• Re: NixOS commits a "purge" of "Nazi" contributors, forces abdication

    From Jack Strangio@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Sat Jul 6 05:30:36 2024
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes:
    To ban Christmas, simply give turkeys the vote.

    Who's going to roast Turkeys in the middle of Summer?

    Better to write

    To ban Christmas, simply give prawns, oysters, and crayfish the vote.

    <grin>

    Jack
    --
    I have read so much about the dangers of tobacco, alcohol
    and gambling, I made up my mind to stop reading.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to Jack Strangio on Sat Jul 6 11:32:50 2024
    On 06/07/2024 06:30, Jack Strangio wrote:
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes:
    To ban Christmas, simply give turkeys the vote.

    Who's going to roast Turkeys in the middle of Summer?

    We did in Johannesburg. 40°C temperatures, roast turkey and christmas
    pudding.

    Followed by racing clockwork bath toys across the swimming pool.
    Heady days.

    --
    "If you don’t read the news paper, you are un-informed. If you read the
    news paper, you are mis-informed."

    Mark Twain

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Dallman@21:1/5 to rbowman on Sun Jul 7 20:04:00 2024
    In article <lf0476Fqm5qU3@mid.individual.net>, bowman@montana.com
    (rbowman) wrote:
    On Sun, 7 Jul 2024 11:18:00 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    UK prioritises stability over representation. EU nations are more representative, but volatile.

    After 4 July I don't know about UK stability. Apparently the voters
    were a little sick of stable.

    I think what they were mainly sick of was incompetence.

    I don't know enough of the situation to know if un-Brexit is in
    the cards.

    Very unlikely. The EU would not take the UK back unless all the major
    political factions were in favour of it, which is definitely not the case
    at present.

    John

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to John Dallman on Mon Jul 8 11:50:50 2024
    On Sun, 7 Jul 2024, John Dallman wrote:

    In article <lf0476Fqm5qU3@mid.individual.net>, bowman@montana.com
    (rbowman) wrote:
    On Sun, 7 Jul 2024 11:18:00 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    UK prioritises stability over representation. EU nations are more
    representative, but volatile.

    After 4 July I don't know about UK stability. Apparently the voters
    were a little sick of stable.

    I think what they were mainly sick of was incompetence.

    I don't know enough of the situation to know if un-Brexit is in
    the cards.

    Very unlikely. The EU would not take the UK back unless all the major political factions were in favour of it, which is definitely not the case
    at present.

    John


    Are you sure? I think the EU would love to get it's old milking cow back.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Dallman@21:1/5 to nospam@example.net on Mon Jul 8 18:04:00 2024
    In article <50398c3b-1dca-838b-da46-0303da2f61b7@example.net>, nospam@example.net (D) wrote:

    The EU would not take the UK back unless all the major political
    factions were in favour of it, which is definitely not the case
    at present.
    Are you sure? I think the EU would love to get it's old milking cow
    back.

    Pretty sure. Having the UK rejoin and then want to leave again within a
    few years after an election would be very counter-productive for the EU.
    That's the general opinion among UK citizens in favour of rejoining.

    There would also be a lot of fuss when people not so keen on rejoining discovered that the UK would lose many of its old opt-outs. One of those
    was created specifically to allow the Murdochs to keep on owning TV
    stations as well as newspapers, and other media companies have taken
    advantage of that. We can thus be sure that most of the media would
    oppose rejoining as being against their interests.

    John

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to John Dallman on Mon Jul 8 22:17:08 2024
    On Mon, 8 Jul 2024, John Dallman wrote:

    In article <50398c3b-1dca-838b-da46-0303da2f61b7@example.net>, nospam@example.net (D) wrote:

    The EU would not take the UK back unless all the major political
    factions were in favour of it, which is definitely not the case
    at present.
    Are you sure? I think the EU would love to get it's old milking cow
    back.

    Pretty sure. Having the UK rejoin and then want to leave again within a
    few years after an election would be very counter-productive for the EU. That's the general opinion among UK citizens in favour of rejoining.

    There would also be a lot of fuss when people not so keen on rejoining discovered that the UK would lose many of its old opt-outs. One of those
    was created specifically to allow the Murdochs to keep on owning TV
    stations as well as newspapers, and other media companies have taken advantage of that. We can thus be sure that most of the media would
    oppose rejoining as being against their interests.

    John


    Very interesting! Thank you for the information John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From The Natural Philosopher@21:1/5 to John Dallman on Tue Jul 9 09:34:27 2024
    On 07/07/2024 20:04, John Dallman wrote:
    In article <lf0476Fqm5qU3@mid.individual.net>, bowman@montana.com
    (rbowman) wrote:
    On Sun, 7 Jul 2024 11:18:00 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    UK prioritises stability over representation. EU nations are more
    representative, but volatile.

    After 4 July I don't know about UK stability. Apparently the voters
    were a little sick of stable.

    I think what they were mainly sick of was incompetence.

    I don't know enough of the situation to know if un-Brexit is in
    the cards.

    Very unlikely. The EU would not take the UK back unless all the major political factions were in favour of it, which is definitely not the case
    at present.

    No, but what Starmer will do is under the guise of a 'better deal' trade
    away all our freedoms for a few crumbs and place us under more EU law,
    that we wont have any chance of changing


    John

    --
    Climate is what you expect but weather is what you get.
    Mark Twain

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From D@21:1/5 to The Natural Philosopher on Tue Jul 9 12:21:32 2024
    On Tue, 9 Jul 2024, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    On 07/07/2024 20:04, John Dallman wrote:
    In article <lf0476Fqm5qU3@mid.individual.net>, bowman@montana.com
    (rbowman) wrote:
    On Sun, 7 Jul 2024 11:18:00 +0100, The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    UK prioritises stability over representation. EU nations are more
    representative, but volatile.

    After 4 July I don't know about UK stability. Apparently the voters
    were a little sick of stable.

    I think what they were mainly sick of was incompetence.

    I don't know enough of the situation to know if un-Brexit is in
    the cards.

    Very unlikely. The EU would not take the UK back unless all the major
    political factions were in favour of it, which is definitely not the case
    at present.

    No, but what Starmer will do is under the guise of a 'better deal' trade away all our freedoms for a few crumbs and place us under more EU law, that we wont have any chance of changing


    That would be the classic socialist playbook. You then ask, but what's in
    it for him? The answer, nice, well paid international political jobs with
    very low taxes as a "thank you" for bringing the UK back under the control
    of the EU-aristocracy.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)