Linux kernel 6.16 will bring a new option, the X86_NATIVE_CPU
option.
https://www.phoronix.com/news/Linux-6.16-X86_NATIVE_CPU
Setting this options allows the kernel to be built with the
"-march=native" compiler optimization. The resulting kernel
will fit the hardware more closely and improve performance.
Now why the fuck would these very smart developers do this?
Do you think that it might actually and really improve kernel
performance?
Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha, ha!
The real question is why the fuck didn't they do this
much earlier?
Unless *all* of your software is built with "-march=native"
then you belong in a padded cell and a straitjacket and
also a waiting list for a lobotomy.
Linux kernel 6.16 will bring a new option, the X86_NATIVE_CPU
option.
vallor wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2025 10:08:34 +0000, Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux>because i said don't
wrote in <1843a903ff7e9650$85557$3102$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>:
Linux kernel 6.16 will bring a new option, the X86_NATIVE_CPU
option.
Yawn. Old news -- already saw them playing with it in linux-next.
$ fgrep NATIVE linux-next-next-20250509/.config
CONFIG_CC_HAS_MARCH_NATIVE=y
# CONFIG_X86_NATIVE_CPU is not set
BTW...why aren't you running 6.15 yet? (Rhetorical question.)
vallor wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2025 20:00:34 -0700, % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote ini have enough computers and ,
<gqedncbX_PF6UKr1nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>:
vallor wrote:
On Wed, 28 May 2025 10:08:34 +0000, Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> >>>> wrote in <1843a903ff7e9650$85557$3102$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>: >>>>because i said don't
Linux kernel 6.16 will bring a new option, the X86_NATIVE_CPU
option.
Yawn. Old news -- already saw them playing with it in linux-next.
$ fgrep NATIVE linux-next-next-20250509/.config
CONFIG_CC_HAS_MARCH_NATIVE=y
# CONFIG_X86_NATIVE_CPU is not set
BTW...why aren't you running 6.15 yet? (Rhetorical question.)
Well yeah, I know _you_ won't...you're stuck with BabbleOS 0.9.
FF isn't running Linux 6.15 because his distro hasn't given it to
him yet, and he's a distro lackey.
enough operating systems to make yours ,
look like coleco vision , never think all you see ,
is all there is
Shouldn’t that be “HP/UX”?
#DOSLexiaStrikesAgain
vallor wrote:
On Thu, 29 May 2025 07:28:46 -0000 (UTC), Lawrence D'Oliveirowhat brains that takes
<ldo@nz.invalid> wrote in <10192be$3olom$5@dont-email.me>:
Shouldn’t that be “HP/UX”?
#DOSLexiaStrikesAgain
I think it used to use the backslash, but now looking at the wiki, it
just uses a dash.
So: HP-UX.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 12:24:33 |
Calls: | 10,387 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 14,061 |
Messages: | 6,416,717 |