• The TRUTH Regarding The '34-time convicted felon' GOOD READ*****

    From John Smyth@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 9 13:25:11 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans, talk.politics.guns XPost: misc.immigration.usa

    'When Your Democrat Friend Screeches “You Voted for a Convicted Felon,” Send Them This!'

    <https://beardsofliberty.com/when-your-democrat-friend-screeches-you-voted-for-a-convicted-felon-send-them-this/?email=trjones73%40yahoo.com&ptn=28&source=BEC2P&r=false>


    'Now that President Trump is back in the White House, it’s time to take
    a victory lap and remind every smug liberal that their so-called
    “34-time convicted felon” narrative was always a sham. We knew it. You
    knew it. And now, with the truth coming to light, even some of them are starting to wake up.

    Because here’s the reality: That entire case was a disgraceful political
    hit job, and the most blatant abuse of the justice system we’ve ever
    seen. The Biden DOJ never even bothered to hide their corruption. They weaponized the courts like a banana republic, hoping to kneecap Trump
    before the election. Spoiler alert: It failed spectacularly.

    The “Crime” That Wasn’t a Crime
    Let’s break this down so even your most TDS-ridden cousin at
    Thanksgiving can understand it:'

    'rump was hit with 34 felony counts of falsifying business
    records—which, by the way, is a misdemeanor.

    The statute of limitations on a misdemeanor in New York? One year.


    So how did Alvin Bragg upgrade this to a felony? Well, in legal
    gymnastics that would make Simone Biles jealous, they claimed Trump
    falsified records to cover up another crime.

    What was the other crime? No one knows! The indictment didn’t say, the
    judge didn’t specify, and the jury was handed a grab bag of
    possibilities, like some twisted legal lottery.

    The jury wasn’t even required to agree on what this “other crime” was. One juror could think it was election fraud, another could believe it
    was a tax violation, and another could claim Trump’s hair is a crime
    against humanity. It didn’t matter.'

    'The Statute of Limitations Trick
    Even with this legal charade, the prosecution had a problem: The case
    was still outside the statute of limitations.

    But fear not! The deep state had a trick up its sleeve. They used a
    court ruling from Harvey Weinstein’s appeal (yes, THAT Harvey Weinstein) which said time spent out of state could “pause” the statute of limitations.

    Trump, being the former leader of the free world, traveled frequently.
    So they decided that because Trump was… you know… doing his job, his statute of limitations clock should be stopped.

    Yeah, that sounds fair.

    A Trial Without a Crime, a Case Without a Verdict
    Let’s be clear: Trump was never told what crime he was supposedly
    covering up until AFTER the trial.

    Think about that.

    How do you mount a defense against an unknown crime? That’s not justice. That’s a third-world dictatorship.

    But the jury? They weren’t troubled by such pesky details. They were
    handed a list of three possible crimes—one state election law violation,
    one federal election law violation, and a tax issue—and told they didn’t even have to agree on which one Trump “covered up.”

    Meaning? We don’t even know what crime Trump was actually convicted of!

    This isn’t just a sham trial. This is a historic disgrace.

    The Biden DOJ’s Openly Corrupt Weaponization
    This was never about justice. It was about stopping Trump at all costs.
    And now that he’s back in office, we’re seeing just how deep the
    corruption ran.

    Let’s not forget:

    Hillary Clinton literally had a secret server in her basement, deleting
    30,000 emails AFTER they were subpoenaed. No charges.
    Hunter Biden has been caught in more shady foreign dealings than a Bond villain. Slap on the wrist.

    Joe Biden himself was caught with classified documents next to his
    vintage Corvette—which, by the way, was NOT protected by Secret Service. Nothing happened.

    Meanwhile, Trump writes a check to his lawyer and suddenly he’s a felon?
    Give me a break.

    Final Thoughts
    This trial was never about justice. It was about stopping Trump, no
    matter what it took. The judge and prosecutor should be held accountable
    for this gross abuse of power. But we know that won’t happen.

    What WILL happen? The appeal shredded this joke of a conviction, and
    history will remember it as the legal scandal it truly was.

    Until then, anytime a liberal brings up “convicted felon” nonsense, just send them this article. And then remind them that their party’s top
    leaders are career criminals walking free.'

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From pothead@21:1/5 to John Smyth on Sun Feb 9 20:42:27 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans, talk.politics.guns XPost: misc.immigration.usa

    On 2025-02-09, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
    'When Your Democrat Friend Screeches “You Voted for a Convicted Felon,” Send Them This!'

    <https://beardsofliberty.com/when-your-democrat-friend-screeches-you-voted-for-a-convicted-felon-send-them-this/?email=trjones73%40yahoo.com&ptn=28&source=BEC2P&r=false>


    'Now that President Trump is back in the White House, it’s time to take
    a victory lap and remind every smug liberal that their so-called
    “34-time convicted felon” narrative was always a sham. We knew it. You knew it. And now, with the truth coming to light, even some of them are starting to wake up.

    Because here’s the reality: That entire case was a disgraceful political hit job, and the most blatant abuse of the justice system we’ve ever
    seen. The Biden DOJ never even bothered to hide their corruption. They weaponized the courts like a banana republic, hoping to kneecap Trump
    before the election. Spoiler alert: It failed spectacularly.

    The “Crime” That Wasn’t a Crime
    Let’s break this down so even your most TDS-ridden cousin at
    Thanksgiving can understand it:'

    'rump was hit with 34 felony counts of falsifying business
    records—which, by the way, is a misdemeanor.

    The statute of limitations on a misdemeanor in New York? One year.


    So how did Alvin Bragg upgrade this to a felony? Well, in legal
    gymnastics that would make Simone Biles jealous, they claimed Trump
    falsified records to cover up another crime.

    What was the other crime? No one knows! The indictment didn’t say, the judge didn’t specify, and the jury was handed a grab bag of
    possibilities, like some twisted legal lottery.

    The jury wasn’t even required to agree on what this “other crime” was. One juror could think it was election fraud, another could believe it
    was a tax violation, and another could claim Trump’s hair is a crime against humanity. It didn’t matter.'

    'The Statute of Limitations Trick
    Even with this legal charade, the prosecution had a problem: The case
    was still outside the statute of limitations.

    But fear not! The deep state had a trick up its sleeve. They used a
    court ruling from Harvey Weinstein’s appeal (yes, THAT Harvey Weinstein) which said time spent out of state could “pause” the statute of limitations.

    Trump, being the former leader of the free world, traveled frequently.
    So they decided that because Trump was… you know… doing his job, his statute of limitations clock should be stopped.

    Yeah, that sounds fair.

    A Trial Without a Crime, a Case Without a Verdict
    Let’s be clear: Trump was never told what crime he was supposedly
    covering up until AFTER the trial.

    Think about that.

    How do you mount a defense against an unknown crime? That’s not justice. That’s a third-world dictatorship.

    But the jury? They weren’t troubled by such pesky details. They were
    handed a list of three possible crimes—one state election law violation, one federal election law violation, and a tax issue—and told they didn’t even have to agree on which one Trump “covered up.”

    Meaning? We don’t even know what crime Trump was actually convicted of!

    This isn’t just a sham trial. This is a historic disgrace.

    The Biden DOJ’s Openly Corrupt Weaponization
    This was never about justice. It was about stopping Trump at all costs.
    And now that he’s back in office, we’re seeing just how deep the corruption ran.

    Let’s not forget:

    Hillary Clinton literally had a secret server in her basement, deleting 30,000 emails AFTER they were subpoenaed. No charges.
    Hunter Biden has been caught in more shady foreign dealings than a Bond villain. Slap on the wrist.

    Joe Biden himself was caught with classified documents next to his
    vintage Corvette—which, by the way, was NOT protected by Secret Service. Nothing happened.

    Meanwhile, Trump writes a check to his lawyer and suddenly he’s a felon? Give me a break.

    Final Thoughts
    This trial was never about justice. It was about stopping Trump, no
    matter what it took. The judge and prosecutor should be held accountable
    for this gross abuse of power. But we know that won’t happen.

    What WILL happen? The appeal shredded this joke of a conviction, and
    history will remember it as the legal scandal it truly was.

    Until then, anytime a liberal brings up “convicted felon” nonsense, just send them this article. And then remind them that their party’s top
    leaders are career criminals walking free.'

    Good poast.
    This should send the libbys into a tailspin.
    The safe spaces are currently SRO so I'm not sure how they are going to cope.


    --
    pothead

    Why did Joe Biden pardon his family?
    Read below to learn the reason.
    The Biden Crime Family Timeline here: https://oversight.house.gov/the-bidens-influence-peddling-timeline/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Greg Taylor@21:1/5 to All on Sun Feb 9 20:58:17 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans, talk.politics.guns XPost: misc.immigration.usa

    On 2025-02-09, John Smyth <smythlejon2@hotmail.com> wrote:
    'When Your Democrat Friend Screeches “You Voted for a Convicted
    Felon,” Send Them This!'

    <https://beardsofliberty.com/when-your-democrat-friend-screeches-you-vote >>d-for-a-convicted-felon-send-them-this/?email=trjones73%40yahoo.com&ptn=2 >>8&source=BEC2P&r=false>


    You two are the same poster. How pathetic.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)