Hungary makes it official: only two genders, end of debate
The parliament in Hungary has passed a constitutional amendment recognizing only two genders — male and female. The decision was supported by 140 lawmakers, with 21 voting against and no abstentions.
The revised constitution states:
"Hungary protects marriage as a union between a man and a woman, and the
family as the foundation of the nation. A person is either male or
female. A father is a man, a mother is a woman."
It's amazing that common sense has to be codified in this Woke world. Britain's Supreme Court seems to have to made the same decision.
It's amazing that common sense has to be codified in this Woke world.
Hungary makes it official: only two genders, end of debate
The parliament in Hungary has passed a constitutional amendment recognizing >only two genders male and female. The decision was supported by 140 >lawmakers, with 21 voting against and no abstentions.
The revised constitution states:
"Hungary protects marriage as a union between a man and a woman, and the
family as the foundation of the nation. A person is either male or
female. A father is a man, a mother is a woman."
It's amazing that common sense has to be codified in this Woke world. >Britain's Supreme Court seems to have to made the same decision.
Le 17-04-2025, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit :
It's amazing that common sense has to be codified in this Woke world.
It's amazing how some late people can't understand science. It's
unsurprising you can believe that vaccine can be designed to kill
people, which goes against common sense.
RonB wrote:
Hungary makes it official: only two genders, end of debate
The parliament in Hungary has passed a constitutional amendment recognizing >> only two genders — male and female. The decision was supported by 140
lawmakers, with 21 voting against and no abstentions.
The revised constitution states:
"Hungary protects marriage as a union between a man and a woman, and the >> family as the foundation of the nation. A person is either male or
female. A father is a man, a mother is a woman."
Strange that it even needs to be spelled-out, eh?
It's amazing that common sense has to be codified in this Woke world.
Britain's Supreme Court seems to have to made the same decision.
That's *really* amazing, since Britain's now a shithole where posting reasonable opinions online can get you arrested and jailed.
On 2025-04-17, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 4/17/25 15:41, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
Le 17-04-2025, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit :
It's amazing that common sense has to be codified in this Woke world.
It's amazing how some late people can't understand science. It's
unsurprising you can believe that vaccine can be designed to kill
people, which goes against common sense.
Meanwhile, a few dozen thousands of people were hurt or maimed by the
vaccine, even according to VAERS. That's only those who survived and
managed to report; those who died suddenly didn't get such an honour.
Stil, lett's all ignore our friends who had uteran cancer or
myocarditis, our resident expert on everything under the sun is telling
us we're wrong.
< snip braindead government narrative communicated by Stéphane Carpentier >
There has never been anything like the mass of reports in the VAERS system like the reports on this so-called mRNA "vaccine" compared to any other vaccine. Not even close. To deny this fact is to deny reality.
(Unfortunately a lot of gullible idiots are quite capable of denying this obvious, scientific reality and the fact that it clearly shows the harm the covid mRNA "vaccines" have caused.)
Le 17-04-2025, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit :
It's amazing that common sense has to be codified in this Woke world.
It's amazing how some late people can't understand science. It's
unsurprising you can believe that vaccine can be designed to kill
people, which goes against common sense.
For your information, I'm pretty sure, you won't believe/understand
that: the ADN defines if someone is a man or a woman. So, someone is
either: a woman if she has XX chromosomes and a man if he has XY
chromosomes. But, the issue is: some people get different combinations.
It looks like hard to believe but it's real. OK, woke people tend to say
that almost no one is either XX or XY and other combinations are more
well spread than they really are. But other combinations exist anyway,
your common sense is just an impossibility to see reality as it is.
On 2025-04-17, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 4/17/25 15:41, Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
Le 17-04-2025, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit :
It's amazing that common sense has to be codified in this Woke world.
It's amazing how some late people can't understand science. It's
unsurprising you can believe that vaccine can be designed to kill
people, which goes against common sense.
Meanwhile, a few dozen thousands of people were hurt or maimed by the
vaccine, even according to VAERS. That's only those who survived and
managed to report; those who died suddenly didn't get such an honour.
Stil, lett's all ignore our friends who had uteran cancer or
myocarditis, our resident expert on everything under the sun is telling
us we're wrong.
< snip braindead government narrative communicated by Stéphane Carpentier >
There has never been anything like the mass of reports in the VAERS system like the reports on this so-called mRNA "vaccine" compared to any other vaccine. Not even close. To deny this fact is to deny reality.
(Unfortunately a lot of gullible idiots are quite capable of denying this obvious, scientific reality and the fact that it clearly shows the harm the covid mRNA "vaccines" have caused.)
vallor wrote:
On 17 Apr 2025 19:41:22 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr>its a good thing you got linux so you can post in usenet
wrote in <68015962$0$417$426a74cc@news.free.fr>:
Le 17-04-2025, RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> a écrit :
It's amazing that common sense has to be codified in this Woke world.
It's amazing how some late people can't understand science. It's
unsurprising you can believe that vaccine can be designed to kill
people, which goes against common sense.
For your information, I'm pretty sure, you won't believe/understand
that: the ADN defines if someone is a man or a woman. So, someone is
either: a woman if she has XX chromosomes and a man if he has XY
chromosomes. But, the issue is: some people get different
combinations. It looks like hard to believe but it's real. OK, woke
people tend to say that almost no one is either XX or XY and other
combinations are more well spread than they really are. But other
combinations exist anyway, your common sense is just an impossibility
to see reality as it is.
There are biological women with XY chromosomes that were born female,
and didn't even know about the XY. Some have even carried babies to
term.
It happens. Do you feel threatened by that?
First one was a pandemic itself, which killed 1.2 million Americans.
This generated far more submissions by health professionals than a
normal or bad flu season/year.
It's amazing how some late people can't understand science. It's
unsurprising you can believe that vaccine can be designed to kill
people, which goes against common sense.
Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
It's amazing how some late people can't understand science. It's
unsurprising you can believe that vaccine can be designed to kill
people, which goes against common sense.
They are _designed_ to make money. They often have beneficial effects
along with the detrimental side-effects. I'm trying my best to avoid
all those GD chemical concoctions that they are coming up with,
including statins, which they want me to take to reduce my
cholesterol. My plan is to stay thin and exercise, rather than pop a
pill.
I guess I won't know if I'm right or wrong until the day I drop
dead...
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 4/17/25 17:05, chrisv wrote:
RonB wrote:
Hungary makes it official: only two genders, end of debate
The parliament in Hungary has passed a constitutional amendment recognizing
only two genders — male and female. The decision was supported by 140 >>>> lawmakers, with 21 voting against and no abstentions.
The revised constitution states:
"Hungary protects marriage as a union between a man and a woman, and the
family as the foundation of the nation. A person is either male or >>>> female. A father is a man, a mother is a woman."
Strange that it even needs to be spelled-out, eh?
It's amazing that common sense has to be codified in this Woke world.
Britain's Supreme Court seems to have to made the same decision.
That's *really* amazing, since Britain's now a shithole where posting
reasonable opinions online can get you arrested and jailed.
+1
Britain was infected with Wokism and de-platforming (shouting-down)
by the USAliens. At last cooler heads are prevailing, not before time.
They are _designed_ to make money. They often have beneficial effects
along with the detrimental side-effects. I'm trying my best to avoid
all those GD chemical concoctions that they are coming up with,
including statins, which they want me to take to reduce my cholesterol.
My plan is to stay thin and exercise, rather than pop a pill.
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 21:36:14 -0500, -hh wrote:
First one was a pandemic itself, which killed 1.2 million Americans.
This generated far more submissions by health professionals than a
normal or bad flu season/year.
It as interesting that the mortality rate of the normal seasonal influenza essentially fell to zero.
On 2025-04-18, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
It's amazing how some late people can't understand science. It's >>>unsurprising you can believe that vaccine can be designed to kill
people, which goes against common sense.
They are _designed_ to make money. They often have beneficial effects
along with the detrimental side-effects. I'm trying my best to avoid
all those GD chemical concoctions that they are coming up with,
including statins, which they want me to take to reduce my cholesterol.
My plan is to stay thin and exercise, rather than pop a pill.
I guess I won't know if I'm right or wrong until the day I drop dead...
When I was a kid, if you were overweight doctors used to say, "eat less
and excercise more" now they knee-jerk pimp for Big Pharma by saying
"there's a pill for that." Which is healthier?
RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2025-04-18, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote:
RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2025-04-17, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
RonB wrote:
Hungary makes it official: only two genders, end of debate
The parliament in Hungary has passed a constitutional amendment
recognizing only two genders ? male and female. The decision was
supported by 140 lawmakers, with 21 voting against and no
abstentions.
The revised constitution states:
"Hungary protects marriage as a union between a man and a woman, >>>>>> and the family as the foundation of the nation. A person is either >>>>>> male or female. A father is a man, a mother is a woman."
Strange that it even needs to be spelled-out, eh?
It's amazing that common sense has to be codified in this Woke world. >>>>>> Britain's Supreme Court seems to have to made the same decision.
That's *really* amazing, since Britain's now a shithole where posting >>>>> reasonable opinions online can get you arrested and jailed.
I'm pretty sure that, in Britain, they'll probably change the law. They're >>>> that far gone with this Woke stupidity.
Have you been to Britain, RonB?
Nope. But I can read.
From where have you gained your information, RonB? Is it
a trustworthy, authoritative and timely source of British news?
RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-18, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote:no they don't
RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2025-04-18, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote:
RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2025-04-17, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
RonB wrote:
Hungary makes it official: only two genders, end of debate
The parliament in Hungary has passed a constitutional amendment >>>>>>>> recognizing only two genders ? male and female. The decision was >>>>>>>> supported by 140 lawmakers, with 21 voting against and no
abstentions.
The revised constitution states:
"Hungary protects marriage as a union between a man and a woman, >>>>>>>> and the family as the foundation of the nation. A person is >>>>>>>> either
male or female. A father is a man, a mother is a woman."
Strange that it even needs to be spelled-out, eh?
It's amazing that common sense has to be codified in this Woke >>>>>>>> world.That's *really* amazing, since Britain's now a shithole where
Britain's Supreme Court seems to have to made the same decision. >>>>>>>
posting
reasonable opinions online can get you arrested and jailed.
I'm pretty sure that, in Britain, they'll probably change the law. >>>>>> They're
that far gone with this Woke stupidity.
Have you been to Britain, RonB?
Nope. But I can read.
From where have you gained your information, RonB? Is it
a trustworthy, authoritative and timely source of British news?
Are you going to deny that people have been jailed for posting memes in
Britain? If so you better get hold of the British press and tell them,
because they seem to be "confused" on the subject.
-hh wrote:
First one was a pandemic itself, which killed 1.2 million Americans.
This generated far more submissions by health professionals than a
normal or bad flu season/year.
It as interesting that the mortality rate of the normal seasonal influenza >essentially fell to zero.
Look at Stéphane, for example, he's been convinced that a "vaccine"
that caused my sister-in-law, my best friend and her co-worker to
develop uteran cancer and need to have their reproductive system is
_safe_.
He's telling us that the injection that caused the cousin of my former brother-in-law and his wife to develop cancer is helpful.
With such a brilliant perspective, it should be no wonder why France is quickly turning into yet another Muslim caliphate.
Sn!pe wrote:
Britain was infected with Wokism and de-platforming (shouting-down)
by the USAliens. At last cooler heads are prevailing, not before time.
There might be _signs_ that they're waking up to the woke disease, but >Britain is much further down the rabbit hole than the United States
could ever be. I don't see people being arrested for sharing a meme on
this continent yet.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 4/18/25 17:01, Sn!pe wrote:
RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2025-04-18, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote:
RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2025-04-17, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
RonB wrote:
Hungary makes it official: only two genders, end of debate
The parliament in Hungary has passed a constitutional amendment >>>>>>>> recognizing only two genders ? male and female. The decision was >>>>>>>> supported by 140 lawmakers, with 21 voting against and no
abstentions.
The revised constitution states:
"Hungary protects marriage as a union between a man and a woman, >>>>>>>> and the family as the foundation of the nation. A person is either >>>>>>>> male or female. A father is a man, a mother is a woman."
Strange that it even needs to be spelled-out, eh?
It's amazing that common sense has to be codified in this Woke world. >>>>>>>> Britain's Supreme Court seems to have to made the same decision. >>>>>>>That's *really* amazing, since Britain's now a shithole where posting >>>>>>> reasonable opinions online can get you arrested and jailed.
I'm pretty sure that, in Britain, they'll probably change the law. >>>>>> They're that far gone with this Woke stupidity.
Have you been to Britain, RonB?
Nope. But I can read.
From where have you gained your information, RonB? Is it
a trustworthy, authoritative and timely source of British news?
The "trustworthy," "authoritative" sources we are encouraged to use by
our respective government always lie by omission. Here in Canada, CBC
routinely removes details, as do CTV, Global and even the local LCN. The
only way you will really know what's going on is if you get your news through
a combination of the mainstream garbage and independent sources.
You always have to use the latter to confirm.
I always take all my news with a big pinch of salt, not to say a
cynical, distrusting approach. I form my opinions by gleaning
information from as many independent sources as I can, giving
due weight to their reputation for trustworthiness.
IMHO "Rebelnews" does not inspire trust.
I abhor bigotry.
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
[...]
no they don'tIt's amazing that common sense has to be codified in this Woke >>>>>>>>>> world. Britain's Supreme Court seems to have to made the same >>>>>>>>>> decision.
That's *really* amazing, since Britain's now a shithole where >>>>>>>>> posting reasonable opinions online can get you arrested and
jailed.
I'm pretty sure that, in Britain, they'll probably change the law. >>>>>>>> They're that far gone with this Woke stupidity.
Have you been to Britain, RonB?
Nope. But I can read.
From where have you gained your information, RonB? Is it
a trustworthy, authoritative and timely source of British news?
Are you going to deny that people have been jailed for posting memes in >>>> Britain? If so you better get hold of the British press and tell them, >>>> because they seem to be "confused" on the subject.
<https://www.rebelnews.com/man_jailed_in_uk_for_posting_memes_of_george_floyd_in_whatsapp_facebook_group_chats>
"A former West Mercia police officer has been jailed for 20 weeks for
sharing 10 memes about George Floyd in a WhatsApp group chat and
charged with "sending grossly offensive messages"."
That's plain racist abuse, not "posting memes".
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3ej8zp4971o>
Incitement to riot is not just "posting memes".
<https://news.sky.com/story/police-officer-jailed-over-racist-whatsapp-memes-mocking-george-floyds-death-12633966>
Promoting racism is not just "posting memes".
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy76dxkpjpjo>
"Stirring up racial hatred on social media." is not just "posting
memes".
Le 19-04-2025, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> a écrit :
Look at Stéphane, for example, he's been convinced that a "vaccine"
that caused my sister-in-law, my best friend and her co-worker to
develop uteran cancer and need to have their reproductive system is
_safe_.
CrudeSausage wrote:
Sn!pe wrote:
Britain was infected with Wokism and de-platforming (shouting-down)
by the USAliens. At last cooler heads are prevailing, not before time.
It's an exception to the rule, and in any case comes too late. They
are *fucked*.
There might be _signs_ that they're waking up to the woke disease, but
Britain is much further down the rabbit hole than the United States
could ever be. I don't see people being arrested for sharing a meme on
this continent yet.
Whites are already a minority in London.
(!)
Those Muslims are going to out-breed the whites 4-to-1. It won't be
more than a couple generations that England (of all places!) will be a
black Muslim country!
CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
[...]
I always take all my news with a big pinch of salt, not to say a
cynical, distrusting approach. I form my opinions by gleaning
information from as many independent sources as I can, giving
due weight to their reputation for trustworthiness.
IMHO "Rebelnews" does not inspire trust.
I abhor bigotry.
And I abhor cowards who worship at the alter of political correctness.
< snip uninteresting perspective >
More rudeness. It's abundantly plain that your opinions are immovable
so this exchange of views is at an end.
On 2025-04-18, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote:
It's amazing how some late people can't understand science. It's
unsurprising you can believe that vaccine can be designed to kill
people, which goes against common sense.
They are _designed_ to make money. They often have beneficial effects
along with the detrimental side-effects. I'm trying my best to avoid
all those GD chemical concoctions that they are coming up with,
including statins, which they want me to take to reduce my
cholesterol. My plan is to stay thin and exercise, rather than pop a
pill.
I guess I won't know if I'm right or wrong until the day I drop
dead...
When I was a kid, if you were overweight doctors used to say, "eat less and excercise more" now they knee-jerk pimp for Big Pharma by saying "there's a pill for that." Which is healthier?
rbowman wrote:
-hh wrote:
First one was a pandemic itself, which killed 1.2 million Americans.
This generated far more submissions by health professionals than a
normal or bad flu season/year.
Far less than the 2% that many (such as yourself, IIRC) predicted, and
nearly all of them where very old and sick already.
It as interesting that the mortality rate of the normal seasonal influenza >> essentially fell to zero.
The summary of what happened:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/lab-leak-true-origins-of-covid-19/
Download the full report (completed last year, BTW) here:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/2024.12.04-SSCP-FINAL-REPORT-ANS.pdf
RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2025-04-18, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote:[...]
RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2025-04-18, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote:
RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2025-04-17, chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
RonB wrote:
It's amazing that common sense has to be codified in this Woke world. >>>>>>>> Britain's Supreme Court seems to have to made the same decision. >>>>>>>That's *really* amazing, since Britain's now a shithole where posting >>>>>>> reasonable opinions online can get you arrested and jailed.
I'm pretty sure that, in Britain, they'll probably change the law. >>>>>> They're that far gone with this Woke stupidity.
Have you been to Britain, RonB?
Nope. But I can read.
From where have you gained your information, RonB? Is it
a trustworthy, authoritative and timely source of British news?
Are you going to deny that people have been jailed for posting memes
in Britain? If so you better get hold of the British press and tell them,
because they seem to be "confused" on the subject.
At this moment I am neither denying nor confirming anything.
I asked you a question which you have not yet answered, RonB.
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
rbowman wrote:
-hh wrote:
First one was a pandemic itself, which killed 1.2 million Americans.
This generated far more submissions by health professionals than a
normal or bad flu season/year.
Far less than the 2% that many (such as yourself, IIRC) predicted, and
nearly all of them where very old and sick already.
I’ll check on if it was a prediction, or just the topical estimate of
worst case.
Le 19-04-2025, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> a écrit :
Look at Stéphane, for example, he's been convinced that a "vaccine"
that caused my sister-in-law, my best friend and her co-worker to
develop uteran cancer and need to have their reproductive system is
_safe_.
You are the biggest liar I ever saw. First, I never said vaccine covid
was safe. It would be stupid. The only safe medicine that exist is
called a placebo. It's useless. So a vaccine have side effects, it's
normal.
<snip>
Stéphane CARPENTIER wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
Le 19-04-2025, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> a écrit :
Look at Stéphane, for example, he's been convinced that a "vaccine"
that caused my sister-in-law, my best friend and her co-worker to
develop uteran cancer and need to have their reproductive system is
_safe_.
You are the biggest liar I ever saw. First, I never said vaccine covid
was safe. It would be stupid. The only safe medicine that exist is
called a placebo. It's useless. So a vaccine have side effects, it's
normal.
<snip>
Crood is trolling, to get a rise out of you. Silly-assed off-topic kiddie-shit. A familiar scent.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=71Hk8LXJCAM
Trolling Linux Users Never Gets Old
On 2025-04-19, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote:
<https://www.rebelnews.com/man_jailed_in_uk_for_posting_memes_of_george_floyd_in_whatsapp_facebook_group_chats>
"A former West Mercia police officer has been jailed for 20 weeks for
sharing 10 memes about George Floyd in a WhatsApp group chat and
charged with "sending grossly offensive messages"."
That's plain racist abuse, not "posting memes".
Not like the "mostly peaceful" BLM riots, eh?
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3ej8zp4971o>
Incitement to riot is not just "posting memes".
Even "mostly peaceful" riots where only a few people are killed or beaten, and only a few dozen buildings are burned down and only a few hundred shops are looted and vandalized? Are you TRYING to offend BLM because, you know, black lives matter. But it's "racist" to say "white lives matter," don't you know?
<https://news.sky.com/story/police-officer-jailed-over-racist-whatsapp-memes-mocking-george-floyds-death-12633966>
Promoting racism is not just "posting memes".
And burning, looting, beating and murder are not racist if they're done
under the flag of "BLM." They're just "mostly peaceful" protests.
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy76dxkpjpjo>
"Stirring up racial hatred on social media." is not just "posting
memes".
I hope you're not speaking about the racist BLM. Those racists don't like to be called racists. You could lose your Woke card and be summarily canceled — maybe even jailed for racism.
Better trod carefully when speaking out against "mostly peaceful" riots. Be sure you know who's ox is being gored. Sometimes it's hard to tell the difference between a "mostly peaceful" protest and a riot, don't you know.
On 2025-04-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 4/21/25 00:40, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-19, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote:It sounds to me like Snipe left because he realized that he wasn't in an
<https://www.rebelnews.com/man_jailed_in_uk_for_posting_memes_of_george_floyd_in_whatsapp_facebook_group_chats>
"A former West Mercia police officer has been jailed for 20 weeks for
sharing 10 memes about George Floyd in a WhatsApp group chat and
charged with "sending grossly offensive messages"."
That's plain racist abuse, not "posting memes".
Not like the "mostly peaceful" BLM riots, eh?
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3ej8zp4971o>
Incitement to riot is not just "posting memes".
Even "mostly peaceful" riots where only a few people are killed or beaten, >>> and only a few dozen buildings are burned down and only a few hundred shops >>> are looted and vandalized? Are you TRYING to offend BLM because, you know, >>> black lives matter. But it's "racist" to say "white lives matter," don't you
know?
<https://news.sky.com/story/police-officer-jailed-over-racist-whatsapp-memes-mocking-george-floyds-death-12633966>
Promoting racism is not just "posting memes".
And burning, looting, beating and murder are not racist if they're done
under the flag of "BLM." They're just "mostly peaceful" protests.
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy76dxkpjpjo>
"Stirring up racial hatred on social media." is not just "posting
memes".
I hope you're not speaking about the racist BLM. Those racists don't like to
be called racists. You could lose your Woke card and be summarily canceled >>> — maybe even jailed for racism.
Better trod carefully when speaking out against "mostly peaceful" riots. Be >>> sure you know who's ox is being gored. Sometimes it's hard to tell the
difference between a "mostly peaceful" protest and a riot, don't you know. >>
echo chamber where everyone is forced to agree with his stupidity or get
banned (or doxxed). I hope he enjoys the choir of BlueSky.
I'm not in favor of riots. They are, by their nature, not "mostly peaceful." But I've got a feeling that Snipe opposed them (or not) depending on who was doing the "mostly peaceful protesting."
On 2025-04-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 4/21/25 17:52, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 4/21/25 00:40, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-19, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote:
<https://www.rebelnews.com/man_jailed_in_uk_for_posting_memes_of_george_floyd_in_whatsapp_facebook_group_chats>
"A former West Mercia police officer has been jailed for 20 weeks for >>>>>> sharing 10 memes about George Floyd in a WhatsApp group chat and >>>>>> charged with "sending grossly offensive messages"."
That's plain racist abuse, not "posting memes".
Not like the "mostly peaceful" BLM riots, eh?
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3ej8zp4971o>
Incitement to riot is not just "posting memes".
Even "mostly peaceful" riots where only a few people are killed or beaten,
and only a few dozen buildings are burned down and only a few hundred shops
are looted and vandalized? Are you TRYING to offend BLM because, you know,
black lives matter. But it's "racist" to say "white lives matter," don't you
know?
<https://news.sky.com/story/police-officer-jailed-over-racist-whatsapp-memes-mocking-george-floyds-death-12633966>
Promoting racism is not just "posting memes".
And burning, looting, beating and murder are not racist if they're done >>>>> under the flag of "BLM." They're just "mostly peaceful" protests.
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy76dxkpjpjo>
"Stirring up racial hatred on social media." is not just "posting
memes".
I hope you're not speaking about the racist BLM. Those racists don't like to
be called racists. You could lose your Woke card and be summarily canceled
— maybe even jailed for racism.
Better trod carefully when speaking out against "mostly peaceful" riots. Be
sure you know who's ox is being gored. Sometimes it's hard to tell the >>>>> difference between a "mostly peaceful" protest and a riot, don't you know.
It sounds to me like Snipe left because he realized that he wasn't in an >>>> echo chamber where everyone is forced to agree with his stupidity or get >>>> banned (or doxxed). I hope he enjoys the choir of BlueSky.
I'm not in favor of riots. They are, by their nature, not "mostly peaceful."
But I've got a feeling that Snipe opposed them (or not) depending on who was
doing the "mostly peaceful protesting."
I used to want to talk to people with opposing opinions and see if we
have common ground somewhere, but with my older age I've lost all
interest because they never make any kind of sense. It's the same thing
with Muslims and their near total, purposeful misunderstanding of the
Christian religion to further their own. If Snipe doesn't like that we
have a different opinion, he's free to join Larry Pietraskiewicz in that
abandoned linux group he once tried to get us to migrate to.
The days of disagreeing but still getting along are long gone. The Woke cancel culture is for immediate dismissal of the person who disagrees with them. If they can cancel, they cancel, if they can't cancel they retreat.
Any time you disagree with one of these Woke whiners, they call you a
"hater" for taking a contrary position and arguing with them. This is what cults do, these are not the actions of reasonable people.
My family was always an arguing family. We would argue politics, even religion, and ten minutes the argument was forgotten. I've never understood cliquish cult mentality. I've never wanted to be part of a clique.
NutYahoo in Israel IS genocidal. You can't call it much else when they
carpet bomb women and children trapped in Gaza, and don't allow food and health supplies in.
On 2025-04-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-04-22 02:05, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 4/21/25 17:52, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 4/21/25 00:40, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-19, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote:
<https://www.rebelnews.com/man_jailed_in_uk_for_posting_memes_of_george_floyd_in_whatsapp_facebook_group_chats>
"A former West Mercia police officer has been jailed for 20 weeks for >>>>>>>> sharing 10 memes about George Floyd in a WhatsApp group chat and >>>>>>>> charged with "sending grossly offensive messages"."
That's plain racist abuse, not "posting memes".
Not like the "mostly peaceful" BLM riots, eh?
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3ej8zp4971o>
Incitement to riot is not just "posting memes".
Even "mostly peaceful" riots where only a few people are killed or beaten,
and only a few dozen buildings are burned down and only a few hundred shops
are looted and vandalized? Are you TRYING to offend BLM because, you know,
black lives matter. But it's "racist" to say "white lives matter," don't you
know?
<https://news.sky.com/story/police-officer-jailed-over-racist-whatsapp-memes-mocking-george-floyds-death-12633966>
Promoting racism is not just "posting memes".
And burning, looting, beating and murder are not racist if they're done >>>>>>> under the flag of "BLM." They're just "mostly peaceful" protests. >>>>>>>
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy76dxkpjpjo>
"Stirring up racial hatred on social media." is not just "posting >>>>>>>> memes".
I hope you're not speaking about the racist BLM. Those racists don't like to
be called racists. You could lose your Woke card and be summarily canceled
— maybe even jailed for racism.
Better trod carefully when speaking out against "mostly peaceful" riots. Be
sure you know who's ox is being gored. Sometimes it's hard to tell the >>>>>>> difference between a "mostly peaceful" protest and a riot, don't you know.
It sounds to me like Snipe left because he realized that he wasn't in an >>>>>> echo chamber where everyone is forced to agree with his stupidity or get >>>>>> banned (or doxxed). I hope he enjoys the choir of BlueSky.
I'm not in favor of riots. They are, by their nature, not "mostly peaceful."
But I've got a feeling that Snipe opposed them (or not) depending on who was
doing the "mostly peaceful protesting."
I used to want to talk to people with opposing opinions and see if we
have common ground somewhere, but with my older age I've lost all
interest because they never make any kind of sense. It's the same thing >>>> with Muslims and their near total, purposeful misunderstanding of the
Christian religion to further their own. If Snipe doesn't like that we >>>> have a different opinion, he's free to join Larry Pietraskiewicz in that >>>> abandoned linux group he once tried to get us to migrate to.
The days of disagreeing but still getting along are long gone. The Woke
cancel culture is for immediate dismissal of the person who disagrees with >>> them. If they can cancel, they cancel, if they can't cancel they retreat. >>> Any time you disagree with one of these Woke whiners, they call you a
"hater" for taking a contrary position and arguing with them. This is what >>> cults do, these are not the actions of reasonable people.
My family was always an arguing family. We would argue politics, even
religion, and ten minutes the argument was forgotten. I've never understood >>> cliquish cult mentality. I've never wanted to be part of a clique.
This morning, I actually discovered that my old high school buddy, who
went from working as a Director of Engineering at Microsoft to doing the
same at Google, actually left the corporation recently to start work at
some AI company called Snowflake. I can imagine what would prompt a
person to leave a lucrative, comfortable position at Google, but I
imagine that a Coptic Christian whose father escaped a position as
doctor in Egypt because of Muslim bullying to come to Montreal and work
at The Bay could see the writing on the wall. The guy probably just
wanted to do his job and create some new technology, but faggots kept
talking about their genders, privilege, white supremacy, how black lives
matter, how Israel is participating in genocide and so on. If I were
still speaking to him, I'd congratulate him for jumping off the sinking
ship of wokeness.
NutYahoo in Israel IS genocidal. You can't call it much else when they
carpet bomb women and children trapped in Gaza, and don't allow food and health supplies in.
Other than that, yeah.
On 2025-04-23, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-04-23 01:12, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-04-22 02:05, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 4/21/25 17:52, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 4/21/25 00:40, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-19, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote:
<https://www.rebelnews.com/man_jailed_in_uk_for_posting_memes_of_george_floyd_in_whatsapp_facebook_group_chats>
"A former West Mercia police officer has been jailed for 20 weeks for
sharing 10 memes about George Floyd in a WhatsApp group chat and
charged with "sending grossly offensive messages"."
That's plain racist abuse, not "posting memes".
Not like the "mostly peaceful" BLM riots, eh?
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3ej8zp4971o>
Incitement to riot is not just "posting memes".
Even "mostly peaceful" riots where only a few people are killed or beaten,
and only a few dozen buildings are burned down and only a few hundred shops
are looted and vandalized? Are you TRYING to offend BLM because, you know,
black lives matter. But it's "racist" to say "white lives matter," don't you
know?
<https://news.sky.com/story/police-officer-jailed-over-racist-whatsapp-memes-mocking-george-floyds-death-12633966>
Promoting racism is not just "posting memes".
And burning, looting, beating and murder are not racist if they're done
under the flag of "BLM." They're just "mostly peaceful" protests. >>>>>>>>>
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy76dxkpjpjo>
"Stirring up racial hatred on social media." is not just "posting >>>>>>>>>> memes".
I hope you're not speaking about the racist BLM. Those racists don't like to
be called racists. You could lose your Woke card and be summarily canceled
— maybe even jailed for racism.
Better trod carefully when speaking out against "mostly peaceful" riots. Be
sure you know who's ox is being gored. Sometimes it's hard to tell the
difference between a "mostly peaceful" protest and a riot, don't you know.
It sounds to me like Snipe left because he realized that he wasn't in an
echo chamber where everyone is forced to agree with his stupidity or get
banned (or doxxed). I hope he enjoys the choir of BlueSky.
I'm not in favor of riots. They are, by their nature, not "mostly peaceful."
But I've got a feeling that Snipe opposed them (or not) depending on who was
doing the "mostly peaceful protesting."
I used to want to talk to people with opposing opinions and see if we >>>>>> have common ground somewhere, but with my older age I've lost all
interest because they never make any kind of sense. It's the same thing >>>>>> with Muslims and their near total, purposeful misunderstanding of the >>>>>> Christian religion to further their own. If Snipe doesn't like that we >>>>>> have a different opinion, he's free to join Larry Pietraskiewicz in that >>>>>> abandoned linux group he once tried to get us to migrate to.
The days of disagreeing but still getting along are long gone. The Woke >>>>> cancel culture is for immediate dismissal of the person who disagrees with
them. If they can cancel, they cancel, if they can't cancel they retreat. >>>>> Any time you disagree with one of these Woke whiners, they call you a >>>>> "hater" for taking a contrary position and arguing with them. This is what
cults do, these are not the actions of reasonable people.
My family was always an arguing family. We would argue politics, even >>>>> religion, and ten minutes the argument was forgotten. I've never understood
cliquish cult mentality. I've never wanted to be part of a clique.
This morning, I actually discovered that my old high school buddy, who >>>> went from working as a Director of Engineering at Microsoft to doing the >>>> same at Google, actually left the corporation recently to start work at >>>> some AI company called Snowflake. I can imagine what would prompt a
person to leave a lucrative, comfortable position at Google, but I
imagine that a Coptic Christian whose father escaped a position as
doctor in Egypt because of Muslim bullying to come to Montreal and work >>>> at The Bay could see the writing on the wall. The guy probably just
wanted to do his job and create some new technology, but faggots kept
talking about their genders, privilege, white supremacy, how black lives >>>> matter, how Israel is participating in genocide and so on. If I were
still speaking to him, I'd congratulate him for jumping off the sinking >>>> ship of wokeness.
NutYahoo in Israel IS genocidal. You can't call it much else when they
carpet bomb women and children trapped in Gaza, and don't allow food and >>> health supplies in.
Other than that, yeah.
I'm sure that a lot of what Israel is doing is not by the book. However,
having spent a lot of time with Muslims, I know how sneaky they are.
Whenever there is any kind of altercation, they will claim to be
victims. You can actually spot them committing a crime and they will say
that the crime was committed against them. If you have a mountain of
evidence against them, their first instinct is to manipulate and make a
deal. There is no possibility of self-reflection whatsoever in that
community. That's why I am convinced that a lot of the stories we get
about how the Gazans are victims are also manipulated to make them look
like victims.
If any of you have had only limited interaction with Muslims, I would
suggest you watch videos from YouTube where Christians, armed with loads
of evidence about the Koran's contradictions and lies, interrupt, talk
over and attack people demonstrating that Islam is a religion of
bullshit. It is like they've been trained since birth to wage taqiyya
against anyone who points out their many flaws.
I think "not by the book" is letting them off with genocide with a light tap on the wrist. These sons of bitches in Israel have been murdering Palestinians for over 70 years. Even before this latest war, they regularly "mowed the grass" (their term) in Gaza about every three years. By "mowing the grass" they meant arbitrarily bombing civilians, men, women and
children. One of their more infamous bombings was during the hour of the day when children were walking home from school. The bastards in the Israeli government are satanic.
Palestine was not always Muslim. The Christians that lived there have pretty much been eradicated, The ones that remain are spit on by the Orthodox Jews. Before the Israeli terrorist thugs made Israel a "state" they're the ones
who were bombing buses and homes and they stole these homes from the Palestinians.
Buying into this "fake news" narrative about the genocide is to fall for Israeli propaganda. These damn bastards actually call children "terrorists." Peace will only come to the Middle East when the Israeli government is eradicated.
Before the Israeli terrorists agitated for and created their Zionist
"state," Jews, Christians and Muslims lived in Palestine in peace with one another.
NutYahoo is doing his best to destroy Israel. I hope he soon complete the job.
On 2025-04-24, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-04-24 08:58, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-23, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-04-23 01:12, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-04-22 02:05, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:This morning, I actually discovered that my old high school buddy, who >>>>>> went from working as a Director of Engineering at Microsoft to doing the >>>>>> same at Google, actually left the corporation recently to start work at >>>>>> some AI company called Snowflake. I can imagine what would prompt a >>>>>> person to leave a lucrative, comfortable position at Google, but I >>>>>> imagine that a Coptic Christian whose father escaped a position as >>>>>> doctor in Egypt because of Muslim bullying to come to Montreal and work >>>>>> at The Bay could see the writing on the wall. The guy probably just >>>>>> wanted to do his job and create some new technology, but faggots kept >>>>>> talking about their genders, privilege, white supremacy, how black lives >>>>>> matter, how Israel is participating in genocide and so on. If I were >>>>>> still speaking to him, I'd congratulate him for jumping off the sinking >>>>>> ship of wokeness.
On 4/21/25 17:52, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 4/21/25 00:40, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-19, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote:
<https://www.rebelnews.com/man_jailed_in_uk_for_posting_memes_of_george_floyd_in_whatsapp_facebook_group_chats>
"A former West Mercia police officer has been jailed for 20 weeks for
sharing 10 memes about George Floyd in a WhatsApp group chat and
charged with "sending grossly offensive messages"." >>>>>>>>>>>>
That's plain racist abuse, not "posting memes".
Not like the "mostly peaceful" BLM riots, eh?
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3ej8zp4971o>
Incitement to riot is not just "posting memes".
Even "mostly peaceful" riots where only a few people are killed or beaten,
and only a few dozen buildings are burned down and only a few hundred shops
are looted and vandalized? Are you TRYING to offend BLM because, you know,
black lives matter. But it's "racist" to say "white lives matter," don't you
know?
<https://news.sky.com/story/police-officer-jailed-over-racist-whatsapp-memes-mocking-george-floyds-death-12633966>
Promoting racism is not just "posting memes".
And burning, looting, beating and murder are not racist if they're done
under the flag of "BLM." They're just "mostly peaceful" protests. >>>>>>>>>>>
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy76dxkpjpjo>
"Stirring up racial hatred on social media." is not just "posting >>>>>>>>>>>> memes".
I hope you're not speaking about the racist BLM. Those racists don't like to
be called racists. You could lose your Woke card and be summarily canceled
— maybe even jailed for racism.
Better trod carefully when speaking out against "mostly peaceful" riots. Be
sure you know who's ox is being gored. Sometimes it's hard to tell the
difference between a "mostly peaceful" protest and a riot, don't you know.
It sounds to me like Snipe left because he realized that he wasn't in an
echo chamber where everyone is forced to agree with his stupidity or get
banned (or doxxed). I hope he enjoys the choir of BlueSky.
I'm not in favor of riots. They are, by their nature, not "mostly peaceful."
But I've got a feeling that Snipe opposed them (or not) depending on who was
doing the "mostly peaceful protesting."
I used to want to talk to people with opposing opinions and see if we >>>>>>>> have common ground somewhere, but with my older age I've lost all >>>>>>>> interest because they never make any kind of sense. It's the same thing
with Muslims and their near total, purposeful misunderstanding of the >>>>>>>> Christian religion to further their own. If Snipe doesn't like that we >>>>>>>> have a different opinion, he's free to join Larry Pietraskiewicz in that
abandoned linux group he once tried to get us to migrate to.
The days of disagreeing but still getting along are long gone. The Woke >>>>>>> cancel culture is for immediate dismissal of the person who disagrees with
them. If they can cancel, they cancel, if they can't cancel they retreat.
Any time you disagree with one of these Woke whiners, they call you a >>>>>>> "hater" for taking a contrary position and arguing with them. This is what
cults do, these are not the actions of reasonable people.
My family was always an arguing family. We would argue politics, even >>>>>>> religion, and ten minutes the argument was forgotten. I've never understood
cliquish cult mentality. I've never wanted to be part of a clique. >>>>>>
NutYahoo in Israel IS genocidal. You can't call it much else when they >>>>> carpet bomb women and children trapped in Gaza, and don't allow food and >>>>> health supplies in.
Other than that, yeah.
I'm sure that a lot of what Israel is doing is not by the book. However, >>>> having spent a lot of time with Muslims, I know how sneaky they are.
Whenever there is any kind of altercation, they will claim to be
victims. You can actually spot them committing a crime and they will say >>>> that the crime was committed against them. If you have a mountain of
evidence against them, their first instinct is to manipulate and make a >>>> deal. There is no possibility of self-reflection whatsoever in that
community. That's why I am convinced that a lot of the stories we get
about how the Gazans are victims are also manipulated to make them look >>>> like victims.
If any of you have had only limited interaction with Muslims, I would
suggest you watch videos from YouTube where Christians, armed with loads >>>> of evidence about the Koran's contradictions and lies, interrupt, talk >>>> over and attack people demonstrating that Islam is a religion of
bullshit. It is like they've been trained since birth to wage taqiyya
against anyone who points out their many flaws.
I think "not by the book" is letting them off with genocide with a light tap
on the wrist. These sons of bitches in Israel have been murdering
Palestinians for over 70 years. Even before this latest war, they regularly >>> "mowed the grass" (their term) in Gaza about every three years. By "mowing >>> the grass" they meant arbitrarily bombing civilians, men, women and
children. One of their more infamous bombings was during the hour of the day
when children were walking home from school. The bastards in the Israeli >>> government are satanic.
Palestine was not always Muslim. The Christians that lived there have pretty
much been eradicated, The ones that remain are spit on by the Orthodox Jews.
Before the Israeli terrorist thugs made Israel a "state" they're the ones >>> who were bombing buses and homes and they stole these homes from the
Palestinians.
Buying into this "fake news" narrative about the genocide is to fall for >>> Israeli propaganda. These damn bastards actually call children "terrorists."
Peace will only come to the Middle East when the Israeli government is
eradicated.
Before the Israeli terrorists agitated for and created their Zionist
"state," Jews, Christians and Muslims lived in Palestine in peace with one >>> another.
NutYahoo is doing his best to destroy Israel. I hope he soon complete the >>> job.
For my part, I don't really care about either side. Israel doesn't care
about Christians unless they need money or people to fight for them.
Similarly, Muslims don't care about us and would be glad to kill us
and/or rape out wives. There is a chance that Christians and Muslims
lived in peace, but I have a lot of trouble believing that narrative
considering what their scripture says about how we should be treated.
As for Palestine pre-Israel, you don't have to go by narrative you just have to go by history.
I'm aware of the history. Weren't different factions fighting for
control of that territory before the British gave it away? Wouldn't that suggest that they were at odds and therefore not peaceful?
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 21:33:42 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
I'm aware of the history. Weren't different factions fighting for
control of that territory before the British gave it away? Wouldn't that
suggest that they were at odds and therefore not peaceful?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tel_Hai
There was a very small Jewish population during the time the Ottoman
Empire controlled the are. Meanwhile the Brits were giving it to the
Arabs, French, and Jews sequentially. If you want to know why the area is
so screwed up look at perfidious Albion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Declaration
Britain originally tried to give the Jews Uganda, but, no, it had to be
the real estate mentioned in their tribal legends.
RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-24, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:i only go by american history it's the funniest
On 2025-04-24 08:58, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-23, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-04-23 01:12, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-04-22 02:05, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-22, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:This morning, I actually discovered that my old high school
On 4/21/25 17:52, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-21, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 4/21/25 00:40, RonB wrote:I'm not in favor of riots. They are, by their nature, not
On 2025-04-19, Sn!pe <snipeco.2@gmail.com> wrote:
<https://www.rebelnews.com/
man_jailed_in_uk_for_posting_memes_of_george_floyd_in_whatsapp_facebook_group_chats>
"A former West Mercia police officer has been jailed for 20 >>>>>>>>>>>>> weeks for
sharing 10 memes about George Floyd in a WhatsApp >>>>>>>>>>>>> group chat and
charged with "sending grossly offensive messages"." >>>>>>>>>>>>>
That's plain racist abuse, not "posting memes".
Not like the "mostly peaceful" BLM riots, eh?
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3ej8zp4971o>
Incitement to riot is not just "posting memes".
Even "mostly peaceful" riots where only a few people are >>>>>>>>>>>> killed or beaten,
and only a few dozen buildings are burned down and only a >>>>>>>>>>>> few hundred shops
are looted and vandalized? Are you TRYING to offend BLM >>>>>>>>>>>> because, you know,
black lives matter. But it's "racist" to say "white lives >>>>>>>>>>>> matter," don't you
know?
<https://news.sky.com/story/police-officer-jailed-over- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> racist-whatsapp-memes-mocking-george-floyds-death-12633966> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Promoting racism is not just "posting memes".
And burning, looting, beating and murder are not racist if >>>>>>>>>>>> they're done
under the flag of "BLM." They're just "mostly peaceful" >>>>>>>>>>>> protests.
<https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cy76dxkpjpjo>
"Stirring up racial hatred on social media." is not just >>>>>>>>>>>>> "posting
memes".
I hope you're not speaking about the racist BLM. Those >>>>>>>>>>>> racists don't like to
be called racists. You could lose your Woke card and be >>>>>>>>>>>> summarily canceled
— maybe even jailed for racism.
Better trod carefully when speaking out against "mostly >>>>>>>>>>>> peaceful" riots. Be
sure you know who's ox is being gored. Sometimes it's hard >>>>>>>>>>>> to tell the
difference between a "mostly peaceful" protest and a riot, >>>>>>>>>>>> don't you know.
It sounds to me like Snipe left because he realized that he >>>>>>>>>>> wasn't in an
echo chamber where everyone is forced to agree with his
stupidity or get
banned (or doxxed). I hope he enjoys the choir of BlueSky. >>>>>>>>>>
"mostly peaceful."
But I've got a feeling that Snipe opposed them (or not)
depending on who was
doing the "mostly peaceful protesting."
I used to want to talk to people with opposing opinions and see >>>>>>>>> if we
have common ground somewhere, but with my older age I've lost all >>>>>>>>> interest because they never make any kind of sense. It's the >>>>>>>>> same thing
with Muslims and their near total, purposeful misunderstanding >>>>>>>>> of the
Christian religion to further their own. If Snipe doesn't like >>>>>>>>> that we
have a different opinion, he's free to join Larry
Pietraskiewicz in that
abandoned linux group he once tried to get us to migrate to.
The days of disagreeing but still getting along are long gone. >>>>>>>> The Woke
cancel culture is for immediate dismissal of the person who
disagrees with
them. If they can cancel, they cancel, if they can't cancel they >>>>>>>> retreat.
Any time you disagree with one of these Woke whiners, they call >>>>>>>> you a
"hater" for taking a contrary position and arguing with them.
This is what
cults do, these are not the actions of reasonable people.
My family was always an arguing family. We would argue politics, >>>>>>>> even
religion, and ten minutes the argument was forgotten. I've never >>>>>>>> understood
cliquish cult mentality. I've never wanted to be part of a clique. >>>>>>>
buddy, who
went from working as a Director of Engineering at Microsoft to
doing the
same at Google, actually left the corporation recently to start
work at
some AI company called Snowflake. I can imagine what would prompt a >>>>>>> person to leave a lucrative, comfortable position at Google, but I >>>>>>> imagine that a Coptic Christian whose father escaped a position as >>>>>>> doctor in Egypt because of Muslim bullying to come to Montreal
and work
at The Bay could see the writing on the wall. The guy probably just >>>>>>> wanted to do his job and create some new technology, but faggots >>>>>>> kept
talking about their genders, privilege, white supremacy, how
black lives
matter, how Israel is participating in genocide and so on. If I were >>>>>>> still speaking to him, I'd congratulate him for jumping off the
sinking
ship of wokeness.
NutYahoo in Israel IS genocidal. You can't call it much else when
they
carpet bomb women and children trapped in Gaza, and don't allow
food and
health supplies in.
Other than that, yeah.
I'm sure that a lot of what Israel is doing is not by the book.
However,
having spent a lot of time with Muslims, I know how sneaky they are. >>>>> Whenever there is any kind of altercation, they will claim to be
victims. You can actually spot them committing a crime and they
will say
that the crime was committed against them. If you have a mountain of >>>>> evidence against them, their first instinct is to manipulate and
make a
deal. There is no possibility of self-reflection whatsoever in that
community. That's why I am convinced that a lot of the stories we get >>>>> about how the Gazans are victims are also manipulated to make them
look
like victims.
If any of you have had only limited interaction with Muslims, I would >>>>> suggest you watch videos from YouTube where Christians, armed with
loads
of evidence about the Koran's contradictions and lies, interrupt, talk >>>>> over and attack people demonstrating that Islam is a religion of
bullshit. It is like they've been trained since birth to wage taqiyya >>>>> against anyone who points out their many flaws.
I think "not by the book" is letting them off with genocide with a
light tap
on the wrist. These sons of bitches in Israel have been murdering
Palestinians for over 70 years. Even before this latest war, they
regularly
"mowed the grass" (their term) in Gaza about every three years. By
"mowing
the grass" they meant arbitrarily bombing civilians, men, women and
children. One of their more infamous bombings was during the hour of
the day
when children were walking home from school. The bastards in the
Israeli
government are satanic.
Palestine was not always Muslim. The Christians that lived there
have pretty
much been eradicated, The ones that remain are spit on by the
Orthodox Jews.
Before the Israeli terrorist thugs made Israel a "state" they're the
ones
who were bombing buses and homes and they stole these homes from the
Palestinians.
Buying into this "fake news" narrative about the genocide is to fall
for
Israeli propaganda. These damn bastards actually call children
"terrorists."
Peace will only come to the Middle East when the Israeli government is >>>> eradicated.
Before the Israeli terrorists agitated for and created their Zionist
"state," Jews, Christians and Muslims lived in Palestine in peace
with one
another.
NutYahoo is doing his best to destroy Israel. I hope he soon
complete the
job.
For my part, I don't really care about either side. Israel doesn't care
about Christians unless they need money or people to fight for them.
Similarly, Muslims don't care about us and would be glad to kill us
and/or rape out wives. There is a chance that Christians and Muslims
lived in peace, but I have a lot of trouble believing that narrative
considering what their scripture says about how we should be treated.
As for Palestine pre-Israel, you don't have to go by narrative you
just have
to go by history.
Yeah, they were called Zionist terrorists (the gangs who bombed the
buses, etc.). And that began happening shortly before the British gave
them the Zionist state by stealing it from the Palestinians. It was the beginning of the terrorist state called Israel, not reflected in the centuries before that the terrorists began Zionist terrorist campaign.
On 2025-04-25, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-04-25 01:34, rbowman wrote:
On Thu, 24 Apr 2025 21:33:42 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
I'm aware of the history. Weren't different factions fighting for
control of that territory before the British gave it away? Wouldn't that >>>> suggest that they were at odds and therefore not peaceful?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Tel_Hai
There was a very small Jewish population during the time the Ottoman
Empire controlled the are. Meanwhile the Brits were giving it to the
Arabs, French, and Jews sequentially. If you want to know why the area is >>> so screwed up look at perfidious Albion.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Declaration
Britain originally tried to give the Jews Uganda, but, no, it had to be
the real estate mentioned in their tribal legends.
I'm sure they would have done a much better job of running Uganda than
Idi Amin did.
I doubt it. They would have probably emptied the country by selling the population as slaves. The Jews were the main slave traders during U.S. Colonial days. A fact not mentioned often.
However, I've seen how Muslims deal with debates
on religion and how much respect they offer to people who think
differently.
Le 26-04-2025, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> a écrit :
However, I've seen how Muslims deal with debates
on religion and how much respect they offer to people who think
differently.
Yep and I see how church deals with protecting pedophiles among its
members. So, you want to claim all Muslims are terrorist, it's like my
saying that all catholics priests are pedophiles. And I'm closer to
the truth than you are. Then now, when Ronb says I know nothing about Americans when I claim that they believe the world is flat, I hope my
FAI provider will show me his answer to your bullshit.
I know, you hope your next pope will be more pedophile than woke, so I
don't really care about your answer. What I'd like to know is how he can
deal with stupid generalities on one side when that suit his claims.
On 2025-04-26, Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote:
Le 26-04-2025, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> a écrit :
However, I've seen how Muslims deal with debates
on religion and how much respect they offer to people who think
differently.
Yep and I see how church deals with protecting pedophiles among its
members. So, you want to claim all Muslims are terrorist, it's like my
saying that all catholics priests are pedophiles. And I'm closer to
the truth than you are. Then now, when Ronb says I know nothing about
Americans when I claim that they believe the world is flat, I hope my
FAI provider will show me his answer to your bullshit.
I know, you hope your next pope will be more pedophile than woke, so I
don't really care about your answer. What I'd like to know is how he can
deal with stupid generalities on one side when that suit his claims.
You're so full of crap it oozes out your gill slits. Another "tolerant" Woke moron,
so long as we agree with you 100% when you're spewing your lying
bullshit.
Take a guess how much rape (of women and children) has increased in Europe after opening their door to millions of Muslims. Look at the murder rate in Sweden (formally a peaceful country) after mass immigration of Muslims. (Now has a thirty times higher rate of murder than London which, itself, is no picnic.) In Sweden, if a woman reports being raped by an immigrant, she's
may face jail time for being a "racist."
Europe is suicidally insane. Your traitorous leaders have done a great job
of turning their citizen's brains into Woke mush. Congratulations.
I note you capitalize "Muslim" but use lower case for "Catholic." Figures.
On 2025-04-26, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
On Sat, 26 Apr 2025 02:35:07 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
Yeah, they were called Zionist terrorists (the gangs who bombed the
buses, etc.). And that began happening shortly before the British gave
them the Zionist state by stealing it from the Palestinians. It was
the beginning of the terrorist state called Israel, not reflected in
the centuries before that the terrorists began Zionist terrorist
campaign.
I doubt they would make the movie today but in the 1960 'Exodus' Sal
Mineo plays Dov Landau who is recruited into the Irgun. Landau is a
bomb maker who participates in the bombing of the King David Hotel that
killed 91 people.
There is a funny scene where Ari Ben Canaan, played by Paul Newman, is
masquerading as a British officer to steal supplies from a British
depot. Peter Lawford is a British major who informs Ben Canaan he can
smell a Jew a mile away while the Jews make off with his supplies.
IRL, after 1948 Irgun was folded into the IDF and the leader of the
terrorist organization, Begin, eventually became the prime minister of
Israel.
I didn't realize this film existed. Before my time, I guess.
On 2025-04-26, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 4/25/25 22:35, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-25, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 4/24/25 21:22, RonB wrote:
As for Palestine pre-Israel, you don't have to go by narrative you just have
to go by history.
I'm aware of the history. Weren't different factions fighting for
control of that territory before the British gave it away? Wouldn't that >>>> suggest that they were at odds and therefore not peaceful?
Yeah, they were called Zionist terrorists (the gangs who bombed the buses, >>> etc.). And that began happening shortly before the British gave them the >>> Zionist state by stealing it from the Palestinians. It was the beginning of >>> the terrorist state called Israel, not reflected in the centuries before >>> that the terrorists began Zionist terrorist campaign.
That might be the case. However, I've seen how Muslims deal with debates
on religion and how much respect they offer to people who think
differently. To say the least, they are very violent. It's not normal
that I wouldn't be able to analyze a song with my students because
Muhammad in the corner was told that music is haram and will get violent
if I play it. It's not normal that I can't watch a show with the kids
because Muhammad Jr. in the corner thinks two characters kissing is
haram and will get violent if I show it. It's not normal that I
constantly have to worry about the crucifix I wear showing because
Muhammad the Third in the corner was taught that Jesus didn't really die
on the cross and will get violent if he sees it. The reality is that it
is impossible to live peacefully with them because every value we have
and every sign we display is offensive to them.
Christians in Israel face the same kind of issues with the Orthodox Jews
(and the IDF). They're spit on and their churches are shuttered on Christian holy days.
I'm not a Muslim and I don't like a lot of their crap, but you've got to remember, it was the Palestinians who were driven out of their homes and businesses and were driven into refugee camps. These homes and businesses were given to the Jews (simply because they were Jews) who streamed in from all over the world.
Europe (and the U.S. and Canada) are doing something similar by moving illegal aliens (many Muslim) to the front of the line for benefits while the native citizens stand at the back of the line and watch. I know you already resent this, but how much more would you resent having your home confiscated from you and given to an illegal alien? (Probably a Muslim.)
That's what happened to the Palestinians. Gaza is basically an open air prison. And American Jews "vacation" in Israel by burning down orchards and destroying homes while backed by the IDF on the West Bank. They then claim the property for their own. There's only so much of that crap that anyone
can take.
So, while I don't like the Muslim religion, I can understand what drives their hatred for the Israelis. Under similar circumstances you would
probably be a "terrorist" as well. (As if carpet bombing civilians, and denying them food, water and medicine is not the act of terrorist and genocidal state.)
Yep: Musk and Trump are far better. Paying foreign countries to put US citizens who did nothing in their jails is far better.
I note you capitalize "Muslim" but use lower case for "Catholic." Figures.
You shouldn't. It's a typo. Unlike the word "Catholic", the word
"Muslim" isn't spelled the same in French and in English. So when I
forget to capitalize the word "Muslim", it shows but not when I forget
to capitalize "Catholic".
The Gazans have a reason to hate Jews, but they would have hated them regardless of whether anything had been done to them. Heck, the entire religion advocates for a hatred of both Christians and Jews, the latter
of which was on the pretense that they had persecuted Muhammad.
There are different Muslim sects. Some are much less aggressive than
others.
The Shiites, for example, aren't usually the "head choppers," that's
nearly always the Sunnis. Guess which ones the U.S. cuddles up to?
Jews in Iran, for example, are not persecuted so long as they identify
as Iranians and not Zionists (Israelis). Iran is a Shiite country.
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 06:39:41 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
There are different Muslim sects. Some are much less aggressive than
others.
The Shiites, for example, aren't usually the "head choppers," that's
nearly always the Sunnis. Guess which ones the U.S. cuddles up to?
Jews in Iran, for example, are not persecuted so long as they identify
as Iranians and not Zionists (Israelis). Iran is a Shiite country.
To further complicate it, Arabs are a small minority in Iran and
frequently persecuted. Iran inherited what was called Arabistan from the Ottoman Empire and it's been a thorn in their side. The Persians are an Indo-European people, or what was called Aryan before some unfortunate
20th century events. They don't like Arabs, who are a Semitic people.
It's like one of those logic statements. Most Arabs are Moslems but most Moslems aren't Arabs. The Arabs seem to be the least civilized.
On Sun, 27 Apr 2025 14:37:32 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
The Gazans have a reason to hate Jews, but they would have hated them
regardless of whether anything had been done to them. Heck, the entire
religion advocates for a hatred of both Christians and Jews, the latter
of which was on the pretense that they had persecuted Muhammad.
It wasn't a bed of roses but arguably the Jews did better under the
Moslems in al-Andalus than in Christian Europe during the same period. Earlier the Visigoths had no use for Jews and after the Reconquista
maranos were treated with suspicion and in 1492 Columbus and practicing
Jews left. (separate events although some claim Columbus had a Jew
onboard) Spain was more or less Judenrein until 1968 after Vatican II published 'Nostra aetate' saying Jews weren't really Christ-killers.
Likewise the Ottoman Empire had its up and downs but many Jews relocated there from Christian controlled areas.
On 2025-04-27, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 4/27/25 02:13, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-26, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 4/25/25 22:35, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-25, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 4/24/25 21:22, RonB wrote:
As for Palestine pre-Israel, you don't have to go by narrative you just have
to go by history.
I'm aware of the history. Weren't different factions fighting for
control of that territory before the British gave it away? Wouldn't that >>>>>> suggest that they were at odds and therefore not peaceful?
Yeah, they were called Zionist terrorists (the gangs who bombed the buses,
etc.). And that began happening shortly before the British gave them the >>>>> Zionist state by stealing it from the Palestinians. It was the beginning of
the terrorist state called Israel, not reflected in the centuries before >>>>> that the terrorists began Zionist terrorist campaign.
That might be the case. However, I've seen how Muslims deal with debates >>>> on religion and how much respect they offer to people who think
differently. To say the least, they are very violent. It's not normal
that I wouldn't be able to analyze a song with my students because
Muhammad in the corner was told that music is haram and will get violent >>>> if I play it. It's not normal that I can't watch a show with the kids
because Muhammad Jr. in the corner thinks two characters kissing is
haram and will get violent if I show it. It's not normal that I
constantly have to worry about the crucifix I wear showing because
Muhammad the Third in the corner was taught that Jesus didn't really die >>>> on the cross and will get violent if he sees it. The reality is that it >>>> is impossible to live peacefully with them because every value we have >>>> and every sign we display is offensive to them.
Christians in Israel face the same kind of issues with the Orthodox Jews >>> (and the IDF). They're spit on and their churches are shuttered on Christian
holy days.
I'm not a Muslim and I don't like a lot of their crap, but you've got to >>> remember, it was the Palestinians who were driven out of their homes and >>> businesses and were driven into refugee camps. These homes and businesses >>> were given to the Jews (simply because they were Jews) who streamed in from >>> all over the world.
Europe (and the U.S. and Canada) are doing something similar by moving
illegal aliens (many Muslim) to the front of the line for benefits while the
native citizens stand at the back of the line and watch. I know you already >>> resent this, but how much more would you resent having your home confiscated
from you and given to an illegal alien? (Probably a Muslim.)
That's what happened to the Palestinians. Gaza is basically an open air
prison. And American Jews "vacation" in Israel by burning down orchards and >>> destroying homes while backed by the IDF on the West Bank. They then claim >>> the property for their own. There's only so much of that crap that anyone >>> can take.
So, while I don't like the Muslim religion, I can understand what drives >>> their hatred for the Israelis. Under similar circumstances you would
probably be a "terrorist" as well. (As if carpet bombing civilians, and
denying them food, water and medicine is not the act of terrorist and
genocidal state.)
The Gazans have a reason to hate Jews, but they would have hated them
regardless of whether anything had been done to them. Heck, the entire
religion advocates for a hatred of both Christians and Jews, the latter
of which was on the pretense that they had persecuted Muhammad. Of
course, no evidence of this exists outside the Koran. Heck, in most
reports within the Koran, it is said that the Muslims were treated well
by the Jewish hosts. Of course, it doesn't matter how well you were
treated once you have an army much larger than that of your hosts.
This is a pattern we constantly see with Muslim: peaceful until they
have the numbers.
There are different Muslim sects. Some are much less aggressive than others. The Shiites, for example, aren't usually the "head choppers," that's nearly always the Sunnis. Guess which ones the U.S. cuddles up to?
Jews in Iran, for example, are not persecuted so long as they identify as Iranians and not Zionists (Israelis). Iran is a Shiite country.
On 2025-04-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 06:39:41 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
There are different Muslim sects. Some are much less aggressive than
others.
The Shiites, for example, aren't usually the "head choppers," that's
nearly always the Sunnis. Guess which ones the U.S. cuddles up to?
Jews in Iran, for example, are not persecuted so long as they identify
as Iranians and not Zionists (Israelis). Iran is a Shiite country.
To further complicate it, Arabs are a small minority in Iran and
frequently persecuted. Iran inherited what was called Arabistan from the
Ottoman Empire and it's been a thorn in their side. The Persians are an
Indo-European people, or what was called Aryan before some unfortunate
20th century events. They don't like Arabs, who are a Semitic people.
It's like one of those logic statements. Most Arabs are Moslems but most
Moslems aren't Arabs. The Arabs seem to be the least civilized.
I keep trying to tell people that the Iranians are not Arabs. They don't
turn on each on each like the Arabs do in time of war.
rbowman wrote this post while blinking in Morse code:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 06:39:41 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
There are different Muslim sects. Some are much less aggressive than
others.
The Shiites, for example, aren't usually the "head choppers," that's
nearly always the Sunnis. Guess which ones the U.S. cuddles up to?
Jews in Iran, for example, are not persecuted so long as they identify
as Iranians and not Zionists (Israelis). Iran is a Shiite country.
To further complicate it, Arabs are a small minority in Iran and
frequently persecuted. Iran inherited what was called Arabistan from
the Ottoman Empire and it's been a thorn in their side. The Persians
are an Indo-European people, or what was called Aryan before some
unfortunate 20th century events. They don't like Arabs, who are a
Semitic people.
It's like one of those logic statements. Most Arabs are Moslems but
most Moslems aren't Arabs. The Arabs seem to be the least civilized.
Can you speak to their usage of Linux? :-)
Apparently, much of it is due to the fact that the Internet is now
available to Muslims, and they can easily discover that their "faith" is
a work of bad plagiarism filled with contradictions and lies. Perhaps exposure to Western content also played a part.
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:43:13 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
Apparently, much of it is due to the fact that the Internet is now
available to Muslims, and they can easily discover that their "faith" is
a work of bad plagiarism filled with contradictions and lies. Perhaps
exposure to Western content also played a part.
Apparently exposure to the internet hasn't hindered the LDS church.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/View_of_the_Hebrews
On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-04-28 08:23, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 06:39:41 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
There are different Muslim sects. Some are much less aggressive than >>>>> others.
The Shiites, for example, aren't usually the "head choppers," that's >>>>> nearly always the Sunnis. Guess which ones the U.S. cuddles up to?
Jews in Iran, for example, are not persecuted so long as they identify >>>>> as Iranians and not Zionists (Israelis). Iran is a Shiite country.
To further complicate it, Arabs are a small minority in Iran and
frequently persecuted. Iran inherited what was called Arabistan from the >>>> Ottoman Empire and it's been a thorn in their side. The Persians are an >>>> Indo-European people, or what was called Aryan before some unfortunate >>>> 20th century events. They don't like Arabs, who are a Semitic people.
It's like one of those logic statements. Most Arabs are Moslems but most >>>> Moslems aren't Arabs. The Arabs seem to be the least civilized.
I keep trying to tell people that the Iranians are not Arabs. They don't >>> turn on each on each like the Arabs do in time of war.
For what it's worth, my wife's best friend married an Iranian who was a
pretty nice person. Similarly, a former Polish co-worker of mine married
an Iranian man and he was wonderful to her. It should be noted that most
Iranians don't actually support their government and are a lot more
Western than they seem.
When I was in Texas my doctor was from Iran. Best doctor I've ever had.
As for Iranians, yes they had a secular government — until they made the "mistake" of wanting to profit from their own oil instead of letting U.S.
and European companies take it all. The U.S. sponsored a coup against the elected government and installed the Shah of Iran and his thug police. So there is no love for the United States in Iran, even if many of the citizens long for the days of a secular government. And here's the important thing to remember about Iranians. If you attack them, they unite. Even the opposition is patriotic. (Even Iranian Jews are patriotic.) These are not Arabs who break up into rival tribes when they see a chance to work with an outside, invading power, for their own gain.
Everything you wrote is confirmed by what I've read, seen in
documentaries and received as testimony to the few Iranians I did talk
to. Heck, I had one in the soccer team I coached years ago. He really
was a good guy. As for the United States going on a demonization
campaign against Iran and Iranians, it's definitely a fact. They've done
the same with South and Central American nations that refused to be
ripped off.
As for Iranians, yes they had a secular government — until they made the "mistake" of wanting to profit from their own oil instead of letting
U.S. and European companies take it all. The U.S. sponsored a coup
against the elected government and installed the Shah of Iran and his
thug police. So there is no love for the United States in Iran, even if
many of the citizens long for the days of a secular government. And
here's the important thing to remember about Iranians. If you attack
them, they unite. Even the opposition is patriotic. (Even Iranian Jews
are patriotic.) These are not Arabs who break up into rival tribes when
they see a chance to work with an outside, invading power, for their own gain.
On 2025-04-28 14:40, rbowman wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:43:13 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
Apparently, much of it is due to the fact that the Internet is now
available to Muslims, and they can easily discover that their "faith"
is a work of bad plagiarism filled with contradictions and lies.
Perhaps exposure to Western content also played a part.
Apparently exposure to the internet hasn't hindered the LDS church.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/View_of_the_Hebrews
I think they just enjoy the fact that they can have a number of wives
and don't want to admit that it's all garbage.
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:37:20 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2025-04-28 14:40, rbowman wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:43:13 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
Apparently, much of it is due to the fact that the Internet is now
available to Muslims, and they can easily discover that their "faith"
is a work of bad plagiarism filled with contradictions and lies.
Perhaps exposure to Western content also played a part.
Apparently exposure to the internet hasn't hindered the LDS church.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/View_of_the_Hebrews
I think they just enjoy the fact that they can have a number of wives
and don't want to admit that it's all garbage.
Garbage sells.
https://ldschurchgrowth.blogspot.com/
Mainstream Christian churches are losing members but they keep on growing. There is a temple planned for here and there are already a number of ward churches or whatever they are called.
There is a LDS fundamentalist town about 30 miles south. It's generally believed they are polygamists but they don't cause problems so it's don't ask, don't tell.
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:42:36 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
Everything you wrote is confirmed by what I've read, seen in
documentaries and received as testimony to the few Iranians I did talk
to. Heck, I had one in the soccer team I coached years ago. He really
was a good guy. As for the United States going on a demonization
campaign against Iran and Iranians, it's definitely a fact. They've done
the same with South and Central American nations that refused to be
ripped off.
If I were king the ally I would want in that part of the world would be
Iran. What makes it worse is the CIA overthrew their government in service
of British greed when the lion had lost all its teeth and couldn't do the
job itself.
Johnson, and now Starmer, still haven't gotten the message that the sun
set on the empire a long time ago.
On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-04-28 15:46, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-04-28 08:23, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 06:39:41 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:
There are different Muslim sects. Some are much less aggressive than >>>>>>> others.To further complicate it, Arabs are a small minority in Iran and
The Shiites, for example, aren't usually the "head choppers," that's >>>>>>> nearly always the Sunnis. Guess which ones the U.S. cuddles up to? >>>>>>>
Jews in Iran, for example, are not persecuted so long as they identify >>>>>>> as Iranians and not Zionists (Israelis). Iran is a Shiite country. >>>>>>
frequently persecuted. Iran inherited what was called Arabistan from the >>>>>> Ottoman Empire and it's been a thorn in their side. The Persians are an >>>>>> Indo-European people, or what was called Aryan before some unfortunate >>>>>> 20th century events. They don't like Arabs, who are a Semitic people. >>>>>>
It's like one of those logic statements. Most Arabs are Moslems but most >>>>>> Moslems aren't Arabs. The Arabs seem to be the least civilized.
I keep trying to tell people that the Iranians are not Arabs. They don't >>>>> turn on each on each like the Arabs do in time of war.
For what it's worth, my wife's best friend married an Iranian who was a >>>> pretty nice person. Similarly, a former Polish co-worker of mine married >>>> an Iranian man and he was wonderful to her. It should be noted that most >>>> Iranians don't actually support their government and are a lot more
Western than they seem.
When I was in Texas my doctor was from Iran. Best doctor I've ever had.
As for Iranians, yes they had a secular government — until they made the >>> "mistake" of wanting to profit from their own oil instead of letting U.S. >>> and European companies take it all. The U.S. sponsored a coup against the >>> elected government and installed the Shah of Iran and his thug police. So >>> there is no love for the United States in Iran, even if many of the citizens
long for the days of a secular government. And here's the important thing to
remember about Iranians. If you attack them, they unite. Even the opposition
is patriotic. (Even Iranian Jews are patriotic.) These are not Arabs who >>> break up into rival tribes when they see a chance to work with an outside, >>> invading power, for their own gain.
Everything you wrote is confirmed by what I've read, seen in
documentaries and received as testimony to the few Iranians I did talk
to. Heck, I had one in the soccer team I coached years ago. He really
was a good guy. As for the United States going on a demonization
campaign against Iran and Iranians, it's definitely a fact. They've done
the same with South and Central American nations that refused to be
ripped off.
It's been the USA (Rothschild) way for a long time now. We don't have nearly 900 military bases (or installations) all over the world to protect our borders. They're there to kneecap countries who won't toe the line. Unfortunately for them, BRICS is breaking up the monopoly. If the Rosthschild's don't get their "vig" from every international transaction
(via control of the dollar) their empire will collapse. Can't wait for that to happen.
On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-04-28 23:20, rbowman wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:37:20 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
On 2025-04-28 14:40, rbowman wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 08:43:13 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
Apparently, much of it is due to the fact that the Internet is now >>>>>> available to Muslims, and they can easily discover that their "faith" >>>>>> is a work of bad plagiarism filled with contradictions and lies.
Perhaps exposure to Western content also played a part.
Apparently exposure to the internet hasn't hindered the LDS church.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/View_of_the_Hebrews
I think they just enjoy the fact that they can have a number of wives
and don't want to admit that it's all garbage.
Garbage sells.
https://ldschurchgrowth.blogspot.com/
Mainstream Christian churches are losing members but they keep on growing. >>> There is a temple planned for here and there are already a number of ward >>> churches or whatever they are called.
There is a LDS fundamentalist town about 30 miles south. It's generally
believed they are polygamists but they don't cause problems so it's don't >>> ask, don't tell.
The question for me is whether I want to join a religion because of the
benefits it offers while I live or do I want to join the true faith
shared by God. In my case, it's the latter. I would be wary of any sect
which promises me all sorts of wonderful luxuries if I join.
When my brother worked with Mormons in Idaho Falls, he would share rides
with his co-workers. When they would drive home his Mormon co-worker would always point to a big house on the side of the highway. He would say, "This is where our bishop lives... awfully BIG for ONE family, isn't it?"
I guess he was proud that his bishop was a polygamist.
On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-04-28 23:43, rbowman wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 16:42:36 -0400, CrudeSausage wrote:
Everything you wrote is confirmed by what I've read, seen in
documentaries and received as testimony to the few Iranians I did talk >>>> to. Heck, I had one in the soccer team I coached years ago. He really
was a good guy. As for the United States going on a demonization
campaign against Iran and Iranians, it's definitely a fact. They've done >>>> the same with South and Central American nations that refused to be
ripped off.
If I were king the ally I would want in that part of the world would be
Iran. What makes it worse is the CIA overthrew their government in service >>> of British greed when the lion had lost all its teeth and couldn't do the >>> job itself.
Johnson, and now Starmer, still haven't gotten the message that the sun
set on the empire a long time ago.
Starmer seems content in destroying what is left of traditional British
culture in favour of the Muslims. It's already unrecognizable, and in
another decade, the traditional culture will have been eradicated. All
they need to continue ignoring the people who complain about the
problems they've caused and only acknowledge it once it is too late to
do anything about it.
This is what happens when you disarm the citizens of a country. The people's will no longer matters... at all.
On 2025-04-29, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-04-29 02:04, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-04-28 15:46, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-28, CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> wrote:
On 2025-04-28 08:23, RonB wrote:
On 2025-04-28, rbowman <bowman@montana.com> wrote:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 06:39:41 -0000 (UTC), RonB wrote:I keep trying to tell people that the Iranians are not Arabs. They don't
There are different Muslim sects. Some are much less aggressive than >>>>>>>>> others.To further complicate it, Arabs are a small minority in Iran and >>>>>>>> frequently persecuted. Iran inherited what was called Arabistan from the
The Shiites, for example, aren't usually the "head choppers," that's >>>>>>>>> nearly always the Sunnis. Guess which ones the U.S. cuddles up to? >>>>>>>>>
Jews in Iran, for example, are not persecuted so long as they identify
as Iranians and not Zionists (Israelis). Iran is a Shiite country. >>>>>>>>
Ottoman Empire and it's been a thorn in their side. The Persians are an
Indo-European people, or what was called Aryan before some unfortunate >>>>>>>> 20th century events. They don't like Arabs, who are a Semitic people. >>>>>>>>
It's like one of those logic statements. Most Arabs are Moslems but most
Moslems aren't Arabs. The Arabs seem to be the least civilized. >>>>>>>
turn on each on each like the Arabs do in time of war.
For what it's worth, my wife's best friend married an Iranian who was a >>>>>> pretty nice person. Similarly, a former Polish co-worker of mine married >>>>>> an Iranian man and he was wonderful to her. It should be noted that most >>>>>> Iranians don't actually support their government and are a lot more >>>>>> Western than they seem.
When I was in Texas my doctor was from Iran. Best doctor I've ever had. >>>>>
As for Iranians, yes they had a secular government — until they made the
"mistake" of wanting to profit from their own oil instead of letting U.S. >>>>> and European companies take it all. The U.S. sponsored a coup against the >>>>> elected government and installed the Shah of Iran and his thug police. So >>>>> there is no love for the United States in Iran, even if many of the citizens
long for the days of a secular government. And here's the important thing to
remember about Iranians. If you attack them, they unite. Even the opposition
is patriotic. (Even Iranian Jews are patriotic.) These are not Arabs who >>>>> break up into rival tribes when they see a chance to work with an outside,
invading power, for their own gain.
Everything you wrote is confirmed by what I've read, seen in
documentaries and received as testimony to the few Iranians I did talk >>>> to. Heck, I had one in the soccer team I coached years ago. He really
was a good guy. As for the United States going on a demonization
campaign against Iran and Iranians, it's definitely a fact. They've done >>>> the same with South and Central American nations that refused to be
ripped off.
It's been the USA (Rothschild) way for a long time now. We don't have nearly
900 military bases (or installations) all over the world to protect our
borders. They're there to kneecap countries who won't toe the line.
Unfortunately for them, BRICS is breaking up the monopoly. If the
Rosthschild's don't get their "vig" from every international transaction >>> (via control of the dollar) their empire will collapse. Can't wait for that >>> to happen.
I imagine that BRICS's success will result in new opportunities for
Canada as well. The problem is that I don't believe our Liberal
government will bother to take advantage of any of them. They've already
made it near impossible for the province of Alberta to enrich itself
with its resources.
Canada used to be a free country. Now it's a Soviet Union wannabe.
CrudeSausage wrote:
All
they need to continue ignoring the people who complain about the
problems they've caused
Ignore? They imprison them!
All
they need to continue ignoring the people who complain about the
problems they've caused
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 19:54:55 -0500, -hh wrote:
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
rbowman wrote:
-hh wrote:
First one was a pandemic itself, which killed 1.2 million Americans. >>>>> This generated far more submissions by health professionals than a
normal or bad flu season/year.
Far less than the 2% that many (such as yourself, IIRC) predicted, and
nearly all of them where very old and sick already.
I’ll check on if it was a prediction, or just the topical estimate of
worst case.
https://www.reuters...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/...
A popular Monday morning quarterback ploy when you've fucked the dog
royally is 'Oh no, that wasn't a prediction, it was a worse case
scenario.'
From where have you gained your information, RonB? Is it
a trustworthy, authoritative and timely source of British news?
Are you going to deny that people have been jailed for posting memes
in Britain? If so you better get hold of the British press and tell them,
because they seem to be "confused" on the subject.
At this moment I am neither denying nor confirming anything.
I asked you a question which you have not yet answered, RonB.
When you've done that, kindly give chapter and verse about
"people have been jailed for posting memes in Britain".
On 4/20/25 01:02, rbowman wrote:
On Sat, 19 Apr 2025 19:54:55 -0500, -hh wrote:
chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> wrote:
rbowman wrote:
-hh wrote:
First one was a pandemic itself, which killed 1.2 million Americans. >>>>>> This generated far more submissions by health professionals than a >>>>>> normal or bad flu season/year.
Far less than the 2% that many (such as yourself, IIRC) predicted, and >>>> nearly all of them where very old and sick already.
I’ll check on if it was a prediction, or just the topical estimate of
worst case.
https://www.reuters...
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/...
I've not had COLA posts cited in major media...at least that I know of.
A popular Monday morning quarterback ploy when you've fucked the dog
royally is 'Oh no, that wasn't a prediction, it was a worse case
scenario.'
Which is why I want to go read the archives to see precisely what I did
say back in 2020, including any/all caveats.
I've just gotten back to my desktop today, but you're free to go search through Google Groups from back then too & provide URL cites to help me.
-hh wrote:
<https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-age-sex-demographics=/>
From it, the age-based death rates:
80+ years old.. 14.8%
70-79 years old 8.0%
60-69 years old 3.6%
50-59 years old 1.3%
40-49 years old 0.4%
10-39 years old 0.2%
Using the above, consider how many older members of one's own
family are in these higher risk Age groups: 50+, 60+, 70+ ...
Ditto for the people you work with, know through church,
friends, neighbors, etc. Its not all that hard for a
parent to quickly count 200-300 folks that they know of
comparable (and typically older) age. For example, if you
know just 25-30 people in their 60s, because their mortality
rate is 3.6%, that means one death for each ~27 you know.
I'm in my 50's, but don't know many people who are significantly
older. One brother, in his 60's, and that's about it.
Of course, the mortality rates, above, are for those who
actually get the coronavirus, and not everyone will...
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 546 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 53:22:08 |
| Calls: | 10,397 |
| Calls today: | 5 |
| Files: | 14,067 |
| Messages: | 6,417,394 |
| Posted today: | 1 |