Both stocks and cryptos are down.
Buying time! :-)
Unless your wife pays your bills.
Both stocks and cryptos are down.
Buying time! :-)
Unless your wife pays your bills.
On 2/28/25 1:44 PM, -hh wrote:
On 2/28/25 13:01, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 2/28/25 4:55 AM, -hh wrote:
On 2/28/25 01:31, Physfitfreak wrote:
Nymshifter? I've never been nymshifter in my life. When I change
alias, it is because I really have changed. So depending on what
my main type of activity has been, every few years my alias also
changed accordingly.
"alias" = "PotAto, PoTaTo".
And I've never had more than one alias at the same time.
AFAIC, even an annual change is too rapid to be bothered with.
You're underestimating what an individual can do by himself in the
world of stocks and cryptos.
No, I'm merely recognizing that the difference in effort to decrease
the gambling risk is quite nonlinear; with the ROI being
unfavorable, I choose to not play that game.
Also, you have a ton of money in your mind when you think and speak
of it, large enough to make you really concerned. So I understand
why you leave it to experts to handle such sums.
I think you've misunderstood what I was saying with the experts:
their performance track records aren't any better than passive, and
since they cost more, they have an inferior ROI. This is why ~half
the individual investor market today has changed from active to
passive.
My world of trading is a microcosm of what experts are doing. It is
a baby game compared to those who play with hundreds of thousands
of dollars and higher.
The raw dollars largely doesn't matter; it is if you're achieving
one's goals or not - along with the insight of how much work is it
taking you, to see if its worth the effort. If its gambling for
entertainment, that's fine so long as entertainment is your goal and
you're willing to pay for it at up to the "100% loss" level.
Also, presence of experts in the field, or volume of their
activities doesn't mean that they are necessarily competing with
you. They can't play god, they can't control you down to your baby
game if you know what you're doing. There are ample opportunities
for an individual to make a few extra thousand dollars a year
without even be felt by the big guys.
You'd be surprised. I think I've mentioned a friend who's tinkered
with a momentum-based decision tool; their conclusion is that
roughly ~1/3rd of a price is from manipulation.
This isn't about suddenly making a ton of money, which can happen
but one cannot rely on such strategies. It is about steadily making
a little sum of money for "silly" expenses as I described.
Especially during retirement.
That can also depend on what sum is required for "silly", along with
what one's risk tolerance is for gambling. Buying a lottery ticket
can have just as much upside potential, but at a lower level of
effort. Or to have sufficient margin such that 'silly' expenses are
noise.
Try it if you like. Make a Robinhood account and put, say, $5k inOh, I dabble in my 'gambling' set-aside. Had a 100% loss a few
it and try to turn it into $10k in one year. You'll have a lot of
fun ahead of you :)
years ago on one pick, but well enough on a few others. Current
speculation is up roughly +300% in less than a year. But point is
that I know that its dabbling, and not necessary for my well-being
or happiness.
-hh
Hmm.. I don't know what you exactly mean by, "alias" = "PotAto, PoTaTo".
Ah, sorry: its a colloquialism:
<https://www.reddit.com/r/EnglishLearning/comments/1fmx44p/
what_does_potayto_potahto_usually_mean/>
Its noting that on "nymshifting" vs "alias", you're trying to claim a
distinction without any effective difference. See:
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distinction_without_a_difference>
Did someone with alias "PotAto" pretended to be Physfitfreak? If so,
you've been victim of immature pranksters like "DFS" or that "Sausage
up wrestlers' ass" guy or Relf. Any "engineer" type bozo included. So
many of them morons tucked inside COLA.
n/a
The aliases I use aren't even true aliases. They are _descriptions_
of me. And they have changed every 5 or 6 years, cause it takes that
long for me (and other Modern Humans) to essentially become someone
else.
When I was deep into studying biology, I was "biofreak" here. When I
was deeply into the world of Excel, I was "Excelfreak" here. etc and
etc.
Doesn't matter AFAIC: I'm merely seeing "not the same name" so I don't
assume that it is still the same individual posting. Since the most
common abusers of nymshifting are luzer trolls not worthy of attention
or care, its where that behavior mostly gets binned.
Are you DRUNK when you reply to my posts? Why do I have to repeat
myself every time we communicate? (I know why - this is not a
question I need an answer for)
Because the real answer is something you don't like /s
This "gambling" thing... Ok. Education time. I think prudent stock
and crypto trading is not gambling. I think long term investments in
such fields are more like gambling! Hehe :) I'm not kidding.
That's your opinion and you're entitled to it. Personally, I'm not
convinced that crypto is any more of an intrinsic value asset than a
tulip bulb. See:
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip_mania>
Yes, it's not like real estate. Far less can happen negatively to a
piece of land than to your long term investments. In USA of course
long term investments are safer than in other countries. This system
here is located too far (geographically) from what's going on in the
world.
Gambling is like crossing the street with your eyes closed and ears
plugged. You'd do it either fast or slowly. That's as much control
there is that you can have. A Russian roulette.
But trading of stocks and crypto by yourself is like crossing the
street the way people who manage it all their lives do. Yes, some
morons get killed by crossing the street but that doesn't mean you
cannot cross the street safely all by yourself.
And of course for this analogy, there's many ways to cross a street
other than under the supervision of a crossing guard, which in analogy
form would relate to varying levels of care vs carelessness...both of
the individuals and of the crossing guard (because using a guard is no
guarantee of never getting hit & killed by a car).
Can I conclude, then, that you're chicken? :)
Nah, just better informed & less reckless than I was in the past.
-hh
But still a chicken. If you are better informed now then you'd be
trading, but more carefully.
But you packed and left the whole thing to others to manage.
You don't trust yourself. I do :)
On 3/1/25 6:31 AM, -hh wrote:
On 2/28/25 18:51, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 2/28/25 1:44 PM, -hh wrote:
On 2/28/25 13:01, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 2/28/25 4:55 AM, -hh wrote:
On 2/28/25 01:31, Physfitfreak wrote:
Nymshifter? I've never been nymshifter in my life. When I change >>>>>>> alias, it is because I really have changed. So depending on what >>>>>>> my main type of activity has been, every few years my alias also >>>>>>> changed accordingly.
"alias" = "PotAto, PoTaTo".
And I've never had more than one alias at the same time.
AFAIC, even an annual change is too rapid to be bothered with.
You're underestimating what an individual can do by himself in
the world of stocks and cryptos.
No, I'm merely recognizing that the difference in effort to
decrease the gambling risk is quite nonlinear; with the ROI being
unfavorable, I choose to not play that game.
Also, you have a ton of money in your mind when you think and
speak of it, large enough to make you really concerned. So I
understand why you leave it to experts to handle such sums.
I think you've misunderstood what I was saying with the experts:
their performance track records aren't any better than passive,
and since they cost more, they have an inferior ROI. This is why >>>>>> ~half the individual investor market today has changed from active >>>>>> to passive.
My world of trading is a microcosm of what experts are doing. It >>>>>>> is a baby game compared to those who play with hundreds of
thousands of dollars and higher.
The raw dollars largely doesn't matter; it is if you're achieving
one's goals or not - along with the insight of how much work is it >>>>>> taking you, to see if its worth the effort. If its gambling for
entertainment, that's fine so long as entertainment is your goal
and you're willing to pay for it at up to the "100% loss" level.
Also, presence of experts in the field, or volume of their
activities doesn't mean that they are necessarily competing with >>>>>>> you. They can't play god, they can't control you down to your
baby game if you know what you're doing. There are ample
opportunities for an individual to make a few extra thousand
dollars a year without even be felt by the big guys.
You'd be surprised. I think I've mentioned a friend who's
tinkered with a momentum-based decision tool; their conclusion is
that roughly ~1/3rd of a price is from manipulation.
This isn't about suddenly making a ton of money, which can happen >>>>>>> but one cannot rely on such strategies. It is about steadily
making a little sum of money for "silly" expenses as I described. >>>>>>> Especially during retirement.
That can also depend on what sum is required for "silly", along
with what one's risk tolerance is for gambling. Buying a lottery >>>>>> ticket can have just as much upside potential, but at a lower
level of effort. Or to have sufficient margin such that 'silly'
expenses are noise.
Try it if you like. Make a Robinhood account and put, say, $5k in >>>>>>> it and try to turn it into $10k in one year. You'll have a lot of >>>>>>> fun ahead of you :)Oh, I dabble in my 'gambling' set-aside. Had a 100% loss a few
years ago on one pick, but well enough on a few others. Current
speculation is up roughly +300% in less than a year. But point is >>>>>> that I know that its dabbling, and not necessary for my well-being >>>>>> or happiness.
-hh
Hmm.. I don't know what you exactly mean by, "alias" = "PotAto,
PoTaTo".
Ah, sorry: its a colloquialism:
<https://www.reddit.com/r/EnglishLearning/comments/1fmx44p/
what_does_potayto_potahto_usually_mean/>
Its noting that on "nymshifting" vs "alias", you're trying to claim
a distinction without any effective difference. See:
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Distinction_without_a_difference>
Did someone with alias "PotAto" pretended to be Physfitfreak? If
so, you've been victim of immature pranksters like "DFS" or that
"Sausage up wrestlers' ass" guy or Relf. Any "engineer" type bozo
included. So many of them morons tucked inside COLA.
n/a
The aliases I use aren't even true aliases. They are _descriptions_
of me. And they have changed every 5 or 6 years, cause it takes
that long for me (and other Modern Humans) to essentially become
someone else.
When I was deep into studying biology, I was "biofreak" here. When
I was deeply into the world of Excel, I was "Excelfreak" here. etc
and etc.
Doesn't matter AFAIC: I'm merely seeing "not the same name" so I
don't assume that it is still the same individual posting. Since
the most common abusers of nymshifting are luzer trolls not worthy
of attention or care, its where that behavior mostly gets binned.
Are you DRUNK when you reply to my posts? Why do I have to repeat
myself every time we communicate? (I know why - this is not a
question I need an answer for)
Because the real answer is something you don't like /s
This "gambling" thing... Ok. Education time. I think prudent stock
and crypto trading is not gambling. I think long term investments
in such fields are more like gambling! Hehe :) I'm not kidding.
That's your opinion and you're entitled to it. Personally, I'm not
convinced that crypto is any more of an intrinsic value asset than a
tulip bulb. See:
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tulip_mania>
Yes, it's not like real estate. Far less can happen negatively to a
piece of land than to your long term investments. In USA of course
long term investments are safer than in other countries. This
system here is located too far (geographically) from what's going
on in the world.
Gambling is like crossing the street with your eyes closed and ears
plugged. You'd do it either fast or slowly. That's as much control
there is that you can have. A Russian roulette.
But trading of stocks and crypto by yourself is like crossing the
street the way people who manage it all their lives do. Yes, some
morons get killed by crossing the street but that doesn't mean you
cannot cross the street safely all by yourself.
And of course for this analogy, there's many ways to cross a street
other than under the supervision of a crossing guard, which in
analogy form would relate to varying levels of care vs
carelessness...both of the individuals and of the crossing guard
(because using a guard is no guarantee of never getting hit & killed
by a car).
Can I conclude, then, that you're chicken? :)
Nah, just better informed & less reckless than I was in the past.
-hh
But still a chicken. If you are better informed now then you'd be
trading, but more carefully.
Or that from Maslow's hierarchy of needs, I'm where you claim I'm at:
higher up on the hierarchy such that those needs are being met.
A sports analogy is a team with a big lead. They have the freedom to
take fewer injury risks, run out the clock, & still comfortably win.
But you packed and left the whole thing to others to manage.
Whereas the real answer is 100% self-managed since 2018.
You don't trust yourself. I do :)
Partly correct, because I know that my cognitive decline is inevitable
with age, so my plans factor this in: a drive towards simplification &
having it be robustly resistant to errors/mistakes or shortfalls.
-hh
You're probably younger than me.
You shouldn't worry about these matters for another 30 years.
30 years is a life time. I don't buy my grave lot in my 20s.
See, you made me repeat again.
And when I do that; i.e., repeat myself, I stop that conversation cause
it tells me the addressee is impervious to sense itself :)
On 3/1/25 2:18 PM, -hh wrote:
Physfitfreak wrote:
{big snip}
You're probably younger than me.
Haven't bothered to keep track of things below my attention threshold.
If you're saying that to try to make a point, you need to say just
what age you are, to to provide self-contained context.
You shouldn't worry about these matters for another 30 years. 30
years is a life time. I don't buy my grave lot in my 20s.
No, simply being able to accept one's mortality isn't a requirement to
also immediately act on those things today: its just having a grip on
what the needs are and likely timeline. That means being deliberative
before deciding if to increase complexity even today.
See, you made me repeat again.
Not at all.
And when I do that; i.e., repeat myself, I stop that conversation
cause it tells me the addressee is impervious to sense itself :)
You want to disengage, but do so while trying to save face. Good luck.
-hh
You're back at it, aren't you. I'm not surprised. I don't like crooks. I
look down on them. And I don't lose face with them.
You (and that ChrisV) haven't learnt enough manners to deal with people
who can teach you stuff.
Hasn't been necessary for you two. Money
compensated for it instead.
It's your own fucking problem that I'm not a
crook even if it bothers you so much.
Apparently Trump's plan to include some of the cryptos into the Reserve
has been behind the jump.
Interestingly, other than Bitcoin and Ethereum, he specifically
mentioned XRP and Cardano and Solana _will_ be in the Reserve :)
Another normal day for everything I'm concerned. XRP did its slight
increase, going up and down by about 10 cents, and slight increases also
in stocks.
News out there is still good for XRP, but reality seems to have nailed
the price between $2 and $3, and its behavior today almost exactly
matched those of the other 4 I look at.
This is not that encouraging, but heck, 10 cents up and down within a
day for XRP is 3.5% increase and decrease, and if you have a huge number
of XRPs, will create some good money for you. Even if your position is
about 1000 of them, that's $100 a day that you'd be making. Not too bad.
A serious "silly" bills payer.
And remember that crypto trading does not incur the so-called "pattern
day trader" penalties for those who (in Robinhood anyway) have less than
$25k in their portfolio. So you could not do this with stocks. But with crypto, you can buy and sell as many times you can each day.
So cut your bullshit about this "Trump" and that "linux" and
"relativity" crap and make some money, I'd say :) Stop being an hh :-)
Hehe :)
Physfitfreak wrote:
Another normal day for everything I'm concerned. XRP did its slight
increase, going up and down by about 10 cents, and slight increases
also in stocks.
News out there is still good for XRP, but reality seems to have nailed
the price between $2 and $3, and its behavior today almost exactly
matched those of the other 4 I look at.
This is not that encouraging, but heck, 10 cents up and down within a
day for XRP is 3.5% increase and decrease, and if you have a huge
number of XRPs, will create some good money for you. Even if your
position is about 1000 of them, that's $100 a day that you'd be making.
Not too bad.
A serious "silly" bills payer.
And remember that crypto trading does not incur the so-called "pattern
day trader" penalties for those who (in Robinhood anyway) have less
than $25k in their portfolio. So you could not do this with stocks. But
with crypto, you can buy and sell as many times you can each day.
So cut your bullshit about this "Trump" and that "linux" and
"relativity" crap and make some money, I'd say :) Stop being an hh :-)
Hehe :)
Linux sucks.
On 3/5/25 9:57 PM, The Starmaker wrote:
Physfitfreak wrote:
Another normal day for everything I'm concerned. XRP did its slight
increase, going up and down by about 10 cents, and slight increases also >> in stocks.
News out there is still good for XRP, but reality seems to have nailed
the price between $2 and $3, and its behavior today almost exactly
matched those of the other 4 I look at.
This is not that encouraging, but heck, 10 cents up and down within a
day for XRP is 3.5% increase and decrease, and if you have a huge number >> of XRPs, will create some good money for you. Even if your position is
about 1000 of them, that's $100 a day that you'd be making. Not too bad. >> A serious "silly" bills payer.
And remember that crypto trading does not incur the so-called "pattern
day trader" penalties for those who (in Robinhood anyway) have less than >> $25k in their portfolio. So you could not do this with stocks. But with
crypto, you can buy and sell as many times you can each day.
So cut your bullshit about this "Trump" and that "linux" and
"relativity" crap and make some money, I'd say :) Stop being an hh :-)
Hehe :)
Linux sucks.
At the beginning, sure. But after learning a few tricks and especially
asking AI for directions, a time comes that you'll notice you don't want
to go back to Windows world cause it would be like going back to 8th grade.
On my computers nowadays, each time I encounter a Windows OS I install
Linux Mint on it. I'm comfortable enough with Linux Mint and it does everything now for me.
Windows is painfully slow, rude in manipulating your time and your
computer resources, and constantly pressing you in some way for the huge variety of businesses they conduct via Windows. They also make a lot of
money on selling information about you to the authorities, directly or indirectly as part of agreements they have with the military and
government agencies. You have no idea how much Microsoft owes you in
reality, and won't pay you a cent of it.
I think Windows business should be destroyed by the better Linux OS. But
the Sheep and the bought out Linux developers don't do that. They're not
man enough for that.
On 3/10/25 9:34 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/6/25 3:51 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
XRP
Hot time buying now 😁
No, still going down looks like. But even at the present price it is a bargain cause it'll sure go way above it not much later.
But knock on wood :)
At times like this as soon as it goes bull it rapidly goes up because a
lot are watching and begin buying, so it gets very easy to miss the event.
On 3/11/25 9:18 AM, -hh wrote:
On 3/10/25 14:38, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/10/25 9:34 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/6/25 3:51 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
XRP
Hot time buying now 😁
No, still going down looks like. But even at the present price it is
a bargain cause it'll sure go way above it not much later.
But knock on wood :)
At times like this as soon as it goes bull it rapidly goes up because
a lot are watching and begin buying, so it gets very easy to miss the
event.
Have fun being entertained with your gambling by trying to time the
market & good luck.
Meantime, this boring investor strategy, with no Market timing event
risks, has realized +$500 in the bank just since your 3/6 post.
..despite how the DJIA is already down by -400 points so far today.
-hh
Gee I don't know how much money you used to create $500 in a week of
time in a "bank"!..
With that kind of money I probably would make $5000 in that
same period with the exact way things happened to cryptos and
stocks since.
Stop hiding behind banks and letting them milk you like Sheep. Step
forward and take things under your own control and leave "banks" to
process your bills payments, and nothing else.
On 3/11/25 4:14 PM, -hh wrote:
On 3/11/25 11:56, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/11/25 9:18 AM, -hh wrote:
On 3/10/25 14:38, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/10/25 9:34 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/6/25 3:51 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
XRP
Hot time buying now 😁
No, still going down looks like. But even at the present price it
is a bargain cause it'll sure go way above it not much later.
But knock on wood :)
At times like this as soon as it goes bull it rapidly goes up
because a lot are watching and begin buying, so it gets very easy
to miss the event.
Have fun being entertained with your gambling by trying to time the
market & good luck.
Meantime, this boring investor strategy, with no Market timing event
risks, has realized +$500 in the bank just since your 3/6 post.
..despite how the DJIA is already down by -400 points so far today.
-hh
Gee I don't know how much money you used to create $500 in a week of
time in a "bank"!..
Because you're not familiar with English language colloquialisms.
To say "realized/in the bank" is that a gain didn't merely
theoretically exist on paper, but through a transaction, produced real
cash to take home.
With that kind of money I probably would make $5000 in that
same period with the exact way things happened to cryptos and stocks
since.
No, there is no "probably" involved because this is retrospective: you
either realized a real gain last week, or you didn't.
Stop hiding behind banks and letting them milk you like Sheep. Step
forward and take things under your own control and leave "banks" to
process your bills payments, and nothing else.
Not at all applicable.
-hh
Your own English, and that's reading comprehension, is not that perfect either. The word "probably" I used, applied to the unknown amount of
money, not whether I'd be successful in using it to realize gain or not.
Chicken!
The banks "probably" made $4500 with your money, and you saw only $500
of it.
On 3/12/25 7:23 PM, -hh wrote:
On 3/11/25 18:12, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/11/25 4:14 PM, -hh wrote:
On 3/11/25 11:56, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/11/25 9:18 AM, -hh wrote:
On 3/10/25 14:38, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/10/25 9:34 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/6/25 3:51 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
XRP
Hot time buying now 😁
No, still going down looks like. But even at the present price it >>>>>>> is a bargain cause it'll sure go way above it not much later.
But knock on wood :)
At times like this as soon as it goes bull it rapidly goes up
because a lot are watching and begin buying, so it gets very easy >>>>>>> to miss the event.
Have fun being entertained with your gambling by trying to time
the market & good luck.
Meantime, this boring investor strategy, with no Market timing
event risks, has realized +$500 in the bank just since your 3/6 post. >>>>>>
..despite how the DJIA is already down by -400 points so far today. >>>>>>
-hh
Gee I don't know how much money you used to create $500 in a week
of time in a "bank"!..
Because you're not familiar with English language colloquialisms.
To say "realized/in the bank" is that a gain didn't merely
theoretically exist on paper, but through a transaction, produced
real cash to take home.
With that kind of money I probably would make $5000 in that
same period with the exact way things happened to cryptos and
stocks since.
No, there is no "probably" involved because this is retrospective:
you either realized a real gain last week, or you didn't.
Stop hiding behind banks and letting them milk you like Sheep. Step
forward and take things under your own control and leave "banks" to
process your bills payments, and nothing else.
Not at all applicable.
-hh
Your own English, and that's reading comprehension, is not that
perfect either. The word "probably" I used, applied to the unknown
amount of money, not whether I'd be successful in using it to realize
gain or not.
No, that's a revision attempt on your part, for your statement was:
"With that kind of money I probably would make $5000..."
Chicken!
The banks "probably" made $4500 with your money, and you saw only
$500 of it.
That's a new statement you're now adding, and it is another example of
you speculating.
Of course, it is now already Wednesday, so how are you doing so far
with your reckless gambling so far this week?
-hh
Childish ..
The "probably" is tied with "that kind of money" which was unknown to
me. But I'm repeating myself, so I'm again in the presence of a type of > crook.
I made no new statement. If I could make $5000 with "that kind of
money", your bank would've certainly made at least $5000 with your
money. They'd pocket $4500 of it, and give you $500. A happy Sheep.
That's how banks work.
With Robinhood, the most you pay is usually only one cent per stock in
each transaction. It's an open book.
But there's no telling what banks are doing with your money. So is that something to brag about?
I'd rather handle it myself even if I lose money! At least I don't get insulted by crooks. It will all be my own doing!
Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/13/25 6:06 PM, -hh wrote:now you're getting like me , good work
On 3/13/25 00:49, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/12/25 7:23 PM, -hh wrote:
On 3/11/25 18:12, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/11/25 4:14 PM, -hh wrote:
On 3/11/25 11:56, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/11/25 9:18 AM, -hh wrote:
On 3/10/25 14:38, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/10/25 9:34 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/6/25 3:51 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
XRP
Hot time buying now 😁
No, still going down looks like. But even at the present price >>>>>>>>>> it is a bargain cause it'll sure go way above it not much later. >>>>>>>>>>
But knock on wood :)
At times like this as soon as it goes bull it rapidly goes up >>>>>>>>>> because a lot are watching and begin buying, so it gets very >>>>>>>>>> easy to miss the event.
Have fun being entertained with your gambling by trying to time >>>>>>>>> the market & good luck.
Meantime, this boring investor strategy, with no Market timing >>>>>>>>> event risks, has realized +$500 in the bank just since your 3/6 >>>>>>>>> post.
..despite how the DJIA is already down by -400 points so far >>>>>>>>> today.
-hh
Gee I don't know how much money you used to create $500 in a
week of time in a "bank"!..
Because you're not familiar with English language colloquialisms. >>>>>>>
To say "realized/in the bank" is that a gain didn't merely
theoretically exist on paper, but through a transaction, produced >>>>>>> real cash to take home.
With that kind of money I probably would make $5000 in that
same period with the exact way things happened to cryptos and
stocks since.
No, there is no "probably" involved because this is
retrospective: you either realized a real gain last week, or you >>>>>>> didn't.
Stop hiding behind banks and letting them milk you like Sheep. >>>>>>>> Step forward and take things under your own control and leave
"banks" to process your bills payments, and nothing else.
Not at all applicable.
-hh
Your own English, and that's reading comprehension, is not that
perfect either. The word "probably" I used, applied to the unknown >>>>>> amount of money, not whether I'd be successful in using it to
realize gain or not.
No, that's a revision attempt on your part, for your statement was:
"With that kind of money I probably would make $5000..."
Chicken!
The banks "probably" made $4500 with your money, and you saw only
$500 of it.
That's a new statement you're now adding, and it is another example
of you speculating.
Of course, it is now already Wednesday, so how are you doing so far
with your reckless gambling so far this week?
-hh
Childish ..
The "probably" is tied with "that kind of money" which was unknown
to me. But I'm repeating myself, so I'm again in the presence of a
type of > crook.
I made no new statement. If I could make $5000 with "that kind of
money", your bank would've certainly made at least $5000 with your
money. They'd pocket $4500 of it, and give you $500. A happy Sheep.
That's how banks work.
Irrelevant, when you don't know what the principle is, nor who the
enterprise (if any) is for which there's been these gains banked.
With Robinhood, the most you pay is usually only one cent per stock
in each transaction. It's an open book.
But you're still gambling though...right?
But there's no telling what banks are doing with your money. So is
that something to brag about?
I'd rather handle it myself even if I lose money! At least I don't
get insulted by crooks. It will all be my own doing!
What you're saying is merely that the Roulette wheel is (mostly) honest? >>>
In any event, its now Thursday ... how are ya doing this week?
Because its just one more business trading day until this week's
outcomes become retrospective too.
So far this month, it appears that you've delivered no actual real
gains made, but just some a "coulda, woulda" weak excuses.
-hh
"Gambling" again? I think that's your way of covering for your being
chicken. Not even trusting yourself. This conversation is all about
you and is getting boring.
Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/14/25 8:57 AM, -hh wrote:
I have my own strategies which are lower risk & more passive.
I'm listening..
me too , i can't wait to read that
On 3/14/25 7:42 PM, -hh wrote:
On 3/14/25 14:52, % wrote:
Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/14/25 8:57 AM, -hh wrote:
I have my own strategies which are lower risk & more passive.
I'm listening..
me too , i can't wait to read that
Sure. Here ya go:
<https://pages.retirementresearcher.com/sales/open-membership-
enrollment?c=0>
-hh
You might’s well take those Ginco Balaloba herbs. Same voodoo effect.
$5.49 for a two month supply.
Your way of losing profit to crooks is like your way of giving money to computer seller crooks, which is itself like your way of giving fortunes
to car seller crooks. You have a symbiotic relationship with crooks :)
I wonder why.
On 3/14/25 21:11, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/14/25 7:42 PM, -hh wrote:
On 3/14/25 14:52, % wrote:
Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/14/25 8:57 AM, -hh wrote:
I have my own strategies which are lower risk & more passive.
I'm listening..
me too , i can't wait to read that
Sure. Here ya go:
<https://pages.retirementresearcher.com/sales/open-membership-
enrollment?c=0>
-hh
You might’s well take those Ginco Balaloba herbs. Same voodoo effect.
$5.49 for a two month supply.
That's merely your opinion based on your personal biases. I've seen how
it has increased my understanding, as well as resulted in subsequent
gains in Net Worth and the "sleep at night" rule, to conclude otherwise.
Your way of losing profit to crooks is like your way of giving money to
computer seller crooks, which is itself like your way of giving
fortunes to car seller crooks. You have a symbiotic relationship with
crooks :)
I wonder why.
Or you could just buy the book for $30 and grind through it to figure
out the basics on your own:
<https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1945640154>
That's doable as a DIY, but most lack the discipline to do it, and in
doing so, lose years of compounding growth opportunity.
Case in point: so how did you actually do this week?
And the month's total?
Or are you going to have some excuse of being 'too busy' or whatnot...
-hh
On 3/15/25 6:37 AM, -hh wrote:
On 3/14/25 21:11, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/14/25 7:42 PM, -hh wrote:
On 3/14/25 14:52, % wrote:
Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/14/25 8:57 AM, -hh wrote:
I have my own strategies which are lower risk & more passive.
I'm listening..
me too , i can't wait to read that
Sure. Here ya go:
<https://pages.retirementresearcher.com/sales/open-membership-
enrollment?c=0>
-hh
You might’s well take those Ginco Balaloba herbs. Same voodoo effect.
$5.49 for a two month supply.
That's merely your opinion based on your personal biases. I've seen
how it has increased my understanding, as well as resulted in
subsequent gains in Net Worth and the "sleep at night" rule, to
conclude otherwise.
Your way of losing profit to crooks is like your way of giving money
to computer seller crooks, which is itself like your way of giving
fortunes to car seller crooks. You have a symbiotic relationship with
crooks :)
I wonder why.
Or you could just buy the book for $30 and grind through it to figure
out the basics on your own:
<https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1945640154>
That's doable as a DIY, but most lack the discipline to do it, and in
doing so, lose years of compounding growth opportunity.
Case in point: so how did you actually do this week?
And the month's total?
Or are you going to have some excuse of being 'too busy' or whatnot...
-hh
I don't disclose such information in social media on demand.
But I will tell you whether "$500" profit in one week from your invested money has been appropriate or not, if you disclose the amount of money involved in creating it.
On 3/15/25 10:31 PM, -hh wrote:
I don't disclose such information in social media on demand.
Oh, so still just a zero then. On a thread that *you* started.
But I will tell you whether "$500" profit in one week from your
invested money has been appropriate or not, if you disclose the
amount of money involved in creating it.
Which actually doesn't matter because it was just a narrow time slice
of a value which varies by week. Some weeks will even be zero, which
is fine, because "weekly" isn't my timescale of interest.
But since you're trying to be judgemental based on return rate, I
certainly could go look up this past week's items' published return
(eg, 4.98%), but that value is based on its current street price, not
what I actually paid, so my returns are different; figure double.
Another one in the basket might similarly be ~1% on paper, but its
holding has appreciated by +700%, so more math there too.
Plus there's also the ~zero effort element too which I've said I value.
Plus there's what my actual performance objectives are. Together,
needing minimal effort for returns which reliably exceed inflation is
a win by what I've set for my needs & priorities; YMMV (obviously).
Better go buy that book. Work smarter, not harder.
-hh
It sounds like you're happy with what you're doing.
Then what's the fuss for :)
On 3/16/25 10:17 AM, -hh wrote:
On 3/15/25 23:56, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/15/25 10:31 PM, -hh wrote:
I don't disclose such information in social media on demand.
Oh, so still just a zero then. On a thread that *you* started.
But I will tell you whether "$500" profit in one week from your
invested money has been appropriate or not, if you disclose the
amount of money involved in creating it.
Which actually doesn't matter because it was just a narrow time
slice of a value which varies by week. Some weeks will even be
zero, which is fine, because "weekly" isn't my timescale of interest.
But since you're trying to be judgemental based on return rate, I
certainly could go look up this past week's items' published return
(eg, 4.98%), but that value is based on its current street price,
not what I actually paid, so my returns are different; figure
double. Another one in the basket might similarly be ~1% on paper,
but its holding has appreciated by +700%, so more math there too.
Plus there's also the ~zero effort element too which I've said I value. >>>> Plus there's what my actual performance objectives are. Together,
needing minimal effort for returns which reliably exceed inflation
is a win by what I've set for my needs & priorities; YMMV (obviously). >>>>
Better go buy that book. Work smarter, not harder.
-hh
It sounds like you're happy with what you're doing.
Yup.
Then what's the fuss for :)
The only fuss is someone who's been trying to gamble with catching the
falling knife on their "hot tip" of XRP.
Wonder how that's been working out for them?
Perhaps -15.8% for Month over Month is a clue...? /s
-hh
For XRP?.. where're you getting your data from?
In the last week the low
was 1.89 and high was just four days later 2.47. Steady rise. You could
put about 50 cents of the difference to your own gain. Do the math for
100 xrp, 1000 xrp, 10000 xrp ... whatever money you invest in it, and
feel shame that banks got all that with _your_ money but your pocket
didn't.
Sheep shouldn't involve themselves in trading. Take the chicken shit and
feel happy too.
On 3/16/25 3:08 PM, -hh wrote:
Well, it was what you trolled with.
Bye.
On 3/19/25 2:08 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/17/25 1:16 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/17/25 12:49 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/10/25 1:38 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/10/25 9:34 AM, Physfitfreak wrote:
On 3/6/25 3:51 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
XRP
Hot time buying now 😁
No, still going down looks like. But even at the present price it
is a bargain cause it'll sure go way above it not much later.
But knock on wood :)
At times like this as soon as it goes bull it rapidly goes up
because a lot are watching and begin buying, so it gets very easy
to miss the event.
This may happen to XRP! .. A couple of analysts are saying as soon
as the present dispute between Security and Exchange Commission
(SEC) and XRP (Ripple Labs) ends - and it is in its final phase -
XRP might jump to about $15.
An almost similar jump took place a few months back when Ripple
presented SEC a proof of safety and speed in its codes conducting
XRP transactions (more safely and much faster than other cryptos).
That made XRP to climb fast from $0.50 to above $3 in value. SEC has
not responded to that proof yet, but is about to.
SEC's beef with Ripple Labs is that they weren't sure their
transactions were secure enough as well against outsiders, and had
the needed integrity in them practiced by insiders. I think they had
seen how fast the transactions were and how little they used energy
compared to other cryptos, and became suspicious of some kind of
fraud in the machinery.
Well, Ripple Labs disclosed their codes, tested them for SEC, and
proved that they carry both security as well as integrity in them,
and no insider and outsider can affect that. This alone, before even
SEC responds to it, made XRP to go up and never come back down to
$0.50 again.
So likely, as soon as SEC shows the slightest sign of approval of
Ripple's machinery, XRP will jump in price.
Not a bad idea to buy a large number of XRP while it is under $3.
I'd buy much more if most of my investing money was not tied
elsewhere in other trade contracts.
I think even if SEC takes a step back but continues nagging, XRP
will go up. This is so because there might not be ever an SEC's full
approval for any crypto or stocks trade. The commission is formed to
police trading for security and integrity. Can you "convince" the
police in your city that the city is safe enough and now they can
move to another city? ..
So any sign, any step back, will do! :)
And SEC isn't just looking into it casually as its daily chores. The
Treasury wants to buy a huge amount of XRP. So this is pushing SEC to
do their job.
As I mentioned before, somebody, one of the analysts, mentioned that
Treasury might buy XRP at $10k each..!
So this little XRP might be another "Bitcoin" in disguise. Its future
looks bright.
SEC dropped its lawsuit against XRP!... :-)
But the jump in price was about 14% only, so far. Not everyone is
aware of this yet. So I can expect for it to go higher during a few
coming days.
Ok, now the road for the Emergency Reserve is open to purchase XRP.
And more than that, the SEC's firm acceptance of Ripple Labs software
and manner of operation as "safe", as well as having the required
"integrity", makes this coin a very nice candidate to grow in value.
I think I was correct in counting on it. The rest of my investing
money is still tied in other trade contracts (Options) otherwise I'd
buy XRP right now with every dollar of it.
Today's other four main cryptos (BTC, DOGE, and SHIB) raised in value
only a bit more than 3%.
No, the price isn't budging. Stocks have lost value and people don't
want to sell them at such lows so they could buy XRP.
As stocks recover, however, XRP will grow.
If XRP had grown steadily, people _would_ sell their stocks at low to
buy XRP.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 02:51:37 |
| Calls: | 10,387 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 14,061 |
| Messages: | 6,416,755 |