I am trying to apply this "upgrade" procedure:
It says, among other things, that I need to replace v2 with v3 in all sources, and here is the problem: djgpp sources do not list v2 or
v3. They instead refer to copying.dj, which explicitly forbids to
modify these headings. Also copying.dj doesn't state what version of
LGPL is that: is it v2+, or plain v2?
"stsp (stsp2@yandex.ru) [via djgpp@delorie.com]" <djgpp@delorie.com>
writes:
I am trying to apply this "upgrade" procedure:The DJGPP sources are not yours; changing the license in any way is not
an option for you. If you combined DJGPP sources with some other
sources that have a different license, you are limited to distributing
the combination under terms that comply with both licenses.
I'm not opposed to clarifying copying.dj to have the usual "or any later version" text, though.
It says, among other things, that I need to replace v2 with v3 in allAssume the version that is in COPYING and COPYING.LIB, included with
sources, and here is the problem: djgpp sources do not list v2 or
v3. They instead refer to copying.dj, which explicitly forbids to
modify these headings. Also copying.dj doesn't state what version of
LGPL is that: is it v2+, or plain v2?
djgpp. Versioning wasn't really an issue back then ;-)
I'm not opposed to clarifying copying.dj to have the usual "or any later version" text, though.
Note that such a change would still not give youUnderstood, thanks.
the right to change the license, just more flexibility in complying with
it.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 546 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 01:00:34 |
Calls: | 10,385 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 14,057 |
Messages: | 6,416,573 |