On 12/20/24 8:42 PM, Alan wrote:Oh, I'm aware. :-)
On 2024-12-20 17:19, Joel wrote:
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:It is absolutely credible...
On 2024-12-20 16:50, will wrote:
Why limit yourself to one OS? Run both.
Or as you could do on a Mac: run all three!
The Mac running Winblows is not that credible, possible to boot it
sure, but it's a small side thing.
...or at least it was absolutely credible...
...until Apple started producing better processors and using them.
:-)
Its just no longer Boot Camp today, but easily done by running within a
VM; ARM64 Windows 11 is presently at version 24H2: same as x86 Win11.
On 12/17/24 3:35 PM, Alan wrote:source=1>
On 2024-12-17 11:50, Joel wrote:
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On some computers (which would have cost you less) you can buy >>>>>>>>>>>> drives
that perfectly sit under the desktop:
<https://www.amazon.ca/Enclosure-Docking-Station-Readers- >>>>>>>>>>>> Compatible/dp/B0C33HS3RP/ref=asc_df_B0C33HS3RP/?
tag=googleshopc0c-20&linkCode=df0&hvadid=708007226763&hvpos=&hvnetw=g&hvrand=13265770567124847550&hvpone=&hvptwo=&hvqmt=&hvdev=c&hvdvcmdl=&hvlocint=&hvlocphy=9001547&hvtargid=pla-2190493457657&psc=1&mcid=5f9e3a8965ea37bc89aca8270bb63779&gad_
So by that argument, an all-in-one is more "elegant" than having an >>>>>> external monitor?Why? What makes it more "elegant"?Which is better in what measurable way?Super neato, but my motherboard can already handle another NVMe >>>>>>>>>>> or
<https://ca.macsales.com/shop/external-drives/owc-ministack> >>>>>>>>>>>
two.
It's elegant.
It's just a piece of the computer, once installed. No wire.
No.
But you just defined elegance by lack of wires...
But not by marrying different components to each other, creating a
fragile system.
So then an external monitor is "fragile"?
And the keyboard & mouse too, because they've not been integrated into the computer case either, so under Joel's choice of definitions they must be considered to be 'fragile' too.
What makes one more "real" than the other?This looks pretty "elegant" to me:
<https://www.owc.com/solutions/ministack-stx>
Or this:
<https://satechi.net/landing/new-stand-and-hub-m4-mac-mini>
Remember: Thunderbolt literally IS PCIe...
OK, but why not just have a real case, a real motherboard? Why the
quirks?
Expandability.
Which I've already addressed.
Plus in the case of the STX, if the NVMe & HDD/SSD which one chose to
install ends up being inadequate in size, it is straightforward to open
the box and install a larger one...all with the advantage of also having a provisioning of a Thunderbolt 3 hub for additional peripheral ports.
They're pretty sweet.
-hh
"-hh" <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> wrote in message news:vjsnu6$1t6l6$2@dont-email.me...
On 12/17/24 3:35 PM, Alan wrote:
On 2024-12-17 11:50, Joel wrote:
Alan <nuh-uh@nope.com> wrote:
On some computers (which would have cost you less) you can >>>>>>>>>>>>> buy drives that perfectly sit under the desktop:Super neato, but my motherboard can already handle another >>>>>>>>>>>> NVMe or two.
<https://www.amazon.ca/Enclosure-Docking-Station-Readers-Compatible/dp/B0C33HS3RP/ref=asc_df_B0C33HS3RP/>
<https://ca.macsales.com/shop/external-drives/owc-ministack> >>>>>>>>>>>>
Which is better in what measurable way?
It's elegant.
Why? What makes it more "elegant"?
It's just a piece of the computer, once installed. No wire.
So by that argument, an all-in-one is more "elegant" than having an >>>>>>> external monitor?
No.
But you just defined elegance by lack of wires...
But not by marrying different components to each other, creating a
fragile system.
So then an external monitor is "fragile"?
And the keyboard & mouse too, because they've not been integrated into
the computer case either, so under Joel's choice of definitions they
must be considered to be 'fragile' too.
Don't forget the printer.. we're going to need to integrate that into
the case was well. Oh and speakers.. they MUST be part of the case....
Seems to me that based on the standards that Joel is setting for the
perfect system.. he has utterly failed to do so with his own build.
Further bought a case with ZERO room for growth or expansion. I mean you
know how hard you would have to look to find a case that only handles
one hard drive?
Would this also meant that our 'computer expert' has ZERO backup capabilities, and that he's just one hard drive crash away from losing
all of his data?
That's certainly 'elite'.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 163:55:41 |
Calls: | 10,385 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 14,057 |
Messages: | 6,416,513 |