Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
... “I wish I’d spent more time in Microsoft Office”.
M$ Office is the epitome of what's wrong with commercial software.
Even as a Winblows fanboy I didn't like Office. I liked their OS,
naively enough, but OO/LO spoke my language, even before I really took
Linux seriously.
On 12/31/2024 9:34 PM, Joel wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
... “I wish I’d spent more time in Microsoft Office”.
M$ Office is the epitome of what's wrong with commercial software.
Even as a Winblows fanboy I didn't like Office. I liked their OS,
naively enough, but OO/LO spoke my language, even before I really took
Linux seriously.
Fact is, you don't know what you're talking about re: office software in general and MS Office in particular. You didn't 12 years ago when you
made truly lame arguments, and you don't today.
If you actually knew what you were talking about, you'd know LibreOffice
is the huge memory sucking bloatware.
Plus it's slow (at least on
Windows).
Plus LO Basic is pure crap.
Plus LO Base is a sad joke.
Plus
the form and report designers are bogus.
Plus LO has no email
component.
Plus the documentation is crap.
If the devs had any shame they would walk away from that suckware, like
you and everyone else should - and would if it weren't free.
DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
On 12/31/2024 9:34 PM, Joel wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
... “I wish I’d spent more time in Microsoft Office”.
M$ Office is the epitome of what's wrong with commercial software.
Even as a Winblows fanboy I didn't like Office. I liked their OS,
naively enough, but OO/LO spoke my language, even before I really took
Linux seriously.
Fact is, you don't know what you're talking about re: office software in >>general and MS Office in particular. You didn't 12 years ago when you
made truly lame arguments, and you don't today.
If you actually knew what you were talking about, you'd know LibreOffice
is the huge memory sucking bloatware. Plus it's slow (at least on >>Windows). Plus LO Basic is pure crap. Plus LO Base is a sad joke. Plus >>the form and report designers are bogus. Plus LO has no email
component. Plus the documentation is crap.
If the devs had any shame they would walk away from that suckware, like
you and everyone else should - and would if it weren't free.
Office is what people are used to. It wins on sheer numbers, and
validly on Wintendo features, if you demand that. LO and others do
well, though.
Joel wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
On 12/31/2024 9:34 PM, Joel wrote:
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:
... “I wish I’d spent more time in Microsoft Office”.
M$ Office is the epitome of what's wrong with commercial software.
Even as a Winblows fanboy I didn't like Office. I liked their OS,
naively enough, but OO/LO spoke my language, even before I really took >>>> Linux seriously.
Fact is, you don't know what you're talking about re: office software in >>> general and MS Office in particular. You didn't 12 years ago when you
made truly lame arguments, and you don't today.
If you actually knew what you were talking about, you'd know LibreOffice >>> is the huge memory sucking bloatware. Plus it's slow (at least on
Windows). Plus LO Basic is pure crap. Plus LO Base is a sad joke. Plus >>> the form and report designers are bogus. Plus LO has no email
component. Plus the documentation is crap.
If the devs had any shame they would walk away from that suckware, like
you and everyone else should - and would if it weren't free.
My gawd, the fact-free whining!
Office is what people are used to. It wins on sheer numbers, and
validly on Wintendo features, if you demand that. LO and others do
well, though.
The irony is this: how much has DFS used LibreOffice in order to make all
the claims above?
https://www.reddit.com/r/libreoffice/comments/xvdy2b/can_libreoffice_replace_ms_office/?rdt=54075
Plus it's slow (at least on Windows).
Plus LO Basic is pure crap.
Plus LO Base is a sad joke.
Plus the form and report designers are bogus.
Plus LO has no email component.
On Sat, 4 Jan 2025 10:47:47 -0500, DFS wrote:
Plus it's slow (at least on Windows).
Maybe the fault lies with Windows?
Plus LO Basic is pure crap.
s/LO Basic/Basic/
Plus LO Base is a sad joke.
It offers much more advanced DBMS functionality than Microsoft Access can match.
Plus the form and report designers are bogus.
What can Office do that they can’t?
Plus LO has no email component.
Remember, Microsoft dates from the time when email was very much a vendor- proprietary function. The idea of being able to send messages between machines on different LANs was still new and exotic, or just plain fantasy
to some.
On 1/8/2025 4:39 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
s/LO Basic/Basic/
VBA makes absolute mincement out of LO Basic. VBA is built for and
great for manipulating the Office environment and managing data.
It offers much more advanced DBMS functionality than Microsoft Access
can match.
Prove this claim in detail, with screenshots and code as needed.
Plus the form and report designers are bogus.
What can Office do that they can’t?
* the Access form designer offers NINE types of autoforms/starters to
quickly give you a skeleton layout you can then customize
https://imgur.com/5zJKuWM
* the Access report designer lets you easily add standalone code or
existing macros to every section of the report (header, footer,
group/s, detail) or to the report object itself (which code fires
during report events activate/deactivate, open/close, error, Page,
NoData). I couldn't find a way to add LO Basic code to an LO report
at all.
The LO Base reporting functionality is buggy and weird and limited...
just FUBAR:
* create a report on a table, save the report, dbl-click to open it and
it shows the data as expected. It also says 'This document is open
in read-only mode.' and there's an 'Edit Document' button. Click
that button and it changes into a weird spreadsheet-like edit mode
where you can make changes to the labels and the data (insert rows,
delete rows, edit data), but those label changes aren't saved, and
data edits aren't propagated to the underlying table. I don't get
it.
* LO Base report objects have 10 editable properties and settings. MS
Access report objects have 47.
* LO Base labels have 16 editable properties; Access report
labels have 32.
* LO Base data fields have 20 editable properties; Access report
data fields have 39.
https://imgur.com/a/6yaK2q3
There are many, many oddball bugs and weird behaviors in LO form and
report designers.
Face facts: MS is smarter than FOSS and works harder than FOSS.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 03:46:47 |
Calls: | 10,386 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 14,057 |
Messages: | 6,416,597 |