The thing with “maildir++” is you have dotfiles within dotfiles, which always struck me as being a bit pointless. The “fs” option avoids
this, and uses a subdirectory hierarchy to reflect your mail folder hierarchy.
On 24.05.2025 02:19 Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
The thing with “maildir++” is you have dotfiles within dotfiles, which >> always struck me as being a bit pointless.
If the software can handle that, is there any real issue?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 498 |
Nodes: | 16 (3 / 13) |
Uptime: | 02:06:08 |
Calls: | 9,821 |
Calls today: | 9 |
Files: | 13,757 |
Messages: | 6,190,249 |