• Re: Steam Backs Down From Forced Arbitration

    From Ross Ridge@21:1/5 to noway@nochance.com on Sat Sep 28 14:35:16 2024
    JAB <noway@nochance.com> wrote:
    In the UK my understanding is that arbitration courts exist* but they
    can only be used for a civil offences if both parties agree including
    who will be the arbitrator.

    It the same in the US and other countries. In this case, both parties,
    Valve and the Steam user, agreed to use a certain arbitration service to resolve any disputes. That happened when the user agreed to the Steam Subscriber Agreement.

    --
    l/ // Ross Ridge -- The Great HTMU
    [oo][oo] rridge@csclub.uwaterloo.ca
    -()-/()/ http://www.csclub.uwaterloo.ca:11068/
    db //

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@21:1/5 to Spalls Hurgenson on Sat Sep 28 09:59:14 2024
    On 9/28/2024 8:04 AM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    On Sat, 28 Sep 2024 09:07:14 +0100, JAB <noway@nochance.com> wrote:
    On 28/09/2024 01:32, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:

    [Fortunately, in many civilized --read, outside the USA--
    jurisdictions, forced arbitration is either illegal or
    greatly restricted. So if you're in the UK, Australia
    or many countries of the EU, any EULAs either won't have
    any forced arbitration clauses, or if they do, those
    clauses are unenforceable]

    I did read about these rules in relation to Disney trying to claim that
    as a husband had signed to to Disney+ many years ago he couldn't take
    them to court after she died when they visited Disney World. My first
    thought was, that's not a good look you're putting forward there Disney
    and my second thought was, heh you can force people to go to
    arbitration, how is that even legal.

    Yeah, that's a really fascinating case. A woman died due to a severe
    allergy reaction at a restaurant on Disney grounds. The restaurant not
    only specified that their food was allergen free on their
    (Disney-sponsored) website, but assured the woman in person that the
    meal she ordered didn't have any of the forbidden foods in it. The
    family sued the restaurant (which was actually an independent company
    that was providing food services for Disney) for negligence, and
    Disney got roped into the case because Disney's website vouched for
    the restaurant.

    Meanwhile, Disney argued that because the defendants had only found
    this information using their Disney account (it's a shared account
    that offers access not only to the Disney+ TV and film library, but
    also can be used for ticketing and reservations on Disney websites),
    the forced arbitration clause of Disney+ bound the people... despite
    the fact the actual reservation wasn't made through Disney+.

    Elon Musk also tried to use forced arbitration on his (former) Twitter employees after they sued him for not giving them their severance
    payments in a timely manner. But, like Steam, he had to back down when
    the sheer number of arbitration claims made the costs skyrocket so it
    would have cost more than actually just paying the severance. (Musk is
    not the brightest of bulbs).

    I don't think Musk is stupid, he just has a colossal ego and is
    something of a bully.

    --
    I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
    dirty old man.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to Ross Ridge on Sun Sep 29 09:38:52 2024
    On 28/09/2024 15:35, Ross Ridge wrote:
    JAB <noway@nochance.com> wrote:
    In the UK my understanding is that arbitration courts exist* but they
    can only be used for a civil offences if both parties agree including
    who will be the arbitrator.

    It the same in the US and other countries. In this case, both parties,
    Valve and the Steam user, agreed to use a certain arbitration service to resolve any disputes. That happened when the user agreed to the Steam Subscriber Agreement.


    In the UK you just can't do that in general as the principle is you
    can't sign away your rights just because the shop says so regardless of
    what you sign/agree to. There has to be a law in place that specially
    says you can sign away an individual right and even then it still has to
    met the criteria of could someone reasonable expect it. So no, burying
    it in ten pages of texts just doesn't work.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to Dimensional Traveler on Sun Sep 29 09:47:41 2024
    On 28/09/2024 17:59, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    Elon Musk also tried to use forced arbitration on his (former) Twitter
    employees after they sued him for not giving them their severance
    payments in a timely manner. But, like Steam, he had to back down when
    the sheer number of arbitration claims made the costs skyrocket so it
    would have cost more than actually just paying the severance. (Musk is
    not the brightest of bulbs).

    I don't think Musk is stupid, he just has a colossal ego and is
    something of a bully.

    I don't think he's stupid as such but instead his over inflated ego and position of power makes he say and do stupid things bordering on the
    unhinged. Something I read about off the record comments from senior
    people at Space X is their job is as much to do with building spacecraft
    as it is to steering Musk away from making any real decisions.

    Then there is the recent temper tantrum he's thrown as he wasn't invited
    to a tech. summit by the UK government due to comments he made during
    our riots and subsequently. Think of it as , well I didn't want to go to
    your party anyway so I'm glad you didn't invite me.

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/sep/26/elon-musk-uk-government-invite-tech-summit

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@21:1/5 to JAB on Sun Sep 29 19:31:42 2024
    On 9/29/2024 1:38 AM, JAB wrote:
    On 28/09/2024 15:35, Ross Ridge wrote:
    JAB  <noway@nochance.com> wrote:
    In the UK my understanding is that arbitration courts exist* but they
    can only be used for a civil offences if both parties agree including
    who will be the arbitrator.

    It the same in the US and other countries.  In this case, both parties,
    Valve and the Steam user, agreed to use a certain arbitration service to
    resolve any disputes.  That happened when the user agreed to the Steam
    Subscriber Agreement.


    In the UK you just can't do that in general as the principle is you
    can't sign away your rights just because the shop says so regardless of
    what you sign/agree to. There has to be a law in place that specially
    says you can sign away an individual right and even then it still has to
    met the criteria of could someone reasonable expect it. So no, burying
    it in ten pages of texts just doesn't work.

    Well, Europe (including the UK) isn't as tightly in the grip of the
    Mega-Corps as the US is.

    --
    I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
    dirty old man.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@21:1/5 to JAB on Sun Sep 29 19:34:14 2024
    On 9/29/2024 1:47 AM, JAB wrote:
    On 28/09/2024 17:59, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    Elon Musk also tried to use forced arbitration on his (former) Twitter
    employees after they sued him for not giving them their severance
    payments in a timely manner. But, like Steam, he had to back down when
    the sheer number of arbitration claims made the costs skyrocket so it
    would have cost more than actually just paying the severance. (Musk is
    not the brightest of bulbs).

    I don't think Musk is stupid, he just has a colossal ego and is
    something of a bully.

    I don't think he's stupid as such but instead his over inflated ego and position of power makes he say and do stupid things bordering on the unhinged. Something I read about off the record comments from senior
    people at Space X is their job is as much to do with building spacecraft
    as it is to steering Musk away from making any real decisions.

    Then there is the recent temper tantrum he's thrown as he wasn't invited
    to a tech. summit by the UK government due to comments he made during
    our riots and subsequently. Think of it as , well I didn't want to go to
    your party anyway so I'm glad you didn't invite me.

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/sep/26/elon-musk-uk- government-invite-tech-summit

    Ya, and his deliberate picking a fight with Brazil. He really thinks he
    is untouchable and can do whatever he wants regardless of the laws
    anywhere. Free Speech Absolutist, as long as he can control who gets to
    use the medium used for Free Speech.

    --
    I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
    dirty old man.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@21:1/5 to Spalls Hurgenson on Sun Sep 29 19:35:11 2024
    On 9/29/2024 8:12 AM, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    On Sun, 29 Sep 2024 09:47:41 +0100, JAB <noway@nochance.com> wrote:

    On 28/09/2024 17:59, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    Elon Musk also tried to use forced arbitration on his (former) Twitter >>>> employees after they sued him for not giving them their severance
    payments in a timely manner. But, like Steam, he had to back down when >>>> the sheer number of arbitration claims made the costs skyrocket so it
    would have cost more than actually just paying the severance. (Musk is >>>> not the brightest of bulbs).

    I don't think Musk is stupid, he just has a colossal ego and is
    something of a bully.

    I don't think he's stupid as such but instead his over inflated ego and
    position of power makes he say and do stupid things bordering on the
    unhinged. Something I read about off the record comments from senior
    people at Space X is their job is as much to do with building spacecraft
    as it is to steering Musk away from making any real decisions.

    Then there is the recent temper tantrum he's thrown as he wasn't invited
    to a tech. summit by the UK government due to comments he made during
    our riots and subsequently. Think of it as , well I didn't want to go to
    your party anyway so I'm glad you didn't invite me.

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/sep/26/elon-musk-uk-government-invite-tech-summit

    Stupid, no. But not the genius some people attest. His skills
    certainly are not in engineering; he is (or was) a people-person. His
    skill is in schmoozing and getting people to believe in his dreams.
    Worthy talents, sure, but he's often held up as a modern day Thomas
    Edison* and that Musk is not.

    Especially not recently. Musk was _never_ entirely stable -he was
    always a bit of a narcissistic asshole- but he's gone off the deep-end recently. There are many suspicions that he has a very destructive
    ketamine habit that is fueling his downfall.


    Musk is a rich kid who had dreams of a sci-fi future, and has the
    money to try and make those dreams a reality. Mostly by hiring people
    with the actual talent to create that future.






    --------------------------
    * And Edision himself was far less a genius than often credited,
    although Edison at least had _some_ technical accumen to go with his
    ruthless business savy.

    Enough to know who to hire and who not to.

    --
    I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
    dirty old man.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to Dimensional Traveler on Mon Sep 30 08:28:11 2024
    On 30/09/2024 03:34, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    On 9/29/2024 1:47 AM, JAB wrote:
    On 28/09/2024 17:59, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    Elon Musk also tried to use forced arbitration on his (former) Twitter >>>> employees after they sued him for not giving them their severance
    payments in a timely manner. But, like Steam, he had to back down when >>>> the sheer number of arbitration claims made the costs skyrocket so it
    would have cost more than actually just paying the severance. (Musk is >>>> not the brightest of bulbs).

    I don't think Musk is stupid, he just has a colossal ego and is
    something of a bully.

    I don't think he's stupid as such but instead his over inflated ego
    and position of power makes he say and do stupid things bordering on
    the unhinged. Something I read about off the record comments from
    senior people at Space X is their job is as much to do with building
    spacecraft as it is to steering Musk away from making any real decisions.

    Then there is the recent temper tantrum he's thrown as he wasn't
    invited to a tech. summit by the UK government due to comments he made
    during our riots and subsequently. Think of it as , well I didn't want
    to go to your party anyway so I'm glad you didn't invite me.

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/sep/26/elon-musk-uk-
    government-invite-tech-summit

    Ya, and his deliberate picking a fight with Brazil.  He really thinks he
    is untouchable and can do whatever he wants regardless of the laws anywhere.  Free Speech Absolutist, as long as he can control who gets to
    use the medium used for Free Speech.


    It's pretty common amongst those who claim to support freedom of
    expression, what they mean is I can say what I like without consequences
    but you can only say things I agree with.

    We have a so called news channel called GB News (also know as Gammon
    Brexit News) which is basically a mouth piece to push very right wing
    politics and also flirts with the far right. They were complaining that
    their freedom of expression was being suppressed as companies were
    pulling their advertising as they didn't want to be associated with a organisation that dog whistles about 'British values' for we don't like non-white people being in the country. The thought that companies were
    choosing to use their own freedom of expression seemed to be beyond them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to Dimensional Traveler on Mon Sep 30 08:19:05 2024
    On 30/09/2024 03:31, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    On 9/29/2024 1:38 AM, JAB wrote:
    On 28/09/2024 15:35, Ross Ridge wrote:
    JAB  <noway@nochance.com> wrote:
    In the UK my understanding is that arbitration courts exist* but they
    can only be used for a civil offences if both parties agree including
    who will be the arbitrator.

    It the same in the US and other countries.  In this case, both parties, >>> Valve and the Steam user, agreed to use a certain arbitration service to >>> resolve any disputes.  That happened when the user agreed to the Steam
    Subscriber Agreement.


    In the UK you just can't do that in general as the principle is you
    can't sign away your rights just because the shop says so regardless
    of what you sign/agree to. There has to be a law in place that
    specially says you can sign away an individual right and even then it
    still has to met the criteria of could someone reasonable expect it.
    So no, burying it in ten pages of texts just doesn't work.

    Well, Europe (including the UK) isn't as tightly in the grip of the Mega-Corps as the US is.


    I remember when the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership
    (TTIP) was under negotiation and thinking what on earth are the EU even
    doing considering it. Yeh what could possibly go wrong in letting
    forgiven companies interfere in domestic government policies and laws if
    it goes against their financial interests.

    It was basically a big corporations wet dream come true.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to Dimensional Traveler on Mon Sep 30 08:54:01 2024
    On 30/09/2024 03:35, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    Musk is a rich kid who had dreams of a sci-fi future, and has the
    money to try and make those dreams a reality. Mostly by hiring people
    with the actual talent to create that future.






       --------------------------
    * And Edision himself was far less a genius than often credited,
    although Edison at least had _some_ technical accumen to go with his
    ruthless business savy.

    Enough to know who to hire and who not to.

    I wonder if part of the interview is getting the candidates to convince
    the interviewer that although they think Musk is a bit of a idiot they
    can do a good impression of thinking he's god.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@21:1/5 to JAB on Mon Sep 30 08:00:16 2024
    On 9/30/2024 12:54 AM, JAB wrote:
    On 30/09/2024 03:35, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    Musk is a rich kid who had dreams of a sci-fi future, and has the
    money to try and make those dreams a reality. Mostly by hiring people
    with the actual talent to create that future.






       --------------------------
    * And Edision himself was far less a genius than often credited,
    although Edison at least had _some_ technical accumen to go with his
    ruthless business savy.

    Enough to know who to hire and who not to.

    I wonder if part of the interview is getting the candidates to convince
    the interviewer that although they think Musk is a bit of a idiot they
    can do a good impression of thinking he's god.

    I suspect that Musk's ego is too large to care what the peons think.

    --
    I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
    dirty old man.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@21:1/5 to JAB on Mon Sep 30 08:03:38 2024
    On 9/30/2024 12:28 AM, JAB wrote:
    On 30/09/2024 03:34, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    On 9/29/2024 1:47 AM, JAB wrote:
    On 28/09/2024 17:59, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    Elon Musk also tried to use forced arbitration on his (former) Twitter >>>>> employees after they sued him for not giving them their severance
    payments in a timely manner. But, like Steam, he had to back down when >>>>> the sheer number of arbitration claims made the costs skyrocket so it >>>>> would have cost more than actually just paying the severance. (Musk is >>>>> not the brightest of bulbs).

    I don't think Musk is stupid, he just has a colossal ego and is
    something of a bully.

    I don't think he's stupid as such but instead his over inflated ego
    and position of power makes he say and do stupid things bordering on
    the unhinged. Something I read about off the record comments from
    senior people at Space X is their job is as much to do with building
    spacecraft as it is to steering Musk away from making any real
    decisions.

    Then there is the recent temper tantrum he's thrown as he wasn't
    invited to a tech. summit by the UK government due to comments he
    made during our riots and subsequently. Think of it as , well I
    didn't want to go to your party anyway so I'm glad you didn't invite me. >>>
    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/sep/26/elon-musk-uk-
    government-invite-tech-summit

    Ya, and his deliberate picking a fight with Brazil.  He really thinks
    he is untouchable and can do whatever he wants regardless of the laws
    anywhere.  Free Speech Absolutist, as long as he can control who gets
    to use the medium used for Free Speech.


    It's pretty common amongst those who claim to support freedom of
    expression, what they mean is I can say what I like without consequences
    but you can only say things I agree with.

    We have a so called news channel called GB News (also know as Gammon
    Brexit News) which is basically a mouth piece to push very right wing politics and also flirts with the far right. They were complaining that
    their freedom of expression was being suppressed as companies were
    pulling their advertising as they didn't want to be associated with a organisation that dog whistles about 'British values' for we don't like non-white people being in the country. The thought that companies were choosing to use their own freedom of expression seemed to be beyond them.

    Does GB News have Foxy ears and a bushy tail? ;) Musk did them one
    step farther, he SUED the companies that pulled their advertising after
    an especially egregious racist post of his.

    --
    I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
    dirty old man.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Xocyll@21:1/5 to All on Mon Sep 30 12:22:06 2024
    Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> looked up from reading the entrails of the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs
    say:

    <snip>
    is the biggest example, although his ridiculous Cybertruck is a close
    second.

    Have you heard the lovely, mocking nickname for that?

    The Deplorean.

    Xocyll

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From candycanearter07@21:1/5 to JAB on Mon Sep 30 19:40:11 2024
    JAB <noway@nochance.com> wrote at 08:47 this Sunday (GMT):
    On 28/09/2024 17:59, Dimensional Traveler wrote:
    Elon Musk also tried to use forced arbitration on his (former) Twitter
    employees after they sued him for not giving them their severance
    payments in a timely manner. But, like Steam, he had to back down when
    the sheer number of arbitration claims made the costs skyrocket so it
    would have cost more than actually just paying the severance. (Musk is
    not the brightest of bulbs).

    I don't think Musk is stupid, he just has a colossal ego and is
    something of a bully.

    I don't think he's stupid as such but instead his over inflated ego and position of power makes he say and do stupid things bordering on the unhinged. Something I read about off the record comments from senior
    people at Space X is their job is as much to do with building spacecraft
    as it is to steering Musk away from making any real decisions.

    Then there is the recent temper tantrum he's thrown as he wasn't invited
    to a tech. summit by the UK government due to comments he made during
    our riots and subsequently. Think of it as , well I didn't want to go to
    your party anyway so I'm glad you didn't invite me.

    https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/sep/26/elon-musk-uk-government-invite-tech-summit


    Did you hear they recently made it impossible to block people on
    Twitter?*
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rin Stowleigh@21:1/5 to All on Fri Sep 27 21:00:53 2024
    Makes a good case for having other hobbies and passions in life
    besides games, does it not? ;)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to Spalls Hurgenson on Sat Sep 28 09:07:14 2024
    On 28/09/2024 01:32, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    [Fortunately, in many civilized --read, outside the USA--
    jurisdictions, forced arbitration is either illegal or
    greatly restricted. So if you're in the UK, Australia
    or many countries of the EU, any EULAs either won't have
    any forced arbitration clauses, or if they do, those
    clauses are unenforceable]

    I did read about these rules in relation to Disney trying to claim that
    as a husband had signed to to Disney+ many years ago he couldn't take
    them to court after she died when they visited Disney World. My first
    thought was, that's not a good look you're putting forward there Disney
    and my second thought was, heh you can force people to go to
    arbitration, how is that even legal.

    In the UK my understanding is that arbitration courts exist* but they
    can only be used for a civil offences if both parties agree including
    who will be the arbitrator. Overall it seems like a good idea as I think
    a lot of reasoning was to stop expensive legal bills being racked up in
    the likes of divorce cases or as papers love to print, something about a
    house boundary dispute involving hedges.

    So for Steam, I think it's good that they are going to get rid of that
    clause even if it's for the wrong reasons.

    *That's what's normally brought up by people claiming that Sharia Law
    Courts exist in the UK normally followed by London is under Muslim control.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)