Hello,
More of my philosophy about neo-nazism and white supremacism and more of my thoughts..
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
I think i am highly smart and i have just looked at the following
video that speaks about how thinks white supremacism and neo-nazism,
so i invite you to look at it:
Eugenics and America's Campaign to Create a Master Race: War Against the Weak (2003)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfPTaBlheGA&t=2557s
So i think i am highly smart and i think the best way to answer white supremacism and neo-nazism , it is that white supremacism and neo-nazism
wants to "unite" especially western white europeans and they want to
destroy or exterminate the others, but this way of thinking is too simplistic, since western white europeans wants also to decentralize and diversify correctly since the being unity under the white supremacism or neo-nazism as systems is not so efficient
and it can hurt the system since it is not decentralized and diversified correctly, since it is also like when you say arabs, there is a diversity of views or political views and diversity of genetics of arabs, so you have to know how to "decentralize"
and "manage" this diversity so that to be efficient, and of course genetic diversity is also necessary for our world so that to be efficient, so it is why i think we need this genetic diversity of arabs and white europeans etc.
More of my philosophy about materialism and about the french philosopher André Comte-Sponville and more of my thoughts..
I am a white arab from Morocco, and i think i am smart since i have also invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms..
I think i am highly smart, and i have just taken a look at the
following web page about the french philosopher André Comte-Sponville
that studied in the École Normale Supérieure and earned a PhD from Panthéon-Sorbonne University:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andr%C3%A9_Comte-Sponville
So look carefully at the above web page about the french philosopher André Comte-Sponville, and notice that he says that he is a proponent of atheism and materialism, but i think i am not like him, since i say
that an idea can has an existence in our minds even if it doesn't exist in the reality, i mean for example we can imagine an
abstract object like a circle into our mind that doesn't exist
in reality, and then we can say that so that to not be an extremist
we can say that the fact that an idea can exist in our mind and not exist in reality is a like a logical proof that an idea can have its proper existence even if it depends and it needs materialism. Also the french philosopher André Comte-Sponville is
making the same mistake as the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer in the following video by saying that human life oscillates between boredom and suffering, and he has also explained it by the fact that when you desire and you are lacking what you want that
means you become suffering, and when you have what you are missing you become bored, so look carefully at the following video so that to notice it:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WcNt-r7LDi0
More of my philosophy about the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer and about the philosopher Albert Camus and more of my thoughts..
Today i will talk more about the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer and
about the philosopher Albert Camus and more of my thoughts:
And here is my new proverb:
"When you don't know how to nuance, that's also where the problems begin"
"Quand on ne sait pas nuancer, c'est là aussi que commencent les problèmes"
The philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer has said that human life oscillates between boredom and suffering, and he has also explained it by the fact that when you desire and you are lacking what you want that means you become suffering, and when you have what
you are missing you become bored, but i think that like in my above new proverb i say that the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer was lacking on knowing how to nuance correctly, since lacking what you want doesn't mean that you are suffering and when you
have what you are missing doesn't mean that you are bored. And by logical analogy even the philosopher Albert Camus was lacking on knowing how to nuance correctly, since he has said that when you look at how we are working 8 hours a day or so and when
you look how our universe is like meaningless since the absurd is produced via conflict, a conflict between our expectation of a rational, just universe and the actual universe that it is quite indifferent to all of our expectations, so then the
philosopher Albert Camus says that it like render your life meaningless , but here again working in a job doesn't mean that you are suffering or suffering so much by working in this job and read my below thoughts so that to understand the rest, so i
think that the philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer and the philosopher Albert Camus were too pessimistic, and here is more of my thoughts about existentialism of the philosopher Albert Camus:
More of my philosophy about existentialism of the philosopher Albert Camus and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart, and i think that existentialism of the philosopher Albert Camus is an open problem, since you can notice that
the philosopher doesn't say how to construct the meaning and
purpose of human life, and notice how the philosopher Albert Camus says that human life is, objectively speaking, meaningless, since according to Camus, the absurd is produced via conflict, a conflict between our expectation of a rational, just universe
and the actual universe that it is quite indifferent to all of our expectations, but i think that Albert Camus was not so right, since i say that the meaning and purpose of human existence of life can be "constructed" as i am doing it below, and i also
think that the most important part of my philosophy are the engines that permits you to be self-confidence and that permits you to be a kind of hope and positive energy, but i will now bring more precision to how i am defining the meaning and purpose of
human life, so i say that i think that the meaning and the purpose of human existence is to play it smartly, since you have to play it smartly like in a game of chess, i don't mean that we have to be violent, but we have to be this satisfaction of
playing it smartly as an individual and as a group and as a world, so i think it is how i am doing it, i am playing it smartly so that to also get the satisfaction of playing it smartly, and this satisfaction of playing it smartly is my engine, and i
think it is a good purpose and a good meaning of human existence. But notice carefully that in a game of chess there is a winner and there is a loser, but the loser has to play it smartly too so that to "win" the satisfaction of playing it smartly that
becomes his engine that pushes him forward with a kind self-confidence and hope, and it is how we have to become smart by playing it smartly so that to get the satisfaction of playing it smartly even if humanity is not able to be successful. So as you
notice the how i am constructing the meaning and purpose of human life, that looks by logical analogy, like my following proverb that i am also explaining, since the satisfaction of playing it smartly is the engine even if you fail to be successful, this
engine of satisfaction of playing it smartly permits you to be self-confidence and hope by continuing to playing it smartly, and notice that the playing smartly in my thoughts is not that it is that you have to have a high IQ, since the playing smartly
is also defined by morality that takes into account the societal smartness and not only individual smartness. So here is my new proverb and notice the logical analogy that i am talking about:
"When you walk towards a goal in life it's like you walk down a forest
path towards a goal, but when you walk this forest path you can look at
flowers and pretty trees and be happier or you can also learn more and
have more experience which is useful while walking in the forest, then
life is like this, you can go through it towards goals, but going
through it you can also have pleasures that make you happier and you can
learn more and have more experience and that is useful to you, and i
think this conception of life makes you more positive."
And here is the translation in french of my new proverb:
"Quand tu marches vers un objectif dans la vie, c'est comme tu marches
dans un chemin de forêt vers un objectif, mais quand tu marches dans ce
chemin de forêt tu peux regarder des fleurs et de jolis arbres et être
plus joyeux ou tu peux aussi en apprendre plus et avoir plus
d'expérience qui est utile en marchant dans la forêt, alors la vie
ressemble à cela, tu peux la traverser vers des objectifs, mais en la traversant tu peux avoir aussi des plaisirs qui te rendent plus heureux
et tu peux apprendre plus et avoir plus d'experience et cela t'est
utile, et je pense que cette conception de la vie te rend plus positif."
So you have to understand that my proverb above is like
trying to well balance between, in one side, our strong human desire for success and the fear or the disliking of failure to attain the goal,
and, in the other side, i am showing in my new proverb the good sides or advantages or the pros of walking our lives towards the goal or goals
even if failure or failures happen(s), and i think this conception of
life of my proverb permits to be more positive, also you have to align
the usefulness of the utility with the global mission of the country or
global world"
And read the following part of my philosophy in the following web link about self-confidence and about how to be the positive energy and how to be hope so that you notice how my philosophy is smart:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM
More of my philosophy about the simplistic language and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart, and as you have just noticed, i have just spoken below about the technical language, and i invite you to look carefully at the following short video of a simplistic language that works in a really useful way:
Spreading the joy of laughter on a train
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydAyvvDQrgY
More of my philosophy about capitalism and about Morocco and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart, and as you have noticed i am a moroccan that lives in Canada since year 1989, but i will speak more about Morocco my country, so i think that Morocco is a beautiful country, and i think Morocco's debt-to-GDP is not so bad, but
i think that so that to enhance much more its economy, Morocco has to do the following:
Morocco is a relatively small internal market, so i think that it has
to enlarge its market by being high economic "integration" with the other Maghrebis or Maghrebians countries such as Algeria etc. and it has to higher productivity so that to also attract much more efficiently Foreign Direct Investments, and it has to
easy much more the administrative burdens that slow down business activities, other than that i think we can be optimistic about capitalism since capitalism is not a zero sum game, since with a reasonable level of growth, capitalism can both deliver
rising living standards for most, and still ensure a relatively high rate of return to the owners of capital, also read my following thoughts in the following web link so that to understand more my views:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/sw5EarahFo8
Also read my following thoughts:
More of my philosophy about abstraction and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart and now i will ask an important philosophical question of:
Does the level of abstraction that we use by using a language like english or french or arabic is sufficient and efficient ?
So i think the languages like english and french and arabic are languages that "abstract" the reality of the existence, so they are not
precise languages that describe reality, but i am smart and i say
that those languages, like english and french and arabic, have there deficiencies, since they can not describe the technical or scientific thoughts in a more precise and more technical manner , so then the languages like english and french and arabic are
not sufficient and are not efficient at expressing those kind of technical or scientific thoughts, this is why we are for example using software programming languages that can be described as technical languages since i say that they describe the
thoughts of humans that are more precise and more technical than non-technical or non-scientific thoughts, so i think i am smart and i will say that when you do software programming it is that you describe technical thoughts in a much more precise and
technical manner, this is why i say that software programming learns us to be more disciplined and more precise and more technical, since for example a cosine or a sine or other trigonometric functions are part of a technical language that we find in
technical languages like software programming languages, but they were added late after to the english dictionary, but notice that they are not part of the english language, and look for example a computer programming register that we use in software
programming, notice that is part of technical language and it is not the english language, so look carefully at my following thoughts that i have thought quickly about more of my philosophy about stack memory allocations and about preemptive and non-
preemptive timesharing, and notice how i am using both the english language and the technical language so that to be much more precise and technical:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/JuC4jar661w
More of my philosophy about Germany and the debt-to-GDP ratio and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart and i have just looked at the following
numbers about the budget balance of Germany in around year 2029 so that to compare it with the numbers of Canada below, and here it is:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/624187/germany-budget-balance-in-relation-to-gdp/
So then in around year 2029, Germany, like Canada, will have balanced the Budget, so i think it is good for both Germany and Canada.
And for the debt-to-GDP ratio of Germany, look at it here:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/624193/national-debt-of-germany-in-relation-to-gross-domestic-product-gdp/
So i think the debt-to-GDP ratio of Germany will be in year 2029 at around 40%, and it is around the same number as for Canada, so i think that both Germany and Canada are in a good shape in there debt-to-GDP ratio and the balance of the budget. And as i
just said that when government debt-to-GDP exceeds 85%, future economic growth is reduced.
And read my previous thoughts:
Germany: Budget balance between 2017 to 2027 in relation to GDP
More of my philosophy about the debt-to-GDP ratio and more of my thoughts..
I think from the following article that when government debt-to-GDP exceeds 85%, future economic growth is reduced. And the current debt-to-GDP ratio of USA is 127%, which is expected to rise to 277% by 2029, so i think USA is not in a good shape in its
debt-to-GDP and i think it will not even balance the budget in 2029 and it is not good, and you can read the following article so that to understand it:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikepatton/2021/05/03/us-national-debt-expected-to-approach-89-trillion-by-2029/?sh=305152295f13
But Canada is in a much better shape in its debt-to-GDP ratio, since its debt-to-GDP will be around 40% in 2029, and Canada will be able to balance the budget in around year 2029, so i think Canada will be in a much better shape in its financial budget
and in debt-to-GDP than USA, so i invite you to read the following article so that to notice it:
https://www.ctvnews.ca/politics/budget-2022-unveils-billions-in-targeted-new-spending-deficit-projected-at-52-8b-1.5852813
Other than that i will talk more about the human identity, so what
do you think is my human identity? so i think that my human
identity comes from my playing it smartly as i am explaining above,
since look at how i have invented many scalable algorithms and algorithms , and look at how i have invented quickly many proverbs
and look at how i have invented quickly many poems of Love and poems,
and look at how i have invented my thoughts of my philosophy, so
my being this creative and inventive is what makes my human identity.
More of my philosophy about the higher purpose and meaning and more of my thoughts..
I have just looked at the following video, and i invite you to look
at it:
Meaning without Higher Meaning - Existentialism
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gaAiHwjDAH4
Here is my new proverb:
"There one type of smartness that is interesting to look at,
and it is also the one that i have just used by explaining to you what is the truth, read it carefully below, and i will call it smartness of the being "resourceful", since i say that resourcefulness is one of the most important things, and it is a skill,
and the good news is: this skill can be learned and mastered, and resourcefulness is attained only when we combine the resourceful mindset and skills, so we have to filter out some of the most useful resources that help us, and resourcefulness is also
to know who/what to look for and what to ask, and when ressourcefulness is attained this becomes an engine that permits you to have hope and to be energetic and to be positive in doing what you are doing, since resourcefulness also permits to easy the
jobs for you"
And read my previous thoughts:
More of my philosophy about mathematics and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart, and i think that in the truth what is so important is the general rule that i am talking about in my below thoughts below, and it is from where comes the truth, since we can also say that we need the truth since we also exist
as humans and consciousness of humans, so it is why we have to make it clear that the general rule that i am talking about is the from where comes the truth, so then i can logically infer that this general rule can be used again and again so that to
logically infer the truth, and it is in accordance with the general rule, so then we have to distinguish between the
truth and the reality of the existence, since being truth is not being reality of the existence, since we can use a general rule that is based on the theoretical that doesn't exist, but i think that the general rule can be based on the reality of the
existence, so then from the characteristics that are realistic of the ingredients of general rule you can logically infer some rules that are useful for the reality of the existence, and i think that it is how works mathematics, since for example when
you work in topology in mathematics,
a point is also a concept defined by characteristics that are also reality of the existence, so from a point you can generate a 2d or a 3d object, so then the result of it can still have characteristics that are realistic.
Read my previously thoughts:
More of my philosophy about the Islamic philosophy and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart and i have just taken a look at the Islamic philosophy here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_philosophy
And notice what it is saying about the "truth" in Islamic philosophy:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islamic_philosophy#Truth
So it for example says the following:
"In his Quodlibeta, Thomas Aquinas wrote a commentary on Avicenna's definition of truth in his Metaphysics and explained it as follows:
The truth of each thing, as Avicenna says in his Metaphysica, is nothing else than the property of its being which has been established in it. So that is called true gold which has properly the being of gold and attains to the established determinations
of the nature of gold. Now, each thing has properly being in some nature because it stands under the complete form proper to that nature, whereby being and species in that nature is.[30]"
But i think i am highly smart, and i have just thought rapidly of what is the "truth", and here is what i say:
I think the truth needs like a general rule from where you logically infer, and the general rule is like a theorem in mathematics, so i give
you an example so that you understand my views:
So when i say:
This table in front of us is truth, what does it means ?
So i think that the language of humans is composed of abstractions,
and the table is also an "abstraction" as a "concept", so i think
that when we say the table is truth we have to follow like a logical path, in form of a rule, of explaining it, so then we can say that the
table is truth is decomposed in the following rule:
First we have to say that the "table" is a concept, so "then" is this
table in front of us correspond to a concept, so we have to
follow the following rule:
If the table in front of us is truth, so it has to correspond
to the concept of a table, so we have to "verify" if its existence
has the characteristics of the concept of the table.
So as you notice that we have to follow like a general rule that
looks like a theorem in mathematics and that permits us to say if it is the truth. And i think all the possibilities of the being truth have to follow the same general rule of decomposing into a form like of theorem in mathematics so that to prove that
it is like logically consistent
and that makes the truth or not. And of course when we make
logical proofs, you will notice that we are using rules with Logical implication and that permits also to logically infer and validate the logical proofs such as:
(p -> q) is equivalent to ((not(q) -> not(p))
or
(not(p) -> 0) is equivalent to p
Note that p and q are logical variables.
So then notice that even this possibility adheres to the general rule that i am speaking about.
And I have also searched more on internet the most precise and correct Gödel's First incompleteness theorem, and here it is:
"Any consistent formal system F within which a certain amount of elementary arithmetic can be carried out is incomplete; i.e., there are statements of the language of F which can neither be proved nor disproved in F"
And in mathematics, a statement is a declarative sentence that is either true or false but not both. A statement is sometimes called a proposition. The key is that there must be no ambiguity. To be a statement, a sentence "must" be true or false, and it
cannot be both.
So that means that we know that the statement is true or false but it can not be proven true or false, so we then logically infer that
we can not prove the consistency of the system , so the statement can be that it is like an axiom in mathematics that is true but that we can not prove by such logical inference or deduction, so then the system
remains really useful even if it's incomplete by Gödel's incompleteness theorems, so i think that Gödel's incompleteness theorems are not so problematic.
More of my philosophy about the exponential progress and about capitalism and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart, and of course i have to talk more about why i am optimistic about capitalism, and here is why , read the following thoughts about the Ramez Naam’s new book so that to understand:
The Limits of the Earth, Part 1: Problems
"In my own new book, The Infinite Resource: The Power of Ideas on a Finite Planet, I challenge this view. The problem isn’t economic growth, per se. Nor is the problem that our natural resources are too small. While finite, the natural resources the
planet supplies are vast and far larger than humanity needs in order to continue to thrive and grow prosperity for centuries to come. The problem, rather, is the types of resources we access, and the manner and efficiency with which we use them.
And the ultimate solution to those problems is innovation – innovation in the science and technology that we use to tap into physical resources, and innovation in the economic system that steers our consumption.
The situation we’re in isn’t a looming wall that we’re doomed to crash into. It’s a race – a race between depletion and pollution of natural resources on one side, and our pace of innovation on the other."
Read more here:
https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/guest-blog/the-limits-of-the-earth-part-1-problems/
And i also say that we have "just" already attained the knee
of the exponential progress curve, this knee of the curve is the place
where growth suddenly switches from a slower to an even faster
exponential mode, so now the curve of exponential progress of our
humanity has "just" already started to go exponentially even much
faster, this is why i say that in about 10 years from now we will become so powerful because of it. And you have to look at the following video so that to understand this exponential progress of our humanity:
Exponential Progress: Can We Expect Mind-Blowing Changes In The Near Future
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HfM5HXpfnJQ
And you can read my thoughts about artificial intelligence and productivity and about China and its artificial intelligence and computer chips in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/UOt_4qTgN8M
And you can read my following thoughts about Nanotechnology and about Exponential Progress in the following web link:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/mjE_2AG1TKQ
More of my philosophy about the american dream and more of my thoughts..
The American dream was initially conceived by Thomas Jefferson as each citizen’s right to the pursuit of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness, this american dream is not about guaranteed outcomes, of course, but the pursuit of opportunities, so
notice carefully
that i have just spoken more and more about those kind of opportunities
that we have to have and that makes the american dream, like for example
my talking in my below thoughts about Progressive Capitalism of Joseph E. Stiglitz, since Joseph E. Stiglitz is saying in his videos below that he has advised the democratic party about his reforms of his progressive capitalism, so read my below thoughts
carefully so that to understand:
And I have just looked at many videos on youtube of Joseph Stiglitz and
i have just understood him well, but i have just quickly found the following interesting video of him that explains well the reforms that we need so that to be progressive capitalism, and he is saying in this video that he has advised the democratic
party about his reforms of his
progressive capitalism and i think that he is a democrat, so i
invite you to look at his following interesting video so that
to understand:
Joseph Stiglitz on People, Power, and Profit | Munich Security Conference 2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sym4UZOjhJc
And more precision about more of my philosophy about progressive capitalism..
I invite you again to look at the following interesting video of Joseph E. Stiglitz that speaks about some thoughts of his interesting book “People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent.”:
Joseph Stiglitz on People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jLJksgMIDdI
And read his following interesting article in The New York Times so that
to understand:
Joseph E. Stiglitz is a university professor at Columbia, the 2001 recipient of the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economics, a former chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, a former chief economist of the World Bank and the author, most recently, of “
People, Power, and Profits: Progressive Capitalism for an Age of Discontent.”, and i invite you to read his following interesting article in The New York Times:
Progressive capitalism is not an oxymoron
Read more here:
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/04/19/opinion/sunday/progressive-capitalism.html
More of my philosophy about my kind of personality and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart, but i will ask a philosophical question of:
How can i explain my kind of personality ?
I think i am like an inventor or creator, since if you look at my below thoughts you will notice that what i like most is inventing thoughts and
inventing algorithms and inventing a philosophy and inventing poems of Love and poems and inventing proverbs, so as you have just noticed it is
what i am doing in front of you, so my way of doing is mostly
about being creative and inventive that permits me to adapt
efficiently, so look for example how i have quickly invented my following algorithms here as a logical proof of what i am saying to you:
Scalable reference counting with efficient support for weak references
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-reference-counting-with-efficient-support-for-weak-references
New variants of Scalable RWLocks
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/new-variants-of-scalable-rwlocks
Scalable lock that is FIFO fair and starvation-free
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/scalable-mlock
And i have also invented many other algorithms too..
And look at my following thoughts so that you notice that
it is the same pattern, i mean that i am the being inventive and creative:
More of my philosophy about my kind of methodology of learning and more of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart, and i will explain to you my kind of way of learning much more clearly:
I don't learn like you are learning, since i have to understand
the architectural ideas more clearly, by inventing them and/or understanding them much more clearly, and after that, i think that
this gives a form to a high level of intelligence that permits me to understand rapidly and efficiently, so i give you an example, so i have invented many architectural ideas that have given form to my philosophy as a high level intelligence , and this
has allowed me to make you understand more the weaknesses of the philosophies of other philosophers, so i am doing it this way for genetic algorithms(read my thoughts about it below) etc., so i give you an example, so read my following thoughts in the
following web link that i have rapidly invented, and you will notice how i am doing it by reading them carefully and by noticing my kind of personality, so here is a part of my philosophy about self-confidence and about how to be the positive energy and
how to be hope so that you notice how my philosophy is smart:
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/RNxOWBpkHkM
And look here in my following tutorial about Petri Nets how i have invented a methodology as also architectural ideas that permit to rapidly model parallel applications from the logical operators IF and THEN and OR and AND into a Petri Net model, so look
at it carefully in my tutorial here , since i think it is interesting too:
https://sites.google.com/site/scalable68/how-to-analyse-parallel-applications-with-petri-nets
More of my philosophy about the the importance of randomness in
the genetic algorithm and in the evolutionary algorithms and more
of my thoughts..
I think i am highly smart, and i will invite you to read my following
smart thoughts about evolutionary algorithms and artificial intelligence so that you notice how i am talking about the so important thing that we call "randomness":
https://groups.google.com/g/alt.culture.morocco/c/joLVchvaCf0
So i think i am highly smart, and notice that i am saying in the above web link the following about evolutionary algorithms:
"I think that Modern trends in solving tough optimization problems tend
to use evolutionary algorithms and nature-inspired metaheuristic
[continued in next message]
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)