Hello,
More of my philosophy about Artificial intelligence and more of my thoughts..
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
I think i am highly smart, and i think that we will attain a high level artificial intelligence in year 2029, so my prediction is that in year 2029 it will become a much more powerful artificial intelligence that will permit us to enhance much more our
human lives, and i also think that by scaling up a giant transformer trained on sequences of tokenized inputs will become a much more powerful artificial intelligence, and you can read more about it on my following thoughts in the following web link:
And you can read my thoughts about artificial intelligence and productivity and about China and its artificial intelligence and computer chips in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/UOt_4qTgN8M
And you can read my thoughts about the next industrial revolution and about Exascale supercomputers and more in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/hT6faP8cndE
And you can read my following thoughts about 3D stacking in CPUs and about EUV (extreme ultra violet) and about scalability and more in the
following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/USMMhMB9WIE
And you can read my following thoughts about Nanotechnology and about Exponential Progress in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ
And more of my philosophy about quantum computers and about how Machine Learning gets a quantum speedup and more of my thoughts..
IBM says thousands of quantum computers will be on sale by 2025, with 4,000 qubits, It represents a leap from its current hardware of 127 qubits
Read more here:
https://hpc-developpez-com.translate.goog/actu/333533/IBM-affirme-que-des-milliers-d-ordinateurs-quantiques-seront-en-vente-d-ici-2025-avec-4-000-qubits-il-represente-un-bond-par-rapport-a-son-materiel-actuel-de-127-qubits/?_x_tr_sl=auto&_x_tr_tl=en&_x_
tr_hl=en
I think i am smart, and as you have just noticed, i have just talked about quantum computers, read my below thoughts about it, and now we have to also ask how Machine Learning gets a quantum speedup, and here is an interesting article about it so that
you understand that quantum computers are also very interesting to have:
https://www.quantamagazine.org/ai-gets-a-quantum-computing-speedup-20220204/
And IBM is releasing the roadmap that we think will take us from the noisy, small-scale quantum computers of today to the million-plus qubit quantum computers of the future. And IBM team is developing a suite of scalable, increasingly larger and better
processors, with a 1,000-plus qubit device, called IBM Quantum Condor, targeted for the end of 2023,
you can read about it on the following interesting article:
https://research.ibm.com/blog/ibm-quantum-roadmap
And you can read my thoughts about artificial intelligence and productivity and about China and its artificial intelligence and computer chips in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/UOt_4qTgN8M
And you can read my thoughts about the next industrial revolution and about Exascale supercomputers and more in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/hT6faP8cndE
And you can read my following thoughts about 3D stacking in CPUs and about EUV (extreme ultra violet) and about scalability and more in the
following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/USMMhMB9WIE
And you can read my following thoughts about Nanotechnology and about Exponential Progress in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ
And read my previous thoughts:
More of my philosophy about quantum computers and about CPUs and more..
For a parallel computer, we need to have one billion different processors. In a quantum computer, a single register can perform a billion computations since a qubit of a register of a quantum computer can be both in two states 1 and 0, this is known as
quantum parallelism, so, what characteristics do the problems where quantum computing wins big share? i think one thing that they share is that they tend to be about some global property of a large mathematical system, and connecting quantum computing to
"Moore's Law" is sort of foolish -- it's not an all-purpose technique for faster computers, but a limited technique that makes certain types of specialized problems easier, while leaving most of the things we actually use computers for unaffected.
So i think that classical computers are also really useful,
so read my following thoughts so that to understand:
More of my philosophy about Intel Thread Director and about CPUs and more..
I invite you to read the following interesting article about Intel Thread Director:
How Intel Thread Director makes Alder Lake and Windows 11 a match made in heaven
https://www.digitaltrends.com/computing/how-intel-thread-director-marries-alder-lake-windows-11/
And more of my philosophy about AVX-512 and about Delphi 11.1 and more
of my thoughts..
I am also using Delphi and Freepascal compilers, and the new Delphi 11.1 compiler provides inline assembler (asm code) support for newer sets of instructions, including AVX2 (ymm) and AVX512 (zmm), you can read about it here:
https://lecturepress.com/tech-journal/dev-tools/delphi-11-is-released/
And the new Delphi 11.1 is here..
Build Native Apps 5x Faster With One Codebase
For Windows, Android, iOS, macOS, and Linux
You can read more about it here:
https://www.embarcadero.com/products/delphi
More of my philosophy about AMD Zen 4 and more of my thoughts..
I have just forgotten to talk about AVX-512 support in Zen 4,
and Zen 4 will be out in 2022, so i think that Zen 4 will support AVX-512 and that's a good news, and you can read about it here:
Gigabyte Leaks AMD Zen 4 Details: 5nm, AVX-512, 96 Cores, 12-Channel DDR5
Read more here:
https://www.extremetech.com/computing/325888-gigabyte-leaks-amd-zen-4-details-5nm-avx-512-96-cores-12-channel-ddr5
And read my following previous thoughts:
More of my philosophy about Intel's Alder Lake and about ARM and x86 memory models and more of my thoughts..
I think i am smart, and as you have just noticed, i have just talked about Epyc Zen 4 and Zen 5 and i have just talked about the network topology inside multicore CPUs etc. read them in my thoughts below, and i think that my talking about the network
topology of multicore CPUs will still be valid if the new Intel's Alder Lake also becomes a server CPU like a Xeon or Epyc, so here is my thoughts about Intel Alder Lake and about ARM and x86 memory models:
I think that the new Intel's Alder Lake is a winner, and i think that
the performance/efficiency core design of Intel's Alder Lake could find its way into servers, workstations, or embedded IT systems as you can notice it by reading the following article:
https://www.networkworld.com/article/3631072/will-intels-new-desktop-cpu-design-come-to-its-xeon-server-chips.html
More of my philosophy about the ARM and x86 memory models and more
of my thoughts..
I think i am smart, and as you have just noticed i have just said
that x86 is the future(read my below thoughts so that to understand why)
, but i think that ARM architecture has another big defect, since its weak hardware memory model has not balanced correctly between safety or security and performance, so i think that it is a big defect in ARM, read carefully the following article about
x86 TSO memory model:
https://research.swtch.com/hwmm
So notice that Intel says that it has well balanced between safety or security and performance by saying the following:
"To address these problems, Owens et al. proposed the x86-TSO model, based on the earlier SPARCv8 TSO model. At the time they claimed that “To the best of our knowledge, x86-TSO is sound, is strong enough to program above, and is broadly in line with
the vendors’ intentions.” A few months later Intel and AMD released new manuals broadly adopting this model."
And read more here so that to understand that x86 TSO memory model is very good:
https://jakob.engbloms.se/archives/1435
So i think that ARM has a big defect since it has to provide
with TSO memory model as RISC-V is providing it, since it is
very important for the security or safety concerns
More of my philosophy about the fight between x86 and ARM architectures and more of my thoughts..
I invite you to read the following interesting article about the
fight between x86 or x64 and ARM architectures
ARM Servers on AWS: How to Save up to 30%
Read more here:
https://opsworks.co/arm-servers-on-aws-how-to-save-up-to-30/
So notice that it says the following about ARM CPU architecture compared to x86 CPU architecture:
"Running in a standard setting, Graviton2 performs 20% better, and the power consumption of the Arm core is about half that of other types of cores. Since the cost savings are also about 20%, performance-cost improvements reach 40%."
But i think that the new Intel's Alder Lake is a new winner, since
read the following article so that to notice:
Intel's Alder Lake chip could speed PCs by 30% while saving battery power
https://www.cnet.com/tech/computing/intels-alder-lake-chip-could-speed-pcs-by-30-while-saving-battery-power/
Also here is the other way that is using Intel so that to fight ARM:
Intel CEO says co-designed x86 chips will fend off Arm threat
Read more here:
https://www.pcgamer.com/intel-x86-vs-arm-gelsinger/
So i think that x86 architecture is the future.
And you can read my following thoughts about 3D stacking in CPUs and about EUV (extreme ultra violet) and about scalability and more in the
following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/USMMhMB9WIE
More of my philosophy about the next Epyc Zen 4 and Epyc Zen 5 CPUs and more of my thoughts..
I have just read the following article about the next AMD EPYC Turin Zen 5 CPUs Rumored To Feature Up To 256 Cores & 192 Core:
https://wccftech.com/amd-epyc-turin-zen-5-cpus-rumored-to-feature-up-to-256-cores-192-core-configurations-max-600w-configurable-tdps/
And notice the data in the above article, so i can say the following
with my calculations:
DDR5 will arrive with a minimum speed of at 4800Mbit/s, which works out to 76.8GB/s of bandwidth in a dual-channel configuration,
and each CCX in Epyc Zen 4 and Zen 4C can be enabled as its own NUMA domain, so in the next AMD EPYC Genoa and AMD EPYC Bergamo CPUs there will be 12 NUMA nodes per socket, with respectively DDR5-5200 and DDR5-5600 support on those CPUs, so the AMD EPYC
Genoa can support a memory bandwidth of 5.2 GT/s x 8 bytes per channel x 12 channels for one socket, and that equals 499.2 GB per second or 998.4 GB per second for two sockets, and the AMD EPYC Bergamo can support a memory bandwidth of 5.6 GT/s x 8 bytes
per channel x 12 channels for one socket, that equals 537.6 GB per second or 1075.2 GB per second for two sockets, so as you notice that the memory bandwidth will become powerful on those kind of CPUs of Zen 4 and Zen 5, and the IPC gain from Zen 3 to
Zen 4 is at around 20% and 40% Overall Performance Boost of Zen 4 over Zen 3, and Zen 5 will have 20-40% IPC increase over Zen 4, and for the network topology in those next multicores CPUs, you can read my following thoughts about it:
More of my philosophy about the knee of an M/M/n queue and more..
Here is the mathematical equation of the knee of an M/M/n queue in
queuing theory in operational research:
1/(n+1)^1/n
n is the number of servers.
So then an M/M/1 has a knee of 50% of the utilization, and the one of
an M/M/2 is 0,578.
More of my philosophy about the network topology in multicores CPUs..
I invite you to look at the following video:
Ring or Mesh, or other? AMD's Future on CPU Connectivity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8teWvMXK99I&t=904s
And i invite you to read the following article:
Does an AMD Chiplet Have a Core Count Limit?
Read more here:
https://www.anandtech.com/show/16930/does-an-amd-chiplet-have-a-core-count-limit
I think i am smart and i say that the above video and the above article
are not so smart, so i will talk about a very important thing, and it is
the following, read the following:
Performance Scalability of a Multi-core Web Server
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/221046211_Performance_scalability_of_a_multi-core_web_server
So notice carefully that it is saying the following:
"..we determined that performance scaling was limited by the capacity of
the address bus, which became saturated on all eight cores. If this key obstacle is addressed, commercial web server and systems software are well-positioned to scale to a large number of cores."
So as you notice they were using an Intel Xeon of 8 cores, and the
application was scalable to 8x but the hardware was not scalable to 8x,
since it was scalable only to 4.8x, and this was caused by the bus
saturation, since the Address bus saturation causes poor scaling, and
the Address Bus carries requests and responses for data, called snoops,
and more caches mean more sources and more destinations for snoops that
is causing the poor scaling, so as you notice that a network topology of
a Ring bus or a bus was not sufficient so that to scale to 8x on an
Intel Xeon with 8 cores, so i think that the new architectures like Epyc
CPU and Threadripper CPU can use a faster bus or/and a different network topology that permits to both ensure a full scalability locally in the
same node and globally between the nodes, so then we can notice that a sophisticated mesh network topology not only permits to reduce the
number of hops inside the CPU for good latency, but it is also good for reliability by using its sophisticated redundancy and it is faster than previous topologies like the ring bus or the bus since
for example the search on address bus becomes parallelized, and it looks
like the internet network that uses mesh topology using routers, so it parallelizes, and i also think that using a more sophisticated topology
like a mesh network topology is related to queuing theory since we can
notice that in operational research the mathematics says that we can
make the queue like M/M/1 more efficient by making the server more
powerful, but we can notice that the knee of a M/M/1 queue is around 50%
, so we can notice that by using a mesh topology like internet or
inside a CPU, you can by parallelizing more you can in operational
research both enhance the knee of the queue and the speed of executing
the transactions and it is like using many servers in queuing theory and
it permits to scale better inside a CPU or in internet.
More of my philosophy about DDR5 and the next Sapphire Rapids CPU of Intel and more of my thoughts..
I will explain something very important:
I invite you to read the following about the next Sapphire Rapids CPU of Intel here:
Intel Provides Details About Sapphire Rapids CPU and Ponte Vecchio GPU
https://www.hpcwire.com/off-the-wire/intel-unveils-details-about-sapphire-rapids-cpu-ponte-vecchio-gpu-ipu/
So notice carefully that it says the following:
"The processor is built to drive industry technology transitions with advanced memory and next generation I/O, including PCIe 5.0, CXL 1.1, DDR5 and HBM technologies."
And notice that it says the same here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sapphire_Rapids
So the next Sapphire Rapids CPU of Intel will support DDR5 and HBM technologies for the memory subsystem, but i will say that CPUs like the kind of CPUs for computer servers have implemented ECC in their caches for at least a decade or so, and DDR5
memory subsystem implementations are useful for creating large capacities with modest bandwidth compared to HBM, and HBM, on the other hand, offers large bandwidth with low capacity, but i think that the problem with the next Sapphire Rapids CPU of Intel
is that DDR5 has a problem that it is not fully ECC, read here to notice it:
"On-die ECC: The presence of on-die ECC on DDR5 memory has been the subject of many discussions and a lot of confusion among consumers and the press alike. Unlike standard ECC, on-die ECC primarily aims to improve yields at advanced process nodes,
thereby allowing for cheaper DRAM chips. On-die ECC only detects errors if they take place within a cell or row during refreshes. When the data is moved from the cell to the cache or the CPU, if there’s a bit-flip or data corruption, it won’t be
corrected by on-die ECC. Standard ECC corrects data corruption within the cell and as it is moved to another device or an ECC-supported SoC."
Read more here to notice it:
https://www.hardwaretimes.com/ddr5-vs-ddr4-ram-quad-channel-and-on-die-ecc-explained/
More of my philosophy about HP NonStop to x86 Server Platform fault-tolerant computer systems and more..
Now HP to Extend HP NonStop to x86 Server Platform
HP announced in 2013 plans to extend its mission-critical HP NonStop technology to x86 server architecture, providing the 24/7 availability required in an always-on, globally connected world, and increasing customer choice.
Read the following to notice it:
https://www8.hp.com/us/en/hp-news/press-release.html?id=1519347#.YHSXT-hKiM8
And today HP provides HP NonStop to x86 Server Platform, and here is
an example, read here:
https://www.hpe.com/ca/en/pdfViewer.html?docId=4aa5-7443&parentPage=/ca/en/products/servers/mission-critical-servers/integrity-nonstop-systems&resourceTitle=HPE+NonStop+X+NS7+%E2%80%93+Redefining+continuous+availability+and+scalability+for+x86+data+sheet
So i think programming the HP NonStop for x86 is now compatible with x86 programming.
More of my philosophy about the simplistic language and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart, and as you have just noticed, i have just spoken below about the technical language, and i invite you to look carefully at the following short video of a simplistic language that works in a really useful way:
Spreading the joy of laughter on a train
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydAyvvDQrgY
More of my philosophy about capitalism and about Morocco and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart, and as you have noticed i am a moroccan that lives in Canada since year 1989, but i will speak more about Morocco my country, so i think that Morocco is a beautiful country, and i think Morocco's debt-to-GDP is not so bad, but
i think that so that to enhance much more its economy, Morocco has to do the following:
Morocco is a relatively small internal market, so i think that it has
to enlarge its market by being high economic "integration" with the other Maghrebis or Maghrebians countries such as Algeria etc. and it has to higher productivity so that to also attract much more efficiently Foreign Direct Investments, and it has to
easy much more the administrative burdens that slow down business activities, other than that i think we can be optimistic about capitalism since capitalism is not a zero sum game, since with a reasonable level of growth, capitalism can both deliver
rising living standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital, also read my following thoughts in the following web link so that to understand more my views:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/sw5EarahFo8
Also read my following thoughts:
More of my philosophy about abstraction and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart and now i will ask an important philosophical question of:
Does the level of abstraction that we use by using a language like english or french or arabic is sufficient and efficient ?
So i think the languages like english and french and arabic are languages that "abstract" the reality of the existence, so they are not
precise languages that describe reality, but i am smart and i say
that those languages, like english and french and arabic, have there deficiencies, since they can not describe the technical or scientific thoughts in a more precise and more technical manner , so then the languages like english and french and arabic are
not sufficient and are not efficient at expressing those kind of technical or scientific thoughts, this is why we are for example using software programming languages that can be described as technical languages since i say that they describe the
thoughts of humans that are more precise and more technical than non-technical or non-scientific thoughts, so i think i am smart and i will say that when you do software programming it is that you describe technical thoughts in a much more precise and
technical manner, this is why i say that software programming learns us to be more disciplined and more precise and more technical, since for example a cosine or a sine or other trigonometric functions are part of a technical language that we find in
technical languages like software programming languages, but they were added late after to the english dictionary, but notice that they are not part of the english language, and look for example a computer programming register that we use in software
programming, notice that is part of technical language and it is not the english language, so look carefully at my following thoughts that i have thought quickly about more of my philosophy about stack memory allocations and about preemptive and non-
preemptive timesharing, and notice how i am using both the english language and the technical language so that to be much more precise and technical:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/JuC4jar661w
More of my philosophy about Germany and the debt-to-GDP ratio and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart and i have just looked at the following
numbers about the budget balance of Germany in around year 2029 so that to compare it with the numbers of Canada below, and here it is:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/624187/germany-budget-balance-in-relation-to-gdp/
So then in around year 2029, Germany, like Canada, will have balanced the Budget, so i think it is good for both Germany and Canada.
And for the debt-to-GDP ratio of Germany, look at it here:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/624193/national-debt-of-germany-in-relation-to-gross-domestic-product-gdp/
So i think the debt-to-GDP ratio of Germany will be in year 2029 at around 40%, and it is around the same number as for Canada, so i think that both Germany and Canada are in a good shape in there debt-to-GDP ratio and the balance of the budget. And as i
just said that when government debt-to-GDP exceeds 85%, future economic growth is reduced.
And read my previous thoughts:
Germany: Budget balance between 2017 to 2027 in relation to GDP
More of my philosophy about the debt-to-GDP ratio and more of my thoughts..
I think from the following article that when government debt-to-GDP exceeds 85%, future economic growth is reduced. And the current debt-to-GDP ratio of USA is 127%, which is expected to rise to 277% by 2029, so i think USA is not in a good shape in its
debt-to-GDP and i think it will not even balance the budget in 2029 and it is not good, and you can read the following article so that to understand it:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikepatton/2021/05/03/us-national-debt-expected-to-approach-89-trillion-by-2029/?sh=305152295f13
But Canada is in a much better shape in its debt-to-GDP ratio, since its debt-to-GDP will be around 40% in 2029, and Canada will be able to balance the budget in around year 2029, so i think Canada will be in a much better shape in its financial budget
and in debt-to-GDP than USA, so i invite you to read the following article so that to notice it:
https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/budget-2022-unveils-billions-in-targeted-new-spending-deficit-projected-at-52-8b-1.5852813
More of my philosophy about existentialism of the philosopher Albert Camus and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart, and i think that existentialism of the philosopher Albert Camus is an open problem, since you can notice that
the philosopher doesn't say how to construct the meaning and
purpose of human life, and notice how the philosopher Albert Camus says that human life is, objectively speaking, meaningless, since according to Camus, the absurd is produced via conflict, a conflict between our expectation of a rational, just universe
and the actual universe that it is quite indifferent to all of our expectations, but i think that Albert Camus was not so right, since i say that the meaning and purpose of human existence of life can be "constructed" as i am doing it below, and i also
think that the most important part of my philosophy are the engines that permits you to be self-confidence and that permits you to be a kind of hope and positive energy, but i will now bring more precision to how i am defining the meaning and purpose of
human life, so i say that i think that the meaning and the purpose of human existence is to play it smartly, since you have to play it smartly like in a game of chess, i don't mean that we have to be violent, but we have to be this satisfaction of
playing it smartly as an individual and as a group and as a world, so i think it is how i am doing it, i am playing it smartly so that to also get the satisfaction of playing it smartly, and this satisfaction of playing it smartly is my engine, and i
think it is a good purpose and a good meaning of human existence. But notice carefully that in a game of chess there is a winner and there is a loser, but the loser has to play it smartly too so that to "win" the satisfaction of playing it smartly that
becomes his engine that pushes him forward with a kind self-confidence and hope, and it is how we have to become smart by playing it smartly so that to get the satisfaction of playing it smartly even if humanity is not able to be successful. So as you
notice the how i am constructing the meaning and purpose of human life, that looks by logical analogy, like my following proverb that i am also explaining, since the satisfaction of playing it smartly is the engine even if you fail to be successful, this
engine of satisfaction of playing it smartly permits you to be self-confidence and hope by continuing to playing it smartly, and notice that the playing smartly in my thoughts is not that it is that you have to have a high IQ, since the playing smartly
is also defined by morality that takes into account the societal smartness and not only individual smartness. So here is my new proverb and notice the logical analogy that i am talking about:
"When you walk towards a goal in life it's like you walk down a forest
path towards a goal, but when you walk this forest path you can look at
flowers and pretty trees and be happier or you can also learn more and
have more experience which is useful while walking in the forest, then
life is like this, you can go through it towards goals, but going
through it you can also have pleasures that make you happier and you can
learn more and have more experience and that is useful to you, and i
think this conception of life makes you more positive."
And here is the translation in french of my new proverb:
"Quand tu marches vers un objectif dans la vie, c'est comme tu marches
dans un chemin de forêt vers un objectif, mais quand tu marches dans ce
chemin de forêt tu peux regarder des fleurs et de jolis arbres et être
plus joyeux ou tu peux aussi en apprendre plus et avoir plus
d'expérience qui est utile en marchant dans la forêt, alors la vie
ressemble à cela, tu peux la traverser vers des objectifs, mais en la traversant tu peux avoir aussi des plaisirs qui te rendent plus heureux
et tu peux apprendre plus et avoir plus d'experience et cela t'est
utile, et je pense que cette conception de la vie te rend plus positif."
So you have to understand that my proverb above is like
trying to well balance between, in one side, our strong human desire for success and the fear or the disliking of failure to attain the goal,
and, in the other side, i am showing in my new proverb the good sides or advantages or the pros of walking our lives towards the goal or goals
even if failure or failures happen(s), and i think this conception of
life of my proverb permits to be more positive, also you have to align
the usefulness of the utility with the global mission of the country or
global world"
Other than that i will talk more about the human identity, so what
do you think is my human identity? so i think that my human
identity comes from my playing it smartly as i am explaining above,
since look at how i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms , and look at how i have invented quickly many proverbs
and look at how i have invented quickly many poems of Love and poems,
and look at how i have invented my thoughts of my philosophy, so
my being this creative and inventive is what makes my human identity.
More of my philosophy about the higher purpose and meaning and more of my thoughts..
I have just looked at the following video, and i invite you to look
at it:
Meaning without Higher Meaning - Existentialism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gaAiHwjDAH4
Here is my new proverb:
"There one type of smartness that is interesting to look at,
and it is also the one that i have just used by explaining to you what is the truth, read it carefully below, and i will call it smartness of the being "resourceful", since i say that resourcefulness is one of the most important things, and it is a skill,
and the good news is: this skill can be learned and mastered, and resourcefulness is attained only when we combine the resourceful mindset and skills, so we have to filter out some of the most useful resources that help us, and resourcefulness is also
to know who/what to look for and what to ask, and when ressourcefulness is attained this becomes an engine that permits you to have hope and to be energetic and to be positive in doing what you are doing, since resourcefulness also permits to easy the
jobs for you"
And read my previous thoughts:
More of my philosophy about mathematics and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart, and i think that in the truth what is so important is the general rule that i am talking about in my below thoughts below, and it is from where comes the truth, since we can also say that we need the truth since we also exist
as humans and consciousness of humans, so it is why we have to make it clear that the general rule that i am talking about is the from where comes the truth, so then i can logically infer that this general rule can be used again and again so that to
logically infer the truth, and it is in accordance with the general rule, so then we have to distinguish between the
truth and the reality of the existence, since being truth is not being reality of the existence, since we can use a general rule that is based on the theoretical that doesn't exist, but i think that the general rule can be based on the reality of the
existence, so then from the characteristics that are realistic of the ingredients of general rule you can logically infer some rules that are useful for the reality of the existence, and i think that it is how works mathematics, since for example when
you work in topology in mathematics,
a point is also a concept defined by characteristics that are also reality of the existence, so from a point you can generate a 2d or a 3d object, so then the result of it can still have characteristics that are realistic.
Read my previously thoughts:
More of my philosophy about the Islamic philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart and i have just taken a look at the Islamic philosophy here:
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)