• DEEP STATE (they/them) vs. the Wonder Boys

    From John Smyth@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 10 13:29:41 2025
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.republicans, talk.politics.guns XPost: misc.immigration.usa

    'DEEP STATE (they/them) vs. the Wonder Boys'
    'pirate wires #133 // trump’s first strike on the bureaucracy reveals
    the face of real power, and unleashes its defenses; trump sends tech
    bros into the arena, and the stakes have never been higher'

    <https://www.piratewires.com/p/deep-state-they-them-vs-the-wonder-boys?f=author>

    'Panic at the disco. Three weeks into Trump the Sequel’s executive order blitz, with technology industry legends standing at the president’s
    side, and figures throughout the government and media likening the
    newly-minted Department of Government Efficiency’s staff and budget cuts
    to the rise of fascism, there are two things everyone finally seems to
    agree on: the Deep State really does exist, and it really does run our
    country. Now we’re mostly just divided over the question of whether
    that’s a good thing, and a little shocked by what these people actually
    look like (yes, I’m about to be petty).

    As it turns out, there is no mysterious cabal of chain-smoking men in
    the shadows, quietly pulling the strings of our country. Much as we saw
    in tech throughout its era of shameful censorship, the Deep State — our actual government — consists of a decentralized network of value-aligned (center left) normie career bureaucrats numbering in the tens of
    thousands, with a good sprinkling of sexless, joyless, untethered
    they/them radicals (extremely, psychotically far left) who have taken
    root in their ranks like parasites feeding off the carcass of FDR’s
    legacy (don’t get me started). They have no leader. They absorb their marching orders from the culture, which has until now protected them.
    While they’re of considerably lower skill than most of what we saw from
    the radicals in tech, they’re more difficult to dislodge, and far more empowered. They were also largely invisible until they were threatened.
    But now, with his new general Elon Musk, Trump is over the target, and
    our nation has entered a power struggle unlike anything most of us have
    ever seen.

    In just the last week: One of the highest-ranking members of the
    Treasury Department resigned rather than comply with Trump’s directive
    to grant the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) access to the government’s payment system, which it requested for audit; USAID
    officials, with a budget of over $40 billion a year, were put on leave
    after attempting to thwart an audit; the General Services Admission
    (GSA), a kind of bureaucratic layer managing property and procurement
    among many other agencies, was seized and exposed for a variety of
    racist and sexist hiring practices, directives euphemistically described
    as “diversity, equity, and inclusion,” and what appears to be an
    explicit strategy of bloating the government with like-minded radical
    gender goblins dedicated to the Trump Resistance (it seems they’ve
    mostly all been fired); thousands of government sites and site pages
    were deleted, including pretty much everything related to DEI; over two
    million federal employees were offered a buyout, much as Twitter
    employees were offered a buyout before the company’s mass firings;
    government unions, which for some reason continue to 1) exist, and 2)
    bargain with each other on behalf of the US taxpayer (the US taxpayer
    always loses) urged employees not to accept the buyout; and the FBI
    vowed… I mean it sounds like they are urging agents to fight against the president?

    I don’t think it would be hyperbolic to describe this as a kind of war between the president and the unelected bureaucratic class. Certainly,
    both sides seem to view the fight as existential. Of course, the problem
    for the bureaucrats is even while under tremendous pressure, they don’t
    seem to move much. And Elon never stops. “Very few in the bureaucracy actually work the weekend,” he posted on X, “so it’s like the opposing team just leaves the field for 2 days!” Then, a good number of them also aren’t very bright. Amidst the chaos, in a major scoop from Bloomberg,
    we learned Pentagon employees connected their work computers to Chinese
    servers to take a break and screw around with DeepSeek.

    Anyway, guess which side the “democracy defenders” have taken?

    “If you don’t realize that Trump is trying to take full control of our government,” said Congressman Daniel Goodman of the
    democratically-elected executive’s efforts to run the executive branch
    rather than the unelected bureaucrats who share the same politics as Congressman Daniel Goodman, “you aren’t paying attention.” Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was a little more clever. “This is a five alarm fire,” she posted to X. “The people elected Donald Trump to be President — not Elon Musk.” Given she understands the institution of a permanent, unelected
    class of power refusing to cede control of the country to its
    duly-elected executive is a bad look for a democracy-obsessed (she
    says!) “socialist” like herself, Ocasio’s only real move is pretending Trump doesn’t exist. This isn’t about democracy, she argues. This is
    about a random billionaire monster who teleported into D.C. and started terrorizing all the queer bisexual librarian women in loving, straight relationships who run our country.

    Naturally, the press has echoed the Deep State. “This is a hostile
    takeover of the federal government by a private citizen of unlimited
    means with no restrictions and no transparency,” said Kara Swisher of a
    man presently working for the democratically-elected president of our
    country, following his orders directly, and who at any moment can be
    (and ultimately almost certainly will be, let’s be honest) fired. “It’s
    a coup,” said Lindsay Owens of Groundwork (some kind of tedious, commie,
    dark money think tank), which was echoed throughout the press. “…what's going on right now really is a genuine crisis,” said Jesse Singal, “and
    it should be recognized as such.”

    But a crisis for who? I don’t share politics with the Deep State, and am
    not a huge fan of permanent, unelected, unaccountable power in general,
    so maybe this is hitting me different. In any case, I’ve been wondering: where is this level of “crisis” reporting on the president’s flurry of trans orders? His dismantling of DEI? The trade war (already mostly
    over, by the way) or Panama (also basically handled now, but I digress).
    With the exception of Selena Gomez, I haven’t seen many tears for
    deported violent criminals, something we heard a lot about back before
    the election. No, panic is almost entirely focused on saving federal bureaucrats. Why?

    “The deep state,” said Bill Kristol, “is far preferable to the Trump state.”

    At this point, I think we have to start believing what these people say.
    They don’t conceive of our president as much more than a government figurehead. Real power, they seem to believe, belongs to the unelected
    state. There is probably a steelman for this. Or, there probably once
    was.

    The Deep State has been stable for about eight decades. This stability
    was key to surviving the Cold War, and World War II before that, back
    when FDR constructed the first semblance of our bureaucratic machine: it
    had to be big enough to compete with foreign tyrannical mega states, it
    had to be competent, and it had to survive elections. Today, it’s
    possible Trump’s critics are right, and dismantling a great deal of our unelected power may be bad for the country in some way they’ve not yet verbalized. But one thing dismantling this power is not — can certainly,
    by definition, not be — is anti-democratic.

    With FDR long gone, and the Cold War long over, the machinery built to
    defend us from foreign power rusted, degraded, and slowly rotted. With
    no external threat demanding competence, weak men flourished in the
    system. These men hired even weaker men, who in turn hired… whatever it
    is we’re looking at today. Much as a beached whale carcass puffs up with
    gas, the size of our government bloated as it atrophied. Now, the state
    is mostly a jobs program for mediocre people, and at its very worst it’s
    a staging ground for radicals hell bent on paralyzing the nation. I do
    believe we need a federal government staffed with competent men and
    women. I do believe there are competent men and women who still work in Washington. But the federal government is presently too big, and too
    full of waste, and that waste looks far too much like fraud. I do not
    think (most) critics are fans of the waste and fraud. But, despite their
    many flaws, the bureaucrats are still basically center left. And for a
    center leftist, I imagine this feels more comfortable than a center
    right president elected to power.

    The New York Times noted Trump’s approach to reducing the size of the government is a near mirror image of Elon’s strategy at Twitter. This is true, and it’s worth noting panic over DOGE in Washington is also near identical to the panic we saw from the tech press when Elon took Twitter private. Back then, journalists insisted the company would die.
    Imminently, they said. This of course never happened, and everyone who
    said it would happen of course never believed what they were saying.
    Critics at the time weren’t afraid Twitter would shut down, they were
    afraid Twitter would survive — but without censorship and propaganda. Likewise, center left DOGE critics aren’t worried the government will
    break. They’re worried it won’t, and the center left Deep State will
    lose power.

    To my eye, concern for the Deep State seems reasonable. Elon is
    absolutely wrecking these people. But even still, the tech right should
    be more clear-eyed. Similarities between the Twitter Deep State and the
    actual real ass American Deep State end at the media freaking out over
    their destruction. This is a real war for power, and the stakes are far
    higher than a failed company.

    Over the weekend, former candidate for Congress and darling left-wing
    thinkboi Will Stancil suggested Elon Musk should be executed. The
    sentiment is fairly common on Bluesky, where violent implications are
    banned but calls for actual violence are generally encouraged, a
    philosophy well summarized by professional crazy person Akilah Hughes,
    last seen defending the assassin Luigi Mangione. “Can we skip to them
    facing the firing squads?” she seemed to ask of DOGE employees.

    Concurrently, I’ve seen this dumb Matt Y tweet making the rounds again'

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)