• We Know What You Are Thinking!

    From Fritz Wuehler@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 3 20:20:58 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.freeware

    We Know What You Are Thinking...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnLSWBBQSEU

    For your normal daily email you should be using 'E2E' encrypted email here...

    Get End To End encrypted email FREE!!! https://tuta.com/pricing

    Tuta has been upgraded to quantum-safe key material, making use of our quantum-safe encryption protocol.

    https://tuta.com/blog/post-quantum-cryptography

    GMAIL and other email providers scan your email as you type it so get your FREE 'ad free' end to end email encryption.

    Free END TO END email encryption: https://tuta.com/pricing

    Stay safe, stay encrypted!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@21:1/5 to Fritz Wuehler on Thu Apr 3 22:20:17 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.freeware

    On 03.04.25 20:20, Fritz Wuehler wrote:
    We Know What You Are Thinking...

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nnLSWBBQSEU

    For your normal daily email you should be using 'E2E' encrypted email here...

    Get End To End encrypted email FREE!!! https://tuta.com/pricing

    Tuta has been upgraded to quantum-safe key material, making use of our quantum-safe encryption protocol.

    https://tuta.com/blog/post-quantum-cryptography

    GMAIL and other email providers scan your email as you type it so get your FREE
    'ad free' end to end email encryption.

    Free END TO END email encryption: https://tuta.com/pricing

    Stay safe, stay encrypted!

    No merci for G-Mail-users!


    --
    "Gutta cavat lapidem." (Ovid)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Nomen Nescio@21:1/5 to All on Thu Apr 3 22:47:09 2025
    XPost: alt.comp.freeware, alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.os.linux.advocacy

    On 03 Apr 2025, Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-202504.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> posted some news:58f17444fed8a45dfa7126b62215798e@msgid.frell.theremailer.net:

    We Know What You Are Thinking...

    https://www.youtube.com/shorts/blXP3ht03g4

    Fixed your link!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JJ@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 4 12:55:53 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.freeware

    On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 22:20:17 +0200, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    On 03.04.25 20:20, Fritz Wuehler wrote:
    We Know What You Are Thinking...

    https://<censored>

    For your normal daily email you should be using 'E2E' encrypted email here...

    Get End To End encrypted email FREE!!! https://<censored>

    Tuta has been upgraded to quantum-safe key material, making use of our
    quantum-safe encryption protocol.

    https://<censored>

    GMAIL and other email providers scan your email as you type it so get your FREE
    'ad free' end to end email encryption.

    Free END TO END email encryption: https://<censored>

    Stay safe, stay encrypted!

    No merci for G-Mail-users!

    I know what they're thinking. Advertising false sense of security.

    First of all, Tuta Mail _does not_ use standard email encryption - which is PGP.

    Second, email encryption is _optional_, and there's no email service that I know (feel free to point me out) which actually provide built-in PGP.

    Third, nothing can decrypt an encrypted data if it doesn't support
    encryption.

    So, sure. Tuta encrypt emails. But outgoing emails must be decrypted before they're sent to the recipient email servers - which aren't _always_ and
    likely are not Tuta Mail. And imcoming emails before they're received on
    Tuta Mail, aren't _always_ and likely are not Tuta Mail - thus not
    encrypted.

    Who actually generate the encryption key in the first place? It's not you.
    It's the email server. Also be aware of who keep the encryption key.

    Who actually encrypt the data in the first place? It's not you. It's the
    email server. Also be aware that, to encrypt a data, requires an encryption key.

    So don't take everything as is, as the truth. Validate them yourself.
    Including everything mentioned above.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Allan Higdon@21:1/5 to jj4public@outlook.com on Fri Apr 4 01:34:52 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.freeware

    On Fri, 04 Apr 2025 00:55:53 -0500, JJ <jj4public@outlook.com> wrote:

    On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 22:20:17 +0200, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    On 03.04.25 20:20, Fritz Wuehler wrote:
    We Know What You Are Thinking...

    https://<censored>

    For your normal daily email you should be using 'E2E' encrypted email here...

    Get End To End encrypted email FREE!!! https://<censored>

    Tuta has been upgraded to quantum-safe key material, making use of our
    quantum-safe encryption protocol.

    https://<censored>

    GMAIL and other email providers scan your email as you type it so get your FREE
    'ad free' end to end email encryption.

    Free END TO END email encryption: https://<censored>

    Stay safe, stay encrypted!

    No merci for G-Mail-users!

    I know what they're thinking. Advertising false sense of security.

    First of all, Tuta Mail _does not_ use standard email encryption - which is PGP.

    Second, email encryption is _optional_, and there's no email service that I know (feel free to point me out) which actually provide built-in PGP.


    Doesn't Proton Mail do that?

    "We have built Proton Mail with PGP fully integrated, so you don’t need to take any additional steps to use PGP encryption."
    https://proton.me/support/how-to-use-pgp


    Third, nothing can decrypt an encrypted data if it doesn't support encryption.

    So, sure. Tuta encrypt emails. But outgoing emails must be decrypted before they're sent to the recipient email servers - which aren't _always_ and likely are not Tuta Mail. And imcoming emails before they're received on
    Tuta Mail, aren't _always_ and likely are not Tuta Mail - thus not
    encrypted.

    Who actually generate the encryption key in the first place? It's not you. It's the email server. Also be aware of who keep the encryption key.

    Who actually encrypt the data in the first place? It's not you. It's the email server. Also be aware that, to encrypt a data, requires an encryption key.

    So don't take everything as is, as the truth. Validate them yourself. Including everything mentioned above.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 4 09:11:42 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.freeware

    On 04.04.25 07:55, JJ wrote:
    On Thu, 3 Apr 2025 22:20:17 +0200, Jörg Lorenz wrote:
    On 03.04.25 20:20, Fritz Wuehler wrote:
    We Know What You Are Thinking...

    https://<censored>

    For your normal daily email you should be using 'E2E' encrypted email here...

    Get End To End encrypted email FREE!!! https://<censored>

    Tuta has been upgraded to quantum-safe key material, making use of our
    quantum-safe encryption protocol.

    https://<censored>

    GMAIL and other email providers scan your email as you type it so get your FREE
    'ad free' end to end email encryption.

    Free END TO END email encryption: https://<censored>

    Stay safe, stay encrypted!

    No merci for G-Mail-users!

    I know what they're thinking. Advertising false sense of security.

    First of all, Tuta Mail _does not_ use standard email encryption - which is PGP.

    Second, email encryption is _optional_, and there's no email service that I know (feel free to point me out) which actually provide built-in PGP.

    Third, nothing can decrypt an encrypted data if it doesn't support encryption.

    So, sure. Tuta encrypt emails. But outgoing emails must be decrypted before they're sent to the recipient email servers - which aren't _always_ and likely are not Tuta Mail. And imcoming emails before they're received on
    Tuta Mail, aren't _always_ and likely are not Tuta Mail - thus not
    encrypted.

    Who actually generate the encryption key in the first place? It's not you. It's the email server. Also be aware of who keep the encryption key.

    Who actually encrypt the data in the first place? It's not you. It's the email server. Also be aware that, to encrypt a data, requires an encryption key.

    So don't take everything as is, as the truth. Validate them yourself. Including everything mentioned above.

    No sober person would ever use a third party to encrypt sensitive mails. Neither Tuta nor Proton.


    --
    "Roma locuta, causa finita." (Augustinus)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 4 09:06:25 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.freeware

    On 04.04.25 07:55, JJ wrote:
    So, sure. Tuta encrypt emails. But outgoing emails must be decrypted before they're sent to the recipient email servers - which aren't _always_ and likely are not Tuta Mail.

    You do not understand the concept of mail encryption/decryption by OpenPGP.

    No merci for outlook.com-users as well.

    --
    "Roma locuta, causa finita." (Augustinus)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From yeti@21:1/5 to hugybear@gmx.net on Fri Apr 4 07:57:54 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.freeware

    Jörg Lorenz <hugybear@gmx.net> wrote:

    No sober person would ever use a third party to encrypt sensitive mails. Neither Tuta nor Proton.

    !

    --
    "The government you elect is the government you deserve"
    - Thomas Jefferson

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 4 08:55:38 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.freeware

    On 4/4/2025 1:55 AM, JJ wrote:

    I know what they're thinking. Advertising false sense of security.

    First of all, Tuta Mail _does not_ use standard email encryption - which is PGP.

    Second, email encryption is _optional_, and there's no email service that I know (feel free to point me out) which actually provide built-in PGP.

    Third, nothing can decrypt an encrypted data if it doesn't support encryption.

    So, sure. Tuta encrypt emails. But outgoing emails must be decrypted before they're sent to the recipient email servers - which aren't _always_ and likely are not Tuta Mail. And imcoming emails before they're received on
    Tuta Mail, aren't _always_ and likely are not Tuta Mail - thus not
    encrypted.


    Mostly true. But better yet is to just block "Fritz Wuehler".
    It's sleazy, nonsense spam. Do you really want to debate spam?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 4 16:17:14 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.freeware

    On 04.04.25 14:55, Newyana2 wrote:
    On 4/4/2025 1:55 AM, JJ wrote:

    I know what they're thinking. Advertising false sense of security.

    First of all, Tuta Mail _does not_ use standard email encryption - which is >> PGP.

    Second, email encryption is _optional_, and there's no email service that I >> know (feel free to point me out) which actually provide built-in PGP.

    Third, nothing can decrypt an encrypted data if it doesn't support
    encryption.

    So, sure. Tuta encrypt emails. But outgoing emails must be decrypted before >> they're sent to the recipient email servers - which aren't _always_ and
    likely are not Tuta Mail. And imcoming emails before they're received on
    Tuta Mail, aren't _always_ and likely are not Tuta Mail - thus not
    encrypted.


    Mostly true. But better yet is to just block "Fritz Wuehler".
    It's sleazy, nonsense spam. Do you really want to debate spam?

    Dont' try to mimick a net cop.
    Are your mails still not end-to-end encrypted?


    --
    "Gutta cavat lapidem." (Ovid)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jan K.@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 4 20:07:31 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.freeware

    W Fri, 4 Apr 2025 16:17:14 +0200, Jörg Lorenz napisal:

    Dont' try to mimick a net cop.

    Did someone impersonate this lorenze spammer?

    This lorenze spammer is everyday always trying to be a net cop on here.

    He is always telling you that you can only say what he wants you to say.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Carlos E.R.@21:1/5 to All on Fri Apr 4 22:37:20 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.freeware

    On 2025-04-04 14:55, Newyana2 wrote:
    On 4/4/2025 1:55 AM, JJ wrote:

    I know what they're thinking. Advertising false sense of security.

    First of all, Tuta Mail _does not_ use standard email encryption -
    which is
    PGP.

    Second, email encryption is _optional_, and there's no email service
    that I
    know (feel free to point me out) which actually provide built-in PGP.

    Third, nothing can decrypt an encrypted data if it doesn't support
    encryption.

    So, sure. Tuta encrypt emails. But outgoing emails must be decrypted
    before
    they're sent to the recipient email servers - which aren't _always_ and
    likely are not Tuta Mail. And imcoming emails before they're received on
    Tuta Mail, aren't _always_ and likely are not Tuta Mail - thus not
    encrypted.


      Mostly true. But better yet is to just block "Fritz Wuehler".
    It's sleazy, nonsense spam. Do you really want to debate spam?

    I don't remember who, but it is probably this chap, that posts in Usenet
    trying to promote that Tuta thing, for years.

    That said, I am interested in an analysis that explains why this Tuta is
    not that good. It negates what the spammer tries to achieve ;-)

    --
    Cheers, Carlos.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Newyana2@21:1/5 to Jan K. on Fri Apr 4 17:08:13 2025
    XPost: alt.privacy.anon-server, alt.comp.freeware

    On 4/4/2025 4:07 PM, Jan K. wrote:
    W Fri, 4 Apr 2025 16:17:14 +0200, Jörg Lorenz napisal:

    Dont' try to mimick a net cop.

    Did someone impersonate this lorenze spammer?

    This lorenze spammer is everyday always trying to be a net cop on here.

    He is always telling you that you can only say what he wants you to say.


    Yes. I already have him blocked. :) For years I never blocked
    anyone on Usenet, but over time we've accumulated a number
    of people who just like to insult others, without offering anything
    useful.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From TuTits@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 6 13:04:59 2025
    XPost: alt.comp.freeware, alt.privacy.anon-server

    On 04 Apr 2025, =?UTF-8?Q?J=C3=B6rg_Lorenz?= <hugybear@gmx.net> posted
    some news:vsopla$ovma$1@solani.org:

    On 04.04.25 14:55, Newyana2 wrote:
    On 4/4/2025 1:55 AM, JJ wrote:

    I know what they're thinking. Advertising false sense of security.

    First of all, Tuta Mail _does not_ use standard email encryption -
    which is PGP.

    Second, email encryption is _optional_, and there's no email service
    that I know (feel free to point me out) which actually provide
    built-in PGP.

    Third, nothing can decrypt an encrypted data if it doesn't support
    encryption.

    So, sure. Tuta encrypt emails. But outgoing emails must be decrypted
    before they're sent to the recipient email servers - which aren't
    _always_ and likely are not Tuta Mail. And imcoming emails before
    they're received on Tuta Mail, aren't _always_ and likely are not
    Tuta Mail - thus not encrypted.


    Mostly true. But better yet is to just block "Fritz Wuehler".
    It's sleazy, nonsense spam. Do you really want to debate spam?

    Dont' try to mimick a net cop.
    Are your mails still not end-to-end encrypted?

    Of course not. Why would you ever think that?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)