• Families of Uvalde shooting victims sue Meta, video game company and gu

    From useapen@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 25 08:07:18 2024
    XPost: alt.politics.media, tx.politics, sac.politics
    XPost: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, talk.politics.guns

    Exactly two years after the Uvalde school massacre, families of victims
    Friday filed multiple state lawsuits in California and Texas against
    social media giant Meta, Activision — the maker of the popular video game
    "Call of Duty" — and Daniel Defense, the manufacturer of the AR-15 which
    the teen gunman used in the shooting.

    The wrongful death lawsuits come just two days after the same group of 19 families reached a $2 million settlement with the city of Uvalde over the
    May 24, 2022, Robb Elementary School massacre, which killed 19 students
    and two teachers.

    One of the two lawsuits was filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court
    against both Activision and Meta – Instagram's parent company. The second lawsuit, against Daniel Defense, was filed in Uvalde District Court.

    The lawsuits were filed by attorney Josh Koskoff, who is also representing
    the same 19 families who were part of Wednesday's $2 million settlement.

    Friday's lawsuits claim that Instagram, Activision and Daniel Defense have
    been "partnering…in a scheme that preys upon insecure, adolescent boys," attorneys said in a news release.

    Attorneys claim that Meta and Activision "enabled and emboldened firearm manufacturers' efforts to expand the market for their weapons by granting unprecedented, direct and 24/7 access to children."

    The lawsuits allege that the gunman, on his 18th birthday, purchased the
    AR-15 used in the Uvalde shooting because "he was targeted and cultivated online by Instagram, Activision and Daniel Defense. This three-headed
    monster knowingly exposed him to the weapon, conditioned him to see it as
    a tool to solve his problems and trained him to use it," Koskoff said in a statement.

    According to the lawsuits, the Uvalde gunman downloaded "Call of Duty:
    Modern Warfare" in November 2021, and had been playing previous iterations
    of "Call of Duty" since he was 15 years old. The video game prominently features a model of the AR-15, known as DDM4V7, that was used in the
    shooting, the lawsuits allege.

    "Simultaneously, on Instagram, the shooter was being courted through
    explicit, aggressive marketing," attorneys said. "In addition to hundreds
    of images depicting and venerating the thrill of combat, Daniel Defense
    used Instagram to extol the illegal, murderous use of its weapons."

    On April 27, 2022, attorneys say, the gunman created an account with
    Daniel Defense and added a DDM4V7 to his online cart. Then on May 16,
    2022, just 23 minutes after midnight on his 18th birthday, he purchased
    the weapon — just eight days before the Uvalde shooting.

    In an interview with CBS News Friday, Koskoff said that the two lawsuits
    are "working in concert with each other."

    "Instagram creates a connection between …an adolescent …and the gun and a
    gun company," Koskoff said. "And nobody exploited Instagram for this
    purpose more than Daniel Defense. If Instagram can prevent people from
    posting pictures of their private parts, they can prevent people from
    posting pictures of an AR-15. And of course, Instagram doesn't care. They
    don't care. All they care about is driving traffic and generating
    attention, drawing attention and getting their ad revenue."

    In a statement provided to CBS News, an Activision spokesperson said the "Uvalde shooting was horrendous and heartbreaking in every way, and we
    express our deepest sympathies to the families and communities who remain impacted by this senseless act of violence. Millions of people around the
    world enjoy video games without turning to horrific acts."

    CBS News has also reached out to Meta and Daniel Defense for comment on
    the litigation.

    The same group of families also said Wednesday they are filing a $500
    million federal lawsuit against nearly 100 state police officers who took
    part in the botched law enforcement response to the shooting, along with
    former Robb Elementary School principal Mandy Gutierrez and Pete
    Arredondo, the school district's police chief who was fired months after
    the shooting.

    An extensive 575-page Justice Department report released in January
    determined there were a series of "cascading failures" in the law
    enforcement response that day. The report said that 77 minutes elapsed
    from when law enforcement first arrived on the scene, to when the suspect
    was confronted and killed.

    https://www.cbsnews.com/news/uvalde-shooting-families-wrongful-death- lawsuit-meta-activision-daniel-defense/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Kick Homer@21:1/5 to Lawrence D'Oliveiro on Sat May 25 05:36:47 2024
    XPost: alt.politics.media, talk.politics.guns, nz.politics
    XPost: aus.politics

    In <v2s6ec$2pue0$1@dont-email.me> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

    It’s about time US gun manufacturers were brought to heel. Also, theyâ
    €™ve
    been turning a blind eye for years, decades, to the smuggling of their products into neighbouring countries and aggravating the violent crime problems there. Problems which are also fed by the appetite in the US for
    the narcotic substances those violent criminals are producing in those countries.

    You'd prefer to be hacked to death with machetes?

    Imagine a world with no guns.

    Your choices of death would be stabbing, stoning, beating, burning, hacking, bound to a tree for animals to eat.

    The list is long.

    If someone decides to kill you, they will use any means available. How long
    it takes simply prolongs their satisfaction.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Lane Larson@21:1/5 to Kick Homer on Sat May 25 07:57:54 2024
    XPost: alt.politics.media, talk.politics.guns, nz.politics
    XPost: aus.politics

    Kick Homer wrote:
    In <v2s6ec$2pue0$1@dont-email.me> Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

    It’s about time US gun manufacturers were brought to heel. Also, theyâ
    €™ve
    been turning a blind eye for years, decades, to the smuggling of their
    products into neighbouring countries and aggravating the violent crime
    problems there. Problems which are also fed by the appetite in the US for
    the narcotic substances those violent criminals are producing in those
    countries.

    You'd prefer to be hacked to death with machetes?

    Imagine a world with no guns.

    Your choices of death would be stabbing, stoning, beating, burning, hacking, bound to a tree for animals to eat.

    The list is long.

    If someone decides to kill you, they will use any means available. How long it takes simply prolongs their satisfaction.

    If someone decides to kill me, I knock their teeth out. This is a
    deterrent upon their decision process. You can also buy some
    bulletproof armor and a helmet. I don't know why you think fortune
    favors the sick in the head.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)