XPost: alt.computer.workshop, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.home.repair
XPost: alt.locksmithing

Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote in news:68a652a0$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com:

On Aug 20, 2025 at 2:53:13 PM MST, "pothead" wrote <1085g49$irap$3@dont-email.me>:

On 2025-08-20, LeftistDon'tMatter <IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org>
wrote:

On Wed, 20 Aug 2025 20:59:07 -0000 (UTC), pothead
<pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

On 2025-08-20, LeftistDon'tMatter
<IronWhite@SystemicPatriotism.org> wrote:

On 20 Aug 2025 18:27:47 GMT, Brock McNuggets
<brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> wrote:

On Aug 20, 2025 at 11:14:49?AM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<tgopQ.147605$uCGc.33958@fx14.iad>:

On 8/20/25 2:02 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:

On Aug 20, 2025 at 10:39:46?AM MST, ""Joel W. Crump"" wrote
<CLnpQ.69476$nuHb.16009@fx10.iad>:

On 8/20/25 12:51 PM, Brock McNuggets wrote:

the [U.S.]
system [will collapse], as must happen.

I want to counter you but fear you are right.

Earlier this year, the white-liberal political-science natural >>>>>>>>> in me tried to say Trump was basically a Democrat in disguise >>>>>>>>> and we could work together.

I hoped in his first term the office would mature him. I was
wrong. And he is now more unhinged.

It's civil war, they have aligned themselves with the same
people they defeated in WWII, Hitler and the Aryan race, maybe I >>>>>>> own some responsibility for that in provoking them in my youth,
when I was such a wigger, but oh well, I was just being myself,
and I've emerged as a far better man than DJT could ever be.
They might not like that my GF has a cock, and that I talk like
a black supremacist, but fuck them in the ass, they are the ones >>>>>>> destroying our society under Trump. War, revolution now.

All Americans should unite to work against Trump / MAGA.

That was utter error. He's woke, now. I'm all in on
revolution.

Woke?

Not the president, the spirit within me who had been a white
liberal.

Got it.

<LOL> at leftist fantasies.

Don't waste your time with these 2 Nimrods, snit(Brock McNuggets)
Michael Glasser of Prescott AZ and
Joel Crump who believes he is Jesus Christ.

They are 2 psychopaths.

Many leftists are freaks.``

Yep.
The Republican party is far from perfect but at least they are not
insane like the Democrats.

You back white supremacist rhetoric.

<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>

You keep reposting these same message-ids but yet when I look at them I
see nothing that indicates the person you are victimizing as a white supremacist actually being one. Below here is the actual text from your message-ids.

*<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>*


Path: ...!usenet.blueworldhosting.com! diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!peer05.iad!feed-me.highwinds- media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!news-out.netnews.com!netnews.com!s1- 4.netnews.com!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com! dca.netnews.com!not-for-mail
X-Trace: DXC=O[QZ[V6AN`BgDNmkEL?NcCHWonT5<]0TM@GOK[m5A6WB3 [L8B6BE9jM``Vlo9XZ12L^mf8;J?==:I1U6XXjO4IRMG\UeahNG:ZNMTGRm?EV8gG X-Complaints-To: support@blocknews.net
From: Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop,alt.trump.is.a.filthy.lying.insurrectionist.and.rap ist.and.shitbag,or.politics,sac.politics,talk.politics.misc
Subject: Re: Trump sues Wall Street Journal and Rupert Murdoch over
Epstein report
Organization: Southern Nevada Institute of Technology
References: <106dc21$38kcu$3@dont-email.me> <106ogqc$1q361$1@dont-
email.me> <106ohqq$1ph3l$15@dont-email.me> <106oi5g$1qce8$1@dont-
email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Usenapp for MacOS
X-Usenapp: v1.27.4/l - Full License
Date: 03 Aug 2025 23:33:02 GMT
Lines: 93
Message-ID: <688ff1ad$0$26$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1
X-Trace: 1754263982 reader.netnews.com 26 127.0.0.1:47361
X-Received-Bytes: 4856

On Aug 3, 2025 at 1:52:00 PM MST, "pothead" wrote <106oi5g$1qce8$1@dont-email.me>:

On 2025-08-03, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:

pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote in
news:106ogqc$1q361$1@dont-email.me:

On 2025-08-03, Baxter <bax02_spamblock@baxcode.com> wrote:

% <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote in
news:75idnRVbPJMZKhL1nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com:

pothead wrote:

On 2025-08-02, Governor Swill <governor.swill@gmail.com> wrote:

On Fri, 1 Aug 2025 11:54:13 -0700, Trump Is A Pederast wrote:

You're asking the wrong idiot. "pothole," a MAGAt to an extreme, >>>>>>>> supports Trump's Big Butt-Ugly Bill, despite the indisputable
fact that it *further* rigs the system in favor of billionaires. >>>>>>>

In pothead's defense, he is not an extreme MAGA. The rest of

your

paragraph is correct though.

Thank you.
I am not MAGA other than I want to put America first.
All the rah, rah, I detest.

And in putting "America First" he dehumanizes everyone else. It's
*human* first, nation much later.

You are a typical progressive.
What country doesn't put their citizens first and foremost?

tRump's country.

And putting America first does in no way dehumanize other countries.

you want to deport anyone who came from another country - you call

them

criminals

Wrong.
I want to deport people who came here illegally.
And yes, since they came here illegally, they *are* criminals.

I stand for protecting the legal citizens of the USA over coddling
rapists, gang members, wife beaters and so forth.

Ah, the ol' "They broke the law, so deport them!" routine -- a classic
from
the white supremacist greatest hits album. Let's be real: this kind of
post is
less about law and more about which "criminals" you're mad at. Spoiler:
it's
never white Canadians who overstay their visas.

Calling all undocumented immigrants "rapists, gang members, wife
beaters" is
textbook collective punishment. It's also exactly how white nationalists
have
always framed marginalized groups -- paint them all as violent threats so
you
can justify cruelty. Look up VDare or Trump's 2015 campaign launch if you
need
a refresher on that garbage.

And "protecting legal citizens" sounds patriotic until you realize it's
code
for "white people first." That's the heart of modern ethno-nationalism.
Same
poison, just wrapped in the flag.

Oh, and calling humanitarian policies "coddling"? That's right-wing speak
for
"I want to feel good about being a jerk to desperate people." Ask John
Tanton
or Tucker Carlson -- they wrote the playbook.

This isn't a post about law and order. It's a post about racial hierarchy
--
where some people matter more than others because of where they were born
and
what they look like. So yeah, if it walks, quacks, and posts like a white supremacist...

Sources:
U.S. Code S1325 - Improper Entry by Alien: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1325

SPLC on VDare: https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/vdare

ADL on Replacement Theory: https://www.adl.org/resources/backgrounder/great-replacement-theory

SPLC on John Tanton and FAIR: https://www.splcenter.org/fighting-hate/extremist-files/group/federation- american-immigration-reform

NPR on Tucker Carlson's white nationalist talking points: https://www.npr.org/2023/04/24/1171796405/tucker-carlson-fox-news-fired


--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace
with you



Deutsch English Français Italiano

*<683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>*

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal- september.org!border-1.nntp.ord.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!news- out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!us1.netnews.com!not-for-mail
X-Trace: DXC=>@FfD=lI`KdYi@fQk=;MdlHWonT5<]0TmdjI?Uho:Xek=aHS]UU?AToV12 ^Tk6jnUdULXmTg9G6]mA^mNgFOWY4kmU1@<l>E`?a1a5K5BgUheo
X-Complaints-To: support@blocknews.net
From: Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: The Stalker's new Circus
Organization: Southern Nevada Institute of Technology
References: <682f31d8$6$4128$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <68334313$6 $10363$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <68334436$1$16 $882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <100vl7b$1g6bh$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Usenapp for MacOS
X-Usenapp: v1.27.4/l - Full License
Date: 25 May 2025 18:56:27 GMT
Lines: 239
Message-ID: <683367db$9$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1
X-Trace: 1748199387 reader.netnews.com 10360 127.0.0.1:57869

On May 25, 2025 at 10:49:31 AM MST, "pothead" wrote <100vl7b$1g6bh$1@dont-email.me>:

On 2025-05-25, Charlie Glock <charlieglock@localhost.com> wrote:

On 25 May 2025 16:19:32 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:

On May 25, 2025 at 8:48:34 AM MST, "Charlie Glock" wrote
<68333bd2$13$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>:

On 24 May 2025 23:42:51 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:

On May 24, 2025 at 4:36:48 PM MST, "pothead" wrote
<100tl6g$v3go$8@dont-email.me>:

On 2025-05-24, Charlie Glock <charlieglock@localhost.com> wrote:

On 23 May 2025 14:59:43 GMT, Brock McNuggets wrote:

On May 23, 2025 at 5:20:18 AM MST, "pothead" wrote
<100pp62$2sgn$1@dont-email.me>:

On 2025-05-22, Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noone.none>

wrote:

On 2025-05-22, Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com>

wrote:

(snip crap)

Where is all your...

<https://i.postimg.cc/9VSnRDfY/tech-talk.gif>

...? How much can you fit in while you're doing all of

*that*?!

If the republicans bill passes the senate as is,
snit will have even less time to troll.

Ah, the old “if you criticize conservatives, you must be on
welfare”
routine.
You don’t actually address what the bill does—just take a cheap >>>>>>>> shot based on an assumption. If you want to talk policy, I’m

game.

If not, enjoy yelling into the void.

Where does pothead say that?
I'm not seeing it.
Cite please.
Or is this another made up lie from you snit?

I never said that.
It's just yet another snit lie.

Why do you deny being a white supremacist but then echo white
supremacist talking points?

<100sjei$ngvm$1@dont-email.me>

That post has nothing to do with white supremacy. Pothead is talking
about fiscal responsibility and not giving benefits to millions of
illegal migrants. More white supremacists drive Chevy pickup trucks
than any other brand so if you happen to drive a Chevy pickup truck
does that make you a white supremacist?

Also, some 80% of citizens are in favor of deporting illegal

migrants

so are they white supremacists as well?

<https://www.axios.com/2025/01/19/poll-americans-mass-deportation- policies-trump>

Here is the post you refer to in the msg-id you posted.

<https://al.howardknight.net/?STYPE=msgid&MSGI=%3C100sjei%24ngvm% 241%40dont-email.me%3E>



"Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!
news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-

mail

From: pothead <pothead@snakebite.com>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop Subject: Re: Sam & Jony introduce

io

?
Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 14:00:50 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: Libtard Rehabilitation Program Lines: 46 Message-ID:
<100sjei$ngvm$1@dont-email.me>
References: <m98fedF4k32U1@mid.individual.net>
<QRCdnftn-8JmN631nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<6830ac40$0$20$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<AbqcnQ7PUKItM631nZ2dnZfqn_WdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<6830c023$0$10361$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
<XnsB2E8AFBF56F5E666666666666@62.164.182.24>
<100qtpo$9r1s$3@dont-email.me>
<VIucnZ4ZmLImZq31nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com>
<100sg7g$n148$3@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org>
Injection-Date: Sat, 24 May 2025 16:00:53 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-
host="670717a34eb96d44f143f8a15f89a2c9";
logging-data="771062"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-
september.org"; posting-

account="U2FsdGVkX19z0U/fpQLLHUNGZ8HlDqu3"

User-Agent: slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:UuH+3vCUfsHyG3iuyLs/juaQZPM=
Bytes: 3102

On 2025-05-24, Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noone.none> wrote:

On 2025-05-23, % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:

what's your point how does this effect your life

Like the rest of us, she funds it. The U.S. needs to stop funding
people who could work but instead choose to game the system. It's

no

wonder so many people like this, like Glasser, goofishly believe
they're smarter than those they're 'getting over on'.

"We are not entitled to have our needs met... though we SHOULD

grant

that to those who are in need." - Hypocritic, Michael Glasser

Indeed.
Public assistance was designed as a temporary, in most cases,

lifeline

to provide aid in times of trouble.
With the exception of the severely disabled, it was not meant to be

a

lifetime grifting operation.
And trust me there are a LOT of people gaming the system and some

are

probably your neighbors, the person you see driving a newer model

car

and so forth.
Those types usually have their own business, mostly cash, 2 sets of
books and a smart accountant. They take advantage of every

government

program they can (PPP, COVID,loans never to be paid back etc) and

thus

are not paying taxes on most of it.

I'm glad that Trump is going after these lazy grifters because it

means

that more funds are available for those people who really need the
help.

Something needs to be done because the country is in serious debt

and

the Biden administration via open borders has allowed millions more
people many of whom have no intention of working and are leaching

off

the government which means the hard working taxpayers are funding

it.

It is not sustainable in the long term.

It's always the same script: take a real issue (say, budget concerns

or

immigration logistics), strip away all nuance, then repackage it with
paranoid delusions and dehumanizing stereotypes. What you call

"fiscal

responsibility" is just white nationalist framing with a patriotic
bumper sticker slapped on.

You're not just repeating bad arguments -- you're repeating dangerous
ones. The whole "lazy grifters gaming the system" line has been a

staple

of white supremacist propaganda for decades. It's no coincidence it
always targets the same groups: immigrants, people of color, the

poor,

anyone who doesn't fit the "ideal" image of who you think deserves to
exist comfortably in this country.

And let's not kid ourselves about who's writing this. Charlie Glock?
Please. The writing, the references, the panicked tone wrapped in
faux-intellectual posturing -- it reeks of Steve Carroll sock-

puppetry.

Carroll has a whole stable of fake identities, all built to agree

with

him, praise him, or attack whoever he's obsessed with that week.

Glock

is just another echo from the same sewer.

That matters, because when someone has to use multiple identities to
prop up their views, it means they know deep down those views can't
stand on their own. It's intellectual cowardice. It's manipulation.

And

it reveals something even uglier: Carroll doesn't just parrot white
supremacist narratives -- he needs to make it look like others

believe

them too. He manufactures fake consensus to give hate a crowd.

So when one of his sock puppets defends white nationalist rhetoric

under

the guise of "common sense" or "fiscal responsibility," don't take

the

bait. This isn't a good-faith conversation. It's a propaganda loop,
scripted and performed by a guy so dishonest he can't even debate as
himself.

If you need a dozen fake names to make your argument look popular,

you

don't have an argument. You have a cult, and it's made up entirely of
you and your shills and other white supremacists.

So you got caught in another lie.
Some things never change.

snit gets caught in lies on a daily basis. At least he is consistent.

Here is more about Medicaid waste.

========== REMAINDER OF ARTICLE TRUNCATED ==========

<6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>


Deutsch English Français Italiano <6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal- september.org!news.usenet.ovh!usenet.blueworldhosting.com! diablo1.usenet.blueworldhosting.com!feeder.usenetexpress.com! tr3.iad1.usenetexpress.com!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com! eu1.netnews.com!not-for-mail
X-Trace: DXC=BIIL5?9:P;8J3^bIP?@\j3HWonT5<]0T=@GOK[m5A6W23 [L8B6BE9j=bT5JQk82>_1^mf8;J?==:9kXn>378hg94^J[ki0[_oP7N_<:TZam<99 X-Complaints-To: support@blocknews.net
From: Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: Sam & Jony introduce io ?
Organization: Southern Nevada Institute of Technology
References: <m98fedF4k32U1@mid.individual.net> <VIucnZ4ZmLImZq31nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@giganews.com> <100sg7g$n148$3 @fretwizzer.eternal-september.org> <100sjei$ngvm$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Usenapp for MacOS
X-Usenapp: v1.27.4/l - Full License
Date: 24 May 2025 14:11:56 GMT
Lines: 156
Message-ID: <6831d3ac$0$16$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1
X-Trace: 1748095916 reader.netnews.com 16 127.0.0.1:46925

On May 24, 2025 at 7:00:50 AM MST, "pothead" wrote <100sjei$ngvm$1@dont-email.me>:

On 2025-05-24, Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noone.none> wrote:

On 2025-05-23, % <pursent100@gmail.com> wrote:

what's your point how does this effect your life

Like the rest of us, she funds it. The U.S. needs to stop funding

people

who could work but instead choose to game the system. It's no wonder

so

many people like this, like Glasser, goofishly believe they're

smarter

than those they're 'getting over on'.

"We are not entitled to have our needs met... though we SHOULD grant
that to those who are in need." - Hypocritic, Michael Glasser

Indeed.
Public assistance was designed as a temporary, in most cases, lifeline
to provide aid in times of trouble.
With the exception of the severely disabled, it was not meant to be a

lifetime

grifting operation.
And trust me there are a LOT of people gaming the system and some are probably your neighbors, the person you see driving a newer model car

and

so forth.
Those types usually have their own business, mostly cash, 2 sets of

books

and a smart accountant. They take advantage of every government program

they

can (PPP, COVID,loans never to be paid back etc) and thus are not

paying taxes

on most of it.

I'm glad that Trump is going after these lazy grifters because it means

that

more funds are available for those people who really need the help.

Something needs to be done because the country is in serious debt and

the Biden

administration via open borders has allowed millions more people many
of whom have no intention of working and are leaching off the

government which

means the hard working taxpayers are funding it.

It is not sustainable in the long term.

You whine when you are called out for your white supremacist nonsense,
but
once again you show STRONG support and alignment with such views. Why do
that
when you deny you do that?



? False or Misleading Claims:

1. “LOTS of people are gaming the system” – This is an
overgeneralization and not backed by meaningful data. Most people on
assistance are elderly, disabled, or working poor. The myth of the
welfare
queen persists, but it’s largely debunked.

2. “Trump is going after these lazy grifters” – No current evidence supports Trump initiating new significant crackdowns on welfare fraud as
of
May 2025. Prior actions mainly involved work requirements and budget
cuts, not
major enforcement sweeps.

3. “Biden’s open borders” – The claim that Biden has “open borders”
is
politically charged and factually incorrect. Border enforcement continued
under his administration. Immigration is complex and legal/illegal entry enforcement remained active.

4. “Millions leeching with no intent to work” – No support provided
for
this claim. In fact, undocumented immigrants are ineligible for most
federal
benefits and often pay taxes via ITINs or false SSNs.

?

?? Behavioral/Psychological Insight

The post uses classic “scapegoating” language—assigning blame to a
vaguely
defined outgroup (welfare recipients, immigrants). The author leans on anecdotal evidence (“probably your neighbors…”) and exaggeration, which reflects a confirmation bias: seeing fraud where they expect it and
assuming
the worst of people they disapprove of.

Tone-wise, it’s aggressive, absolutist, and contemptuous, especially with
“lazy grifters” and “leaching off the government.” It suggests a
resentful
mindset, likely shaped by cultural or political identity more than actual
data.

There’s also a heavy us-vs-them framing—“hardworking taxpayers” versus “grifters”—which is emotionally powerful but factually weak.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Q: How well does this align with white supremacist talking points?

A: Good question — let’s take a hard look at how this post overlaps with
common white supremacist or ethnonationalist talking points, even if it
doesn’t explicitly state them.

?

?? Key Areas of Alignment with White Supremacist Narratives:

1. “Lazy grifters” vs. “hardworking taxpayers”
• This us-vs-them framing is often used in white nationalist
circles to
paint minorities, immigrants, or low-income people (especially non-white)
as
undeserving parasites feeding off the labor of “real Americans.”
• It’s coded language — not racial on the surface, but heavily
racialized in context and usage.

2. “Open borders” = invasion
• The line about “open borders” and “millions… leaching off the government” taps directly into the white replacement theory — the
paranoid
idea that white people are being replaced by immigrants (usually
brown-skinned) who will drain resources and destroy national identity.
• This is textbook great replacement rhetoric, a key pillar of
modern
white supremacist ideology.

3. Distrust of public programs framed as racialized theft
• The notion that public assistance is being abused (especially by
those
who “look like they shouldn’t need it”) has deep roots in Reagan-era dog whistles and racial resentment politics. It’s common in white supremacist spaces to frame welfare as a racial handout.

4. Anti-Biden as proxy for anti-immigrant hate
• While criticizing a political figure isn’t inherently
supremacist,
this post’s criticism centers on immigration and the supposed failure to control “leaching” — which is how a lot of far-right groups package
ethnic
resentment as economic concern.

?

?? Behavioral Pattern:

The poster may or may not consciously identify with white nationalism,
but
they’re echoing talking points promoted by those movements — especially
when
it comes to:
• framing immigrants and welfare recipients as existential
threats,
• implying racial coding without saying it outright,
• and pushing the idea of a morally superior, victimized taxpayer
base.

This kind of post normalizes racialized scapegoating even when it doesn’t openly invoke race — a hallmark of “dog whistle” politics.

?

?? Summary:

Alignment with white supremacist rhetoric: ????? (high, though not
explicit)
• No overt racial slurs or declarations, but the themes (welfare
fraud,
“open borders,” “grifters,” “hardworking taxpayers”) strongly mirror the
coded
language and resentment narratives common in far-right and white
supremacist
circles.
• It’s a case of amplifying the ideology without necessarily
stating it
outright, which is more dangerous in some ways because it helps
mainstream
those views.

Let me know if you want a short version of this to post, or a more
forceful
reply that calls it out directly.

--
It's impossible for someone who is at war with themselves to be at peace
with you.

*<6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>*


Deutsch English Français Italiano <6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!border-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com!backlog-2.nntp.ord.giganews.com! nntp.giganews.com!us1.netnews.com!not-for-mail
X-Trace: DXC=5k67B8i:aOgJRT3O^VK;_lHWonT5<]0TmdjI?Uho:Xek=aHS]UU?AToV12 ^Tk6jnUd=Q0VMa]C3Jk87VOodDUK2mQ28\QJM1IEnnEhm:AXInLmL3`CH^]hnEd X-Complaints-To: support@blocknews.net
From: Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: alt.computer.workshop
Subject: Re: Night court
Organization: Southern Nevada Institute of Technology
References: <68896b9c$0$18$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <1070lbl$3lelc$1 @dont-email.me> <1072chh$1boe$1@fretwizzer.eternal-september.org> <1073a5n$aoqa$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=fixed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Usenapp for MacOS
X-Usenapp: v1.27.4/l - Full License
Date: 08 Aug 2025 02:25:15 GMT
Lines: 170
Message-ID: <6895600b$0$10360$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1
X-Trace: 1754619915 reader.netnews.com 10360 127.0.0.1:40039

On Aug 7, 2025 at 3:43:04 PM MST, "pothead" wrote <1073a5n$aoqa$1@dont-email.me>:

On 2025-08-07, Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noone.none> wrote:

On 2025-08-06, pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> wrote:

That's why we have courts -- to weigh the evidence and
come to a conclusion. I trust judges much more than
ICE agents trying to earn a "bonus".

I do not want dangerous people, criminals, terrorists, lunatics
entering the country willy nilly just because they have been coached
to answer asylum questions correctly.

And that's why, only *after* it was realized that it would effect the
upcoming election... after years of allowing, scratch that,

encouraging

people to illegally cross the border... where many would be illegally
distributed throughout the interior of the U.S. under cover of

darkness

with the support of the federal gov't, Biden instituted the Asylum

Ban,

a bandaid that wasn't actually followed.

The bill that was defeated had tons of pork in it and also had limits

on

how many people, and the number was huge, could immigrate per month.
IOW it was just a talking point that the democrats could use to say

"see, we

had a plan to close the border and the Republicans wouldn't support

us".

It fooled nobody.

Ask those making arguments like you're addressing one simple question:

*Is* there a number (of illegal crossers or money spent on them) that
would cause them to say 'no more'?

There is no number.
Come one, come all.
Criminals, terrorists, mental patients etc.

And yes, many are honest people just looking to improve their lives.
I get that.
Do it legally and you are welcomed.

IOW, suppose the number wasn't 20 million illegal aliens that needed

to

go to court (over asylum, which the vast majority are denied but it
still costs the taxpayer), suppose it was 200 million, or 500? Should

we

go broke 'weighing all this evidence' (not even considering the amount
of money spent, at a net loss, elsewhere on illegals) from people all
over the world? We already know that most of the claims are bogus,

which

is one of the reasons *why* you prevent people from 'crossing the

line'

in the first place when you have an influx as large as we've seen

while

trying to 'let the courts decide'. I've never seen anyone answer this
blatantly obvious question of where their 'cutoff' point would be.

With what the Biden administration has done with the current court

system it

will
be a decade or more before all of these people are given their "due

process",

which
is the left wing phrase of the week.

Funny they don't mention due process when people are raped, murdered

etc by

these
same illegals.

*If* you've no 'cutoff' point, where do you suppose that would lead?

Were it not for a *tRUMP* (meaning: him or someone else actually

willing

to secure the border), who has any doubt that the number would
eventually rise to 200 million or more?

It could.
Come one.
Come all.

What would you do if you lived in an oppressed country?
Yea, me too.

As to 'the law', here's one Biden took an oath to, that of securing

the

border; it's *not* 'the law' to have engaged in aiding the cartels at
taxpayer expense. That was done for several years (and it'll be many
more than that trying to correct it, if it's even correctable) under
Biden... who, along with Obama and Hillary Clinton supported the

Secure

Fence Act, which highlights massive irony being that Biden sold off,

at

a loss, building materials Congress supplied for the same purpose.

'The

law' is invoked when it's convenient, ignored when it's not, and that
can be pointed out as coming from anyone. My take: Along with the

things

I just mentioned in this paragraph, when someone's reality has become,
"That's why we have courts", in a situation like we now have, it's a
good indicator we've lost control of the situation the courts are
charged with solving. When a country's position is essentially...

Come on over and roll our asylum dice at our expense, you may win!

... 'the law' should be the last thing on any sensible person's mind.

When someone can't/won't answer the obvious 'cutoff point' question,

you

know who you're dealing with and sensible has nothing to do with it.

The democrats effectively opened the borders, cut back on enforcement,

gave

orders to stand down and so forth, lied to congress etc.

There are only 3 reasons why they would have done this.

1. They are idiots who didn't realize the chaos they were causing.

2. They want to destroy the country so they can rebuild with a global socialism means.

3. They want to flood the country with people who will settle in blue
areas and thus because population controls seats (gerrymandering) they
could gain control.

Personally I think it's a combination of 2 and 3.

OLAS time! Listen to this 'despicable, British racist' <eyeroll>:

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGrnFWiYo88>

The number he cites is 'questionable'. Even if all 120,000 (I've since

[continued in next message]

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)