• More of my philosophy about correlation and about diversity and more of

    From Amine Moulay Ramdane@21:1/5 to All on Sun Apr 17 12:38:02 2022
    Hello,



    More of my philosophy about correlation and about diversity and more of my thoughts..

    I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


    I think i am really smart, and here is more of my thoughts that make you understand why i don't agree with neo-Nazism and white supremacism,
    so read them carefully:


    I think i am smart, and i will say to look again at what is saying
    the Ph.D Katherine W. Phillips that is the Paul Calello Professor of
    Leadership and Ethics Management at Columbia Business School(Read about
    her here: https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/profile/katherine_phillips):

    "Large data-set studies have an obvious limitation: They only show that diversity is correlated with better performance, not that it causes
    better performance."

    So i will say that this Ph.D and other researchers are not so smart,
    since notice how is speaking the Ph.D Katherine W. Phillips in the
    following article:

    How Diversity Makes Us Smarter

    Read more here:

    https://greatergood.berkeley.edu/article/item/how_diversity_makes_us_smarter

    So notice that she is not saying that human diversity is a "mechanism"
    that can cause "competition" or more competition between people, and
    then competition can be the cause of better performance, so you are
    noticing that the above Ph.D and researchers are trying to measure it empirically, but i think that this kind of measuring is not a correct measuring, since what i am showing you by my way of thinking is the fact
    that there is a "tendency" in human diversity that it causes competition
    or more competition, so it causes better performance, so then we can
    notice that by not following there way of empirical measuring we can still know about the process. So as i said, i think this Ph.D and other
    researchers are not thinking and abstracting correctly since from my
    saying below we can notice that human Diversity in a global world or in
    a society or in a group brings more "competition" between people, so it
    makes us work harder and better cognitively and socially, but if we are
    not being the right human diversity and we are working harder and better cognitively and socially, then i think being human diversity can still
    "keep" or "maintain" the working harder and better cognitively and
    socially, also human diversity brings different human perspectives or
    views and it brings different human experiences and different human
    knowledges and it is good for creativity and innovation since it is also
    good for divergent thinking that enhance creativity and innovation.

    More of my philosophy about USA and human diversity and more..

    I just said the following:

    "I think i am understanding rapidly, since i think that human Diversity
    in a global world or in a society or in a group brings more
    "competition" between people, so it makes us work harder and
    better cognitively and socially, also human diversity brings different
    human perspectives or views and it brings different human experiences
    and different human knowledges and it is good for creativity and
    innovation since it is also good for divergent thinking that enhance
    creativity and innovation."

    So i will invite you to look at my following writing about USA that will
    make you notice how USA is making itself innovative and creative by
    bringing the "best" big brains immigrants, and notice, like in my above
    saying, that it is also saying the following:

    "But it’s not just a numbers thing. Another reason immigrants do so well
    in tech is that people from outside bring new perspectives that lead to
    new ideas."

    And here is more of my new thoughts about USA, read them again carefully:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/kIbGEdTXezQ

    Yet more precision of my philosophy about diversity and adaptability and resilience..

    I think i am understanding rapidly, since i think that human Diversity
    in a global world or in a society or in a group brings more
    "competition" between people, so it makes us work harder and
    better cognitively and socially, also human diversity brings different
    human perspectives or views and it brings different human experiences
    and different human knowledges and it is good for creativity and
    innovation since it is also good for divergent thinking that enhance
    creativity and innovation:

    And here is my new proverb that talks more about it:

    "Human vitality comes from intellectual openness and intellectual
    openness also comes from divergent thinking and you have to well balance divergent thinking with convergent thinking so that to converge towards
    the global optimum of efficiency and not get stuck on a local optimum of efficiency, and this kind of well balancing makes the good creativity."

    And i will explain more my proverb so that you understand it:

    I think that divergent thinking is thought process or method used to
    generate creative ideas by exploring many possible solutions, but notice
    that we even need openness in a form of economic actors that share ideas
    across nations and industries (and this needs globalization) that make
    us much more creative and that's good for economy, since you can easily
    notice that globalization also brings a kind of optimality to divergent thinking, and also you have to know how to balance divergent thinking
    with convergent thinking, since if divergent thinking is much greater
    than convergent thinking it can become costly in terms of time, and if
    the convergent thinking is much greater than divergent thinking you can
    get stuck on local optimum of efficiency and not converge to a global
    optimum of efficiency, and it is related to my following thoughts about
    the philosopher and economist Adam Smith, so i invite you to read them:

    https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/ftf3lx5Rzxo


    More of my philosophy about life and about evolutionary algorithms..

    I invite you to listen to the following beautiful song of Simon &
    Garfunkel called called April Come She Will:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4J1tCJEYETk

    I think that the above video of the song is showing how our world
    is "diversified" and it is good for adaptation and resilience, and it is
    the most important thing, and this diversification is also very
    important even in economy, since i think it is like evolutionary
    algorithms in artificial intelligence, since they are based on the same
    very important idea of diversifying by also decentralizing by
    efficiently specializing the members of the population so that to make
    it efficiently "adaptable" and much more "resilient", and the
    efficiently specializing can be efficiently specializing in a much
    higher level layer, like being a "generalist" medical doctor, and from
    the this decentralizing and efficiently specializing emerges a higher
    level intelligence such as a civilization, so then even evolutionary
    design methodology that i am talking about in my thoughts below does decentralize from the agile architect to the other members of the team,
    and here is step 3 of the important steps of evolutionary design
    methodology of agile:

    3- Instead of creating one big design at the beginning of the project
    that covers all of the requirements, agile architects use incremental
    design, which involves techniques that allow them to design a system
    that is not just complete, but also easy for the team to modify as
    the project changes.

    More of my philosophy about closed systems and open systems and
    interdependent systems..

    I think i am smart, and i will say that we have to have the right spirit
    so that to be efficient, and i think that the basis of the right spirit
    is also to look at how we are interdependent systems of different
    countries etc., so i think that the best way is to know how to be like
    the right randomness of the evolutionary algorithms that permits to not
    get stuck in a local optimum and be able to ensure the convergence to a
    global optimum, i mean that the best way is also to know how to well
    balance between cooperation and competition, since so that to not get
    stuck in a local optimum of efficiency we have also to know how to buy
    products and services from the other countries so that also to encourage creativity and innovation, since if you are too much competition you can "monopolize" too much and this can hurt creativity and innovation, so
    then we have to become a much more efficient and civilized world. And I
    think that Nazism or neo-nazism or white supremacism or communism are
    also too rigid, so they don't work correctly, since they also have the
    strong tendency to want to like too much homogenize and to too much
    monopolize and too much centralize, so they are not efficient systems.

    More of my philosophy about conformism and tribalism..

    I think i am smart, and i really believe that this strong loyality in
    tribalism is problematic, and i think that if we look at for example
    the white supremacism tribalism, it lacks something important, and it is that it doesn't believe that the smart ideas can change the
    "behavior" in the positive way of the other ethnical groups that are not of the ethnical groups of white supremacists, so they believe that
    the other ethnical groups are genetically not apt and not civilized,
    so they don't accept them and they view them as enemies, and i think that this way of doing is an archaism in philosophy that can bring too much violence globally, this is why we have to be the right "flexibility" and not as rigid as white supremacists,
    also this too much negativity in white supremacism is not good for productivity and quality, as i am explaining it in my thoughts below, and it can bring too much violence inside the society, and i am of the ones that believe that the smart ideas are
    powerful and they can change humans in the positive way, this is why you are noticing that i am sharing with you my philosophy and my thoughts, and here what i have just said about the smart ideas:

    What is the true power of the idea ?

    This is a so important philosophical subject, since
    i think i am smart and i will make you feel more the true
    power of the idea by first talking about the technic in psychology that
    we call "Mood freezing", since i think that the most important aspect of
    Mood freezing is that it recognizes the true power of the mind, and you
    can read about it here:

    https://www.alleydog.com/glossary/definition.php?term=Mood+Freezing

    So as you are noticing that it says that when the respondents were
    convinced that expressing aggression would not make them feel better,
    they actually accepted their current situation which eventually improved
    their moods, so this proves that the power of the idea is great, this is
    why i am of the ones that believes that we can enhance much better
    humans and construct a new type of man by using some intellectual
    mechanisms, and i am talking about some of them below and here is my
    poem about the true power of the idea, read it again:

    "Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
    Since it is how they have built south Korea
    Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
    Since it is how we unite the people such as of Crimea
    Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
    Since it is not just a pizza from the pizzeria
    Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
    Since it is not the simple prayer of Ave Maria
    Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
    Since it is not the stupid war between the sunnite and shiah
    Give me this beautiful and so smart idea
    Since it is how we make north Korea look like a beautiful Canada
    So give me more of those beautiful and so smart ideas !"

    More of my philosophy about the Volksgemeinschaft and about neo-Nazism and more..

    I think i am smart, and i have just spoken yesterday about neo-Nazism
    and i have just said that what also they want to do is to be a dictatorship so that to use the radical form that has not worked correctly, where we have to re-engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as
    in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), and here is more logical proof about the way of Social Engineering of Nazism and how the Nazism or neo-Nazism define who belongs to the National Socialist ‘community’ and who does not,
    read the following:

    https://oxford.universitypressscholarship.com/view/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199689590.001.0001/acprof-9780199689590

    And read the following article so that you understand more what i am saying:

    Germany seeks ban on neo-Nazis

    https://wc.arizona.edu/papers/94/58/01_96_m.html


    And read my previous thoughts:

    More of my philosophy about responsability and about happiness and more..

    I invite you to read the following article from a white supremacist and neo-nazi website called national vanguard:


    https://nationalvanguard.org/2022/04/cosmotheism-in-savitri-devi-2/


    And notice that it is saying the following about national socialism
    of the white supremacism and neo-nazism:

    "[National Socialism] aimed at stemming the physical and moral decay of modern, technically “advanced” humanity by forcing it — by forcing its racial élite, at least — to live in accordance with the ultimate purpose of Nature, which is not to
    make individuals “happy,” nor even to make, nations “happy,” but to evolve supermankind — living godhead — out of the existing master races, first of all, out of the pure Aryan. Happiness is a bourgeois conception, definitely. It is not our
    concern. We want animals to be happy — and inferior men, also, to the extent their happiness does not disturb the New Order. We believe higher mankind has better things to do. The Aryan world, remoulded by us after our final triumph, will no longer
    think in terms of happiness like the decadent world of today. It will think in terms of duty — like the early Vedic world, the early Christian world, the early Islamic world; like the world at the time of any great new beginning."


    But i think i am really smart and i say that there is two weaknesses in
    the above thoughts of neo-nazism, first weakness is that neo-nazism wants to be dictatorship so that to use the radical form, where we have to re-engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old
    communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), but this way of doing has not worked correctly, and the second weakness is that the "duty" in the above thoughts of neo-nazism is idealized, but since the duty has to be dictated by the
    dictatorship of neo-nazism, so since it is not the democratic way, then the duty that is dictated by neo-nazism can not work correctly and it can become a big problem since it comes from the dictatorship of neo-nazism.


    More of my philosophy about societal and individual identity and more of my thoughts..

    I think i am smart, and i think that societal identity can not come
    from the being rich or having big money, and i think that the societal identity is much more important than individual identity, since it is
    the very basis for societal order, since the being diversity of this one
    is rich and that one is not rich or is poor brings a kind of societal disorder and violence, since this kind of being unequal is not liked by people, so this is why i say that it is primordial to compensate it with a kind of being "decency" that maintain
    order in a society, and this kind of decency is, as i am saying it below, also the fact that we standardize with laws and rules so that to bring order.

    More of my philosophy of what is the Western values and about the laws and more..

    I have to clear something really important about laws, and here is what i will say:

    Western countries have wanted to avoid the radical form, where we have to re-engineer the human condition by the centralized planning and large-scale social engineering as in old communist China or USSR(United Socialist Soviet Republic), since i think
    this way of doing has not worked so efficiently, so i think that western countries have given to there people human rights and freedom of expression or speech as Liberty, but i think they are not definitive rights, since i think that Western countries
    are proceeding by rational reforms into the society and then to undertake evidence-based assessments, so then they are also monitoring those western rights to see if they are working correctly or not, so if they are not working correctly , so they can
    change them, so then from my previous thoughts about nationalism and about the laws you
    are also understanding the a kind of decency that brings order is so important for the society.

    Read my previous thoughts so that to understand:

    More of my philosophy about nationalism and about the laws and more..

    I think i am smart, since i think that the laws that we enforce and
    the kind of soft power that we softly enforce like by making them
    rules that we explain is the constraints that makes the basis of americanism as a nationalism of USA, since speaking and writing english can become a law too if it is necessary, so you will say why not the culture ? but the culture is the expression of
    the diversity of the population, but the laws and the soft power as soft rules is what "standardize" and makes the the basis of the americanism of USA that i say is the nationalism of USA.

    This is why i also just said the following:

    More of my philosophy of is USA nationalism or patriotism..

    I think that Donald Trump has not brought nationalism to USA, since i think that USA is a kind of nationalism that is not hard nationalism, since USA is a kind of americanism that is a kind of nationalism that is more softer than the one of president
    Putin, so what is the most important thing in americanism of USA ? i think it is the fact that it also comes from this USA americanism that maintain a kind of order by standardizing by being a mixture of laws that we enforce and by faith in God and a
    kind of soft power that brings a kind of decency that is an americanism that brings order, so i am saying it like this since
    the most important part in americanism of USA is how to be an acceptable society by being the right order.

    More of my philosophy about president Putin and about the war in Ukraine..

    I think i am smart, and i think that saying that president Putin is the only one responsable is not correct thinking, and what we have to do
    is think more efficiently and to try to understand nationalism of president Putin, so we have to ask a question of is nationalism of president Putin too much dictatorial and too much extremist and why is it too much dictatorial and too much extremist,
    since we can easily notice that the kind of too much dictatorial and extremist nationalism of Putin is not the kind of nationalism of the nationalist Union for a Popular Movement that is centre-right political party in France, so then you are
    understanding that there is hard and archaic nationalism like in Algeria and Russia and Syria and of the one of Marine Le Pen , and there is more appropriate nationalism like nationalist Union for a Popular Movement that is centre-right political party
    in France, so then you are noticing where is the defect of nationalism of Putin, since i think that nationalism of Putin is partly an archaism that has to be improved by making it look like nationalist Union for a Popular Movement that is centre-right
    political party in France, but we have to
    be careful since we have also to take into account the internal context
    of what has happened in Russia that has created this kind of too much dictatorial and extremist nationalism of president Putin.

    More of my philosophy about human diversity..

    I think i am smart, and i think that one of the most important
    thing in philosophy is to speak about what is the acceptable human diversity, so i think that what we are trying to do in the societies is that we are also standardizing by using laws, i mean the law doesn't accept all human diversities, and also we have
    to know that there is
    soft power and hard power, and the hard power is the laws that we are enforcing, and there is also soft power that we have to use so that
    to be an acceptable society, this is why i say that having an acceptable society is also knowing how to have smart and wise laws and how to be wisely and proactively a soft power that construct an acceptable society that doesn't degenerate into an unacceptable society. And it is
    how i am doing it by also inventing many poems of Love and poems so
    that to be in accordance with my following new proverb, so read them below:

    I think i am really smart, and i am also an inventor of many proverbs,
    and here is my just new proverb:

    "We can easily hate our world, and look at the destruction that just happened quickly in Ukraine and you will notice it quickly, so hate becomes by logical analogy like an animal instinct that we have to control wisely, it is why we have to know how to
    be constructive so that to make our world more beautiful so that we become much less destructive because of hate."

    More of my philosophy about my inventions and about my kind of personality..

    I think i am really smart, and you have to understand my kind
    of personality, since as you notice i am talking about my new software projects, and as you notice that i am a inventor of many scalable
    algorithms and algorithms, and i am also an inventor of many poems of Love and poems and here they are, read them carefully since my
    poems of Love and poems look like me:


    I want to share with you the following beautiful song with my poems of Love and poems..


    I want to share with you the following beautiful song of Cesária Evora:

    Amor Di Mundo

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCuJJwVwdJY&list=RDrCuJJwVwdJY&start_radio=1


    And invite you to read all my following poems of Love and poems
    that i have invented quickly:


    Here is my new poem called: "I am walking this so beautiful desert"


    I invite to listen to the following arabic music from Morocco
    reading at the same time my poem below:

    Music mandolin lamchaheb

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A8hnf2v4lmU


    Here is my new poem (and read all my poems below):


    I am beautifully walking this so beautiful desert

    Since notice how i am making it a beautiful concert

    I am beautifully walking this so beautiful desert

    Since my way is not the dirt or a simple flirt

    I am beautifully walking this so beautiful desert

    Since i am also for the good moral quest

    I am beautifully walking this so beautiful desert

    Since i am also not the evil or a pervert

    I am beautifully walking this so beautiful desert

    Since with my poems of Love i am like a delicious yoghurt

    I am beautifully walking this so beautiful desert

    Since i am the beautiful white arab that is loving you my sweatheart !



    Thank you,
    Amine Moulay Ramdane.

    --

    Here is my just new poem called: "I want to be silence so that to hear your name of USA or Europe or France"

    I am a white arab, and i think i am smart since i have also
    invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..


    As you know i am a white arab, and i invite you again to listen
    to the following beautiful arabic music reading at the same time
    my new poem below:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lcy_MF_jGdE


    So here is my new poem that i have just thought fast and written fast:


    I want to be silence so that to hear your name of USA or Europe or France

    Since you are the beautiful that is getting me in a beautiful trance !

    I want to be silence so that to hear your name of USA or Europe or France

    Since we are also like the so beautiful dance of a beautiful circumstance

    Since it is not about finance, but it is about the how to advance !

    I want to be silence so that to hear your name of USA or Europe or France

    So, is my kind of beautiful Love just a game of chance ?