On Sat, 28 Dec 2024 08:54:34 -0500, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
In summary: ASUS has yet to fix an fTPM bug with AMD processors
discovered in 2021 yet Fedora fixes an annoyance within a few days (I
experienced it yesterday but it was reported to the developers a few
days earlier).
I haven't moved to 41 but the KDE spin of 40 was a little rocky when it rolled out but the issues were fixed very rapidly. I think most were from
the KDE/Wayland side.
In summary: ASUS has yet to fix an fTPM bug with AMD processors
discovered in 2021 yet Fedora fixes an annoyance within a few days (I experienced it yesterday but it was reported to the developers a few
days earlier).
I'm actually trying hard to find bugs in Fedora 41. I'm surprised that
it works as well as it does. The one issue I did come up with is that
the machine doesn't stick to Hybrid mode with NVIDIA, and reverts to Integrated on its own. When it does that, I am incapable of running my external monitor through a USB-C hub. I can either plug it directly to
an HDMI port or log in, set it to Hybrid, log out, log in and try again.
It's not a big issue though.
After installing Fedora 41 yesterday,
On 12/28/2024 8:54 AM, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
After installing Fedora 41 yesterday,
wtf?
It's one of the wokest distros of all, with a code of conduct, DEI
galore, and a "Week of Diversity".
That's a hard pass for me.
On 12/28/2024 8:54 AM, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
After installing Fedora 41 yesterday,
wtf?
It's one of the wokest distros of all, with a code of conduct, DEI
galore, and a "Week of Diversity".
That's a hard pass for me.
On Mon, 30 Dec 2024 19:10:19 -0500, DFS wrote:
On 12/28/2024 8:54 AM, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
After installing Fedora 41 yesterday,
wtf?
It's one of the wokest distros of all, with a code of conduct, DEI
galore, and a "Week of Diversity".
That's a hard pass for me.
The software works. TBH I don't care if they have bisexual circle jerks involving gerbils. It's not like Netflix coming up with a black, female, possibly lesbian jarl in 11th century Denmark and expect me to watch the show.
On 2024-12-31, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
On 2024-12-30 19:10, DFS wrote:
On 12/28/2024 8:54 AM, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
After installing Fedora 41 yesterday,
wtf?
It's one of the wokest distros of all, with a code of conduct, DEI
galore, and a "Week of Diversity".
That's a hard pass for me.
It's the one asus-linux.org provides a guide for and so far, everything
works as it should. I have no idea if there even is a non-woke Linux
distribution anymore.
You're getting lectured from someone who touts Woke Microsoft. But you're right, there really isn't much in the IT industry that isn't Woke anymore... but it's starting to turn around (I think).
Microsoft's DEI page...
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/diversity/default?oneroute=true
On 2024-12-30 19:10, DFS wrote:
On 12/28/2024 8:54 AM, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
After installing Fedora 41 yesterday,
wtf?
It's one of the wokest distros of all, with a code of conduct, DEI
galore, and a "Week of Diversity".
That's a hard pass for me.
It's the one asus-linux.org provides a guide for and so far, everything
works as it should. I have no idea if there even is a non-woke Linux distribution anymore.
There are. 11 of the the Top 25 on distrowatch I looked at a few months
ago had no code of conduct or DEI statement on their website (doing a
cursory search)
MX Linux Mint EndeavourOS Pop!_OS Zorin CachyOS (tho the founder
specified he/him pronouns)
Garuda Sparky Tuxedo Kali EasyOS
On 12/30/2024 8:50 PM, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
On 2024-12-30 19:10, DFS wrote:
On 12/28/2024 8:54 AM, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
After installing Fedora 41 yesterday,
wtf?
It's one of the wokest distros of all, with a code of conduct, DEI
galore, and a "Week of Diversity".
That's a hard pass for me.
It's the one asus-linux.org provides a guide for and so far,
everything works as it should. I have no idea if there even is a non-
woke Linux distribution anymore.
There are. 11 of the the Top 25 on distrowatch I looked at a few months
ago had no code of conduct or DEI statement on their website (doing a
cursory search)
MX Linux
Mint
EndeavourOS
Pop!_OS
Zorin
CachyOS (tho the founder specified he/him pronouns)
Garuda
Sparky
Tuxedo
Kali
EasyOS
11 of the the Top 25 on distrowatch I looked at a few months
ago had no code of conduct or DEI statement on their website (doing a
cursory search) ...
On Tue, 31 Dec 2024 17:40:53 -0500, DFS wrote:
11 of the the Top 25 on distrowatch I looked at a few months
ago had no code of conduct or DEI statement on their website (doing a
cursory search) ...
I wonder what you think needs to be said. Do they have to declare that
they do not condone slavery? Or is that understood these days?
On 1/1/2025 1:42 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 31 Dec 2024 17:40:53 -0500, DFS wrote:
11 of the the Top 25 on distrowatch I looked at a few months
ago had no code of conduct or DEI statement on their website (doing a
cursory search) ...
I wonder what you think needs to be said. Do they have to declare that
they do not condone slavery? Or is that understood these days?
It's not what needs to be said. It's what needs to NOT be said. Nobody needs an explicit "code of conduct" to guide their behavior (or face increasing levels of penalties as judged by The Council...ooohhh!!!).
And nobody needs to be told a computer OS website and conference events
are "welcoming nurturing safe spaces for everyone".
Fedora DEI page:
"Our key focuses are to engage, empower, and celebrate the contributions
of women, LGBT+, BIPOC, and people with disabilities in Free and Open
Source projects and communities."
gag. Contributions by females, queers, jigs and disabled people have
always been welcomed in software... on the technical merits of the contributions.
But overwhelmingly, straight White males have created the world's
computer technology, and apparently that FACT needs to be "corrected" by shoving blue-haired dykes in our faces. Pathetically, the straight
White males that started these distros and technologies are social
weaklings, and are allowing DEI and woke sickness to be plastered all
over their distros.
On 2025-01-02, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
On 2025-01-02 13:14, DFS wrote:
On 1/1/2025 1:42 AM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
On Tue, 31 Dec 2024 17:40:53 -0500, DFS wrote:
11 of the the Top 25 on distrowatch I looked at a few months
ago had no code of conduct or DEI statement on their website (doing a >>>>> cursory search) ...
I wonder what you think needs to be said. Do they have to declare that >>>> they do not condone slavery? Or is that understood these days?
It's not what needs to be said. It's what needs to NOT be said. Nobody >>> needs an explicit "code of conduct" to guide their behavior (or face
increasing levels of penalties as judged by The Council...ooohhh!!!).
And nobody needs to be told a computer OS website and conference events
are "welcoming nurturing safe spaces for everyone".
Fedora DEI page:
"Our key focuses are to engage, empower, and celebrate the contributions >>> of women, LGBT+, BIPOC, and people with disabilities in Free and Open
Source projects and communities."
gag. Contributions by females, queers, jigs and disabled people have
always been welcomed in software... on the technical merits of the
contributions.
But overwhelmingly, straight White males have created the world's
computer technology, and apparently that FACT needs to be "corrected" by >>> shoving blue-haired dykes in our faces. Pathetically, the straight
White males that started these distros and technologies are social
weaklings, and are allowing DEI and woke sickness to be plastered all
over their distros.
I made an account on the Fedora page and I was given the option to
choose pronouns to be referred by. It was disheartening but it was
clearly an option.
The last time I filled out something at the doctor's office they had a crap form like that also.
Andrzej Matuch wrote:
They didn't resist the vaccine, they
didn't resist the mask, they didn't resist the pronoun garbage; why
would they resist the Mark?
I skipped the vaccine and had my useless, Chinese made, N0 muzzle to get
me into CostCo, but how do you 'resist' the pronoun garbage?
What amuses me is the 'White non-Hispanic' category. Are they trying to
imply Hispanics aren't white?
They didn't resist the vaccine, they
didn't resist the mask, they didn't resist the pronoun garbage; why
would they resist the Mark?
On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 08:37:19 -0500, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
They didn't resist the vaccine, they
didn't resist the mask, they didn't resist the pronoun garbage; why
would they resist the Mark?
I skipped the vaccine and had my useless, Chinese made, N0 muzzle to get
me into CostCo, but how do you 'resist' the pronoun garbage?
What amuses me is the 'White non-Hispanic' category. Are they trying to
imply Hispanics aren't white?
Hispanics aren't cro-magnon. Whites are cro-magnon. Too bad, "Whites"
carry the best and most easily understandable proof of it on them. The
best clue tying them with Neanderthals.
_Anything_ more advanced than Neanderthals that Whites have got today,
is from the Iranian dicks fucking those Neanderthals in Europe from 40k
years back all the way to 24K years back.
On 2025-01-03, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:get
On 2025-01-03 15:41, rbowman wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 08:37:19 -0500, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
They didn't resist the vaccine, they
didn't resist the mask, they didn't resist the pronoun garbage; why
would they resist the Mark?
I skipped the vaccine and had my useless, Chinese made, N0 muzzle to
tome into CostCo, but how do you 'resist' the pronoun garbage?
By refusing to address people who believe they are the opposite gender
by the pronouns associated with that gender. Also, by refusing to use
made-up pronouns like ze and zir.
What amuses me is the 'White non-Hispanic' category. Are they trying
racialimply Hispanics aren't white?
Since Hispanics include people who have no European characteristics
whatsoever, I can imagine why they are not considered White.
I consider white Latinos white. "Hispanic" is a language group, not a
group.
On 2025-01-03 15:41, rbowman wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 08:37:19 -0500, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
They didn't resist the vaccine, they
didn't resist the mask, they didn't resist the pronoun garbage; why
would they resist the Mark?
I skipped the vaccine and had my useless, Chinese made, N0 muzzle to
get me into CostCo, but how do you 'resist' the pronoun garbage?
By refusing to address people who believe they are the opposite gender
by the pronouns associated with that gender. Also, by refusing to use
made-up pronouns like ze and zir.
What amuses me is the 'White non-Hispanic' category. Are they trying to
imply Hispanics aren't white?
Since Hispanics include people who have no European characteristics whatsoever, I can imagine why they are not considered White.
On 2025-01-03, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
On 2025-01-03 15:41, rbowman wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 08:37:19 -0500, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
They didn't resist the vaccine, they
didn't resist the mask, they didn't resist the pronoun garbage; why
would they resist the Mark?
I skipped the vaccine and had my useless, Chinese made, N0 muzzle to get >>> me into CostCo, but how do you 'resist' the pronoun garbage?
By refusing to address people who believe they are the opposite gender
by the pronouns associated with that gender. Also, by refusing to use
made-up pronouns like ze and zir.
What amuses me is the 'White non-Hispanic' category. Are they trying to
imply Hispanics aren't white?
Since Hispanics include people who have no European characteristics
whatsoever, I can imagine why they are not considered White.
I consider white Latinos white. "Hispanic" is a language group, not a racial group.
On 2025-01-04, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
On 2025-01-04 02:37, RonB wrote:
On 2025-01-03, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
On 2025-01-03 15:41, rbowman wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 08:37:19 -0500, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
They didn't resist the vaccine, they
didn't resist the mask, they didn't resist the pronoun garbage; why >>>>>> would they resist the Mark?
I skipped the vaccine and had my useless, Chinese made, N0 muzzle to get >>>>> me into CostCo, but how do you 'resist' the pronoun garbage?
By refusing to address people who believe they are the opposite gender >>>> by the pronouns associated with that gender. Also, by refusing to use
made-up pronouns like ze and zir.
What amuses me is the 'White non-Hispanic' category. Are they trying to >>>>> imply Hispanics aren't white?
Since Hispanics include people who have no European characteristics
whatsoever, I can imagine why they are not considered White.
I consider white Latinos white. "Hispanic" is a language group, not a racial
group.
Until they forced me to notice that they looked different in my 30s or
so, I never cared what ethnicity someone was. They were either friends
or they weren't. However, Obama and the media of the time were very good
at separating us by sex and religion and I can no longer be as blind as
I used to be. I guess that was the HOPE he kept referring to.
When I was a kid in school they taught us about the "melting pot" and how there are no differences in the races. (Not true, but I got the point.
People are people.) Now it's "racist" not to "recognize" the differences in race. And the "melting pot" mixing of cultures has become "appropriation." But all this only seems to work only in one direction. There's no issues
with other races "appropriating" stuff from the white culture. I think it's all stupid. People are people — we're basically all mutts. As my grandmother
used to say, "There's good and there's bad in all of us." By "us" she meant the various races.
DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
On 1/3/2025 7:47 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
Hispanics aren't cro-magnon. Whites are cro-magnon. Too bad, "Whites"
carry the best and most easily understandable proof of it on them. The
best clue tying them with Neanderthals.
_Anything_ more advanced than Neanderthals that Whites have got today,
is from the Iranian dicks fucking those Neanderthals in Europe from 40k
years back all the way to 24K years back.
You ugly, hairy, backward dune coons are seen as jokes around the
civilized world.
Don't you ever get tired of treating an entire *race* of people as a monolith? Not even a family is a monolith, much less a race ...
On 1/3/2025 8:08 PM, Joel wrote:
DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
On 1/3/2025 7:47 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
Hispanics aren't cro-magnon. Whites are cro-magnon. Too bad, "Whites"
carry the best and most easily understandable proof of it on them. The >>>> best clue tying them with Neanderthals.
_Anything_ more advanced than Neanderthals that Whites have got today, >>>> is from the Iranian dicks fucking those Neanderthals in Europe from 40k >>>> years back all the way to 24K years back.
You ugly, hairy, backward dune coons are seen as jokes around the
civilized world.
Don't you ever get tired of treating an entire *race* of people as a
monolith? Not even a family is a monolith, much less a race ...
How come you don't say this to the jealous SandChimp about his "cro-
magnon" putdown of his White masters? Oh yeah, you're a jigaboo that
hates Whitey too.
When I was a kid in school they taught us about the "melting pot" and
how there are no differences in the races. (Not true, but I got the
point. People are people.)
DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
On 1/3/2025 8:08 PM, Joel wrote:
DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
On 1/3/2025 7:47 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
Hispanics aren't cro-magnon. Whites are cro-magnon. Too bad, "Whites" >>>>> carry the best and most easily understandable proof of it on them. The >>>>> best clue tying them with Neanderthals.
_Anything_ more advanced than Neanderthals that Whites have got today, >>>>> is from the Iranian dicks fucking those Neanderthals in Europe from 40k >>>>> years back all the way to 24K years back.
You ugly, hairy, backward dune coons are seen as jokes around the
civilized world.
Don't you ever get tired of treating an entire *race* of people as a
monolith? Not even a family is a monolith, much less a race ...
How come you don't say this to the jealous SandChimp about his
"cro-magnon" putdown of his White masters? Oh yeah, you're a jigaboo
that hates Whitey too.
I might hate "Whitey" but *you* aren't him.
Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
On 2025-01-05 20:50, Joel wrote:
DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
On 1/3/2025 8:08 PM, Joel wrote:
Don't you ever get tired of treating an entire *race* of people as a >>>>> monolith? Not even a family is a monolith, much less a race ...
How come you don't say this to the jealous SandChimp about his
"cro-magnon" putdown of his White masters? Oh yeah, you're a jigaboo
that hates Whitey too.
I might hate "Whitey" but *you* aren't him.
Without Whitey, you'd be living in poverty and forced to defend whatever
pathetic home you've built and your family from constant attacks. Be
thankful for what Whites have created.
That's not what I think of as Whitey.
On 2025-01-05 20:50, Joel wrote:
DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
On 1/3/2025 8:08 PM, Joel wrote:
DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
On 1/3/2025 7:47 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
Hispanics aren't cro-magnon. Whites are cro-magnon. Too bad, "Whites" >>>>>> carry the best and most easily understandable proof of it on them. >>>>>> The
best clue tying them with Neanderthals.
_Anything_ more advanced than Neanderthals that Whites have got
today,
is from the Iranian dicks fucking those Neanderthals in Europe
from 40k
years back all the way to 24K years back.
You ugly, hairy, backward dune coons are seen as jokes around the
civilized world.
Don't you ever get tired of treating an entire *race* of people as a
monolith? Not even a family is a monolith, much less a race ...
How come you don't say this to the jealous SandChimp about his
"cro-magnon" putdown of his White masters? Oh yeah, you're a jigaboo
that hates Whitey too.
I might hate "Whitey" but *you* aren't him.
Without Whitey, you'd be living in poverty and forced to defend whatever pathetic home you've built and your family from constant attacks. Be
thankful for what Whites have created.
On 2025-01-05, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
On 2025-01-05 08:42, RonB wrote:
On 2025-01-04, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
On 2025-01-04 02:37, RonB wrote:
On 2025-01-03, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
On 2025-01-03 15:41, rbowman wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jan 2025 08:37:19 -0500, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
They didn't resist the vaccine, they
didn't resist the mask, they didn't resist the pronoun garbage; why >>>>>>>> would they resist the Mark?
I skipped the vaccine and had my useless, Chinese made, N0 muzzle to get
me into CostCo, but how do you 'resist' the pronoun garbage?
By refusing to address people who believe they are the opposite gender >>>>>> by the pronouns associated with that gender. Also, by refusing to use >>>>>> made-up pronouns like ze and zir.
What amuses me is the 'White non-Hispanic' category. Are they trying to >>>>>>> imply Hispanics aren't white?
Since Hispanics include people who have no European characteristics >>>>>> whatsoever, I can imagine why they are not considered White.
I consider white Latinos white. "Hispanic" is a language group, not a racial
group.
Until they forced me to notice that they looked different in my 30s or >>>> so, I never cared what ethnicity someone was. They were either friends >>>> or they weren't. However, Obama and the media of the time were very good >>>> at separating us by sex and religion and I can no longer be as blind as >>>> I used to be. I guess that was the HOPE he kept referring to.
When I was a kid in school they taught us about the "melting pot" and how >>> there are no differences in the races. (Not true, but I got the point.
People are people.) Now it's "racist" not to "recognize" the differences in >>> race. And the "melting pot" mixing of cultures has become "appropriation." >>> But all this only seems to work only in one direction. There's no issues >>> with other races "appropriating" stuff from the white culture. I think it's >>> all stupid. People are people — we're basically all mutts. As my grandmother
used to say, "There's good and there's bad in all of us." By "us" she meant >>> the various races.
I don't mind the other races appropriating the White culture because
it's their only hope of ever becoming civilized. However, I am entirely
against Whites appropriating anything from inferior cultures like black
ones. Their nutrition is terrible, their music does little other than
corrupt minds and their languages are always a lazy creole of something
that already exists. If Whites want to appropriate the excellent
nutrition of the Japanese or Indians, that's fine because they've
actually accomplished something in their respective existences. Blacks,
however, have done little more than destroy something that already existed. >>
If anyone needs an excellent example of _how_ Whites are superior to
other civilizations, consider the creation of Venice in Italy
<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=77omYd0JOeA&pp=ygUSY3JlYXRpb24gb2YgdmVuaWNl>
Meanwhile, the civilizations that we apparently stole from and which
take credit for building everything for us can't even erect a house.
When they talk about "cultural appropriation" they're usually talking about food and Halloween customs. Really stupid stuff that only vapid morons would worry about.
Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
On 2025-01-05 20:50, Joel wrote:
DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
On 1/3/2025 8:08 PM, Joel wrote:
Don't you ever get tired of treating an entire *race* of people as a >>>>> monolith? Not even a family is a monolith, much less a race ...
How come you don't say this to the jealous SandChimp about his
"cro-magnon" putdown of his White masters? Oh yeah, you're a jigaboo
that hates Whitey too.
I might hate "Whitey" but *you* aren't him.
Without Whitey, you'd be living in poverty and forced to defend whatever
pathetic home you've built and your family from constant attacks. Be
thankful for what Whites have created.
That's not what I think of as Whitey.
Joel wrote:
Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
On 2025-01-05 20:50, Joel wrote:
DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
On 1/3/2025 8:08 PM, Joel wrote:
Don't you ever get tired of treating an entire *race* of people as a >>>>>> monolith? Not even a family is a monolith, much less a race ...
How come you don't say this to the jealous SandChimp about his
"cro-magnon" putdown of his White masters? Oh yeah, you're a jigaboo >>>>> that hates Whitey too.
I might hate "Whitey" but *you* aren't him.
Without Whitey, you'd be living in poverty and forced to defend whatever >>> pathetic home you've built and your family from constant attacks. Be
thankful for what Whites have created.
That's not what I think of as Whitey.
https://postimg.cc/zbsxh1Fx
On 1/6/2025 10:23 AM, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
On 2025-01-05 20:50, Joel wrote:
DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
On 1/3/2025 8:08 PM, Joel wrote:
DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
On 1/3/2025 7:47 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
Hispanics aren't cro-magnon. Whites are cro-magnon. Too bad,
"Whites"
carry the best and most easily understandable proof of it on
them. The
best clue tying them with Neanderthals.
_Anything_ more advanced than Neanderthals that Whites have got
today,
is from the Iranian dicks fucking those Neanderthals in Europe
from 40k
years back all the way to 24K years back.
You ugly, hairy, backward dune coons are seen as jokes around the
civilized world.
Don't you ever get tired of treating an entire *race* of people as a >>>>> monolith? Not even a family is a monolith, much less a race ...
How come you don't say this to the jealous SandChimp about his
"cro-magnon" putdown of his White masters? Oh yeah, you're a jigaboo >>>> that hates Whitey too.
I might hate "Whitey" but *you* aren't him.
Without Whitey, you'd be living in poverty and forced to defend
whatever pathetic home you've built and your family from constant
attacks. Be thankful for what Whites have created.
+10000000000000
Joel (and other ungrateful negroids) don't verbally appreciate what
Whites have created and allowed them to enjoy. They ALL know in their hearts that being forced to live in the African shitholes they belong in would be a literal nightmare.
I know I'm lucky as hell to have been born a Caucasian male in a Western country, at this time in history (computing, technology, Internet).
I can't even imagine being born poor and black and female in South Sudan.
When they talk about "cultural appropriation" they're usually talking
about food and Halloween customs. Really stupid stuff that only vapid
morons would worry about.
DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
On 1/6/2025 10:23 AM, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
On 2025-01-05 20:50, Joel wrote:
I might hate "Whitey" but *you* aren't him.
Without Whitey, you'd be living in poverty and forced to defend whatever >>> pathetic home you've built and your family from constant attacks. Be
thankful for what Whites have created.
+10000000000000
Joel (and other ungrateful negroids) don't verbally appreciate what
Whites have created and allowed them to enjoy. They ALL know in their
hearts that being forced to live in the African shitholes they belong in
would be a literal nightmare.
I know I'm lucky as hell to have been born a Caucasian male in a Western
country, at this time in history (computing, technology, Internet).
I can't even imagine being born poor and black and female in South Sudan.
I like white people and in some respects *am* one.
Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
Without Whitey, you'd be living in poverty and forced to defend whatever >>>> pathetic home you've built and your family from constant attacks. Be
thankful for what Whites have created.
That's not what I think of as Whitey.
You can interpret Whitey in your own way, but the definition of Whitey
includes the entire continent of Europe and its colonies when they were
inhabited mostly by Europeans. Whether you want to admit it to yourself
or not, it is because of Whitey that the Ottomans stopped growing their
empire. It is also Whitey who neutralized the pirate threat in the
Mediterranean where Muslim pirates enslaved coastal populations all the
way to Ireland at a number of around 1.25 million, including Americans
who had never even had a cross word with them. It is because of Whitey
in general that blacks are no longer living as slaves in the West even
though the practice still exists in their home continent. The reality is
that the people who complain about Whitey can barely write their own
names, much less form a sentence, so they have no idea what really
happened and how good life is as a result of "the oppressors."
The Caucasian contributions to achievement of a better world are
remarkable, but it's dangerous to think it reflects a generalized superiority.
On 2025-01-06 12:37, Joel wrote:
DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
On 1/6/2025 10:23 AM, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
On 2025-01-05 20:50, Joel wrote:
I might hate "Whitey" but *you* aren't him.
Without Whitey, you'd be living in poverty and forced to defend
whatever
pathetic home you've built and your family from constant attacks. Be
thankful for what Whites have created.
+10000000000000
Joel (and other ungrateful negroids) don't verbally appreciate what
Whites have created and allowed them to enjoy. They ALL know in their
hearts that being forced to live in the African shitholes they belong in >>> would be a literal nightmare.
I know I'm lucky as hell to have been born a Caucasian male in a Western >>> country, at this time in history (computing, technology, Internet).
I can't even imagine being born poor and black and female in South
Sudan.
I like white people and in some respects *am* one.
Not in "some respects," a pasty-faced guy like you can be nothing else.
Don't fool yourself: by surrendering to the coloured populations, you're
only ensuring that once they have the opportunity, they will liquidate
you. They see you as little more than a useful idiot for the time being.
They will never allow you to live in peace because she's a thing is
contrary to their identity. Look at how well they treated Whites in
Rhodesia before they turned it into a joke. Look now at how they're
treating Whites in South Africa. That is your fate.
Acknowledge that your race is accomplished and that it has done little
other than attempt to civilize the savage. Unfortunately, no matter how
much we do to help them, they will cry out at being turned into
something other than the barbarians they have always been.
I'm not white.
Andrzej Matuch wrote:
On 2025-01-06 12:37, Joel wrote:
DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
On 1/6/2025 10:23 AM, Andrzej Matuch wrote:
On 2025-01-05 20:50, Joel wrote:
I might hate "Whitey" but *you* aren't him.
Without Whitey, you'd be living in poverty and forced to defend
whatever
pathetic home you've built and your family from constant attacks. Be >>>>> thankful for what Whites have created.
+10000000000000
Joel (and other ungrateful negroids) don't verbally appreciate what
Whites have created and allowed them to enjoy. They ALL know in their >>>> hearts that being forced to live in the African shitholes they
belong in
would be a literal nightmare.
I know I'm lucky as hell to have been born a Caucasian male in a
Western
country, at this time in history (computing, technology, Internet).
I can't even imagine being born poor and black and female in South
Sudan.
I like white people and in some respects *am* one.
Not in "some respects," a pasty-faced guy like you can be nothing
else. Don't fool yourself: by surrendering to the coloured
populations, you're only ensuring that once they have the opportunity,
they will liquidate you. They see you as little more than a useful
idiot for the time being. They will never allow you to live in peace
because she's a thing is contrary to their identity. Look at how well
they treated Whites in Rhodesia before they turned it into a joke.
Look now at how they're treating Whites in South Africa. That is your
fate.
Acknowledge that your race is accomplished and that it has done little
other than attempt to civilize the savage. Unfortunately, no matter
how much we do to help them, they will cry out at being turned into
something other than the barbarians they have always been.
Yes, avoid the groid at all costs.
https://youtu.be/aRWAYKJ4IJI
avoid the groid
Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
Without Whitey, you'd be living in poverty and forced to defend whatever >>>>>> pathetic home you've built and your family from constant attacks. Be >>>>>> thankful for what Whites have created.
That's not what I think of as Whitey.
You can interpret Whitey in your own way, but the definition of Whitey >>>> includes the entire continent of Europe and its colonies when they were >>>> inhabited mostly by Europeans. Whether you want to admit it to yourself >>>> or not, it is because of Whitey that the Ottomans stopped growing their >>>> empire. It is also Whitey who neutralized the pirate threat in the
Mediterranean where Muslim pirates enslaved coastal populations all the >>>> way to Ireland at a number of around 1.25 million, including Americans >>>> who had never even had a cross word with them. It is because of Whitey >>>> in general that blacks are no longer living as slaves in the West even >>>> though the practice still exists in their home continent. The reality is >>>> that the people who complain about Whitey can barely write their own
names, much less form a sentence, so they have no idea what really
happened and how good life is as a result of "the oppressors."
The Caucasian contributions to achievement of a better world are
remarkable, but it's dangerous to think it reflects a generalized
superiority.
Whether you want to admit it or not, Whites have made greater
contributions to humanity which essentially results in them being
superior. Let's not forget that they were the first to develop a
republic and democracy as well, systems superior to what even the Asians
were using. However, there is no greater example of example of White
superiority than the story of how 464 White settlers defeated 25,000
Zulus in the Battle of Blood River.
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Blood_River>
Remember that the 464 settlers had single-fire guns which needed to be
reloaded constantly. They were, however, organized... something that
blacks can't manage to be _to this day_. The Zulus essentially figured
that sheer numbers being thrown like lemmings at the Whites would be
enough to defeat them, but Whites believed in some magic called strategy.
Just don't forget that we form consciousness collectively, individual achievements and group efforts are interdependent with everything
going around. It's dangerous to become arrogant or self-satisfied.
Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
Without Whitey, you'd be living in poverty and forced to defend whatever >>>> pathetic home you've built and your family from constant attacks. Be
thankful for what Whites have created.
That's not what I think of as Whitey.
You can interpret Whitey in your own way, but the definition of Whitey
includes the entire continent of Europe and its colonies when they were
inhabited mostly by Europeans. Whether you want to admit it to yourself
or not, it is because of Whitey that the Ottomans stopped growing their
empire. It is also Whitey who neutralized the pirate threat in the
Mediterranean where Muslim pirates enslaved coastal populations all the
way to Ireland at a number of around 1.25 million, including Americans
who had never even had a cross word with them. It is because of Whitey
in general that blacks are no longer living as slaves in the West even
though the practice still exists in their home continent. The reality is
that the people who complain about Whitey can barely write their own
names, much less form a sentence, so they have no idea what really
happened and how good life is as a result of "the oppressors."
The Caucasian contributions to achievement of a better world are
remarkable, but it's dangerous to think it reflects a generalized superiority.
On Sat, 4 Jan 2025 07:37:51 -0000 (UTC), RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com>
wrote in <vlaogf$c5ch$4@dont-email.me>:
On 2025-01-03, Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> wrote:
On 2025-01-03 15:41, rbowman wrote:
...
What amuses me is the 'White non-Hispanic' category. Are they trying
to imply Hispanics aren't white?
Since Hispanics include people who have no European characteristics
whatsoever, I can imagine why they are not considered White.
I consider white Latinos white. "Hispanic" is a language group, not a
racial group.
And they are Spanish/Indigenous descendants.
(I guess Spain isn't in Europe anymore? Learn something
every day!)
On 2025-01-06, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
On Mon, 6 Jan 2025 10:08:03 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
When they talk about "cultural appropriation" they're usually talking
about food and Halloween customs. Really stupid stuff that only vapid
morons would worry about.
https://www.florabelletheband.com/about-6
The local vapid morons are in a dither about this band. I don't care for
their genre but that's neither here nor there. The original name of the
band was 'War Pony' and the posters had an Indian motif. After much
bitching about cultural appropriation Schulz changed the name to
Florabelle. However she didn't grovel enough to satisfy the morons
You can never grovel enough to satisfy these Woke morons. I remember when
Mel Gibson released Braveheart. They were whining about the homosexual
prince being too stereotyped (or something). Gibson just told them it "his movie" and he would make it how he wanted to make it, and if they didn't
like it they could make their own movie. That was the last I heard about it. Had he caved, they would probably still be pushing for more and more apologies.
You can never grovel enough to satisfy these Woke morons. I remember when
Mel Gibson released Braveheart. They were whining about the homosexual
prince being too stereotyped (or something). Gibson just told them it "his movie" and he would make it how he wanted to make it, and if they didn't
like it they could make their own movie. That was the last I heard about it. Had he caved, they would probably still be pushing for more and more apologies.
On 1/7/2025 2:49 AM, RonB wrote:
You can never grovel enough to satisfy these Woke morons. I remember when
Mel Gibson released Braveheart. They were whining about the homosexual
prince being too stereotyped (or something). Gibson just told them it
"his
movie" and he would make it how he wanted to make it, and if they didn't
like it they could make their own movie. That was the last I heard
about it.
Had he caved, they would probably still be pushing for more and more
apologies.
I saw Braveheart in the theater on opening weekend, and when King
Richard shoved a gayboy (his gay son's lover) out a high window to his
death, most of the audience - including me - laughed out loud.
The queer "community" was outraged that everyone laughed at that scene.
But I didn't laugh because he was gay - it happened so fast and he
screamed on the way down... you have to see it to understand.
Gibson's a masterful movie director who loves bloodletting on screen. Apocalypto is one of his best.
On 1/7/2025 2:49 AM, RonB wrote:
You can never grovel enough to satisfy these Woke morons. I remember when
Mel Gibson released Braveheart. They were whining about the homosexual
prince being too stereotyped (or something). Gibson just told them it "his >> movie" and he would make it how he wanted to make it, and if they didn't
like it they could make their own movie. That was the last I heard about it. >> Had he caved, they would probably still be pushing for more and more
apologies.
I saw Braveheart in the theater on opening weekend, and when King
Richard shoved a gayboy (his gay son's lover) out a high window to his
death, most of the audience - including me - laughed out loud.
The queer "community" was outraged that everyone laughed at that scene.
But I didn't laugh because he was gay - it happened so fast and he
screamed on the way down... you have to see it to understand.
Gibson's a masterful movie director who loves bloodletting on screen. Apocalypto is one of his best.
Queers for Palestine.
Trannys for Gaza.
Are these people idiots?
They wouldn't last 10 minutes in Gaza before they are castrated and tossed off the highest rooftop.
Despite what the LBGTQ+ community wants you to believe, they are a minuscule portion
of the population but they are very loud vocally.
pothead wrote:
Queers for Palestine.
Trannys for Gaza.
Are these people idiots?
They wouldn't last 10 minutes in Gaza before they are castrated and tossed off the highest rooftop.
Despite what the LBGTQ+ community wants you to believe, they are a minuscule portion
of the population but they are very loud vocally.
Well, fully half of the population (females) are suppressed by the
Muslims. Yet leftists here support them over the *far* more
enlightened Israelis. Incredible.
On 2025-01-10, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-01-10 08:02, chrisv wrote:
pothead wrote:
Queers for Palestine.
Trannys for Gaza.
Are these people idiots?
They wouldn't last 10 minutes in Gaza before they are castrated and tossed off the highest rooftop.
Despite what the LBGTQ+ community wants you to believe, they are a minuscule portion
of the population but they are very loud vocally.
Well, fully half of the population (females) are suppressed by the
Muslims. Yet leftists here support them over the *far* more
enlightened Israelis. Incredible.
The funny part is that the leftists believe they can make allies of
Muslims by convincing them that they are being "oppressed" by the White
man. Muslims have already spent most of their history oppressing the
world all the while complaining that they are being oppressed. As such,
both parties are seeing the other as being a pack of useful idiots.
Leftists are so dumb that they believe that Muslims will conveniently
ignore the fact that everything they are pushing is contrary to Islamic
law like homosexuality, free sex, an empowered woman and a secular
society. Even if these hippies were to become the authority (with the
assumed help of the Muslims), Muslims would either be a constant threat
to their power or would hang every last one of them. Unlike what
happened during Soviet times though, whichever "progressives" aren't
already lying in a pool of their own blood or hanging would be calling
anyone who fears that they are going to be the next to be raped or
killed an islamophobe.
The "enemy of my enemy" is not always my friend. Sometimes there is no good side. But if I had to pick one over the other, bombing and starving children (as the Israelis are doing) makes them the more detestable of the two sides.
At one point there was a large Christian population in Palestine. The
Muslims aren't the only ones oppressed by the Israeli terrorists.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-01-11 04:22, RonB wrote:
On 2025-01-10, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-01-10 08:02, chrisv wrote:
pothead wrote:
Queers for Palestine.
Trannys for Gaza.
Are these people idiots?
They wouldn't last 10 minutes in Gaza before they are castrated and tossed off the highest rooftop.
Despite what the LBGTQ+ community wants you to believe, they are a minuscule portion
of the population but they are very loud vocally.
Well, fully half of the population (females) are suppressed by the
Muslims. Yet leftists here support them over the *far* more
enlightened Israelis. Incredible.
The funny part is that the leftists believe they can make allies of
Muslims by convincing them that they are being "oppressed" by the White >>>> man. Muslims have already spent most of their history oppressing the
world all the while complaining that they are being oppressed. As such, >>>> both parties are seeing the other as being a pack of useful idiots.
Leftists are so dumb that they believe that Muslims will conveniently
ignore the fact that everything they are pushing is contrary to Islamic >>>> law like homosexuality, free sex, an empowered woman and a secular
society. Even if these hippies were to become the authority (with the
assumed help of the Muslims), Muslims would either be a constant threat >>>> to their power or would hang every last one of them. Unlike what
happened during Soviet times though, whichever "progressives" aren't
already lying in a pool of their own blood or hanging would be calling >>>> anyone who fears that they are going to be the next to be raped or
killed an islamophobe.
The "enemy of my enemy" is not always my friend. Sometimes there is no good >>> side. But if I had to pick one over the other, bombing and starving children
(as the Israelis are doing) makes them the more detestable of the two sides.
At one point there was a large Christian population in Palestine. The
Muslims aren't the only ones oppressed by the Israeli terrorists.
In the conflict between Muslims and Jews, the only side to pick is the
Christians. As I told anyone who's asked me in the past which side I'm
on, one side will spit on me for being a Christian and the other will
behead me.
This unobjective rhetoric from the four of you illustrates quite well
the problem. We can't overcome cultural differences long enough to
have a prayer of mediating the Middle East conflict. And by now it's
just impossible to think about another strategy, the Israelis have
made a basis for regional war that no one could believe is avoidable,
unless Iran has decided to go along with Zionism.
The "enemy of my enemy" is not always my friend. Sometimes there is no good >side. But if I had to pick one over the other, bombing and starving children >(as the Israelis are doing) makes them the more detestable of the two sides.
At one point there was a large Christian population in Palestine. The
Muslims aren't the only ones oppressed by the Israeli terrorists.
RonB wrote:
The "enemy of my enemy" is not always my friend. Sometimes there is no good >> side. But if I had to pick one over the other, bombing and starving children >> (as the Israelis are doing) makes them the more detestable of the two sides. >>
At one point there was a large Christian population in Palestine. The
Muslims aren't the only ones oppressed by the Israeli terrorists.
What is going on over there is horrible, but we should not forget that
Hamas intentionally uses civilians as shields. We also should not
forget that Hamas would happily slaughter *every last jew* if they had
the ability.
The "enemy of my enemy" is not always my friend. Sometimes there is no
good side. But if I had to pick one over the other, bombing and starving children (as the Israelis are doing) makes them the more detestable of
the two sides.
On 2025-01-11, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
RonB wrote:
The "enemy of my enemy" is not always my friend. Sometimes there is no good >>> side. But if I had to pick one over the other, bombing and starving children
(as the Israelis are doing) makes them the more detestable of the two sides.
At one point there was a large Christian population in Palestine. The
Muslims aren't the only ones oppressed by the Israeli terrorists.
What is going on over there is horrible, but we should not forget that
Hamas intentionally uses civilians as shields. We also should not
forget that Hamas would happily slaughter *every last jew* if they had
the ability.
And Israelis have been calling for the total anihilation of Palestinians.
I'm not Muslim or Jewish. Neither side is worth a shit. I agree with Crude, just stay out of it.
On 2025-01-11, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
RonB wrote:
The "enemy of my enemy" is not always my friend. Sometimes there is no good >>> side. But if I had to pick one over the other, bombing and starving children
(as the Israelis are doing) makes them the more detestable of the two sides.
At one point there was a large Christian population in Palestine. The
Muslims aren't the only ones oppressed by the Israeli terrorists.
What is going on over there is horrible, but we should not forget that
Hamas intentionally uses civilians as shields. We also should not
forget that Hamas would happily slaughter *every last jew* if they had
the ability.
You've got to remember that, about three or four years, the Israelis "mow
the grass" in Gaza. By "mowing the grass" they mean terrorizing the Gazans
by carpet bombing them and killing whomever is there (women, children and innocent men). So the Muslims may *want* to do the same to the Jews, but it is the Israelis who actually do it — with the weapons we supply.
On 2025-01-12, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-01-12 03:18, RonB wrote:
On 2025-01-11, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
RonB wrote:
The "enemy of my enemy" is not always my friend. Sometimes there is no good
side. But if I had to pick one over the other, bombing and starving children
(as the Israelis are doing) makes them the more detestable of the two sides.
At one point there was a large Christian population in Palestine. The >>>>> Muslims aren't the only ones oppressed by the Israeli terrorists.
What is going on over there is horrible, but we should not forget that >>>> Hamas intentionally uses civilians as shields. We also should not
forget that Hamas would happily slaughter *every last jew* if they had >>>> the ability.
And Israelis have been calling for the total anihilation of Palestinians. >>> I'm not Muslim or Jewish. Neither side is worth a shit. I agree with Crude, >>> just stay out of it.
Both of their ideologies see us Christians as garbage, so I don't see
why they should allow themselves to beg for our help, why they should
accept it or why we would be foolish enough to offer it in the first place.
The obvious answer is... the West is run by the Rothschilds. Israel is comprised of their kith and kin. Mostly kin.
On 2025-01-12, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-01-12 03:21, RonB wrote:
On 2025-01-11, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
RonB wrote:
The "enemy of my enemy" is not always my friend. Sometimes there is no good
side. But if I had to pick one over the other, bombing and starving children
(as the Israelis are doing) makes them the more detestable of the two sides.
At one point there was a large Christian population in Palestine. The >>>>> Muslims aren't the only ones oppressed by the Israeli terrorists.
What is going on over there is horrible, but we should not forget that >>>> Hamas intentionally uses civilians as shields. We also should not
forget that Hamas would happily slaughter *every last jew* if they had >>>> the ability.
You've got to remember that, about three or four years, the Israelis "mow >>> the grass" in Gaza. By "mowing the grass" they mean terrorizing the Gazans >>> by carpet bombing them and killing whomever is there (women, children and >>> innocent men). So the Muslims may *want* to do the same to the Jews, but it >>> is the Israelis who actually do it — with the weapons we supply.
Nothing in what I've seen over the past few years suggests otherwise.
There is no redeeming either of these parties. In fact, if you watch
Openration Stephen on YouTube where an Indian Christian uses the Koran
itself to show Muslims how incorrect their faith is, you'll know that
there is no arguing with these people. They will deceive, lie and defend
the indefensible rather than admit that they might be wrong about anything.
The Sunni branch seem to have the most obstinate practices. The Shiite's
seem to be a little more civilized. But it's two branches of the same cult. And, as is usual with cults, there are a lot of little twigs branching off into a myriad of sub-cults.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 45:24:28 |
| Calls: | 10,393 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 14,066 |
| Messages: | 6,417,264 |