XPost: alt.atheism, or.politics, sac.politics
XPost: talk.politics.guns, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
In <108cpa4$3gq1i$
1@paganini.bofh.team> Rudy Canoza sloppily forging Richard Clayton Wieber bleated and lied:
On 1/4/2013 8:40 AM, Ray Keller wrote:
http://www.wnd.com/2004/11/27300/ <http://www.wnd.com/2004/11/27300/>
*Kerry's non-honorable discharge
*Published: 11/01/2004 at 1:00 AM
There is overwhelming evidence that the Navy gave John Kerry either a
dishonorable discharge or an undesirable discharge
There is no evidence of that whatever.
Of course Rudy's ignorance is well known. As well known as John Kerry's undesirable discharge.
"The document is dated February 16, 1978. But Mr. Kerry's military
commitment began with his six-year enlistment contract with the Navy
on February 18, 1966. His commitment should have terminated in 1972.
It is highly unlikely that either the man who at that time was a
Vietnam Veterans Against the War leader, John Kerry, requested or
the Navy accepted an additional six year reserve commitment. And
the Claytor document indicates proceedings to reverse a less than
honorable discharge that took place sometime prior to February 1978."
"There are a number of categories of discharges besides honorable.
There are general discharges, medical discharges, bad conduct
discharges, as well as other than honorable and dishonorable discharges.
There is one odd coincidence that gives some weight to the possibility
that Mr. Kerry was dishonorably discharged. Mr. Kerry has claimed that
he lost his medal certificates and that is why he asked that they be
reissued. But when a dishonorable discharge is issued, all pay
benefits, and allowances, and all medals and honors are revoked as well.
And five months after Mr. Kerry joined the U.S. Senate in 1985, on one
single day, June 4, all of Mr. Kerry's medals were reissued."
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)