• Nobody Ever Lay On Their Deathbed Thinking ...

    From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 1 02:25:44 2025
    XPost: alt.comp.os.windows-11

    ... “I wish I’d spent more time in Microsoft Office”.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DFS@21:1/5 to Joel on Sat Jan 4 10:47:47 2025
    On 12/31/2024 9:34 PM, Joel wrote:
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    ... “I wish I’d spent more time in Microsoft Office”.


    M$ Office is the epitome of what's wrong with commercial software.
    Even as a Winblows fanboy I didn't like Office. I liked their OS,
    naively enough, but OO/LO spoke my language, even before I really took
    Linux seriously.


    Fact is, you don't know what you're talking about re: office software in general and MS Office in particular. You didn't 12 years ago when you
    made truly lame arguments, and you don't today.

    If you actually knew what you were talking about, you'd know LibreOffice
    is the huge memory sucking bloatware. Plus it's slow (at least on
    Windows). Plus LO Basic is pure crap. Plus LO Base is a sad joke. Plus
    the form and report designers are bogus. Plus LO has no email
    component. Plus the documentation is crap.

    If the devs had any shame they would walk away from that suckware, like
    you and everyone else should - and would if it weren't free.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrzej Matuch@21:1/5 to DFS on Sat Jan 4 11:45:20 2025
    On 2025-01-04 10:47, DFS wrote:
    On 12/31/2024 9:34 PM, Joel wrote:
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    ... “I wish I’d spent more time in Microsoft Office”.


    M$ Office is the epitome of what's wrong with commercial software.
    Even as a Winblows fanboy I didn't like Office.  I liked their OS,
    naively enough, but OO/LO spoke my language, even before I really took
    Linux seriously.


    Fact is, you don't know what you're talking about re: office software in general and MS Office in particular.  You didn't 12 years ago when you
    made truly lame arguments, and you don't today.

    What Joel is saying is that if he uses office, LibreOffice is more than
    enough for him as it is for most users. The reality is that much in the
    same way that Photoshop is not essential software, having Microsoft
    Office is not essential to most people. If people want to use it, that's
    fine. However, even the people who swear by it probably wouldn't
    complain that LibreOffice is lacking anything that they need. Face it:
    not everyone is as obsessed with Excel and Access as you are.

    If you actually knew what you were talking about, you'd know LibreOffice
    is the huge memory sucking bloatware.

    Oh no! Whatever will those people with 16GB (or more) of RAM do? I used
    it on a 2012 Mac Mini with 8GB perfectly and it ran well on the 2006 or
    2007 laptop with 4GB of RAM I gave away to a co-worker without issue.

     Plus it's slow (at least on
    Windows).

    It's ridiculously fast on Linux even without being pre-loaded the way
    that Microsoft Office often is.

     Plus LO Basic is pure crap.

    Why?

    Plus LO Base is a sad joke.

    Why?

    Plus
    the form and report designers are bogus.

    How?

    Plus LO has no email
    component.

    Because if there's one thing that's sorely lacking in a Linux
    environment, it's an e-mail client. Kmail, Thunderbird, Evolution
    apparently won't do the job. Let me guess: they don't connect to your
    beloved, proprietary Microsoft e-mail system. Is your e-mail address
    stuck in the 1990s and inaccessible from the web?

    Plus the documentation is crap.

    Why?

    If the devs had any shame they would walk away from that suckware, like
    you and everyone else should - and would if it weren't free.

    I'm sure that the developers who produce good software that you didn't
    have to pay for are crying that it doesn't compare to the expensive
    software produced by Microsoft.

    --
    Andrzej (Andre) Matuch
    Telegram: @AndrzejMatuch
    Zephyrus G14 GA401QM on Fedora 41
    KDE supporting member

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Ahlstrom@21:1/5 to Joel on Mon Jan 6 07:40:02 2025
    Joel wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
    On 12/31/2024 9:34 PM, Joel wrote:
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    ... “I wish I’d spent more time in Microsoft Office”.

    M$ Office is the epitome of what's wrong with commercial software.
    Even as a Winblows fanboy I didn't like Office. I liked their OS,
    naively enough, but OO/LO spoke my language, even before I really took
    Linux seriously.

    Fact is, you don't know what you're talking about re: office software in >>general and MS Office in particular. You didn't 12 years ago when you
    made truly lame arguments, and you don't today.

    If you actually knew what you were talking about, you'd know LibreOffice
    is the huge memory sucking bloatware. Plus it's slow (at least on >>Windows). Plus LO Basic is pure crap. Plus LO Base is a sad joke. Plus >>the form and report designers are bogus. Plus LO has no email
    component. Plus the documentation is crap.

    If the devs had any shame they would walk away from that suckware, like
    you and everyone else should - and would if it weren't free.

    My gawd, the fact-free whining!

    Office is what people are used to. It wins on sheer numbers, and
    validly on Wintendo features, if you demand that. LO and others do
    well, though.

    The irony is this: how much has DFS used LibreOffice in order to make all
    the claims above?

    https://www.reddit.com/r/libreoffice/comments/xvdy2b/can_libreoffice_replace_ms_office/?rdt=54075

    --
    <Knghtbrd> I can think of lots of people who need USER=ID10T someplace!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andrzej Matuch@21:1/5 to Chris Ahlstrom on Mon Jan 6 14:04:41 2025
    On 2025-01-06 07:40, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
    Joel wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:

    DFS <guhnoo-basher@linux.advocaca> wrote:
    On 12/31/2024 9:34 PM, Joel wrote:
    Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote:

    ... “I wish I’d spent more time in Microsoft Office”.

    M$ Office is the epitome of what's wrong with commercial software.
    Even as a Winblows fanboy I didn't like Office. I liked their OS,
    naively enough, but OO/LO spoke my language, even before I really took >>>> Linux seriously.

    Fact is, you don't know what you're talking about re: office software in >>> general and MS Office in particular. You didn't 12 years ago when you
    made truly lame arguments, and you don't today.

    If you actually knew what you were talking about, you'd know LibreOffice >>> is the huge memory sucking bloatware. Plus it's slow (at least on
    Windows). Plus LO Basic is pure crap. Plus LO Base is a sad joke. Plus >>> the form and report designers are bogus. Plus LO has no email
    component. Plus the documentation is crap.

    If the devs had any shame they would walk away from that suckware, like
    you and everyone else should - and would if it weren't free.

    My gawd, the fact-free whining!

    Office is what people are used to. It wins on sheer numbers, and
    validly on Wintendo features, if you demand that. LO and others do
    well, though.

    The irony is this: how much has DFS used LibreOffice in order to make all
    the claims above?

    https://www.reddit.com/r/libreoffice/comments/xvdy2b/can_libreoffice_replace_ms_office/?rdt=54075

    I'm sure that there is a set of features from Microsoft Office that
    LibreOffice still doesn't have. Nevertheless, most people either don't
    know what they are because they never use them or simply don't need them.

    --
    Andrzej (Andre) Matuch
    Telegram: @AndrzejMatuch
    Zephyrus G14 GA401QM on Fedora 41
    KDE supporting member

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to DFS on Wed Jan 8 21:39:48 2025
    On Sat, 4 Jan 2025 10:47:47 -0500, DFS wrote:

    Plus it's slow (at least on Windows).

    Maybe the fault lies with Windows?

    Plus LO Basic is pure crap.

    s/LO Basic/Basic/

    Plus LO Base is a sad joke.

    It offers much more advanced DBMS functionality than Microsoft Access can match.

    Plus the form and report designers are bogus.

    What can Office do that they can’t?

    Plus LO has no email component.

    Remember, Microsoft dates from the time when email was very much a vendor- proprietary function. The idea of being able to send messages between
    machines on different LANs was still new and exotic, or just plain fantasy
    to some.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From DFS@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Wed Jan 8 22:54:29 2025
    On 1/8/2025 4:39 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
    On Sat, 4 Jan 2025 10:47:47 -0500, DFS wrote:

    Plus it's slow (at least on Windows).

    Maybe the fault lies with Windows?

    No doubt it's a conspiracy by Microsoft.


    Plus LO Basic is pure crap.

    s/LO Basic/Basic/

    VBA makes absolute mincement out of LO Basic. VBA is built for and
    great for manipulating the Office environment and managing data.


    Plus LO Base is a sad joke.

    It offers much more advanced DBMS functionality than Microsoft Access can match.

    Prove this claim in detail, with screenshots and code as needed.



    Plus the form and report designers are bogus.

    What can Office do that they can’t?

    TONS^2, as I've explained here several times.

    You and Joel should educate yourselves. LO is free, and MS Office Pro (versions 2003-2024) can be bought very cheaply from eBay or
    Gamers-Outlet or other sites, $10 to $50.

    I'll give you a couple teasers (Office 2003):

    * the Access form designer offers NINE types of autoforms/starters to
    quickly give you a skeleton layout you can then customize

    https://imgur.com/5zJKuWM

    * the Access report designer lets you easily add standalone code or
    existing macros to every section of the report (header, footer,
    group/s, detail) or to the report object itself (which code fires
    during report events activate/deactivate, open/close, error, Page,
    NoData). I couldn't find a way to add LO Basic code to an LO report
    at all.



    The LO Base reporting functionality is buggy and weird and limited...
    just FUBAR:

    * create a report on a table, save the report, dbl-click to open it and
    it shows the data as expected. It also says 'This document is open in
    read-only mode.' and there's an 'Edit Document' button. Click that
    button and it changes into a weird spreadsheet-like edit mode where
    you can make changes to the labels and the data (insert rows, delete
    rows, edit data), but those label changes aren't saved, and data
    edits aren't propagated to the underlying table. I don't get it.

    * LO Base report objects have 10 editable properties and settings. MS
    Access report objects have 47.

    * LO Base labels have 16 editable properties; Access report
    labels have 32.

    * LO Base data fields have 20 editable properties; Access report
    data fields have 39.

    https://imgur.com/a/6yaK2q3


    * the LO Base report design ruler doesn't toggle on and off correctly.
    If it's off it will turn on, but if it's on it won't turn off - until
    you save and close/reopen the report in design mode. Somebody should
    file a bug report so it will get fixed this decade.

    There are many, many oddball bugs and weird behaviors in LO form and
    report designers.


    I once inherited a gnarly Access report and subreport combo, which the
    original developer claimed couldn't be combined into one report object.
    A few hours later I had it done, and he was "quite impressed".

    MS Office is my man, and LO is my bitch.


    Let the excuse-making begin. Bring Feeb in: that fraud loves to dismiss
    LO's shortcomings vs Access.




    Plus LO has no email component.

    Remember, Microsoft dates from the time when email was very much a vendor- proprietary function. The idea of being able to send messages between machines on different LANs was still new and exotic, or just plain fantasy
    to some.

    huh? LibreOffice dates from before MS Office, to 1985 when it was
    proprietary StarOffice, then FOSS OpenOffice in 2000, then FOSS
    LibreOffice in 2011.

    Face facts: MS is smarter than FOSS and works harder than FOSS.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lawrence D'Oliveiro@21:1/5 to DFS on Tue Jan 21 22:57:08 2025
    On Wed, 8 Jan 2025 22:54:29 -0500, DFS wrote:

    On 1/8/2025 4:39 PM, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

    s/LO Basic/Basic/

    VBA makes absolute mincement out of LO Basic. VBA is built for and
    great for manipulating the Office environment and managing data.

    What a laugh. I already showed you some more advanced Python code for
    working with LibreOffice documents, and your reaction was one of pure
    terror and confusion.

    It offers much more advanced DBMS functionality than Microsoft Access
    can match.

    Prove this claim in detail, with screenshots and code as needed.

    We’ve been through this before. You ran away that time; are you going
    to do it again?

    <https://help.libreoffice.org/latest/en-US/text/sdatabase/dabawiz00.html?DbPAR=BASE#bm_id2026429>

    Plus the form and report designers are bogus.

    What can Office do that they can’t?

    * the Access form designer offers NINE types of autoforms/starters to
    quickly give you a skeleton layout you can then customize

    https://imgur.com/5zJKuWM

    Interesting: no subform components, just a fixed list.

    <https://help.libreoffice.org/latest/en-US/text/shared/autopi/01090000.html?&DbPAR=BASE&System=UNIX>

    * the Access report designer lets you easily add standalone code or
    existing macros to every section of the report (header, footer,
    group/s, detail) or to the report object itself (which code fires
    during report events activate/deactivate, open/close, error, Page,
    NoData). I couldn't find a way to add LO Basic code to an LO report
    at all.

    Maybe you were looking in the wrong place?

    <https://help.libreoffice.org/latest/en-US/text/shared/02/01170000.html?&DbPAR=BASE&System=UNIX>

    The LO Base reporting functionality is buggy and weird and limited...
    just FUBAR:

    * create a report on a table, save the report, dbl-click to open it and
    it shows the data as expected. It also says 'This document is open
    in read-only mode.' and there's an 'Edit Document' button. Click
    that button and it changes into a weird spreadsheet-like edit mode
    where you can make changes to the labels and the data (insert rows,
    delete rows, edit data), but those label changes aren't saved, and
    data edits aren't propagated to the underlying table. I don't get
    it.

    You do realize, forms and reports are two different things?

    * LO Base report objects have 10 editable properties and settings. MS
    Access report objects have 47.

    * LO Base labels have 16 editable properties; Access report
    labels have 32.

    * LO Base data fields have 20 editable properties; Access report
    data fields have 39.

    https://imgur.com/a/6yaK2q3

    LO has a bit more than that.

    <https://help.libreoffice.org/latest/en-US/text/shared/guide/data_report.html?&DbPAR=BASE&System=UNIX>

    There are many, many oddball bugs and weird behaviors in LO form and
    report designers.

    I think you just have no clue how to use software that isn’t from
    Microsoft.

    Face facts: MS is smarter than FOSS and works harder than FOSS.

    So why is Microsoft trying to hard to embrace FOSS? And more than
    that, to turn Windows into Linux?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)