM

    Convert a SIM with freedom to a SIM with DRM, why not.

    I leave that one up to the two of you to hash out.


    56i Satellite SOS on iPhone 14 and 15 models.

    Android has had this for _years_. You could press power a certain number
    of times, and a preconfigured list of ICE contacts would get a text with
    your location, and (optionally) a five-second voice clip.

    I have a bunch of emergency SOS apps on my Android but none are satellite.

    SOS ALert (press homescreen button to send SOS message & GPS to 5 contacts) https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.main.contacts.smsmanager

    To conclude, your list sucks.

    Mostly the author is right so the list doesn't suck, but the author
    doesn't seem to take input from people like you and me so it's only
    as good as what he knows about the devices.

    Mostly the author suffers from reading too many Apple advertisements
    (e.g., he thinks the iPhone is more private and it's just not).

    And the author suffers from not knowing that Android can do everything
    the iPhone can do because if it's useful, developers have written it
    (an example is texting from any device has been on Android for years).

    Mostly what the author needs to do is CORRECT his otherwise decent
    document so that the things you explained to him will be improved.

    But he won't do that, unfortunately.

    The doc is decent - but it's ONLY his opinion because he doesn't
    fix things when people explain that he's wrong. Too bad for all of us.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordinator@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 16 21:57:45 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    which is one of the reasons I say that Steve's document is pretty good

    How so? It's really imbalanced and clearly biased towards iOS, and misrepresents certain arguments, is out-of-date in many places, and
    cites features that have been in Android for longer than iOS as things
    Android users "wish they'd have".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Thu May 16 20:17:01 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    badgolferman wrote on Thu, 16 May 2024 20:10:00 -0000 (UTC) :

    Why would you want to take calls on a laptop? Also, the Windows Phone
    Link, and also KDE Connect can do that, I am quite sure.

    When you're sitting in bed or on the couch with your iPad and the phone rings, you don't have to go find your phone to answer it. It will ring
    and you can answer it right in bed. My mother and wife who can never
    find their phones or have them in their purses use this feature all the
    time.

    Android does the same things if you're willing to create an account as all
    it needs is the Internet to do this - it has nothing to do with Apple.

    The only reason Apple has it by default is you've created an account by default, and you're always logged into that account, by default.

    But Android has had this for years - which is one of the reasons I say that Steve's document is pretty good - but Steve doesn't know Android well.

    Unfortunately, Steve will never fix his document, which is one thing nospam said that is true as I've emailed Steve in the past this information.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Gordinator on Thu May 16 21:17:49 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Gordinator wrote on Thu, 16 May 2024 21:57:45 +0100 :

    which is one of the reasons I say that Steve's document is pretty good

    How so? It's really imbalanced and clearly biased towards iOS, and misrepresents certain arguments, is out-of-date in many places, and
    cites features that have been in Android for longer than iOS as things Android users "wish they'd have".

    I don't disagree with anything you've said... however... I will remark that
    the Apple religious zealots say that Steve's doc is biased against Apple.

    Most people don't realize the number of things that iOS just can't do.
    Nor do they realize tghat for almost everything on Android, there's an app.

    The author isn't good at finding apps, as he doesn't even know about this:
    <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=scadica.aq>

    BTW, that's ANOTHER thing iOS doesn't have which is a good appsearch
    utility that filters on the scores of things users want to filter on.

    I think it's a good document because it _tries_ to outline what the
    functional differences are (which are many) especially given Apple spends probably many millions to make people think Apple does things it doesn't.

    The biggest failing, as I see it, are two fold, one on each platform:
    a. On the Apple side, it touts what turns out to be Apple marketing crap
    b. On the Android side, it ignores that Android can do almost everything

    I think both are based on the author's ignorance but he's actually a user
    of both platforms daily (as am I) so he does know more than most people do.

    The author knows more than I do on some things (like bluetooth and eSIMs
    and codecs) as do you - so as a team of people - we could make it better.

    I just wish the author would listen to what you and I said to improve it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordinator@21:1/5 to Andrew on Thu May 16 22:25:59 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 16/05/2024 22:17, Andrew wrote:
    Gordinator wrote on Thu, 16 May 2024 21:57:45 +0100 :

    which is one of the reasons I say that Steve's document is pretty good

    How so? It's really imbalanced and clearly biased towards iOS, and
    misrepresents certain arguments, is out-of-date in many places, and
    cites features that have been in Android for longer than iOS as things
    Android users "wish they'd have".

    I don't disagree with anything you've said... however... I will remark that the Apple religious zealots say that Steve's doc is biased against Apple.

    Most people don't realize the number of things that iOS just can't do.
    Nor do they realize tghat for almost everything on Android, there's an app.

    The author isn't good at finding apps, as he doesn't even know about this:
    <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=scadica.aq>

    BTW, that's ANOTHER thing iOS doesn't have which is a good appsearch
    utility that filters on the scores of things users want to filter on.

    I think it's a good document because it _tries_ to outline what the functional differences are (which are many) especially given Apple spends probably many millions to make people think Apple does things it doesn't.

    The biggest failing, as I see it, are two fold, one on each platform:
    a. On the Apple side, it touts what turns out to be Apple marketing crap
    b. On the Android side, it ignores that Android can do almost everything

    I think both are based on the author's ignorance but he's actually a user
    of both platforms daily (as am I) so he does know more than most people do.

    The author knows more than I do on some things (like bluetooth and eSIMs
    and codecs) as do you - so as a team of people - we could make it better.

    I just wish the author would listen to what you and I said to improve it.

    You put it very succinctly. Steve, fix your document.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Gordinator@21:1/5 to All on Thu May 16 22:24:41 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Hello.

    Thanks for taking the time to respond! I really appreciate it, and it
    makes me less regretful for spending money for Usenet access :)


    In summary, the choices for Android are:
    a. 75% AUX
    b. 50% FM Radio
    c. 71% SD SLOT

    That's pretty good stats, especially since FM radio is a fairly niche
    feature, and phones have been ditching all three for well over a decade now.


    As you said, Apple adds bloatware, it's just Apple bloatware,
    and not carrier bloatware.

    Don't get me started on carrier bloatware. It's why I buy phones
    unlocked. It's why I install a custom OS on my phone, so I don't have
    the entire Office suite taking up space on my phone (please, Samsung, I
    don't need Play Store AND Galaxy Store!)

    What's worse about Apple bloatware is most of it is unremovable.

    Well, to be fair, things like the Calculator and App Store are removable
    (for some reason).

    Every app can be removed from the user partition without being root.

    That's cool - I've been using rooted Android on and off since 2017 and I
    didn't know that!

    Apple doesn't have privacy. As with Ashley Madison, they advertise
    they have privacy. But it doesn't exist for a number of reasons.

    Just looking at what Ashley Madison makes you give them to sign up
    eliminates the possibility of privacy.

    In addition, Apple won't allow the privacy of the Tor Browser.

    Apple is scared of freedom-giving web browsers. Oh, the irony of it!


    Another of which is Apple inserts a unique tracking ID into
    every app - which no other operating system but Apple does.

    So much for App Tracking Transparency.

    I can vouch for the fact that the Genius Bar people are useless.

    I went to them asking them to test why the iPad had far worse
    radio reception than Android and they didn't even know what a
    decibel was.

    All they did was use an UV light on the water detection strip
    (no water) and ensure that it had the latest operating system.

    That's all they can do.


    Wait, you asked them about radio reception, and they checked for water
    damage? And they didn't know what a decibel was? I know nothing about
    radio and I know what a decibel is, come on!


    I don't know anything about eSIM so I'll let the two of you work it out.
    We benefit from that if Steve responds to your suggestions about his doc.

    I doubt Steve will do that.


    Biometric security is a (brilliant) marketing gimmick.
    People feel) their face is unique and only about them (even twins).

    As far as marketing gimmicks, saying "you can unlock your phone with
    your face" is borderline genius in its success at converting new iPhone
    users and creating new iPhone salespeople in the form of Android haters.


    The real threat to a phone isn't that we all live in slums where
    people steal our phones out of our hands, so I don't even have
    a PIN on mine - but since Apple requires people to log into the
    Apple mainframes, people need to add these security locks as if
    all Apple iPhone owners live in the abject squalor of the slums.

    It's a little reductive to assume that most people don't worry about
    getting their phone stolen. I mean, have you ever used the subway system
    of a major city (London's Tube, etc.)? Pickpockets are RUTHLESS there.


    And the iPhone has ten times the active exploits than any other phone!

    To be fair, it has a lot of eyes on the OS due to its popularity. It's
    the same reason why the majority of desktop malware targets Windows.
    It's not to say that no-one else is targeted, and it says nothing about
    which is 'more secure' over Windows/Linux. Although I personally prefer
    Linux ;)


    The author of that document buys everything on credit,
    and he engages in finding the best "rewards" credit cards.

    To be fair, Steve finds some good deals but he spends way more
    energy looking for those rewards dollars than any of us do.

    Credit cards are a tool that can be used properly, provided you know
    how. Using credit for literally everything is a bad idea. Then again,
    I'm not the Money Police.


    What the author of that document doesn't know is that the iPhone
    has puny batteries compared to Android phones where that's why
    I've often said if someone is charging every night, they're on an iPhone (because Android phones can typically go a few days between charges).


    They can, until they get as old as mine, at which point I need to set
    the low battery threshold to 50% to remind me to conserve the battery
    and use less cycles. It did the trick, that's for sure!


    39i. Crash Detection

    False positives lead to useless 999/911/112 calls that cost taxpayer
    money and hold up the phone line for someone having a *real* emergency.

    Apple sells mostly to people who are scared.


    You forgot to mention people who want a "just works" experience, but to
    be fair Android provides that AND the ability to tinker if your heart
    desires.

    40i. Physical Silent Mode Switch

    Physical volume buttons exist.

    Agree. Android can assign actions to the buttons.

    On my S8, my old Bixby button switches between apps, it's great.


    44i. Region restricted app stores

    Because that's a benefit and not DRM.

    Having restrictions is a disadvantage in my book.



    Which is why I default to finding apps from F-Droid instead of Google
    Play (and even then I use Aurora Store as a frontend for it). F-Droid is awesome!

    45i. AirTags

    Tile existed for a decade before AirTags did.

    And both Apple and Google recently signed a joint agreement
    so that mutual software will find them.


    That's actually cool. I like this. It also makes AirTag so much easier
    to reverse-engineer, since Android is mostly written in Java and its derivatives ;)


    48i. Realistic Replica Devices

    Yes, because I want a knock-off phone. If a design is easy to copy, it's
    a bad design. End of.

    I don't even understand this one. A phone is a commodity.
    They all do the same things, even as iOS does fewer of them.


    For the most part, you're right. However, I generally don't like the
    idea of knock-off phones, since you're getting the worst of many worlds:

    1. You are paying for a phone from a sketchy manufacturer that might put
    actual malware on the phone, give you fake specs, etc.

    2. You are supporting the manufacture of counterfeit devices, which may
    be morally questionable to some.

    3. You are supporting companies that produce e-waste, which is bad for
    the planet and your wallet, since such e-waste will likely break sooner.



    49i. iPhones Can Improve Your Love Life

    If someone likes you more because of a green bubble, they're not the
    kind of person to be around.

    Agreed. The iPhone sells to gullible people who are herd animals.


    Thank you for not saying "sheeple".

    51i. Seamless Updates
    Literally who cares. Updates download in the background, and install
    with a reboot in less than 5 minutes. Again, NOBODY CARES.

    This is actually false. Android A/B updates are completely seamless.
    As is Project Mainline completely seamless.

    Project MainLine (since renamed a few times) for asynchronous updates: https://www.androidcentral.com/android-12-features-we-love-android-runtime-now-part-project-mainline
    https://www.xda-developers.com/android-project-mainline-modules-explanation/ https://www.hexnode.com/blogs/android-project-mainline-everything-you-need-to-know/


    The ability for my phone to update in a way that minimises risk is
    always welcome.

    52i. Less Fragmentation

    Fragmentation --> Competition

    Agreed. Fragmentation is good because it keeps the prices down and
    it keeps the functionality up.

    Even so, Samsung has the lion's share of Android anyway,
    which negates the fragmentation issue.


    Shame the competition thing doesn't affect the cellphone carrier market.
    Also, yes, Samsung does own the lion's share, meaning they're basically
    a carbon copy of Apple in this regard (and others as well).


    Mostly the author suffers from reading too many Apple advertisements
    (e.g., he thinks the iPhone is more private and it's just not).

    This sort of marketing actually aggravates me, and I wonder why
    regulatory bodies don't look into it. You can't lie to sell a product.
    Even worse is the aforementioned App Tracking Transparency, which is
    just a way of Apple hogging your data for themselves.


    Mostly what the author needs to do is CORRECT his otherwise decent
    document so that the things you explained to him will be improved.

    But he won't do that, unfortunately.

    In that case, the doc doesn't matter much, if it's designed to be a
    useful form of reference.

    Anyway, thanks again for responding :)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Gordinator on Thu May 16 23:49:28 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Gordinator wrote on Thu, 16 May 2024 22:24:41 +0100 :

    Thanks for taking the time to respond! I really appreciate it, and it
    makes me less regretful for spending money for Usenet access :)

    I never spend money if I don't have to but it takes more work to
    find good apps that are free, especially since I disabled the ability
    to buy apps long ago on my phone.

    As a result, even some payware apps are legally free, such as the
    fantastic search engine that you don't get from Google or Apple.
    <https://skyica.com/appfinder/get>

    I even worked with that developer to test his app when it was
    in the alpha stage (pre beta releases) and he added many of my
    suggestions (unlike the author of that document on iOSvsAndroid).

    BTW, given I pay for nothing that I can get for free, I also get my
    Usenet for free - where I don't understand why people pay for Usenet.

    But I'm not saying it's bad - as if everyone were like I am, then
    everything would fall apart as nobody could make money off of us.
    :)



    In summary, the choices for Android are:
    a. 75% AUX
    b. 50% FM Radio
    c. 71% SD SLOT

    That's pretty good stats, especially since FM radio is a fairly niche feature, and phones have been ditching all three for well over a decade now.

    My Android phones are all free from T-Mobile and they all have the aux
    jack, the FM radio, and the all important portable-storage sd slot.

    Most iPhone users think the portable storage slot is only for extending the internal memory - but it's also portable storage - which they can't do.
    (Apple wants them to pay for the iCloud so they can save pictures & video.)

    Most Android Camera apps can be set to save directly to the sdcard, which reminds me, that's ANOTHER thing iOS can't do that is not in the doc.

    The iPhone can't change the default Camera app as far as I know, whereas Android can have as many camera apps as you want, where the Google GCam app takes great night photos and the open source Open Camera does lots of good things (too many to elucidate here but suffice to say iOS can't do them).
    <https://opencamera.org.uk/>
    <https://sourceforge.net/projects/opencamera/files/>
    <https://sourceforge.net/projects/opencamera/>
    <https://f-droid.org/en/packages/net.sourceforge.opencamera/>
    <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=net.sourceforge.opencamera>

    The lack of Camera apps on iOS with those features should be in the doc.

    As you said, Apple adds bloatware, it's just Apple bloatware,
    and not carrier bloatware.

    Don't get me started on carrier bloatware. It's why I buy phones
    unlocked. It's why I install a custom OS on my phone, so I don't have
    the entire Office suite taking up space on my phone (please, Samsung, I
    don't need Play Store AND Galaxy Store!)

    Buying phones "unlocked" usually means "network unlocked" where in the USA (where I am), my carrier will unlock even a locked phone automatically when
    you own the phone (they gave it to me for free but they owned it for two years). Then they automatically network unlocked it without me even asking.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/NMcttY2s/networkunlock01.jpg>

    But that network lock/unlock has nothing to do with bloatware removal.
    You can always remove bloatware if you use adb freeware on a PC to do it.
    <https://www.kaspersky.com/blog/how-to-disable-and-remove-android-bloatware/49960/>

    I repeat: All apps can be removed from the Android user space.
    (without being rooted)

    So if there is bloatware, you can just remove it.

    As an example, I've removed _both_ the Galaxy Store & Play Store from
    my phone, and then I use Aurora to get any app I want from the Google Play Store repository - without any Google or Samsung account on my phone.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Bnyr9fP1/account01.jpg>

    What's worse about Apple bloatware is most of it is unremovable.

    Well, to be fair, things like the Calculator and App Store are removable
    (for some reason).

    As I said _all_ apps are removable from the user space on Android.
    Without root. <https://www.google.com/search?q=adb+remove+bloatware>

    Every app can be removed from the user partition without being root.

    That's cool - I've been using rooted Android on and off since 2017 and I didn't know that!

    While I rooted my Samsung Galaxy S3 to get rid of Knox, unfortunately for
    me, my Android baseband version is unrootable (according to the XDA
    Developers' web site) so everything I do is as a normal user without any account set up on the phone.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/NG5pHyBx/aurora10.jpg>

    There is no bloatware since you can easily remove anything.

    See? That's the kind of stuff that the author of that document doesn't umnderstand, as he only believes what he sees in advertisements.

    And nobody in advertisements is gonna tell you that you can remove anything
    you want from an Android phone without needing to be rooted.

    Apple doesn't have privacy. As with Ashley Madison, they advertise
    they have privacy. But it doesn't exist for a number of reasons.

    Just looking at what Ashley Madison makes you give them to sign up
    eliminates the possibility of privacy.

    Yup. When the Ashley Madison hack of 30 million people hit the news a few
    years ago, it was said the company made you pay to scrub your data.

    They took the money - but they never scrubbed the data.
    They lied.

    That's why they lost a big lawsuit (as I recall).

    It's no different than Apple who lies all the time about having privacy.
    On iOS you can't even have the Tor browser privacy for God's sake.

    In addition, Apple won't allow the privacy of the Tor Browser.

    Apple is scared of freedom-giving web browsers. Oh, the irony of it!

    Not really. Apple simply requires WebKit for all browsers.

    Why? I don't know why. But WebKit has no privacy (according to the
    makers of the tor browser - which I gave you the link to as I tell
    the truth about all platforms).

    Very many of Apple's zero-day holes are in WebKit by the way,
    which is another thing Apple never touts in its advertisements.

    Another of which is Apple inserts a unique tracking ID into
    every app - which no other operating system but Apple does.

    So much for App Tracking Transparency.

    Most people are unaware that Google can't insert a tracking ID into
    downloaded apps and Apple always does.

    Also most people aren't aware a free Android app works on all phones, while
    a free iOS app does not - they only work on phones with your AppleID.

    (Or your family plan - but that's essentially just another AppleID.)

    I can vouch for the fact that the Genius Bar people are useless.

    I went to them asking them to test why the iPad had far worse
    radio reception than Android and they didn't even know what a
    decibel was.

    All they did was use an UV light on the water detection strip
    (no water) and ensure that it had the latest operating system.

    That's all they can do.

    Wait, you asked them about radio reception, and they checked for water damage? And they didn't know what a decibel was? I know nothing about
    radio and I know what a decibel is, come on!

    Android has many utilities for graphically displaying Wi-Fi and Cellular
    signal strength in realtime whereas iOS doesn't have a single one, which is something that is in the document that Steve has published for us to read.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Gtywwn8f/signal01.jpg>

    What I've noticed is the iPad sucks compared to Android for picking up
    Wi-Fi access points that the Android phone can easily see but iOS can't.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/4xgmTTgm/wifi01.jpg>

    When I brought it to the Genius Bar to debug, they knew absolutely nothing about how to test Wi-Fi signal strength.

    All they can do is check the phone to see if it's physically damaged.

    I don't know anything about eSIM so I'll let the two of you work it out.
    We benefit from that if Steve responds to your suggestions about his doc.

    I doubt Steve will do that.

    I hope the two of you work out the eSIM and other issues I know nothing
    about (bluetooth, credit cards, etc.) as nobody knows everything but
    together as a team we know almost everything about the iPhone & Android.

    Biometric security is a (brilliant) marketing gimmick.
    People feel) their face is unique and only about them (even twins).

    As far as marketing gimmicks, saying "you can unlock your phone with
    your face" is borderline genius in its success at converting new iPhone
    users and creating new iPhone salespeople in the form of Android haters.

    I agree that the biometric gimmick works on people who are herd animals,
    and specifically it works for people who are scared shitless of a phone.

    Most Apple users bought the device because Apple makes them feel safe.

    The real threat to a phone isn't that we all live in slums where
    people steal our phones out of our hands, so I don't even have
    a PIN on mine - but since Apple requires people to log into the
    Apple mainframes, people need to add these security locks as if
    all Apple iPhone owners live in the abject squalor of the slums.

    It's a little reductive to assume that most people don't worry about
    getting their phone stolen. I mean, have you ever used the subway system
    of a major city (London's Tube, etc.)? Pickpockets are RUTHLESS there.

    I understand what you're saying but what you're not saying is what happens
    when the phone is stolen? Nothing on my phone, right?

    What I mean by that is my phone has no login account.
    My phone can't buy anything (nor do I want it to).
    Nor can my phone automatically log into anything (like a bank).

    If I want to log into a bank, I can go to a web page and log into it.
    If I want to buy something, I can pull out my credit card even easier.

    What do I lose if someone steals my phone?
    The phone.
    Which I got for free from T-Mobile (well, I had to pay the imputed tax).

    Now, what you didn't say is most people do not have their phone set up like
    my phone, which means they do have ways to buy stuff and they do have ways
    to get private information. I do not. They do.

    So if someone steals my phone, they only get my free phone. Big deal.
    There's nothing private on it that they can do anything with.
    Not even my name is on it anywhere.

    They get nothing of value about me (I don't even have contacts on it).


    And the iPhone has ten times the active exploits than any other phone!

    To be fair, it has a lot of eyes on the OS due to its popularity. It's
    the same reason why the majority of desktop malware targets Windows.
    It's not to say that no-one else is targeted, and it says nothing about
    which is 'more secure' over Windows/Linux. Although I personally prefer
    Linux ;)

    If you look at Google Zero's report on how shitty Apple's QA is, you
    wouldn't say it's only due to the number of eyes on it, and if you looked
    at market share where Apple is something like 16% of the world's phone
    market you wouldn't say it'd due to eyes on it either.

    If you read the internal emails of Craig Federighi complaining about how
    shitty Apple QA is (which agrees with Google's assessment) you wouldn't say
    the holes in Apple's phones are due to the eyes on it.

    In fact, the fact Apple QA is well known to be atrocious is the fundamental reason (remember, Apple shipped the same bug twice in numerous releases!).

    They don't even test for stuff they already fixed and did again.
    That's just shitty QA.

    It doesn't help that Apple only recently (in iOS 16) started patching
    phones where until then, they had to build an entire release even if only a single line of code was changed.

    The author of that document buys everything on credit,
    and he engages in finding the best "rewards" credit cards.

    To be fair, Steve finds some good deals but he spends way more
    energy looking for those rewards dollars than any of us do.

    Credit cards are a tool that can be used properly, provided you know
    how. Using credit for literally everything is a bad idea. Then again,
    I'm not the Money Police.

    As I said, the author is big on rewards cards.
    All the power to him on that.

    Most of us don't spend the time he does to get a good deal on them.
    I've had the same Costco VISA for something like a few decades.

    What the author of that document doesn't know is that the iPhone
    has puny batteries compared to Android phones where that's why
    I've often said if someone is charging every night, they're on an iPhone
    (because Android phones can typically go a few days between charges).


    They can, until they get as old as mine, at which point I need to set
    the low battery threshold to 50% to remind me to conserve the battery
    and use less cycles. It did the trick, that's for sure!

    Well, my free Samsung Galaxy A32-5G lasts for days, and on the fast charger that came with the phone in the box, it charges back up in a couple of
    hours.

    I no longer charge nightly even though I got the phone sometime in 2020 or
    2021 as I recall - so it's not a new phone - and the 5 Amp Hour battery can jumpstart a car - it's so powerful. (Note: I'm joking about jumpstarting
    but I'm making the point that no Apple iPhone battery is anywhere close.)

    39i. Crash Detection

    False positives lead to useless 999/911/112 calls that cost taxpayer
    money and hold up the phone line for someone having a *real* emergency.

    Apple sells mostly to people who are scared.


    You forgot to mention people who want a "just works" experience, but to
    be fair Android provides that AND the ability to tinker if your heart desires.

    Android works fine in the "just works" category nowadays.
    The "just works" was simply a brilliant marketing gimmick.

    Try to set the volume control on an iPhone for various things and
    you'll see how the "just works" doesn't work at all.


    40i. Physical Silent Mode Switch

    Physical volume buttons exist.

    Agree. Android can assign actions to the buttons.

    On my S8, my old Bixby button switches between apps, it's great.

    I forget the app I use to assign the flashlight to the power button but
    when I doubleclick the power button, my flashlight goes on - which is a
    nice thing that I do not think iOS can do.

    If Steve is reading this - we might ask him if the ability to assign
    buttons to actions is possible on iOS as I've never tried to do that.

    I just looked on my phone and I think it was this app that did it.
    <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=flar2.homebutton>

    Like I said, Apple severely restricts what developers can add but Google
    can't so that's why you get everything you ever wanted with Android
    and not with iOS (because with iOS you only get what Apple wanted).

    44i. Region restricted app stores

    Because that's a benefit and not DRM.

    Having restrictions is a disadvantage in my book.


    Which is why I default to finding apps from F-Droid instead of Google
    Play (and even then I use Aurora Store as a frontend for it). F-Droid is awesome!

    It's good you use Aurora as I have had great experience with the current developer who is very understanding and who added some good features that I
    had asked for (my most recent request is an "x" at the right side of the
    search to wipe out the old search without you having to backspace it).

    He hasn't added that yet but he said he will do so when he can.

    I use F-Droid to get payware apps for free, such as the Simple Mobile Tools
    Pro apps and the OSMAnd+ payware apps - which are free on F-droid but not
    free on the Google Play Store.

    This is something that is impossible with iOS in the United States,
    and which may be possible in Europe soon but so far only 38 of something
    like fifty thousand apps are using the alternative store due to the way
    Apple is charging (according to the recent news, which was discussed here
    as it's a current court case that is in the legal system as we speak).

    45i. AirTags

    Tile existed for a decade before AirTags did.

    And both Apple and Google recently signed a joint agreement
    so that mutual software will find them.


    That's actually cool. I like this. It also makes AirTag so much easier
    to reverse-engineer, since Android is mostly written in Java and its derivatives ;)

    I don't use them but when I travel, I just use Android to find them.

    48i. Realistic Replica Devices

    Yes, because I want a knock-off phone. If a design is easy to copy, it's >>> a bad design. End of.

    I don't even understand this one. A phone is a commodity.
    They all do the same things, even as iOS does fewer of them.


    For the most part, you're right. However, I generally don't like the
    idea of knock-off phones, since you're getting the worst of many worlds:

    1. You are paying for a phone from a sketchy manufacturer that might put actual malware on the phone, give you fake specs, etc.

    2. You are supporting the manufacture of counterfeit devices, which may
    be morally questionable to some.

    3. You are supporting companies that produce e-waste, which is bad for
    the planet and your wallet, since such e-waste will likely break sooner.

    Oh. Now I get what he meant by "knock off" phones. You mean counterfeit?

    49i. iPhones Can Improve Your Love Life

    If someone likes you more because of a green bubble, they're not the
    kind of person to be around.

    Agreed. The iPhone sells to gullible people who are herd animals.


    Thank you for not saying "sheeple".

    Heh heh heh... I have called them iSheep but what I've noticed is they're
    herd animals. They don't think for themselves. They do what others tell
    them to do. So if some marketing person says you need to create an account
    for your todolist or food counter, they don't even think about it.

    They create the account. (which is then used to track their activities)
    I don't ever create an account for anything that doesn't need an account.

    I find a todolist (or whatever) that doesn't need to create an account.
    <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.secuso.privacyfriendlyfoodtracker>
    <https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=org.secuso.privacyfriendlytodolist>

    51i. Seamless Updates
    Literally who cares. Updates download in the background, and install
    with a reboot in less than 5 minutes. Again, NOBODY CARES.

    This is actually false. Android A/B updates are completely seamless.
    As is Project Mainline completely seamless.

    Project MainLine (since renamed a few times) for asynchronous updates:
    https://www.androidcentral.com/android-12-features-we-love-android-runtime-now-part-project-mainline
    https://www.xda-developers.com/android-project-mainline-modules-explanation/ >> https://www.hexnode.com/blogs/android-project-mainline-everything-you-need-to-know/


    The ability for my phone to update in a way that minimises risk is
    always welcome.

    Google updates EVERY Android 4.4+ phone monthly over the Internet.

    <https://www.androidheadlines.com/2022/01/google-monthly-changelog-play-system-updates.html>
    "Google System updates, meanwhile, are fully automated. Originally
    referred to as Project Mainline, these updates fix bugs discovered
    in various OS components like device connectivity, location services,
    media services, Emergency alerts, and others."

    That's yet ANOTHER HUGE THING that is missing from Steve's doc.
    As I said, he means well but he has no idea how Android actually updates.

    52i. Less Fragmentation

    Fragmentation --> Competition

    Agreed. Fragmentation is good because it keeps the prices down and
    it keeps the functionality up.

    Even so, Samsung has the lion's share of Android anyway,
    which negates the fragmentation issue.


    Shame the competition thing doesn't affect the cellphone carrier market.

    Well, in the USA, T-Mobile started a lot of good trends (such as no
    contracts) which forced the other two big carriers to follow suit.

    Also, yes, Samsung does own the lion's share, meaning they're basically
    a carbon copy of Apple in this regard (and others as well).

    Yup. No fragmentation if you always buy Samsung phones (or get them free
    like I do from T-Mobile who gave EVERYONE in the USA a free Android phone
    if they were postpaid customers and unlimited data if they had any data).


    Mostly the author suffers from reading too many Apple advertisements
    (e.g., he thinks the iPhone is more private and it's just not).

    This sort of marketing actually aggravates me, and I wonder why
    regulatory bodies don't look into it. You can't lie to sell a product.
    Even worse is the aforementioned App Tracking Transparency, which is
    just a way of Apple hogging your data for themselves.

    The reality of marketing is that they tout something like "safety" which
    has a thousand components, and if they have ONE component that they can say
    is better, then they say "it's safer!".

    Apple will never tell you in ads that the iPhone is the most exploited
    phone in history and Apple will never tell you in ads that they only fully support a single release - so most people think Apple supports more
    releases than everyone else and that it's safer.

    Apple's marketing is brilliant.
    But it works only on gullible herd animals.

    Mostly what the author needs to do is CORRECT his otherwise decent
    document so that the things you explained to him will be improved.

    But he won't do that, unfortunately.

    In that case, the doc doesn't matter much, if it's designed to be a
    useful form of reference.

    Anyway, thanks again for responding :)

    I hope Steve reads this information and makes the changes we stated
    so that his document, which is already pretty good, only gets better.

    Mostly he suffers from reading too much into Apple advertisements,
    and he lacks the knowledge you and I have about Android (but to his
    credit he has some knowledge that I lack such as about eSims).

    Together we should be a pretty good team since nobody knows everything.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to Andrew on Fri May 17 19:34:44 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote:
    [...]
    My Android phones are all free from T-Mobile and they all have the aux
    jack, the FM radio, and the all important portable-storage sd slot.

    Most iPhone users think the portable storage slot is only for extending the internal memory - but it's also portable storage - which they can't do. (Apple wants them to pay for the iCloud so they can save pictures & video.)

    I know you like to tout the SD card 'slot' on Android phones, but IMO
    using them for *portable* storage, while possible, is not very
    convenient.

    Much too much fiddling to get the MicroSD card out of a miniscule
    'slot' or 'tray' (your Samsung Galaxy A53 probably has a 'tray' (my A51
    has)) and insert it in the miniscule 'slot' or 'tray' of the destination device.

    For portable storage, it's much easier to plug a (compatible)
    memory-stick into the USB or Lightning port. There are many such
    memory-sticks, most with dual plugs of different types (USB-A, USB-C, Micro-USB, Lightning). Yes, more expensive than a MicroSD card, but
    much, much more convenient.

    But I understand *why* you are touting the SD card slot on Android
    phones, because only Android phones have them, while the memory-stick
    approach also works on iDevices, so that ruins your troll! :-)

    [...]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Fri May 17 13:18:19 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-05-17 12:34, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote:
    [...]
    My Android phones are all free from T-Mobile and they all have the aux
    jack, the FM radio, and the all important portable-storage sd slot.

    Most iPhone users think the portable storage slot is only for extending the >> internal memory - but it's also portable storage - which they can't do.
    (Apple wants them to pay for the iCloud so they can save pictures & video.)

    I know you like to tout the SD card 'slot' on Android phones, but IMO using them for *portable* storage, while possible, is not very
    convenient.

    Much too much fiddling to get the MicroSD card out of a miniscule
    'slot' or 'tray' (your Samsung Galaxy A53 probably has a 'tray' (my A51
    has)) and insert it in the miniscule 'slot' or 'tray' of the destination device.

    For portable storage, it's much easier to plug a (compatible)
    memory-stick into the USB or Lightning port. There are many such memory-sticks, most with dual plugs of different types (USB-A, USB-C, Micro-USB, Lightning). Yes, more expensive than a MicroSD card, but
    much, much more convenient.

    But I understand *why* you are touting the SD card slot on Android
    phones, because only Android phones have them, while the memory-stick approach also works on iDevices, so that ruins your troll! :-)

    [...]

    Not to mention just directly transferring the data.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Fri May 17 20:54:50 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Frank Slootweg wrote on 17 May 2024 19:34:44 GMT :

    My Android phones are all free from T-Mobile and they all have the aux
    jack, the FM radio, and the all important portable-storage sd slot.

    Most iPhone users think the portable storage slot is only for extending the >> internal memory - but it's also portable storage - which they can't do.
    (Apple wants them to pay for the iCloud so they can save pictures & video.)

    I know you like to tout the SD card 'slot' on Android phones, but IMO
    using them for *portable* storage, while possible, is not very
    convenient.

    Thank you for understanding that I _love_ that more than half of all
    Android phones in use today still have the SD slot, the aux jack and the FM radio (if not the removable battery - which I loved just as much as those).

    Much too much fiddling to get the MicroSD card out of a miniscule
    'slot' or 'tray' (your Samsung Galaxy A53 probably has a 'tray' (my A51
    has)) and insert it in the miniscule 'slot' or 'tray' of the destination device.

    While that is true, what I do is use the PC to set the volume label of the
    sd card to "0000-0001" for _all_ my sdcards on _all_ my phones, which is
    genius when you realize what that simple act of reformatting allows us.

    Notice that EVERY sd card looks alike to Android, so I can pop my sd card
    out of my phone and pop it into another phone, and the apps all look at the same data (which makes migration to a new phone super easy, especially as I
    had to return my Samsung Galaxy A32-5G three times to T-Mobile under
    warranty because I was rough on the phone - and because I use adb on it).
    Do you see the genius in that, Frank>?
    1. I use my last known good version of Nova to save my homescreen
    2. I use Aurora to automatically save every app I ever installed
    3. And I keep everything of value that I can in a sub folder of the
    sd card in all cases, which is /storage/0000-0001/0001/{folders}.

    At some point I screwed up the USB-C port (by sleeping on the phone with
    the cord plugged in) and T-Mobile replaced it for free (waiving the $20
    store replacement procedure by crediting $20 to my bill).

    It was trivial to reload the phone exactly as it was prior, with all the
    exact apps and their exact versions and their exact locations. The only
    thing that had problems were some of the shortcuts, which I never did debug since it was easy enough to make shortcuts to activities inside apps.

    Then I used adb too aggressively (or, I don't know, something else) but the phone was bricked at one point, so T-Mobile checked it at the store, and by
    now it was a $25 warranty fee which T-Mobile also credited my bill for.

    This time everything came over perfectly and all the map data, for example,
    and pictures, and encrypted database, and the webdav servers, etc., worked
    just fine because the phone was using the sd card and all my sd cards are formatted with the volume label of "0000-0001" so they look alike to the
    phone and more importantly (since the phone doesn't care what the volume
    label is) they look exactly alike to the apps that use the sd card.

    For portable storage, it's much easier to plug a (compatible)
    memory-stick into the USB or Lightning port. There are many such memory-sticks, most with dual plugs of different types (USB-A, USB-C, Micro-USB, Lightning).

    I understand what you're saying but that's not necessarily portable
    storage, at least the way I'm using the word portable for sd cards.

    What I mean by portable sd card storage is I can crush my phone to bits,
    but as long as the sd card is intact, I can reload another phone with the
    same apps (using the nova backup/restore) and when I plug the sd card into
    that brand new Android phone, everythign works *exactly* as it did prior!
    Note: Everything stored on the sd card, which is as much as I can
    put on it given it's multiple times the default storage size.

    For example, all the map apps which have map data on the sd card in
    the /storage/0000-0001/0001/map/osmand/{data} location, still work.

    The camera still sees all the old photos. The webdav servers sill see the
    same WebDAVWWW root directory. The files apps see the same folders. etc.

    That's damn portable, don't you think?

    Yes, more expensive than a MicroSD card, but
    much, much more convenient.

    Heh heh heh... I can do that for free Frank, with my iPad.
    It's trivial to turn an iPad into a portable read/write memory stick.

    You just have to know how, which probably one in a million people know, but
    I wrote multiple tutorials on how to do that Frank. You just forgot.

    Please remember, I'm of at least average intelligence and I'm well
    educated, which means I find solutions that one out of million can.

    But I understand *why* you are touting the SD card slot on Android
    phones, because only Android phones have them, while the memory-stick approach also works on iDevices, so that ruins your troll! :-)

    No. You're wrong on that. Very wrong. You ascribe the wrong motive to me. That's because your motives aren't as honorable as mine are Frank.

    I will always say when the iPhone is better, Frank, if it's better.

    For example, in this thread alone I've said the iPhone is more private when using Google Voice than is Android - did I not? I simply tell the truth.

    What you don't remember is I wrote detailed tutorials to make the entire
    iPad into a read/write USB stick, Frank - which is a far better as it's
    free, and at the same time it doesn't destroy the utility of the iPad.

    Never forget that I am not stupid, Frank, and that I'm of at least average intelligence, and that I find solutions to almost all problems I face.

    Probably one out of a million people can do what I can do, Frank.

    You don't have to believe it - but I bet you don't know how to turn any
    iPad into a read/write USB stick either - so just take that on faith Frank.

    Better yet, I'll prove I can do what one out of a million know how to do.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/s2x0f9Js/files14.jpg> Simultaneous linux, win10 & iOS
    <https://i.postimg.cc/g269S8rT/files13.jpg> How does macOS work with iOS?
    <https://i.postimg.cc/pVJf72fN/files12.jpg> iOS hacks very often will fail
    <https://i.postimg.cc/cChf8mx1/files11.jpg> iOS requires hacks just to copy
    <https://i.postimg.cc/9MGdc2s7/files10.jpg> Android is 2-way fast over USB
    <https://i.postimg.cc/mDx3xkp4/files09.jpg> iOS only DCIM & only 1-way copy
    <https://i.postimg.cc/3xcCBngd/files08.jpg> iOS is just a dumb brick on Win
    <https://i.postimg.cc/KjK4nHwf/files07.jpg> Ubuntu is two-way, everything
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Jhmy9KH7/files06.jpg> Ubuntu uses iFuse for its magic
    <https://i.postimg.cc/qqg61Rh8/files05.jpg> Ubuntu, movies _to_ iOS on USB
    <https://i.postimg.cc/QMk7tvZW/files04.jpg> Ubuntu is two way, everything
    <https://i.postimg.cc/d3SGkdgr/files03.jpg> Android is two way, everything
    <https://i.postimg.cc/L8b18Zmx/files02.jpg> iOS "Files" does nothing useful
    <https://i.postimg.cc/NFkXsJ0X/files01.jpg> iOS/Win is 1-way & DCIM only

    In summary, I appreciate your help, where I aim to solve (or work around)
    any problem that I run into - but first I have to understand how it works.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrew on Fri May 17 13:55:42 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-05-17 13:54, Andrew wrote:
    Frank Slootweg wrote on 17 May 2024 19:34:44 GMT :

    My Android phones are all free from T-Mobile and they all have the aux
    jack, the FM radio, and the all important portable-storage sd slot.

    Most iPhone users think the portable storage slot is only for extending the >>> internal memory - but it's also portable storage - which they can't do.
    (Apple wants them to pay for the iCloud so they can save pictures & video.) >>
    I know you like to tout the SD card 'slot' on Android phones, but IMO
    using them for *portable* storage, while possible, is not very
    convenient.

    Thank you for understanding that I _love_ that more than half of all
    Android phones in use today still have the SD slot, the aux jack and the FM radio (if not the removable battery - which I loved just as much as those).

    Even if nobody is using them...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank Rogers@21:1/5 to Alan on Fri May 17 17:04:49 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Alan wrote:
    On 2024-05-17 13:54, Andrew wrote:
    Frank Slootweg wrote on 17 May 2024 19:34:44 GMT :

    My Android phones are all free from T-Mobile and they all have the aux >>>> jack, the FM radio, and the all important portable-storage sd slot.

    Most iPhone users think the portable storage slot is only for extending >>>> the
    internal memory - but it's also portable storage - which they can't do. >>>> (Apple wants them to pay for the iCloud so they can save pictures &
    video.)

    I know you like to tout the SD card 'slot' on Android phones, but IMO >>> using them for *portable* storage, while possible, is not very
    convenient.

    Thank you for understanding that I _love_ that more than half of all
    Android phones in use today still have the SD slot, the aux jack and the FM >> radio (if not the removable battery - which I loved just as much as those).

    Even if nobody is using them...

    Both phones suffer from the shitty and non-user replaceable batteries.
    Glued together. And the software that drops support after a few years.

    Both are shitty chinese disposable devices. Pure crap.

    Both are the result of pure greed.

    At least apple has a thriving cult.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Hank Rogers on Fri May 17 15:54:19 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-05-17 15:04, Hank Rogers wrote:
    Alan wrote:
    On 2024-05-17 13:54, Andrew wrote:
    Frank Slootweg wrote on 17 May 2024 19:34:44 GMT :

    My Android phones are all free from T-Mobile and they all have the aux >>>>> jack, the FM radio, and the all important portable-storage sd slot.

    Most iPhone users think the portable storage slot is only for
    extending the
    internal memory - but it's also portable storage - which they can't
    do.
    (Apple wants them to pay for the iCloud so they can save pictures &
    video.)

       I know you like to tout the SD card 'slot' on Android phones, but >>>> IMO
    using them for *portable* storage, while possible, is not very
    convenient.

    Thank you for understanding that I _love_ that more than half of all
    Android phones in use today still have the SD slot, the aux jack and
    the FM
    radio (if not the removable battery - which I loved just as much as
    those).

    Even if nobody is using them...

    Both phones suffer from the shitty and non-user replaceable batteries.
    Glued together. And the software that drops support after a few years.

    Whereby with iOS "a few years" means "almost always more than 5 years"...

    ...which is longer than most phones survive.


    Both are shitty chinese disposable devices. Pure crap.

    Both are the result of pure greed.

    At least apple has a thriving cult.

    <yawn>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Hank Rogers on Fri May 17 23:37:02 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-05-17, Hank Rogers <Hank@nospam.invalid> wrote:
    Alan wrote:
    On 2024-05-17 13:54, Andrew wrote:
    Frank Slootweg wrote on 17 May 2024 19:34:44 GMT :

    My Android phones are all free from T-Mobile and they all have the
    aux jack, the FM radio, and the all important portable-storage sd
    slot.

    Most iPhone users think the portable storage slot is only for
    extending the internal memory - but it's also portable storage -
    which they can't do. (Apple wants them to pay for the iCloud so
    they can save pictures & video.)

       I know you like to tout the SD card 'slot' on Android phones,
    but IMO using them for *portable* storage, while possible, is not
    very convenient.

    Thank you for understanding that I _love_ that more than half of all
    Android phones in use today still have the SD slot, the aux jack and
    the FM radio (if not the removable battery - which I loved just as
    much as those).

    Even if nobody is using them...

    Both phones suffer from the shitty and non-user replaceable batteries.

    I've replaced plenty of iPhone batteries. And for those who aren't
    skilled enough or don't have the required parts and tools, Apple will
    rent the tools needed to users along with detailed instructions and
    replacement batteries. So it's untrue to say they are not
    user-replaceable.

    Glued together. And the software that drops support after a few years.

    Devices can run indefinitely even after support expires, if well taken
    care of.

    Both are shitty chinese disposable devices. Pure crap.

    No.

    At least apple has a thriving cult.

    So claim the Android zealots.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Hank Rogers on Sat May 18 00:26:41 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    Hank Rogers wrote on Fri, 17 May 2024 17:04:49 -0500 :

    Even if nobody is using them...

    Both phones suffer from the shitty and non-user replaceable batteries.
    Glued together.

    This is true but at least 5% of Android models still have them.
    While 0% of Apple models ever had user-replaceable batteries.

    And the software that drops support after a few years.

    The full software support for Android is far better than iOS for a variety
    of reasons which the Apple zealots would never be able to comprehend.

    For example, apple zealots are completely ignorant that all Android phones
    (4.4 & above) are updated monthly completely seamlessly over the Internet.

    <https://www.androidheadlines.com/2022/01/google-monthly-changelog-play-system-updates.html>
    "Google System updates, meanwhile, are fully automated. Originally
    referred to as Project Mainline, these updates fix bugs discovered
    in various OS components like device connectivity, location services,
    media services, Emergency alerts, and others."

    Google & Samsung phones have 7 years of multi-update full support.
    *Samsung Extends Android and Security Updates to 7 Years*
    <https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/samsung-extends-android-and-security-updates-to-7-years/>
    "Samsung phones now come backed with seven years' worth of
    security updates and seven generations of OS upgrades."

    *Google just put Apple and Samsung on notice - 7 years of software updates*
    <https://www.tomsguide.com/opinion/google-pixel-8-software-updates>
    "That support covers everything, including full Android updates,
    the regular Pixel feature drops and security updates."

    Apple only fully supports one release and one release alone.
    <https://support.apple.com/guide/deployment/about-software-updates-depc4c80847a/>

    Which is partially why iPhones have more than 1-1/2 times known exploits!
    <https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog>

    The other part is by all accounts, Apple has the worst QA in the
    industry, which was easily proven by Google's Project Zero analysis.

    Both are shitty chinese disposable devices. Pure crap.

    This is mostly true, as they are 'shitty disposable devices', but some are built in India and others in South Korea... not sure about the rest.

    Both are the result of pure greed.

    The profit margins on Apple devices are extremely high (around 50%) so
    there's less greed (but only due to competition) in Android pricing.

    For example, my phone was free (I only had to pay the tax) and T-Mobile replaced it twice for free (it's my third one) because I broke it twice.

    At least apple has a thriving cult.

    I always wondered why Apple has that thriving cult, and I'm only slowly realizing the Apple users are herd animals who can't think on their own.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrew on Fri May 17 18:00:26 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-05-17 17:26, Andrew wrote:
    Hank Rogers wrote on Fri, 17 May 2024 17:04:49 -0500 :

    Even if nobody is using them...

    Both phones suffer from the shitty and non-user replaceable batteries.
    Glued together.

    This is true but at least 5% of Android models still have them.
    While 0% of Apple models ever had user-replaceable batteries.

    Which is irrelevant.


    And the software that drops support after a few years.

    The full software support for Android is far better than iOS for a variety
    of reasons which the Apple zealots would never be able to comprehend.

    No... ...it's really not.


    For example, apple zealots are completely ignorant that all Android phones (4.4 & above) are updated monthly completely seamlessly over the Internet.

    <https://www.androidheadlines.com/2022/01/google-monthly-changelog-play-system-updates.html>
    "Google System updates, meanwhile, are fully automated. Originally
    referred to as Project Mainline, these updates fix bugs discovered
    in various OS components like device connectivity, location services,
    media services, Emergency alerts, and others."

    Is that every single update?

    Don't you tout the wonder of being able to load software from anywhere?


    Google & Samsung phones have 7 years of multi-update full support.
    *Samsung Extends Android and Security Updates to 7 Years*
    <https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/samsung-extends-android-and-security-updates-to-7-years/>
    "Samsung phones now come backed with seven years' worth of
    security updates and seven generations of OS upgrades."

    That's only for their latest phones.

    Apple has mostly supported it's phones for longer than Samsung OR Google.


    *Google just put Apple and Samsung on notice - 7 years of software updates*
    <https://www.tomsguide.com/opinion/google-pixel-8-software-updates>
    "That support covers everything, including full Android updates,
    the regular Pixel feature drops and security updates."

    Apple only fully supports one release and one release alone.
    <https://support.apple.com/guide/deployment/about-software-updates-depc4c80847a/>

    But supports phones going by 5 or 6 years ON that release.


    Which is partially why iPhones have more than 1-1/2 times known exploits!
    <https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog>

    The other part is by all accounts, Apple has the worst QA in the
    industry, which was easily proven by Google's Project Zero analysis.

    No, actually.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sms@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Fri May 17 18:11:35 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 5/16/2024 3:28 AM, badgolferman wrote:
    sms wrote:


    <https://tinyurl.com/iOS-Android-Features>
    ✓ 123 Pages of Extensively Referenced Information with Hundreds of
    Citations ✓


    I wonder if nospam has gone missing because he's busy writing 123 pages
    of refutations for your document...

    I hope that nothing bad happened to him.

    I think that he gave up on refutations since nearly every item on the
    list has references and citations and he wasn't getting any traction
    with his one-word responses.

    --
    “If you are not an expert on a subject, then your opinions about it
    really do matter less than the opinions of experts. It's not
    indoctrination nor elitism. It's just that you don't know as much as
    they do about the subject.”—Tin Foil Awards

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sms@21:1/5 to badgolferman on Fri May 17 18:12:56 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 5/16/2024 8:32 AM, badgolferman wrote:

    <snip>

    Considering nospam's Shift keys were broken and he worked overtime to
    defend Apple, maybe he was asking for more than Apple felt was worth defending their name.

    You can be sure that these companies would be more than happy if people
    like nospam stopped trying to "help" them.


    --
    “If you are not an expert on a subject, then your opinions about it
    really do matter less than the opinions of experts. It's not
    indoctrination nor elitism. It's just that you don't know as much as
    they do about the subject.”—Tin Foil Awards

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sms@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Fri May 17 18:22:21 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 5/17/2024 12:34 PM, Frank Slootweg wrote:

    <snip>

    For portable storage, it's much easier to plug a (compatible)
    memory-stick into the USB or Lightning port. There are many such memory-sticks, most with dual plugs of different types (USB-A, USB-C, Micro-USB, Lightning). Yes, more expensive than a MicroSD card, but
    much, much more convenient.

    And then carry around a separate device?!

    If you like to store large quantities of photos, music or audiobooks or
    video content on your phone then the MicroSD card expansion is great.
    That said, none of the phones I currently use have a MicroSD card slot.

    You're pretty much limited to very low end phones if you want a MicroSD
    card slot and/or a headphone jack, with the exception of the Sony XPERIA
    phones (which can cost more than an iPhone Pro Max model).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 18 07:51:08 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    c21zIHdyb3RlOg0KDQo+IGlPUyBGZWF0dXJlcw0KPiAtLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0NCj4gNTZpIFNh dGVsbGl0ZSBTT1Mgb24gaVBob25lIDE0IGFuZCAxNSBtb2RlbHMuIOKckw0KDQpJIGJlbGll dmUgeW91IGNhbiBjaGFsayB0aGF0IHVwIGZvciBUZWFtIFJvYm90IGFzIHdlbGwsIHRob3Vn aCBwcm9iYWJseSANCm9uIGEgdmVyeSBuYXJyb3cgY29tYmluYXRpb24gb2YgcGhvbmVzIGFu ZCBwcm92aWRlcnMNCg0KPGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3LnJlZGRpdC5jb20vci90bW9iaWxlL2NvbW1l bnRzLzFjdDFubzEvc2F0ZWxsaXRlX21lc3NhZ2luZ19vcHRpb25fYXBwZWFyZWRfb25fbXlf cGl4ZWxfNy8+DQo=

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to sms on Sat May 18 12:59:41 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    sms wrote on Fri, 17 May 2024 18:22:21 -0700 :

    For portable storage, it's much easier to plug a (compatible)
    memory-stick into the USB or Lightning port. There are many such
    memory-sticks, most with dual plugs of different types (USB-A, USB-C,
    Micro-USB, Lightning). Yes, more expensive than a MicroSD card, but
    much, much more convenient.

    And then carry around a separate device?!

    If you like to store large quantities of photos, music or audiobooks or
    video content on your phone then the MicroSD card expansion is great.
    That said, none of the phones I currently use have a MicroSD card slot.

    Keep in mind that "portable" storage means different things, none of which
    an iPhone can do, but all of which an Android phone with an sd card can do.

    #1. Sure it means "expanding" the memory - but almost nobody does that
    (as it's too slow and limiting in a variety of ways we all know about).

    #2. And just as sure, it means "extending" the memory - but everyone knows
    that also - which is what most people do to store pictures & videos.

    #3. Also, just as surely, it means popping the card into another device
    (usually a PC) for the purpose of backing up or moving data.

    #4. But what very few people understand it also means you can swap the
    card out of your old phone into your new phone and EVERYTHING works!

    None of that can an iPhone do (which is one reason iPhones are severely limited, not only in lack of software functionality, but hardware too).

    You're pretty much limited to very low end phones if you want a MicroSD
    card slot and/or a headphone jack, with the exception of the Sony XPERIA phones (which can cost more than an iPhone Pro Max model).

    *The best Android phones with expandable memory*
    <https://www.androidauthority.com/best-android-phones-expandable-memory-696913/>

    Sony Xperia 1 V
    MSRP: $1,399.99

    Sony Xperia 10 V
    MSRP: 449.00 Euros

    Samsung Galaxy A55
    MSRP: $470.00

    Samsung Galaxy A35
    MSRP: $400.00

    Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024)
    MSRP: $299.99

    Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
    MSRP: $200.00

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrew on Sat May 18 10:29:15 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-05-18 05:59, Andrew wrote:
    sms wrote on Fri, 17 May 2024 18:22:21 -0700 :

    For portable storage, it's much easier to plug a (compatible)
    memory-stick into the USB or Lightning port. There are many such
    memory-sticks, most with dual plugs of different types (USB-A, USB-C,
    Micro-USB, Lightning). Yes, more expensive than a MicroSD card, but
    much, much more convenient.

    And then carry around a separate device?!

    If you like to store large quantities of photos, music or audiobooks or
    video content on your phone then the MicroSD card expansion is great.
    That said, none of the phones I currently use have a MicroSD card slot.

    Keep in mind that "portable" storage means different things, none of which
    an iPhone can do, but all of which an Android phone with an sd card can do.

    Keep in mind that that which follows is pretty much all bullshit...


    #1. Sure it means "expanding" the memory - but almost nobody does that
    (as it's too slow and limiting in a variety of ways we all know about).

    "almost nobody does that" would mean "almost nobody does" virtual memory...

    ...and both Android and iOS definitely DO employ virtual memory.



    #2. And just as sure, it means "extending" the memory - but everyone knows
    that also - which is what most people do to store pictures & videos.

    And now the doofus mixes his use of the term "memory".

    "memory" on a computing device has always been used to refer to "random
    access memory" which is volatile and where data is store when being
    access by the CPU to execute instructions.

    So MEMORY is NEVER used to "store pictures & videos": that is STORAGE.

    "Storage" is used to refer to the non-volatile medium used to store data
    long term.

    But more on the reference to '"extending" the memory' in a moment.


    #3. Also, just as surely, it means popping the card into another device
    (usually a PC) for the purpose of backing up or moving data.

    Hmmmmm...

    If you "extend" the "memory" (actually storage)...

    ...wouldn't that mean that only SOME of the data is on the removable
    storage?


    #4. But what very few people understand it also means you can swap the
    card out of your old phone into your new phone and EVERYTHING works!

    And wouldn't it also mean that "EVERYTHING" isn't ON the removable storage?


    None of that can an iPhone do (which is one reason iPhones are severely limited, not only in lack of software functionality, but hardware too).

    My iPhone backs itself up to the cloud, but if I preferred, I could have
    it back up to my computer.


    You're pretty much limited to very low end phones if you want a MicroSD
    card slot and/or a headphone jack, with the exception of the Sony XPERIA
    phones (which can cost more than an iPhone Pro Max model).

    *The best Android phones with expandable memory*

    Storage not memory.

    <https://www.androidauthority.com/best-android-phones-expandable-memory-696913/>

    Sony Xperia 1 V
    MSRP: $1,399.99

    So to transfer between devices as you suggest...

    ...you have to disable your phone twice (once to take it out, once to
    put it back in)...

    ...because:

    'microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)'


    Sony Xperia 10 V
    MSRP: 449.00 Euros

    Same.


    Samsung Galaxy A55
    MSRP: $470.00

    Same.


    Samsung Galaxy A35
    MSRP: $400.00


    Same.

    Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024)
    MSRP: $299.99

    At least this one has a dedicated slot...


    Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
    MSRP: $200.00

    ...but then we're back to a slot shared with the SIM!

    And having to temporarily deactivate the phone's most important
    functions just to transfer data seems...

    ...pretty impractical to me.

    And to put it in perspective, less than a quarter of the Android phones released in the last 3 years have separate card slots for storage.

    And only about 60% have any kind of storage card support at all.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Hank Rogers@21:1/5 to Alan on Sat May 18 17:07:33 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Alan wrote:
    On 2024-05-18 05:59, Andrew wrote:
    sms wrote on Fri, 17 May 2024 18:22:21 -0700 :

    For portable storage, it's much easier to plug a (compatible)
    memory-stick into the USB or Lightning port. There are many such
    memory-sticks, most with dual plugs of different types (USB-A, USB-C,
    Micro-USB, Lightning). Yes, more expensive than a MicroSD card, but
    much, much more convenient.

    And then carry around a separate device?!

    If you like to store large quantities of photos, music or audiobooks or
    video content on your phone then the MicroSD card expansion is great.
    That said, none of the phones I currently use have a MicroSD card slot.

    Keep in mind that "portable" storage means different things, none of which >> an iPhone can do, but all of which an Android phone with an sd card can do.

    Keep in mind that that which follows is pretty much all bullshit...


    #1. Sure it means "expanding" the memory - but almost nobody does that
    (as it's too slow and limiting in a variety of ways we all know about).

    "almost nobody does that" would mean "almost nobody does" virtual memory...

    ...and both Android and iOS definitely DO employ virtual memory.



    #2. And just as sure, it means "extending" the memory - but everyone knows >> that also - which is what most people do to store pictures & videos.

    And now the doofus mixes his use of the term "memory".

    "memory" on a computing device has always been used to refer to "random access memory" which is volatile and where data is store when being access
    by the CPU to execute instructions.

    So MEMORY is NEVER used to "store pictures & videos": that is STORAGE.

    "Storage" is used to refer to the non-volatile medium used to store data
    long term.

    But more on the reference to '"extending" the memory' in a moment.


    #3. Also, just as surely, it means popping the card into another device
    (usually a PC) for the purpose of backing up or moving data.

    Hmmmmm...

    If you "extend" the "memory" (actually storage)...

    ...wouldn't that mean that only SOME of the data is on the removable storage?


    #4. But what very few people understand it also means you can swap the
    card out of your old phone into your new phone and EVERYTHING works!

    And wouldn't it also mean that "EVERYTHING" isn't ON the removable storage?


    None of that can an iPhone do (which is one reason iPhones are severely
    limited, not only in lack of software functionality, but hardware too).

    My iPhone backs itself up to the cloud, but if I preferred, I could have it back up to my computer.


    You're pretty much limited to very low end phones if you want a MicroSD
    card slot and/or a headphone jack, with the exception of the Sony XPERIA >>> phones (which can cost more than an iPhone Pro Max model).

    *The best Android phones with expandable memory*

    Storage not memory.


    <https://www.androidauthority.com/best-android-phones-expandable-memory-696913/>


    Sony Xperia 1 V
    MSRP: $1,399.99

    So to transfer between devices as you suggest...

    ...you have to disable your phone twice (once to take it out, once to put
    it back in)...

    ...because:

    'microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)'


    Sony Xperia 10 V
    MSRP: 449.00 Euros

    Same.


    Samsung Galaxy A55
    MSRP: $470.00

    Same.


    Samsung Galaxy A35
    MSRP: $400.00


    Same.

    Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024)
    MSRP: $299.99

    At least this one has a dedicated slot...


    Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
    MSRP: $200.00

    ...but then we're back to a slot shared with the SIM!

    And having to temporarily deactivate the phone's most important functions just to transfer data seems...

    ...pretty impractical to me.

    And to put it in perspective, less than a quarter of the Android phones released in the last 3 years have separate card slots for storage.

    And only about 60% have any kind of storage card support at all.

    Did any early iphones ever support storage cards? I never had iphone till
    2021 (SE2020 model). Never had an android either.

    My iphone does have a really slow primitive lightning port that works with
    old usb2 flash drives. I had to buy the special apple gadget that allows
    using a flash drive or camera on the lightening port. No usb3 speed. Why
    the hell do they call something this slow "lightning"? It's also real
    clumsy with the files app, but it does actually work if you are persistent.
    Not really worth the effort.

    But the phone works really well. Reminds me of my first computer in 1982,
    an Ohio Scientific single board with 6502 microprocessor running at 1 Mhz.
    (no storage card either, just 300 baud cassette tape)

    I just use all apple garden supplied stuff. iCloud, apple account, app
    store, iTunes, etc. It's a hell of a lot easier that way. Too much work to
    try to use any other way. I have never done a "jailbreak", nor even peeked
    over the garden wall.

    I can say it works very well, but sometimes I feel like I am in the year
    1980 when I power on my trusty iphone. Still, it works, so I'm not whining,
    I just take it for what it is ... as reliable as any modern pocket "telephone".

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Hank Rogers on Sat May 18 15:39:27 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-05-18 15:07, Hank Rogers wrote:
    Alan wrote:
    On 2024-05-18 05:59, Andrew wrote:
    sms wrote on Fri, 17 May 2024 18:22:21 -0700 :

        For portable storage, it's much easier to plug a (compatible) >>>>> memory-stick into the USB or Lightning port. There are many such
    memory-sticks, most with dual plugs of different types (USB-A, USB-C, >>>>> Micro-USB, Lightning). Yes, more expensive than a MicroSD card, but
    much, much more convenient.

    And then carry around a separate device?!

    If you like to store large quantities of photos, music or audiobooks or >>>> video content on your phone then the MicroSD card expansion is great.
    That said, none of the phones I currently use have a MicroSD card slot. >>>
    Keep in mind that "portable" storage means different things, none of
    which
    an iPhone can do, but all of which an Android phone with an sd card
    can do.

    Keep in mind that that which follows is pretty much all bullshit...


    #1. Sure it means "expanding" the memory - but almost nobody does that
         (as it's too slow and limiting in a variety of ways we all know >>> about).

    "almost nobody does that" would mean "almost nobody does" virtual
    memory...

    ...and both Android and iOS definitely DO employ virtual memory.



    #2. And just as sure, it means "extending" the memory - but everyone
    knows
         that also - which is what most people do to store pictures &
    videos.

    And now the doofus mixes his use of the term "memory".

    "memory" on a computing device has always been used to refer to
    "random access memory" which is volatile and where data is store when
    being access by the CPU to execute instructions.

    So MEMORY is NEVER used to "store pictures & videos": that is STORAGE.

    "Storage" is used to refer to the non-volatile medium used to store
    data long term.

    But more on the reference to '"extending" the memory' in a moment.


    #3. Also, just as surely, it means popping the card into another device
         (usually a PC) for the purpose of backing up or moving data.

    Hmmmmm...

    If you "extend" the "memory" (actually storage)...

    ...wouldn't that mean that only SOME of the data is on the removable
    storage?


    #4. But what very few people understand it also means you can swap the
         card out of your old phone into your new phone and EVERYTHING
    works!

    And wouldn't it also mean that "EVERYTHING" isn't ON the removable
    storage?


    None of that can an iPhone do (which is one reason iPhones are severely
    limited, not only in lack of software functionality, but hardware too).

    My iPhone backs itself up to the cloud, but if I preferred, I could
    have it back up to my computer.


    You're pretty much limited to very low end phones if you want a MicroSD >>>> card slot and/or a headphone jack, with the exception of the Sony
    XPERIA
    phones (which can cost more than an iPhone Pro Max model).

      *The best Android phones with expandable memory*

    Storage not memory.

    <https://www.androidauthority.com/best-android-phones-expandable-memory-696913/>

    Sony Xperia 1 V
    MSRP: $1,399.99

    So to transfer between devices as you suggest...

    ...you have to disable your phone twice (once to take it out, once to
    put it back in)...

    ...because:

    'microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)'


    Sony Xperia 10 V
    MSRP: 449.00 Euros

    Same.


    Samsung Galaxy A55
    MSRP: $470.00

    Same.


    Samsung Galaxy A35
    MSRP: $400.00


    Same.

    Motorola Moto G Power 5G (2024)
    MSRP: $299.99

    At least this one has a dedicated slot...


    Samsung Galaxy A15 5G
    MSRP: $200.00

    ...but then we're back to a slot shared with the SIM!

    And having to temporarily deactivate the phone's most important
    functions just to transfer data seems...

    ...pretty impractical to me.

    And to put it in perspective, less than a quarter of the Android
    phones released in the last 3 years have separate card slots for storage.

    And only about 60% have any kind of storage card support at all.

    Did any early iphones ever support storage cards? I never had iphone
    till 2021 (SE2020 model). Never had an android either.

    Nope.


    My iphone does have a really slow primitive lightning port that works
    with old usb2 flash drives. I had to buy the special apple gadget that
    allows using a flash drive or camera on the lightening port. No usb3
    speed. Why the hell do they call something this slow "lightning"?  It's
    also real clumsy with the files app, but it does actually work if you
    are persistent. Not really worth the effort.

    A Lightning port introduced in 2012...

    ...and kept for compatibility with all accessories sold.

    And 480Mb/s is practically about 48MB/s (I divide by 10 to allow for overhead)...

    ...which is nearly 3GB/minute.


    But the phone works really well. Reminds me of my first computer in
    1982, an Ohio Scientific single board with 6502 microprocessor running
    at 1 Mhz. (no storage card either, just 300 baud cassette tape)

    Yup. It "works really well".

    Which is what keeps normal people (i.e. not Arlen) coming back.


    I just use all apple garden supplied stuff. iCloud, apple account, app
    store, iTunes, etc. It's a hell of a lot easier that way. Too much work
    to try to use any other way. I have never done a "jailbreak", nor even
    peeked over the garden wall.

    I can say it works very well, but sometimes I feel like I am in the year
    1980 when I power on my trusty iphone. Still, it works, so I'm not
    whining, I just take it for what it is ... as reliable as any modern
    pocket "telephone".

    And what model is it?

    You get that they make newer, faster ones, right?



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Frank Slootweg@21:1/5 to sms on Sun May 19 10:02:46 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
    On 5/17/2024 12:34 PM, Frank Slootweg wrote:

    <snip>

    For portable storage, it's much easier to plug a (compatible) memory-stick into the USB or Lightning port. There are many such memory-sticks, most with dual plugs of different types (USB-A, USB-C, Micro-USB, Lightning). Yes, more expensive than a MicroSD card, but
    much, much more convenient.

    And then carry around a separate device?!

    I interpreted 'Arlen''s "portable storage" as a sneaker-net mechanism, copying a bunch of files from device X to device Y, where X and Y can be
    any device which can handle MicroSD cards.

    (IM) For *that*, a memory-stick is much more conevenient than fiddling
    with tiny MicroSD cards and tiny 'slots'/'trays'.

    But meanwhile 'Arlen' has explained that he uses the MicroSD card to
    move a complete file system from and 'old' phone to a 'new' one. So he
    is not copying files, but moving a complete file system.

    That is a very specific use of the MicroSD card feature, not something
    I would have described with a general term like "portable storage".

    [...]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Sun May 19 10:00:45 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-05-19 03:02, Frank Slootweg wrote:
    sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:
    On 5/17/2024 12:34 PM, Frank Slootweg wrote:

    <snip>

    For portable storage, it's much easier to plug a (compatible)
    memory-stick into the USB or Lightning port. There are many such
    memory-sticks, most with dual plugs of different types (USB-A, USB-C,
    Micro-USB, Lightning). Yes, more expensive than a MicroSD card, but
    much, much more convenient.

    And then carry around a separate device?!

    I interpreted 'Arlen''s "portable storage" as a sneaker-net mechanism, copying a bunch of files from device X to device Y, where X and Y can be
    any device which can handle MicroSD cards.

    (IM) For *that*, a memory-stick is much more conevenient than fiddling with tiny MicroSD cards and tiny 'slots'/'trays'.

    Especially as so many phones are now using the same tray for the SIM...

    ...so you have to stop using the phone AS A PHONE...

    ...twice!


    But meanwhile 'Arlen' has explained that he uses the MicroSD card to
    move a complete file system from and 'old' phone to a 'new' one. So he
    is not copying files, but moving a complete file system.

    That is a very specific use of the MicroSD card feature, not something
    I would have described with a general term like "portable storage".

    [...]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Frank Slootweg on Sun May 19 18:56:43 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Frank Slootweg wrote on 19 May 2024 10:02:46 GMT :

    And then carry around a separate device?!

    I interpreted his "portable storage" as a sneaker-net mechanism,
    copying a bunch of files from device X to device Y, where X and Y can be
    any device which can handle MicroSD cards.

    (IM) For *that*, a memory-stick is much more conevenient than fiddling
    with tiny MicroSD cards and tiny 'slots'/'trays'.

    But meanwhile he has explained that he uses the MicroSD card to
    move a complete file system from and 'old' phone to a 'new' one. So he
    is not copying files, but moving a complete file system.

    That is a very specific use of the MicroSD card feature, not something
    I would have described with a general term like "portable storage".

    This is so basic that it's shocking that the Apple people don't know it.

    As I said, there are at multiple use models for using the sd card in a expandable/extensible & movable/portable sense.

    Most people, including myself, use the sd card to store data, APKs, map databases, encrypted files and media files.

    However... since I re-format all my sd cards to the same volume label, I
    also use the sd card to repopulate another phone when the need arises, and
    the beauty is that everything works instantly. I can even repopulate the
    _same_ phone with a larger card, if and when the need arises, simply by ensuring the volume label and the top-level /0001/{folders} tree
    remains consistent.

    The entire file system is portable!
    It's a brilliant use of sd cards, in fact.

    That a phone without sd is crippled compared to one with sd is so obvious
    that for there to be any disagreement only means the child-like Apple users
    are on the thread as it's all well-known fact what sd adds to the phone.

    Which is why many Android phones still have sd card slots, including mine.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Andrew on Sun May 19 19:02:53 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-05-19, Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote:
    Frank Slootweg wrote on 19 May 2024 10:02:46 GMT :

    And then carry around a separate device?!

    I interpreted his "portable storage" as a sneaker-net mechanism,
    copying a bunch of files from device X to device Y, where X and Y
    can be any device which can handle MicroSD cards.

    (IM) For *that*, a memory-stick is much more conevenient than
    fiddling with tiny MicroSD cards and tiny 'slots'/'trays'.

    But meanwhile he has explained that he uses the MicroSD card to
    move a complete file system from and 'old' phone to a 'new' one. So
    he is not copying files, but moving a complete file system.

    That is a very specific use of the MicroSD card feature, not
    something I would have described with a general term like "portable
    storage".

    This is so basic that it's shocking that the Apple people don't know
    it.

    Narrator: They know. They just don't care.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Sun May 19 19:29:29 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Jolly Roger wrote on 19 May 2024 19:27:23 GMT :

    SD cards are storage devices, nothing more. Everyone is aware they exist
    and how they work, Arlen. In fact, Macs have supported them for many,
    many years. Again, they know. They just don't care. And you're obsessed
    with them.

    Then you agree that a phone without sd can't do what a phone with sd can.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Sun May 19 19:18:37 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Jolly Roger wrote on 19 May 2024 19:02:53 GMT :

    This is so basic that it's shocking that the Apple people don't know
    it.

    Narrator: They know. They just don't care.

    I doubt the Apple users are aware of the enormous power of sd cards.
    SD is extensible/expandable and convenient movable/portable storage.

    I've never heard of a single Apple user on this group understand that.
    What those ignorant Apple users do is always what Apple tells them to do.

    Which is to constantly daily for the rest of their lives send all their
    private data to Cupertino's hackable servers which they're logged into
    24/7/365 over the traceable Internet - just to then claim even after losing
    all their privacy and paying for storage on the Internet every moment of
    their lives, that they still can't do anywhere near what sd does.

    Which makes profits for Apple (and all their data available to hackers).
    At the users' expense.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Andrew on Sun May 19 19:27:23 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-05-19, Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote:
    Jolly Roger wrote on 19 May 2024 19:02:53 GMT :

    This is so basic that it's shocking that the Apple people don't know
    it.

    Narrator: They know. They just don't care.

    I doubt the Apple users are aware of the enormous power of sd cards.

    SD cards are storage devices, nothing more. Everyone is aware they exist
    and how they work, Arlen. In fact, Macs have supported them for many,
    many years. Again, they know. They just don't care. And you're obsessed
    with them.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Andrew on Sun May 19 19:32:25 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-05-19, Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote:
    Jolly Roger wrote on 19 May 2024 19:27:23 GMT :

    SD cards are storage devices, nothing more. Everyone is aware they
    exist and how they work, Arlen. In fact, Macs have supported them for
    many, many years. Again, they know. They just don't care. And you're
    obsessed with them.

    Then you agree that a phone without sd can't do what a phone with sd
    can.

    A device with an SD card slot can store things on an SD card - something
    iPhone users couldn't care less about. The only reason you are obsessing
    about SD cards is because Apple chooses not to add SD card slots on
    iPhones. It's your weak attempt at trolling, as usual.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to Jolly Roger on Sun May 19 20:07:51 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Jolly Roger wrote on 19 May 2024 19:32:25 GMT :

    A device with an SD card slot can store things on an SD card - something iPhone users couldn't care less about. The only reason you are obsessing about SD cards is because Apple chooses not to add SD card slots on
    iPhones. It's your weak attempt at trolling, as usual.

    All my APKs (every app, every version) are automatically stored on my sd
    card at the time of installation, Jolly Roger, such that I can repopulate
    any other Android on the planet simply by popping the card into that phone.

    Can an iPhone do that?

    I have my homescreen backed up to the sd card, Jolly Roger, with all folder names and locations, and all app shortcut names and locations Jolly Roger,
    so everything is on the phone if the phone needs to be factory reset and everything is portable to another phone should I want to populate it.

    Can an iPhone do that?

    I can easily double or triple the internal storage capacity for my media
    and data files using an inexpensive sd card any time that sd get better
    over time - thereby extending the useful life of any phone with sd cards.

    Can an iPhone do that?

    The fact is an iPhone is nothing but a dumb terminal that can't do half of
    that while the other half requires logging into Apple's mainframe servers.

    iPhone === dumb terminal

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jolly Roger@21:1/5 to Andrew on Sun May 19 22:36:54 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-05-19, Andrew <andrew@spam.net> wrote:
    Jolly Roger wrote on 19 May 2024 19:32:25 GMT :

    A device with an SD card slot can store things on an SD card -
    something iPhone users couldn't care less about. The only reason you
    are obsessing about SD cards is because Apple chooses not to add SD
    card slots on iPhones. It's your weak attempt at trolling, as usual.

    All my APKs blah blah blah

    iPhone === dumb terminal

    Your only goal here is to troll, Arlen.

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrew on Sun May 19 19:30:21 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2024-05-19 13:07, Andrew wrote:
    Jolly Roger wrote on 19 May 2024 19:32:25 GMT :

    A device with an SD card slot can store things on an SD card - something
    iPhone users couldn't care less about. The only reason you are obsessing
    about SD cards is because Apple chooses not to add SD card slots on
    iPhones. It's your weak attempt at trolling, as usual.

    All my APKs (every app, every version) are automatically stored on my sd
    card at the time of installation, Jolly Roger, such that I can repopulate
    any other Android on the planet simply by popping the card into that phone.

    Can an iPhone do that?

    I have my homescreen backed up to the sd card, Jolly Roger, with all folder names and locations, and all app shortcut names and locations Jolly Roger,
    so everything is on the phone if the phone needs to be factory reset and everything is portable to another phone should I want to populate it.

    Mine is backed up in the cloud and/or on my computer.

    Not really a difference.


    Can an iPhone do that?

    I can easily double or triple the internal storage capacity for my media
    and data files using an inexpensive sd card any time that sd get better
    over time - thereby extending the useful life of any phone with sd cards.

    Can an iPhone do that?

    The fact is an iPhone is nothing but a dumb terminal that can't do half of that while the other half requires logging into Apple's mainframe servers.

    LOL!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Alan on Wed May 22 11:07:01 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 5/17/24 9:00 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-05-17 17:26, Andrew wrote:
    Hank Rogers wrote on Fri, 17 May 2024 17:04:49 -0500 :

    Even if nobody is using them...

    Both phones suffer from the shitty and non-user replaceable batteries.
    Glued together.

    This is true but at least 5% of Android models still have them.
    While 0% of Apple models ever had user-replaceable batteries.

    Which is irrelevant.

    Indeed. All that saying that ~95% of Android products have moved along
    to current design philosophies, while the last 5% haven't. It would take
    some more research to determine if these holdouts are actually still in production (and for what market segment) or if they're now down to "New
    Old Stock" that's still available for sale.


    And the software that drops support after a few years.

    The full software support for Android is far better than iOS for a
    variety
    of reasons which the Apple zealots would never be able to comprehend.

    No... ...it's really not.

    This doesn't actually matter, because fundamentally, its not a profound statement: by literal definition as per set theory, no subset of a
    whole can ever be greater than the whole from which it was a subset.

    As such, just what does 'full software support' really mean? Its only
    of value if every Android smartphone sold is capable of using the 'full' breadth of this software set (which is dang near impossible) and then
    also only if this 'full' set is materially different (better) than
    software sets from other providers (eg, Apple iOS). Plus the Law of
    Diminishing Returns applies too: just because something is "N+1" larger
    doesn't mean that the "+1" increment is also significant. To use a
    analogy, $10,000,001 is pedantically "more money" than $10,000,000, but
    that extra dollar doesn't make this difference be significant.


    For example, apple zealots are completely ignorant that all Android
    phones
    (4.4 & above) are updated monthly completely seamlessly over the
    Internet.

    <https://www.androidheadlines.com/2022/01/google-monthly-changelog-play-system-updates.html>
       "Google System updates, meanwhile, are fully automated. Originally
        referred to as Project Mainline, these updates fix bugs discovered
        in various OS components like device connectivity, location services, >>     media services, Emergency alerts, and others."

    Is that every single update?

    Don't you tout the wonder of being able to load software from anywhere?


    Google & Samsung phones have 7 years of multi-update full support.
      *Samsung Extends Android and Security Updates to 7 Years*

    <https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/samsung-extends-android-and-security-updates-to-7-years/>
      "Samsung phones now come backed with seven years' worth of
       security updates and seven generations of OS upgrades."

    That's only for their latest phones.

    Apple has mostly supported it's phones for longer than Samsung OR Google.

    Yes, that's been their track record history. Plus:

      *Google just put Apple and Samsung on notice - 7 years of software
    updates*

    These "7 years" announcements were clearly made to try to have their
    products be better able to compete against Apple.

    Plus they're merely promises of future performance which remains yet to
    be seen as achievable in real world practice. Let's wait to see what
    their respective SEC filings say about these initiatives.

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrew on Wed May 22 09:33:00 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-05-22 09:27, Andrew wrote:
    -hh wrote on Wed, 22 May 2024 11:07:01 -0400 :

    Which is irrelevant.

    Indeed. All that saying that ~95% of Android products have moved along
    to current design philosophies, while the last 5% haven't.

    You missed the point of having choices that Apple never gives users
    (mainly because there are few companies as anti-consumer as Apple is).

    And yet Apple has incredible consumer loyalty...


    It would take
    some more research to determine if these holdouts are actually still in
    production (and for what market segment) or if they're now down to "New
    Old Stock" that's still available for sale.

    Those were phones on sale at the time that the search was run.

    What's relevant is if you're on Android & you want an sd card or an aux
    jack or an FM radio, you can extremely easily find a model today with them, (since about half of Android phones sold today have one or more of them).

    And yet people keep buying iPhones and replacing them with iPhones when
    they change phones.


    Unfortunately, it also means that if you want a user-removable battery,
    then your choices are severely limited.

    But it also shows Android hardware is always better than iPhone hardware (because Apple gives you no choice for any of those 4 hardware features).

    LOL!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to -hh on Wed May 22 16:27:44 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    -hh wrote on Wed, 22 May 2024 11:07:01 -0400 :

    Which is irrelevant.

    Indeed. All that saying that ~95% of Android products have moved along
    to current design philosophies, while the last 5% haven't.

    You missed the point of having choices that Apple never gives users
    (mainly because there are few companies as anti-consumer as Apple is).

    It would take
    some more research to determine if these holdouts are actually still in production (and for what market segment) or if they're now down to "New
    Old Stock" that's still available for sale.

    Those were phones on sale at the time that the search was run.

    What's relevant is if you're on Android & you want an sd card or an aux
    jack or an FM radio, you can extremely easily find a model today with them, (since about half of Android phones sold today have one or more of them).

    Unfortunately, it also means that if you want a user-removable battery,
    then your choices are severely limited.

    But it also shows Android hardware is always better than iPhone hardware (because Apple gives you no choice for any of those 4 hardware features).

    And the software that drops support after a few years.

    The full software support for Android is far better than iOS for a
    variety
    of reasons which the Apple zealots would never be able to comprehend.

    No... ...it's really not.

    This doesn't actually matter, because fundamentally, its not a profound statement: by literal definition as per set theory, no subset of a
    whole can ever be greater than the whole from which it was a subset.

    Au contraire... given Apple's hotfix support is the worst in the industry, you're only saying bugfix support isn't important because it's not there.

    As such, just what does 'full software support' really mean?

    It's no longer shocking you didn't read Apple's own definition of full
    support, given you Apple religious zealots not only know nothing of Apple products - but you "think" you know everything about Android & iOS.

    Its only
    of value if every Android smartphone sold is capable of using the 'full' breadth of this software set (which is dang near impossible) and then
    also only if this 'full' set is materially different (better) than
    software sets from other providers (eg, Apple iOS).

    Idiot. You're making lame excuses for Apple only patching all the bugs it
    knows about in only the latest iOS or mac release - which are dumb excuses.

    Apple's bugfix support for operating systems is the worst in the industry.

    Plus the Law of
    Diminishing Returns applies too: just because something is "N+1" larger doesn't mean that the "+1" increment is also significant. To use a
    analogy, $10,000,001 is pedantically "more money" than $10,000,000, but
    that extra dollar doesn't make this difference be significant.

    You didn't even read Apple's own explanation that they never patch all the
    hole in operating systems that they know exist - except the latest OS only.

    Apple has mostly supported it's phones for longer than Samsung OR Google.

    Yes, that's been their track record history.

    Apple's operating system support has _always_ been the worst in the
    industry. The only reason you don't know that is you don't know what Apple
    says about Apple NOT PATCHING all known bugs in any release but the latest.

    *Google just put Apple and Samsung on notice - 7 years of software
    updates*

    These "7 years" announcements were clearly made to try to have their
    products be better able to compete against Apple.

    Plus they're merely promises of future performance which remains yet to
    be seen as achievable in real world practice. Let's wait to see what
    their respective SEC filings say about these initiatives.

    Why do you think the iPhone historically always has had more than twice the zero-day holes and more than 1-1/2 times the exploits of Android?

    Do you think the fact the iPhone is exploited more and has more 0 days may
    be because Apple's hotfix support is the worst in the industry perhaps?

    See references in the sig since I speak facts about Apple & Android.
    --
    FACT:
    *Apple only fully supports a single release.*
    <https://screenrant.com/apple-product-security-update-lifespan/> <https://support.apple.com/guide/deployment/about-software-updates-depc4c80847a/>
    <https://hothardware.com/news/apple-admits-only-fully-patches-security-flaws-in-latest-os-releases>
    <https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/10/apple-clarifies-security-update-policy-only-the-latest-oses-are-fully-patched/>

    FACT:
    *Apple always has far more exploits than does Android.*
    <https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog>

    FACT:
    *Apple only recently (in iOS 16) started the RSR patch mechanism.*
    <https://support.apple.com/en-us/HT201224>

    FACT:
    *Google & Craig Federighi both said Apple QA is lacking in coverage.* <https://googleprojectzero.blogspot.com/2019/08/a-very-deep-dive-into-ios-exploit.html>
    "The root causes I highlight here are not novel and are often overlooked.
    *We'll see cases of iOS code which seems to have never worked*,
    *iOS code that likely skipped QA or likely had little testing*
    *or no code review before the iOS release was shipped to users*."

    See also: <https://www.forbes.com/sites/markrogowsky/2016/02/15/what-apple-did-and-didnt-say-about-its-software-quality/>
    <https://www.quiverquant.com/news/Apple%20Prioritizes%20Software%20Stability%20Over%20New%20Features%20in%20Strategic%20Shift>
    <https://www.axios.com/2018/01/30/scoop-apple-delays-ios-features-to-focus-on-reliability-performance-1517278421>
    <https://www.quiverquant.com/news/Apple%20Prioritizes%20Software%20Stability%20Over%20New%20Features%20in%20Strategic%20Shift>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Andrew on Fri May 24 10:30:57 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 5/22/24 12:27 PM, Andrew wrote:
    -hh wrote on Wed, 22 May 2024 11:07:01 -0400 :

    Which is irrelevant.

    Indeed. All that saying that ~95% of Android products have moved along
    to current design philosophies, while the last 5% haven't.

    You missed the point of having choices that Apple never gives users
    (mainly because there are few companies as anti-consumer as Apple is).

    Since the rest of the Industry (well, 95%) has adopted the same design
    choice, it really isn't as tyrannical of Apple as you're trying to make
    it out to be. It is more indicative of Apple appropriately identifying
    a "where the puck is going to be".


    It would take
    some more research to determine if these holdouts are actually still in
    production (and for what market segment) or if they're now down to "New
    Old Stock" that's still available for sale.

    Those were phones on sale at the time that the search was run.

    I'm aware of that. Now go back and check to see how many of those were actually --> still in production <-- versus being obsolete stock that
    was merely still available for sale.


    What's relevant is if you're on Android & you want an sd card or an aux
    jack or an FM radio, you can extremely easily find a model today with them, (since about half of Android phones sold today have one or more of them).

    Incorrect, because your claim also means ~half have none of these
    features too. And what have all three? Probably just a tiny fraction.

    Once again, you're just not being successful in identifying if any of
    these product feature are integral to product success in the, to
    demonstrate if Apple's disinclination towards them is "anti-consumer".

    Indeed, if they were as much of a "pro consumer" differentiator as
    you're trying to imply, then the fraction of Androids which featured all
    three should be quite large. It isn't.



    Unfortunately, it also means that if you want a user-removable battery,
    then your choices are severely limited.

    But it also shows Android hardware is always better than iPhone hardware (because Apple gives you no choice for any of those 4 hardware features).

    But 95% of Android doesn't offer that choice either, so that feature is
    simply not an indicator. Especially since you've not been able to show
    if the 5% residual is actually still in production, as opposed to left
    over inventory.


    And the software that drops support after a few years.

    The full software support for Android is far better than iOS for a
    variety
    of reasons which the Apple zealots would never be able to comprehend.

    No... ...it's really not.

    This doesn't actually matter, because fundamentally, its not a profound
    statement: by literal definition as per set theory, no subset of a
    whole can ever be greater than the whole from which it was a subset.

    Au contraire... given Apple's hotfix support is the worst in the industry, you're only saying bugfix support isn't important because it's not there.

    Just what is "hotfix" supposed to mean here? And why is it now being introduced as a new Goalpost?


    As such, just what does 'full software support' really mean?

    It's no longer shocking you didn't read Apple's own definition of full support, given you Apple religious zealots not only know nothing of Apple products - but you "think" you know everything about Android & iOS.
    I've not read the fine print because I'm not a fanboy, nor have I ever
    had any issues or troubles from their current & historical level of
    product support: I'm predominantly going by what you've tried to brag
    about, which I see as evidence of Android/Google trying to catch up.


    Its only
    of value if every Android smartphone sold is capable of using the 'full'
    breadth of this software set (which is dang near impossible) and then
    also only if this 'full' set is materially different (better) than
    software sets from other providers (eg, Apple iOS).

    Idiot. You're making lame excuses for Apple only patching all the bugs it knows about in only the latest iOS or mac release - which are dumb excuses.

    How can any software developer patch bugs that they don't know about?

    Or are you trying to criticize the entire industry for their practice of sun-setting support on old obsolete & superseded software that's if its
    used by anyone at all, its <0.0001% of the installed base?

    If so, show us the dates of the latest bug & security updates for
    Android OS versions 1 (2008) through 6 (2015): I'm sure that there's
    been zero for the past five years, if not longer.

    Apple's bugfix support for operating systems is the worst in the industry.

    Unsubstantiated claim. Golly, how about that.


    Plus the Law of
    Diminishing Returns applies too: just because something is "N+1" larger
    doesn't mean that the "+1" increment is also significant. To use a
    analogy, $10,000,001 is pedantically "more money" than $10,000,000, but
    that extra dollar doesn't make this difference be significant.

    You didn't even read Apple's own explanation that they never patch all the hole in operating systems that they know exist - except the latest OS only.

    You're correct that I didn't bother to read that, because all that one
    has to do to mitigate whatever theoretical risk you're concerned about
    is just to maintain one's equipment to the latest OS. Since MacOS and
    iOS updates from Apple are free of charge, there's few reasons not to.


    Apple has mostly supported it's phones for longer than Samsung OR Google. >>
    Yes, that's been their track record history.

    Apple's operating system support has _always_ been the worst in the
    industry. The only reason you don't know that is you don't know what Apple says about Apple NOT PATCHING all known bugs in any release but the latest.


    Unsubstantiated claim. Again. Golly, how about that.


    � *Google just put Apple and Samsung on notice - 7 years of software >>>> updates*

    These "7 years" announcements were clearly made to try to have their
    products be better able to compete against Apple.

    Plus they're merely promises of future performance which remains yet to
    be seen as achievable in real world practice. Let's wait to see what
    their respective SEC filings say about these initiatives.

    Why do you think the iPhone historically always has had more than twice the zero-day holes and more than 1-1/2 times the exploits of Android? > Do you think the fact the iPhone is exploited more and has more 0
    days may
    be because Apple's hotfix support is the worst in the industry perhaps?


    "When asked why he robbed banks, Sutton simply replied,
    'Because that's where the money is.'"


    See references in the sig since I speak facts about Apple & Android.

    No need to, as you clearly don't sufficiently understand the industry.


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrew@21:1/5 to -hh on Fri May 24 15:53:33 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    -hh wrote on Fri, 24 May 2024 10:30:57 -0400 :

    You missed the point of having choices that Apple never gives users
    (mainly because there are few companies as anti-consumer as Apple is).

    Since the rest of the Industry (well, 95%) has adopted the same design choice, it really isn't as tyrannical of Apple as you're trying to make
    it out to be. It is more indicative of Apple appropriately identifying
    a "where the puck is going to be".

    You're so desperate to excuse Apple's well-known anti-consumer stance that
    you brazen fabricate out of thin air that more than half is, now, only 5%?

    It would take
    some more research to determine if these holdouts are actually still in
    production (and for what market segment) or if they're now down to "New
    Old Stock" that's still available for sale.

    Those were phones on sale at the time that the search was run.

    I'm aware of that. Now go back and check to see how many of those were actually --> still in production <-- versus being obsolete stock that
    was merely still available for sale.

    Those are recent figures which you hate because Apple has never supplied
    the user with basic hardware functionality that Android always enjoyed.

    What's relevant is if you're on Android & you want an sd card or an aux
    jack or an FM radio, you can extremely easily find a model today with them, >> (since about half of Android phones sold today have one or more of them).

    Incorrect, because your claim also means ~half have none of these
    features too. And what have all three? Probably just a tiny fraction.

    Once again, you're just not being successful in identifying if any of
    these product feature are integral to product success in the, to
    demonstrate if Apple's disinclination towards them is "anti-consumer".

    Indeed, if they were as much of a "pro consumer" differentiator as
    you're trying to imply, then the fraction of Androids which featured all three should be quite large. It isn't.

    It's no longer shocking how desperate you Apple religious zealots are to
    defend that Apple has never supplied you with basic hardware functionality.

    Unfortunately, it also means that if you want a user-removable battery,
    then your choices are severely limited.

    But it also shows Android hardware is always better than iPhone hardware
    (because Apple gives you no choice for any of those 4 hardware features).

    But 95% of Android doesn't offer that choice either, so that feature is simply not an indicator. Especially since you've not been able to show
    if the 5% residual is actually still in production, as opposed to left
    over inventory.

    It's no longer amazing how desperate you are to defend that cheap iPhone
    which has never had even the most basic of standard hardware functionality.

    And the software that drops support after a few years.

    The full software support for Android is far better than iOS for a
    variety
    of reasons which the Apple zealots would never be able to comprehend. >>>>
    No... ...it's really not.

    This doesn't actually matter, because fundamentally, its not a profound
    statement: by literal definition as per set theory, no subset of a
    whole can ever be greater than the whole from which it was a subset.

    Au contraire... given Apple's hotfix support is the worst in the industry, >> you're only saying bugfix support isn't important because it's not there.

    Just what is "hotfix" supposed to mean here? And why is it now being introduced as a new Goalpost?

    You zealots are so desperate to defend Apple's worst support in the
    industry that you claim you don't even know what a bug fix is?

    As such, just what does 'full software support' really mean?

    It's no longer shocking you didn't read Apple's own definition of full
    support, given you Apple religious zealots not only know nothing of Apple
    products - but you "think" you know everything about Android & iOS.
    I've not read the fine print because I'm not a fanboy, nor have I ever
    had any issues or troubles from their current & historical level of
    product support: I'm predominantly going by what you've tried to brag
    about, which I see as evidence of Android/Google trying to catch up.

    You're too desperate. Fixing all the known bugs is not fine print.
    Fixing all known bugs is what everyone does for multiple releases.
    *Except Apple*

    Only Apple only fixes all the bugs it knows about in only one release.
    *Apple has the worst support in the industry*

    Its only
    of value if every Android smartphone sold is capable of using the 'full' >>> breadth of this software set (which is dang near impossible) and then
    also only if this 'full' set is materially different (better) than
    software sets from other providers (eg, Apple iOS).

    Idiot. You're making lame excuses for Apple only patching all the bugs it
    knows about in only the latest iOS or mac release - which are dumb excuses.

    How can any software developer patch bugs that they don't know about?

    Or are you trying to criticize the entire industry for their practice of sun-setting support on old obsolete & superseded software that's if its
    used by anyone at all, its <0.0001% of the installed base?

    If so, show us the dates of the latest bug & security updates for
    Android OS versions 1 (2008) through 6 (2015): I'm sure that there's
    been zero for the past five years, if not longer.

    You are defending what is known to be the absolute worst support in the industry & you don't even understand how iOS or Android update.

    Apple's bugfix support for operating systems is the worst in the industry.

    Unsubstantiated claim. Golly, how about that.

    Read the cites. Every operating system except Apple's patches all bugs they know about in multiple releases. Only Apple doesn't. That's just a fact.

    <https://screenrant.com/apple-product-security-update-lifespan/> <https://hothardware.com/news/apple-admits-only-fully-patches-security-flaws-in-latest-os-releases>
    <https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/10/apple-clarifies-security-update-policy-only-the-latest-oses-are-fully-patched/>

    Plus the Law of
    Diminishing Returns applies too: just because something is "N+1" larger
    doesn't mean that the "+1" increment is also significant. To use a
    analogy, $10,000,001 is pedantically "more money" than $10,000,000, but
    that extra dollar doesn't make this difference be significant.

    You didn't even read Apple's own explanation that they never patch all the >> hole in operating systems that they know exist - except the latest OS only.

    You're correct that I didn't bother to read that, because all that one
    has to do to mitigate whatever theoretical risk you're concerned about
    is just to maintain one's equipment to the latest OS. Since MacOS and
    iOS updates from Apple are free of charge, there's few reasons not to.

    It's no longer shocking you Apple religious zealots deny even what Apple
    said about their hotfix support being the worst in the industry bar none. <https://support.apple.com/guide/deployment/about-software-updates-depc4c80847a/>

    Apple has mostly supported it's phones for longer than Samsung OR Google. >>>
    Yes, that's been their track record history.

    Apple's operating system support has _always_ been the worst in the
    industry. The only reason you don't know that is you don't know what Apple >> says about Apple NOT PATCHING all known bugs in any release but the latest.

    Unsubstantiated claim. Again. Golly, how about that.

    And yet, I provided the cites which prove only Apple patches all the bugs
    it knows about only in a single release while nobody's support is that bad.

    Samsung and Google support 7 years of operating system updates
    and 7 years of security updates to the operating system, Jolly Roger.
    *Samsung Extends Android and Security Updates to 7 Years*

    <https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/samsung-extends-android-and-security-updates-to-7-years/>
    "Samsung phones now come backed with seven years' worth of
    security updates and seven generations of OS upgrades."

    *Google fixes all known bugs for 7 years of software updates*
    <https://www.tomsguide.com/opinion/google-pixel-8-software-updates>
    "That support covers everything, including full Android updates,
    the regular Pixel feature drops and security updates."

    In addition, for billions of Android devices, Google has been updating
    _all_ of those over version 4.4 for years! Monthly. Forever.

    <https://www.androidheadlines.com/2022/01/google-monthly-changelog-play-system-updates.html>
    "Google System updates, meanwhile, are fully automated. Originally
    referred to as Project Mainline, these updates fix bugs discovered
    in various OS components like device connectivity, location services,
    media services, Emergency alerts, and others."

    It's so seamless, most Android users don't even know it.

    There's a reason iPhones are the most exploited phones in phone history?
    <https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog>
    It's because Apple's support is well known to be the worst in the industry.

    See references in the sig since I speak facts about Apple & Android.

    No need to, as you clearly don't sufficiently understand the industry.

    Heh heh heh... there's a reason I say about you Apple zealots what I do.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sms@21:1/5 to -hh on Fri May 24 09:44:07 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 5/22/2024 8:07 AM, -hh wrote:

    <snip>

    Indeed.  All that saying that ~95% of Android products have moved along
    to current design philosophies, while the last 5% haven't. It would take
    some more research to determine if these holdouts are actually still in production (and for what market segment) or if they're now down to "New
    Old Stock" that's still available for sale.

    Thankfully, one iPhone philosophy, only on U.S. models, has not been
    adopted by any Android phone manufacturers, and that's the decontenting
    of the physical SIM slot. This loss is a a royal PITA if you're
    traveling outside the U.S. and want to buy a local SIM card complete
    with a phone number. While foreign data-only eSIMs are readily available
    for travelers, travel eSIMs that include an actual phone number, are few
    and far between.

    My sister's boyfriend had his iPhone 12 stolen in Paris and he needed to
    buy a new iPhone. He had a hard time finding an iPhone 13 since there
    was such a rush on the 13 when the 14 came out. He travels a lot and
    needs to use a physical foreign SIM.

    --
    “If you are not an expert on a subject, then your opinions about it
    really do matter less than the opinions of experts. It's not
    indoctrination nor elitism. It's just that you don't know as much as
    they do about the subject.”—Tin Foil Awards

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to sms on Fri May 24 18:08:51 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-05-24 09:44, sms wrote:
    On 5/22/2024 8:07 AM, -hh wrote:

    <snip>

    Indeed.  All that saying that ~95% of Android products have moved
    along to current design philosophies, while the last 5% haven't. It
    would take some more research to determine if these holdouts are
    actually still in production (and for what market segment) or if
    they're now down to "New Old Stock" that's still available for sale.

    Thankfully, one iPhone philosophy, only on U.S. models, has not been
    adopted by any Android phone manufacturers, and that's the decontenting
    of the physical SIM slot. This loss is a a royal PITA if you're
    traveling outside the U.S. and want to buy a local SIM card complete
    with a phone number. While foreign data-only eSIMs are readily available
    for travelers, travel eSIMs that include an actual phone number, are few
    and far between.

    My sister's boyfriend had his iPhone 12 stolen in Paris and he needed to
    buy a new iPhone. He had a hard time finding an iPhone 13 since there
    was such a rush on the 13 when the 14 came out. He travels a lot and
    needs to use a physical foreign SIM.


    You not understanding the physical SIMs can be made in to eSIMs is not
    the world's problem.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to Andrew on Fri May 24 18:07:03 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-05-24 08:53, Andrew wrote:
    -hh wrote on Fri, 24 May 2024 10:30:57 -0400 :

    You missed the point of having choices that Apple never gives users
    (mainly because there are few companies as anti-consumer as Apple is).
    Since the rest of the Industry (well, 95%) has adopted the same design
    choice, it really isn't as tyrannical of Apple as you're trying to make
    it out to be. It is more indicative of Apple appropriately identifying
    a "where the puck is going to be".
    You're so desperate to excuse Apple's well-known anti-consumer stance that you brazen fabricate out of thin air that more than half is, now, only 5%?

    It would take
    some more research to determine if these holdouts are actually still in >>>> production (and for what market segment) or if they're now down to "New >>>> Old Stock" that's still available for sale.
    Those were phones on sale at the time that the search was run.
    I'm aware of that. Now go back and check to see how many of those were
    actually --> still in production <-- versus being obsolete stock that
    was merely still available for sale.
    Those are recent figures which you hate because Apple has never supplied
    the user with basic hardware functionality that Android always enjoyed.

    What's relevant is if you're on Android & you want an sd card or an aux
    jack or an FM radio, you can extremely easily find a model today with them, >>> (since about half of Android phones sold today have one or more of them). >> Incorrect, because your claim also means ~half have none of these
    features too. And what have all three? Probably just a tiny fraction.

    Once again, you're just not being successful in identifying if any of
    these product feature are integral to product success in the, to
    demonstrate if Apple's disinclination towards them is "anti-consumer".

    Indeed, if they were as much of a "pro consumer" differentiator as
    you're trying to imply, then the fraction of Androids which featured all
    three should be quite large. It isn't.
    It's no longer shocking how...

    ...you refuse to address the points HH actually made?

    You're right about that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Alan on Sun May 26 13:05:03 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 5/24/24 9:08 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-05-24 09:44, sms wrote:
    On 5/22/2024 8:07 AM, -hh wrote:

    <snip>

    Indeed.  All that saying that ~95% of Android products have moved
    along to current design philosophies, while the last 5% haven't. It
    would take some more research to determine if these holdouts are
    actually still in production (and for what market segment) or if
    they're now down to "New Old Stock" that's still available for sale.

    Thankfully, one iPhone philosophy, only on U.S. models, has not been
    adopted by any Android phone manufacturers, and that's the
    decontenting of the physical SIM slot. This loss is a a royal PITA if
    you're traveling outside the U.S. and want to buy a local SIM card
    complete with a phone number. While foreign data-only eSIMs are
    readily available for travelers, travel eSIMs that include an actual
    phone number, are few and far between.

    My sister's boyfriend had his iPhone 12 stolen in Paris and he needed
    to buy a new iPhone. He had a hard time finding an iPhone 13 since
    there was such a rush on the 13 when the 14 came out. He travels a lot
    and needs to use a physical foreign SIM.


    You not understanding the physical SIMs can be made in to eSIMs is not
    the world's problem.

    I wasn't aware of this .. if one buys a physical SIM in a random foreign smokeshop (or whatever), what's the process for entering into an
    eSIM-only smartphone like?


    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From -hh@21:1/5 to Andrew on Sun May 26 14:38:19 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 5/24/24 11:53 AM, Andrew wrote:
    -hh wrote on Fri, 24 May 2024 10:30:57 -0400 :

    You missed the point of having choices that Apple never gives users
    (mainly because there are few companies as anti-consumer as Apple is).

    Since the rest of the Industry (well, 95%) has adopted the same design
    choice, it really isn't as tyrannical of Apple as you're trying to make
    it out to be. It is more indicative of Apple appropriately identifying
    a "where the puck is going to be".

    You're so desperate to excuse Apple's well-known anti-consumer stance that you brazen fabricate out of thin air that more than half is, now, only 5%?

    No, it was based on what you said: half of Android contain at least one
    of these features that you worship .. that's ~50% .. and you conceded
    that virtually none contain all three: I was gracious and allocated 5%
    to that.

    Now you're welcome to go provide the substantiating citations which
    quantify the value more accurately, so get to it. Frankly, I'd be quite surprised if it exceeded even but 1% of Android sales, esp. in the West.


    It would take
    some more research to determine if these holdouts are actually still in >>>> production (and for what market segment) or if they're now down to "New >>>> Old Stock" that's still available for sale.

    Those were phones on sale at the time that the search was run.

    I'm aware of that. Now go back and check to see how many of those were
    actually --> still in production <-- versus being obsolete stock that
    was merely still available for sale.

    Those are recent figures which you hate because Apple has never supplied
    the user with basic hardware functionality that Android always enjoyed.

    It doesn't matter if the figures are 'recent' because what you've
    provided does not identify and differentiate between products currently
    in production vs "New Old Stock" that was discontinued 1-20 years ago.

    As such, you're not making a successful line of argument for describing
    what Android's *current* product feature set decisions are.


    What's relevant is if you're on Android & you want an sd card or an aux
    jack or an FM radio, you can extremely easily find a model today with them, >>> (since about half of Android phones sold today have one or more of them). >>
    Incorrect, because your claim also means ~half have none of these
    features too. And what have all three? Probably just a tiny fraction.

    Once again, you're just not being successful in identifying if any of
    these product feature are integral to product success in the, to
    demonstrate if Apple's disinclination towards them is "anti-consumer".

    Indeed, if they were as much of a "pro consumer" differentiator as
    you're trying to imply, then the fraction of Androids which featured all
    three should be quite large. It isn't.

    It's no longer shocking how desperate you Apple religious zealots are to defend that Apple has never supplied you with basic hardware functionality.

    Nah. I've had smartphones with removable batteries & microSDs, so I
    actually know what I'm allegedly "missing out on" by those features
    being dropped in favor of others.

    The facts of the matter are that if these features that you're trying to
    taut were actually compelling to users, then more than 5% of Androids
    would be equipped with them today. They're not. Indeed, by your own
    claim, barely half of them bother to have at least one of this set.


    Unfortunately, it also means that if you want a user-removable battery,
    then your choices are severely limited.

    But it also shows Android hardware is always better than iPhone hardware >>> (because Apple gives you no choice for any of those 4 hardware features). >>
    But 95% of Android doesn't offer that choice either, so that feature is
    simply not an indicator. Especially since you've not been able to show
    if the 5% residual is actually still in production, as opposed to left
    over inventory.

    It's no longer amazing how desperate you are to defend that cheap iPhone which has never had even the most basic of standard hardware functionality.

    If your claim was true that these features are fundamental to (as you
    call it): "the most basic of standard hardware functionality", then why
    do essentially no Android smartphones feature them either?


    And the software that drops support after a few years.

    The full software support for Android is far better than iOS for a >>>>>> variety
    of reasons which the Apple zealots would never be able to comprehend. >>>>>
    No... ...it's really not.

    This doesn't actually matter, because fundamentally, its not a profound >>>> statement: by literal definition as per set theory, no subset of a
    whole can ever be greater than the whole from which it was a subset.

    Au contraire... given Apple's hotfix support is the worst in the industry, >>> you're only saying bugfix support isn't important because it's not there. >>
    Just what is "hotfix" supposed to mean here? And why is it now being
    introduced as a new Goalpost?

    You zealots are so desperate to defend Apple's worst support in the
    industry that you claim you don't even know what a bug fix is?

    You said "hotfix", not "bugfix".
    If you made a typographical error here, clearly say so.



    As such, just what does 'full software support' really mean?

    It's no longer shocking you didn't read Apple's own definition of full
    support, given you Apple religious zealots not only know nothing of Apple >>> products - but you "think" you know everything about Android & iOS.
    I've not read the fine print because I'm not a fanboy, nor have I ever
    had any issues or troubles from their current & historical level of
    product support: I'm predominantly going by what you've tried to brag
    about, which I see as evidence of Android/Google trying to catch up.

    You're too desperate. Fixing all the known bugs is not fine print.

    No, that's not what was being said.


    Fixing all known bugs is what everyone does for multiple releases.
    *Except Apple*

    Except that the proof that your statement is false was contained within
    the challenge I gave you below ... which you've dodged addressing.


    Only Apple only fixes all the bugs it knows about in only one release.
    *Apple has the worst support in the industry*

    YA Unsubstantiated claim. Cite, please.


    Its only
    of value if every Android smartphone sold is capable of using the 'full' >>>> breadth of this software set (which is dang near impossible) and then
    also only if this 'full' set is materially different (better) than
    software sets from other providers (eg, Apple iOS).

    Idiot. You're making lame excuses for Apple only patching all the bugs it >>> knows about in only the latest iOS or mac release - which are dumb excuses. >>
    How can any software developer patch bugs that they don't know about?

    Silence!


    Or are you trying to criticize the entire industry for their practice of
    sun-setting support on old obsolete & superseded software that's if its
    used by anyone at all, its <0.0001% of the installed base?

    Silence!


    If so, show us the dates of the latest bug & security updates for
    Android OS versions 1 (2008) through 6 (2015): I'm sure that there's
    been zero for the past five years, if not longer.

    You are defending what is known to be the absolute worst support in the industry & you don't even understand how iOS or Android update.

    On the contrary: because *NO* version of Android OS 1 - 6 (inclusive)
    have received any bugfixes or security updates for the past five (5)
    years, it shows that Android support isn't "forever" as you've tried to
    imply in your criticisms on how Apple provides their own support.


    Apple's bugfix support for operating systems is the worst in the industry. >>
    Unsubstantiated claim. Golly, how about that.

    Read the cites. Every operating system except Apple's patches all bugs they know about in multiple releases. Only Apple doesn't. That's just a fact.

    Because (and as I've already noted), the simplest user solution is to
    make sure to keep the OS up-to-date, where --> as you pointed out <--
    all [known] bugs are patched because its the latest release.


    <https://screenrant.com/apple-product-security-update-lifespan/> <https://hothardware.com/news/apple-admits-only-fully-patches-security-flaws-in-latest-os-releases>
    <https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2022/10/apple-clarifies-security-update-policy-only-the-latest-oses-are-fully-patched/>

    Yup, confirmation of being up-to-date simply by having the latest OS,
    just as I've already pointed out to you.


    Plus the Law of
    Diminishing Returns applies too: just because something is "N+1" larger >>>> doesn't mean that the "+1" increment is also significant. To use a
    analogy, $10,000,001 is pedantically "more money" than $10,000,000, but >>>> that extra dollar doesn't make this difference be significant.

    You didn't even read Apple's own explanation that they never patch all the >>> hole in operating systems that they know exist - except the latest OS only. >>
    You're correct that I didn't bother to read that, because all that one
    has to do to mitigate whatever theoretical risk you're concerned about
    is just to maintain one's equipment to the latest OS. Since MacOS and
    iOS updates from Apple are free of charge, there's few reasons not to.

    It's no longer shocking you Apple religious zealots deny even what Apple
    said about their hotfix support being the worst in the industry bar none. <https://support.apple.com/guide/deployment/about-software-updates-depc4c80847a/>

    No, that cite isn't Apple admitting that their support is the worst.
    Try again.

    Likewise, you're dodging addressing the point I made, which was to
    simply maintain the OS as current to be confident in being the most
    up-to-date on bug & security patches to one's device.


    Apple has mostly supported it's phones for longer than Samsung OR Google. >>>>
    Yes, that's been their track record history.

    Apple's operating system support has _always_ been the worst in the
    industry. The only reason you don't know that is you don't know what Apple >>> says about Apple NOT PATCHING all known bugs in any release but the latest. >>
    Unsubstantiated claim. Again. Golly, how about that.

    And yet, I provided the cites which prove only Apple patches all the bugs
    it knows about only in a single release while nobody's support is that bad.

    No, that's not what was being said. What was being said was that Apple
    wasn't guaranteeing that known patches would flow down to all old legacy
    OS versions. That statement doesn't prevent them from providing all bug patches to earlier OS versions - its just not an ironclad obligation.
    From a business sense, there's diminishing returns on the expense,
    since both current installed base and the relevant risk are in decline.
    This is precisely why I asked you about Android's current level of
    support for old OS's and Android 1 - 6 OS specifically: with zero
    updates over the past five (5) years, they're obviously abandoned for
    _all_ patches.


    Samsung and Google support 7 years of operating system updates
    and 7 years of security updates to the operating system, Jolly Roger.
    *Samsung Extends Android and Security Updates to 7 Years*

    Android OS 8 ("Oreo") is still less than 7 years old, yet there's been
    zero security patch updates to it since October 2021 ... over 2.5 years.
    Is this because its already been abandoned too?

    Or is Samsung/Google's "7 years" merely "from today going forward"
    promise?

    Evidence suggests the latter, not the former:


    <https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/samsung-extends-android-and-security-updates-to-7-years/>
    "Samsung phones now come backed with seven years' worth of
    security updates and seven generations of OS upgrades. >
    *Google fixes all known bugs for 7 years of software updates*
    <https://www.tomsguide.com/opinion/google-pixel-8-software-updates>
    "That support covers everything, including full Android updates,
    the regular Pixel feature drops and security updates."

    In addition, for billions of Android devices, Google has been updating
    _all_ of those over version 4.4 for years! Monthly. Forever.

    But 4.4 years is far short of 7 years, plus where's their official
    statement that these patches for **all** known bugs for older Android OS versions? Cite, please.

    Because the track record ain't that great:

    Android OS 9 hasn't any security patches since Jan 2022 (2+ years)

    Android OS 10? None since Feb 2023 = 15 months & counting.

    Android OS 11 is still less than 4 years since its initial release, and
    its latest security update was Feb 2024, so that's not "monthly" as per
    your above claim, since 12-14's latest security update were all in May:

    <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Android_version_history>


    <https://www.androidheadlines.com/2022/01/google-monthly-changelog-play-system-updates.html>
    "Google System updates, meanwhile, are fully automated. Originally
    referred to as Project Mainline, these updates fix bugs discovered
    in various OS components like device connectivity, location services,
    media services, Emergency alerts, and others."

    It's so seamless, most Android users don't even know it.

    But iOS updates aren't? Pull my other leg. The main way that I'm aware
    that there's been an iOS update is that iOS requires its security code
    to be entered after a reboot. Perhaps a question for Android here is
    what comparable security element do they choose to incorporate, if any?


    There's a reason iPhones are the most exploited phones in phone history?
    <https://www.cisa.gov/known-exploited-vulnerabilities-catalog>
    It's because Apple's support is well known to be the worst in the industry.

    YA unsubstantiated claim on your part ..

    ... plus a mere list of known exploits isn't proof of "most" exploited.

    ... plus even if it was true that iOS is most exploited, one then
    needs to seek understanding as to why it would be so deliberately
    targeted. FYI, I've already alluded to one major reason for such a
    motivation.


    See references in the sig since I speak facts about Apple & Android.

    No need to, as you clearly don't sufficiently understand the industry.

    Heh heh heh... there's a reason I say about you Apple zealots what I do.

    Because you're merely a troll, and a pretty lame one at that.

    -hh

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From sms@21:1/5 to -hh on Sun May 26 13:52:44 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 5/26/2024 10:05 AM, -hh wrote:
    On 5/24/24 9:08 PM, Alan wrote:

    <snip>

    You not understanding the physical SIMs can be made in to eSIMs is not
    the world's problem.

    I wasn't aware of this .. if one buys a physical SIM in a random foreign smokeshop (or whatever), what's the process for entering into an
    eSIM-only smartphone like?

    See: <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnEvkwgEWhM>. It's been done to
    add a physical SIM to an eSIM only iPhone, but it's not trivial.

    Basically, he has it backwards. eSIMs can be loaded onto a phone that
    only has a physical SIM slot, using eSIM.me <https://esim.me/>, but not
    the other way around.

    What is needed is the ability to put a physical SIM into an iPhone that
    only has eSIMs (only the iPhone 14 & 15 models sold in the U.S.). For
    the rest of the world, except China, you still get one physical SIM slot
    and one eSIM slot. In China you get two physical SIM slots.

    For data-only, an eSIM is fine. If you're traveling, and want a foreign
    phone number as well as data, then you're usually stuck with a physical SIM.

    --
    “If you are not an expert on a subject, then your opinions about it
    really do matter less than the opinions of experts. It's not
    indoctrination nor elitism. It's just that you don't know as much as
    they do about the subject.”—Tin Foil Awards

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alan@21:1/5 to -hh on Sun May 26 13:54:31 2024
    XPost: misc.phone.mobile.iphone, comp.sys.mac.advocacy

    On 2024-05-26 10:05, -hh wrote:
    On 5/24/24 9:08 PM, Alan wrote:
    On 2024-05-24 09:44, sms wrote:
    On 5/22/2024 8:07 AM, -hh wrote:

    <snip>

    Indeed.  All that saying that ~95% of Android products have moved
    along to current design philosophies, while the last 5% haven't. It
    would take some more research to determine if these holdouts are
    actually still in production (and for what market segment) or if
    they're now down to "New Old Stock" that's still available for sale.

    Thankfully, one iPhone philosophy, only on U.S. models, has not been
    adopted by any Android phone manufacturers, and that's the
    decontenting of the physical SIM slot. This loss is a a royal PITA if
    you're traveling outside the U.S. and want to buy a local SIM card
    complete with a phone number. While foreign data-only eSIMs are
    readily available for travelers, travel eSIMs that include an actual
    phone number, are few and far between.

    My sister's boyfriend had his iPhone 12 stolen in Paris and he needed
    to buy a new iPhone. He had a hard time finding an iPhone 13 since
    there was such a rush on the 13 when the 14 came out. He travels a
    lot and needs to use a physical foreign SIM.


    You not understanding the physical SIMs can be made in to eSIMs is not
    the world's problem.

    I wasn't aware of this .. if one buys a physical SIM in a random foreign smokeshop (or whatever), what's the process for entering into an
    eSIM-only smartphone like?

    I did some of this for a client before she left Canada for the winter.
    She was going to carry around both phones so she could have both her
    Canada number and her US number available to her, when I explained she
    could have both on one phone.

    In the process, I came across this:

    'Convert a physical SIM to an eSIM on the same iPhone

    You can convert a physical SIM to an eSIM on the same iPhone, if your
    carrier supports it. Follow these steps:'

    <https://support.apple.com/en-ca/118669>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)