• Re: World of Warcraft used to be under 50 GB install

    From Xocyll@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jun 21 14:05:05 2025
    Praetor Mandrake <horchata12839@gmail.com> looked up from reading the
    entrails of the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs
    say:

    It's currently 150+. Why don't they just make it a terabyte and no one
    can fit it on their comp?

    You _don't_ have a multi-terabyte drive?

    What, you think it's 2010 or something?


    Current System: 2TB SSD + 16TB of Spinning Rust

    Hell I even have a 1TB USB Stick.

    Xocyll
    --
    I don't particularly want you to FOAD, myself. You'll be more of
    a cautionary example if you'll FO And Get Chronically, Incurably,
    Painfully, Progressively, Expensively, Debilitatingly Ill. So
    FOAGCIPPEDI. -- Mike Andrews responding to an idiot in asr

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mike S.@21:1/5 to horchata12839@gmail.com on Sat Jun 21 14:33:41 2025
    On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 09:39:20 -0500, Praetor Mandrake
    <horchata12839@gmail.com> wrote:

    It's currently 150+. Why don't they just make it a terabyte and no one
    can fit it on their comp?

    20+ years of updates is going to do that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Xocyll@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 23 06:43:59 2025
    Praetor Mandrake <horchata12839@gmail.com> looked up from reading the
    entrails of the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs
    say:

    Xocyll wrote:
    Praetor Mandrake <horchata12839@gmail.com> looked up from reading the
    entrails of the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs
    say:

    It's currently 150+. Why don't they just make it a terabyte and no one
    can fit it on their comp?

    You _don't_ have a multi-terabyte drive?

    What, you think it's 2010 or something?


    Current System: 2TB SSD + 16TB of Spinning Rust

    Hell I even have a 1TB USB Stick.

    Xocyll

    I've gotten the non-VIP treatment from Best Buy and Dell recently. They
    gave me the runaround on big hard drives and I ended up with a couple
    comps with half a terabyte each for the last four yrs. Maybe I will
    look into wired external hard drives for a bit, since that could be
    good. I wonder what the data rate is like for those.


    Eewww pre-builts!
    These always come with less than stellar components in order to maximize profit. The components may be decent quality, but they're always the
    older and smaller, with the least possible amount of upgradeability.
    [A MB that has just one SSD slot they've filled with a 320 or 500GB
    drive, no SATA, and oh yeah, only 2 ram slots, filled with the least
    amount they can get away with. Upgrading isn't adding to existing, but replacing them, and then your stuck with the substandard junk they
    saddled you with.]

    There's a reason pre-builts have this stuff in them, it does not sell
    and they need to get rid of it.

    Build your own and you get exactly the hardware you want.

    External HDs are ok for storage or watching movies/listening to music,
    but you would not want to game from one.

    Xocyll
    --
    I don't particularly want you to FOAD, myself. You'll be more of
    a cautionary example if you'll FO And Get Chronically, Incurably,
    Painfully, Progressively, Expensively, Debilitatingly Ill. So
    FOAGCIPPEDI. -- Mike Andrews responding to an idiot in asr

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Xocyll@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jun 23 14:26:56 2025
    Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> looked up from reading the entrails of the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs
    say:

    On Mon, 23 Jun 2025 06:43:59 -0400, Xocyll <Xocyll@gmx.com> wrote:


    Eewww pre-builts!
    Build your own and you get exactly the hardware you want.


    I'm less picky.

    Yes, if you want the ultimate gaming rig, maxed out in every area,
    you're not going to get that experience from an OEM... not even from a >boutique reseller. But that sort of hardware is really only for the
    sake of HAVING the hardware, and not actually because you're getting
    some benefit in gameplay. And most people have neither the money, nor
    time, nor expertise for putting together a computer like that.

    In my case it wasn't about having the ultimate gaming rig, but maximum
    utility and upgradeability for the future.

    So I got a MB with 2 SSD connectors and 2 SATA, but only used one of
    each for now. Ditto the RAM with 64GB installed and room for 64 more.

    I don't build a new system often, because I don't have to, I can just
    add some more storage or RAM when I need more.

    Also, in my own personal experience, you aren't really saving much
    money by getting somebody else to do it for you either. While some
    boutique PC vendors are positively predatory in their pricing <cough
    cough Falcon PC cough cough>, more mid-tier boutiques are relatively >competitive in cost. Yes, it's more... but not MUCH more. The days
    when you could get a far superior PC for far less money are long past;
    even boutique gaming PCs are sold at the narrowest of margins these
    days.

    In my case, it actually cost me _more_ than one of their prebuilts, but
    I got exactly the bits I wanted and with maximum upgrade potential. Future-proofing.

    <snip>
    TL;DR; get what makes sense to your wallet and usage scenario. If
    that's a cheap OEM, or a mid-tier boutique pre-built, or building your
    own from scratch, they're all good and -thanks to how powerful our
    computers have become- you'll probably have a good experience when it
    comes to games.


    External HDs are ok for storage or watching movies/listening to music,
    but you would not want to game from one.

    That depends on your hardware. External SSDs linked through
    Thunderbolt3 ports have surprising performance. I won't go so far to
    say that they can compete with the fastest internal drives, they are >definitely good enough for gaming on. Certainly they are faster than
    any spinning-rust drives. If you're not rocking the fastest SSD
    internally (which is probably the case for a lot of OEM devices) you
    may actually see a benefit from using the external.

    Of course, a lot of PCs don't offer the fastest Thunderbolt3 ports,
    and a lot of external drives tend to be slower hardware too. Don't buy
    a 16TB Western Digital MyBook off of Amazon and think you can drop
    "Doom Dark Ages" on it and have any sort of a good time. Your typical
    USB3 port -and the old-school platter technology- will make that a
    painful experience.

    But if you need some more space, your PC has Thunderbolt3 and you
    bought a fast external SSD? It'll work.

    Most of the external drives I see are USB based, great for backups, not
    for gaming or anything else that requires serious data rates, although
    as I said, music and movies work pretty well since the data flow rate
    isn't that high unless you've ripped 4kUltra movies to that external HD.

    Chances that a cheapish OEM Best Buy/Dell computer has a Thunderbolt3
    port are, I think, minimal at best.

    Xocyll
    --
    I don't particularly want you to FOAD, myself. You'll be more of
    a cautionary example if you'll FO And Get Chronically, Incurably,
    Painfully, Progressively, Expensively, Debilitatingly Ill. So
    FOAGCIPPEDI. -- Mike Andrews responding to an idiot in asr

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From candycanearter07@21:1/5 to Praetor Mandrake on Mon Jun 23 19:30:06 2025
    Praetor Mandrake <horchata12839@gmail.com> wrote at 02:21 this Sunday (GMT):
    Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 14:05:05 -0400, Xocyll <Xocyll@gmx.com> wrote:

    Praetor Mandrake <horchata12839@gmail.com> looked up from reading the
    entrails of the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs
    say:

    It's currently 150+. Why don't they just make it a terabyte and no one >>>> can fit it on their comp?

    You _don't_ have a multi-terabyte drive?

    What, you think it's 2010 or something?


    Current System: 2TB SSD + 16TB of Spinning Rust

    Hell I even have a 1TB USB Stick.

    Xocyll

    In fairness, a lot of laptops (and even some computers) are /still/
    shipping with hard-drives* less than 1TB, and I'm always surprised at
    how many people use ordinary laptops --not even overpriced gaming
    laptops, but just regular 'designed mostly for office work' laptops--
    as their primary gaming platform. Space for games on these machines is
    at a premium, and dedicating 100+GB to a single title can be /very/
    annoying.

    It's kind of like a bubble that pops when the install is 100+ GB. I had
    this with Street Fighter V, GTA V and Baldur's Gate III. When I finally decide to uninstall, about ten other games instantly fill the vacuum. I started to realize that <2 GB for a game is nearly trivial (on half a terabyte).


    Yeah, it is kinda ridiculous how much storage everything takes up
    nowadays. I know my laptop didn't, and I had to get a seperate TB hard
    drive later.
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to Spalls Hurgenson on Tue Jun 24 09:46:08 2025
    On 23/06/2025 18:25, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    Twenty years ago, I was all on the side of 'build your own' but these
    days? You get almost the same cost/value benefit from OEMs, and a lot
    more ease of use. I still like tinkering and building my own rigs, but
    I get value from_that_ and don't really see it in the end-product
    itself while playing games.

    Personally I still build (well I like to say assemble as build sounds
    far to grand for what you actually do) my own and it probable does save
    me money as I can reuse parts and do minor refreshes when required. It
    also means I don't end up with LED's everywhere!

    Generally though I say go with an OEM/pre-built mainly because most
    people don't have the expertise (or confidence) to either select the
    parts or put them together. The latter part isn't hard if you have some knowledge but lots of people (I'd imagine the norm by far) don't even
    have that minimum.

    I remember going around a friend of my better half's house to help him
    with his PC. I don't know what he had done but a best guess was he tried
    to remove the DVI cable from PC not realising that you have to undo the
    screws first, it wasn't pretty.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Xocyll@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jun 24 05:29:51 2025
    JAB <noway@nochance.com> looked up from reading the entrails of the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs say:

    On 23/06/2025 18:25, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    Twenty years ago, I was all on the side of 'build your own' but these
    days? You get almost the same cost/value benefit from OEMs, and a lot
    more ease of use. I still like tinkering and building my own rigs, but
    I get value from_that_ and don't really see it in the end-product
    itself while playing games.

    Personally I still build (well I like to say assemble as build sounds
    far to grand for what you actually do) my own and it probable does save
    me money as I can reuse parts and do minor refreshes when required. It
    also means I don't end up with LED's everywhere!

    I don't mind the LEDs, as long as I don't have to pay extra.
    In fact my ram has bloody lights on it as do the fans I bought, simply
    because it would have cost more to get em without (the fans were on
    clearance at 1/3rd normal price, and they're basic red lighting not
    rainbow and don't look bad with a black case.)

    Generally though I say go with an OEM/pre-built mainly because most
    people don't have the expertise (or confidence) to either select the
    parts or put them together. The latter part isn't hard if you have some >knowledge but lots of people (I'd imagine the norm by far) don't even
    have that minimum.

    I've always said that assembling a computer is about as hard as playing
    with LEGOs (and I started saying that back in the days when everything
    had a jumper to set.)
    Unfortunately, there exist in the world, people who would be incapable
    of playing with LEGOs.

    I remember going around a friend of my better half's house to help him
    with his PC. I don't know what he had done but a best guess was he tried
    to remove the DVI cable from PC not realising that you have to undo the >screws first, it wasn't pretty.

    Oh look, you found one of the LEGO challenged.

    Now imagine him changing his brake pads.

    Xocyll
    --
    I don't particularly want you to FOAD, myself. You'll be more of
    a cautionary example if you'll FO And Get Chronically, Incurably,
    Painfully, Progressively, Expensively, Debilitatingly Ill. So
    FOAGCIPPEDI. -- Mike Andrews responding to an idiot in asr

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dimensional Traveler@21:1/5 to Xocyll on Tue Jun 24 07:20:46 2025
    On 6/24/2025 2:29 AM, Xocyll wrote:
    JAB <noway@nochance.com> looked up from reading the entrails of the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs say:

    On 23/06/2025 18:25, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    Twenty years ago, I was all on the side of 'build your own' but these
    days? You get almost the same cost/value benefit from OEMs, and a lot
    more ease of use. I still like tinkering and building my own rigs, but
    I get value from_that_ and don't really see it in the end-product
    itself while playing games.

    Personally I still build (well I like to say assemble as build sounds
    far to grand for what you actually do) my own and it probable does save
    me money as I can reuse parts and do minor refreshes when required. It
    also means I don't end up with LED's everywhere!

    I don't mind the LEDs, as long as I don't have to pay extra.
    In fact my ram has bloody lights on it as do the fans I bought, simply because it would have cost more to get em without (the fans were on
    clearance at 1/3rd normal price, and they're basic red lighting not
    rainbow and don't look bad with a black case.)

    Generally though I say go with an OEM/pre-built mainly because most
    people don't have the expertise (or confidence) to either select the
    parts or put them together. The latter part isn't hard if you have some
    knowledge but lots of people (I'd imagine the norm by far) don't even
    have that minimum.

    I've always said that assembling a computer is about as hard as playing
    with LEGOs (and I started saying that back in the days when everything
    had a jumper to set.)
    Unfortunately, there exist in the world, people who would be incapable
    of playing with LEGOs.

    I remember going around a friend of my better half's house to help him
    with his PC. I don't know what he had done but a best guess was he tried
    to remove the DVI cable from PC not realising that you have to undo the
    screws first, it wasn't pretty.

    Oh look, you found one of the LEGO challenged.

    Now imagine him changing his brake pads.

    There is a term for that. "Evolution in Action."

    --
    I've done good in this world. Now I'm tired and just want to be a cranky
    dirty old man.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to Xocyll on Wed Jun 25 10:08:00 2025
    On 24/06/2025 10:29, Xocyll wrote:
    JAB <noway@nochance.com> looked up from reading the entrails of the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs say:

    On 23/06/2025 18:25, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    Twenty years ago, I was all on the side of 'build your own' but these
    days? You get almost the same cost/value benefit from OEMs, and a lot
    more ease of use. I still like tinkering and building my own rigs, but
    I get value from_that_ and don't really see it in the end-product
    itself while playing games.

    Personally I still build (well I like to say assemble as build sounds
    far to grand for what you actually do) my own and it probable does save
    me money as I can reuse parts and do minor refreshes when required. It
    also means I don't end up with LED's everywhere!

    I don't mind the LEDs, as long as I don't have to pay extra.
    In fact my ram has bloody lights on it as do the fans I bought, simply because it would have cost more to get em without (the fans were on
    clearance at 1/3rd normal price, and they're basic red lighting not
    rainbow and don't look bad with a black case.)

    The nearest I've got to a LED in my PC is the MB has a very small strip
    running near the edge of it which lights up when it's powered. It would
    have been useful when I was having problems with my last PC that turned
    out to be a dodgy PSU.

    Generally though I say go with an OEM/pre-built mainly because most
    people don't have the expertise (or confidence) to either select the
    parts or put them together. The latter part isn't hard if you have some
    knowledge but lots of people (I'd imagine the norm by far) don't even
    have that minimum.

    I've always said that assembling a computer is about as hard as playing
    with LEGOs (and I started saying that back in the days when everything
    had a jumper to set.)
    Unfortunately, there exist in the world, people who would be incapable
    of playing with LEGOs.

    I think that's where the confidence part comes in. I know lots of people
    who think that putting together the parts of a PC is some sort of magic
    without realising that everything is sized/keyed so you don't have to
    worry about it. Saying that for my last upgrade I did get a combined
    MB/CPU/RAM on the grounds you could pretty much select which ones you
    want and I always hate the CPU part.

    I remember going around a friend of my better half's house to help him
    with his PC. I don't know what he had done but a best guess was he tried
    to remove the DVI cable from PC not realising that you have to undo the
    screws first, it wasn't pretty.

    Oh look, you found one of the LEGO challenged.

    Now imagine him changing his brake pads.

    When it comes to the car I do basically nothing beyond filling up
    windscreen washer fluid. Everything else someone else can do it. Even
    when it came to changing one of the reverse lights I was going to do it
    myself as looking on YouTube made it look easy. I'm glad I didn't as in
    the end it turned out not to be not so easy and even the guy who did it
    said it was one of those cars that he doesn't like doing as it's really
    fiddly.

    I also had one of my friends berate me for not knowing how to change a
    wheel (technical I kinda do know how to do it even though I've never
    done it) as what happens if I get a puncture. I kindly pointed out that
    the car had run flat tyres so you can get to a garage and just as
    importantly there is no spare wheel.

    The positive though, we have a garage near us that does a good job and
    also won't rip you off which is more that can be said for the official
    dealer. I stopped using them for anything many years ago after during a
    service they charged £35 just for topping up the windscreen washer
    fluid. How the feck can you justify that price as an additional cost of
    a service.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Xocyll@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 26 03:05:58 2025
    Dimensional Traveler <dtravel@sonic.net> looked up from reading the
    entrails of the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs
    say:

    On 6/24/2025 2:29 AM, Xocyll wrote:
    JAB <noway@nochance.com> looked up from reading the entrails of the porn
    spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs say:

    On 23/06/2025 18:25, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    Twenty years ago, I was all on the side of 'build your own' but these
    days? You get almost the same cost/value benefit from OEMs, and a lot
    more ease of use. I still like tinkering and building my own rigs, but >>>> I get value from_that_ and don't really see it in the end-product
    itself while playing games.

    Personally I still build (well I like to say assemble as build sounds
    far to grand for what you actually do) my own and it probable does save
    me money as I can reuse parts and do minor refreshes when required. It
    also means I don't end up with LED's everywhere!

    I don't mind the LEDs, as long as I don't have to pay extra.
    In fact my ram has bloody lights on it as do the fans I bought, simply
    because it would have cost more to get em without (the fans were on
    clearance at 1/3rd normal price, and they're basic red lighting not
    rainbow and don't look bad with a black case.)

    Generally though I say go with an OEM/pre-built mainly because most
    people don't have the expertise (or confidence) to either select the
    parts or put them together. The latter part isn't hard if you have some
    knowledge but lots of people (I'd imagine the norm by far) don't even
    have that minimum.

    I've always said that assembling a computer is about as hard as playing
    with LEGOs (and I started saying that back in the days when everything
    had a jumper to set.)
    Unfortunately, there exist in the world, people who would be incapable
    of playing with LEGOs.

    I remember going around a friend of my better half's house to help him
    with his PC. I don't know what he had done but a best guess was he tried >>> to remove the DVI cable from PC not realising that you have to undo the
    screws first, it wasn't pretty.

    Oh look, you found one of the LEGO challenged.

    Now imagine him changing his brake pads.

    There is a term for that. "Evolution in Action."

    I thought it was "scene in Michael Bay movie."

    Xocyll
    --
    I don't particularly want you to FOAD, myself. You'll be more of
    a cautionary example if you'll FO And Get Chronically, Incurably,
    Painfully, Progressively, Expensively, Debilitatingly Ill. So
    FOAGCIPPEDI. -- Mike Andrews responding to an idiot in asr

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Xocyll@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jun 26 03:18:09 2025
    JAB <noway@nochance.com> looked up from reading the entrails of the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs say:

    On 24/06/2025 10:29, Xocyll wrote:
    JAB <noway@nochance.com> looked up from reading the entrails of the porn
    spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs say:

    On 23/06/2025 18:25, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    Twenty years ago, I was all on the side of 'build your own' but these
    days? You get almost the same cost/value benefit from OEMs, and a lot
    more ease of use. I still like tinkering and building my own rigs, but >>>> I get value from_that_ and don't really see it in the end-product
    itself while playing games.

    Personally I still build (well I like to say assemble as build sounds
    far to grand for what you actually do) my own and it probable does save
    me money as I can reuse parts and do minor refreshes when required. It
    also means I don't end up with LED's everywhere!

    I don't mind the LEDs, as long as I don't have to pay extra.
    In fact my ram has bloody lights on it as do the fans I bought, simply
    because it would have cost more to get em without (the fans were on
    clearance at 1/3rd normal price, and they're basic red lighting not
    rainbow and don't look bad with a black case.)

    The nearest I've got to a LED in my PC is the MB has a very small strip >running near the edge of it which lights up when it's powered. It would
    have been useful when I was having problems with my last PC that turned
    out to be a dodgy PSU.

    Generally though I say go with an OEM/pre-built mainly because most
    people don't have the expertise (or confidence) to either select the
    parts or put them together. The latter part isn't hard if you have some
    knowledge but lots of people (I'd imagine the norm by far) don't even
    have that minimum.

    I've always said that assembling a computer is about as hard as playing
    with LEGOs (and I started saying that back in the days when everything
    had a jumper to set.)
    Unfortunately, there exist in the world, people who would be incapable
    of playing with LEGOs.

    I think that's where the confidence part comes in. I know lots of people
    who think that putting together the parts of a PC is some sort of magic >without realising that everything is sized/keyed so you don't have to
    worry about it. Saying that for my last upgrade I did get a combined >MB/CPU/RAM on the grounds you could pretty much select which ones you
    want and I always hate the CPU part.

    Even the CPU is a drop in part, it literally only goes in one way, but
    yeah I can see avoiding it if you can.

    I remember going around a friend of my better half's house to help him
    with his PC. I don't know what he had done but a best guess was he tried >>> to remove the DVI cable from PC not realising that you have to undo the
    screws first, it wasn't pretty.

    Oh look, you found one of the LEGO challenged.

    Now imagine him changing his brake pads.

    When it comes to the car I do basically nothing beyond filling up
    windscreen washer fluid. Everything else someone else can do it. Even
    when it came to changing one of the reverse lights I was going to do it >myself as looking on YouTube made it look easy. I'm glad I didn't as in
    the end it turned out not to be not so easy and even the guy who did it
    said it was one of those cars that he doesn't like doing as it's really >fiddly.

    Yeah it can really depend heavily on the make and model of car - some manufacturers do the stupidest shit.
    Like those Japanese cars where the engine is shoehorned in so tight, you
    have to pull it out to change the spark plugs on one side.
    Who thought that was a good idea?

    I also had one of my friends berate me for not knowing how to change a
    wheel (technical I kinda do know how to do it even though I've never
    done it) as what happens if I get a puncture. I kindly pointed out that
    the car had run flat tyres so you can get to a garage and just as
    importantly there is no spare wheel.

    Most cars do not have run flats, but yeah I hear ya on the spare, the
    most you get these days is one of those tiny "space saver" donut tires.

    The positive though, we have a garage near us that does a good job and
    also won't rip you off which is more that can be said for the official >dealer. I stopped using them for anything many years ago after during a >service they charged £35 just for topping up the windscreen washer
    fluid. How the feck can you justify that price as an additional cost of
    a service.

    You answered that with your first line "When it comes to the car I do
    basically nothing beyond filling up windscreen washer fluid."

    When they have clients incapable of doing the most basic things, they
    charge em for it.

    They're happy to pay, since it absolves them of having to think.

    Xocyll
    --
    I don't particularly want you to FOAD, myself. You'll be more of
    a cautionary example if you'll FO And Get Chronically, Incurably,
    Painfully, Progressively, Expensively, Debilitatingly Ill. So
    FOAGCIPPEDI. -- Mike Andrews responding to an idiot in asr

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to Xocyll on Thu Jun 26 10:02:28 2025
    On 26/06/2025 08:18, Xocyll wrote:
    When it comes to the car I do basically nothing beyond filling up
    windscreen washer fluid. Everything else someone else can do it. Even
    when it came to changing one of the reverse lights I was going to do it
    myself as looking on YouTube made it look easy. I'm glad I didn't as in
    the end it turned out not to be not so easy and even the guy who did it
    said it was one of those cars that he doesn't like doing as it's really
    fiddly.

    Yeah it can really depend heavily on the make and model of car - some manufacturers do the stupidest shit.
    Like those Japanese cars where the engine is shoehorned in so tight, you
    have to pull it out to change the spark plugs on one side.
    Who thought that was a good idea?

    It wasn't quite that bad but it certainly wasn't the simple job show in
    the video as the fitting had some hard to get to screws that retained
    the lighting board. The good thing though the shop that does it puts a
    low fixed cost on doing it.

    I also had one of my friends berate me for not knowing how to change a
    wheel (technical I kinda do know how to do it even though I've never
    done it) as what happens if I get a puncture. I kindly pointed out that
    the car had run flat tyres so you can get to a garage and just as
    importantly there is no spare wheel.

    Most cars do not have run flats, but yeah I hear ya on the spare, the
    most you get these days is one of those tiny "space saver" donut tires.

    The conversation with my friend did lead to me looking at how many cars
    in the UK have spare tyres and it's about 10%, and falling, in the UK.

    The positive though, we have a garage near us that does a good job and
    also won't rip you off which is more that can be said for the official
    dealer. I stopped using them for anything many years ago after during a
    service they charged £35 just for topping up the windscreen washer
    fluid. How the feck can you justify that price as an additional cost of
    a service.

    You answered that with your first line "When it comes to the car I do basically nothing beyond filling up windscreen washer fluid."

    When they have clients incapable of doing the most basic things, they
    charge em for it.

    They're happy to pay, since it absolves them of having to think.

    What got me about it was how it was an additional cost (among others)
    which made me think why am I pay a large base cost for a service if
    you're going to charge me extra for what should be included. I also had
    a feeling that there were 'looking' for things to charge for.

    If you compare that to the garage we now use it's not good. When getting
    the brake pads and discs replaced I went in next day the guy said that
    had also topped up the engine oil as it was quite low. When I asked how
    much that was the reply I got was don't worry about it.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JAB@21:1/5 to Spalls Hurgenson on Wed Jul 9 08:50:31 2025
    On 08/07/2025 17:11, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    As a follow up:

    PCGamesN has an article* on the very subject, pointing to the data of
    the June 2025 Steam Hardware survey** where Valve reports that storage
    is increasingly becoming an issue for gamers. 15% of gamers survey
    have less than 100GB free on their drives; 25% have less than 250GB
    free. That's space for one or two modern "big" games (or about half of
    a full install of MS Flight Sim 2020 ;-).

    Modern games do require a lot of disk space --all those high-res
    textures and sound files are storage hogs-- but developers /could/ be
    a bit less profligate with our hard-drives if they needed to be. I
    don't NEED multiple language files for every game installed on my
    computer (or, worse, multiple cinematic video files with different languages); the developers could give us a choice of which we want
    when we install (some developers do just that, and offer the other
    language packs as free DLC should we suddenly desire to play Call of
    Halo LXXIV in Swahili, or something).

    Maybe this survey will start making them realize the necessity.


    I've got 1.5TB SSD + 1TB HDD and find that is pretty much enough as I
    don't tend to play the bit hitters when it comes to storage so I can
    have more than enough games installed and then occasionally do some
    house cleaning if it get below 0.5TB free.

    It's one of the things that's nice about Steam, it can take some time
    but reinstalling a game is just easy and you even have cloud saves as well.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From candycanearter07@21:1/5 to JAB on Thu Jul 10 16:10:06 2025
    JAB <noway@nochance.com> wrote at 07:50 this Wednesday (GMT):
    On 08/07/2025 17:11, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    As a follow up:

    PCGamesN has an article* on the very subject, pointing to the data of
    the June 2025 Steam Hardware survey** where Valve reports that storage
    is increasingly becoming an issue for gamers. 15% of gamers survey
    have less than 100GB free on their drives; 25% have less than 250GB
    free. That's space for one or two modern "big" games (or about half of
    a full install of MS Flight Sim 2020 ;-).

    Modern games do require a lot of disk space --all those high-res
    textures and sound files are storage hogs-- but developers /could/ be
    a bit less profligate with our hard-drives if they needed to be. I
    don't NEED multiple language files for every game installed on my
    computer (or, worse, multiple cinematic video files with different
    languages); the developers could give us a choice of which we want
    when we install (some developers do just that, and offer the other
    language packs as free DLC should we suddenly desire to play Call of
    Halo LXXIV in Swahili, or something).

    Maybe this survey will start making them realize the necessity.


    I've got 1.5TB SSD + 1TB HDD and find that is pretty much enough as I
    don't tend to play the bit hitters when it comes to storage so I can
    have more than enough games installed and then occasionally do some
    house cleaning if it get below 0.5TB free.

    It's one of the things that's nice about Steam, it can take some time
    but reinstalling a game is just easy and you even have cloud saves as well.


    Yeah, but also I have a small enough library that I can fit it on
    internal storage with a fair amount left.
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Xocyll@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jul 11 07:30:11 2025
    Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> looked up from reading the entrails of the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs
    say:

    On Thu, 10 Jul 2025 16:10:06 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07 ><candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote:

    JAB <noway@nochance.com> wrote at 07:50 this Wednesday (GMT):
    On 08/07/2025 17:11, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    As a follow up:

    PCGamesN has an article* on the very subject, pointing to the data of
    the June 2025 Steam Hardware survey** where Valve reports that storage >>>> is increasingly becoming an issue for gamers. 15% of gamers survey
    have less than 100GB free on their drives; 25% have less than 250GB
    free. That's space for one or two modern "big" games (or about half of >>>> a full install of MS Flight Sim 2020 ;-).

    Modern games do require a lot of disk space --all those high-res
    textures and sound files are storage hogs-- but developers /could/ be
    a bit less profligate with our hard-drives if they needed to be. I
    don't NEED multiple language files for every game installed on my
    computer (or, worse, multiple cinematic video files with different
    languages); the developers could give us a choice of which we want
    when we install (some developers do just that, and offer the other
    language packs as free DLC should we suddenly desire to play Call of
    Halo LXXIV in Swahili, or something).

    Maybe this survey will start making them realize the necessity.


    I've got 1.5TB SSD + 1TB HDD and find that is pretty much enough as I
    don't tend to play the bit hitters when it comes to storage so I can
    have more than enough games installed and then occasionally do some
    house cleaning if it get below 0.5TB free.

    It's one of the things that's nice about Steam, it can take some time
    but reinstalling a game is just easy and you even have cloud saves as well. >>

    Yeah, but also I have a small enough library that I can fit it on
    internal storage with a fair amount left.

    You have failed The Number. ;-)

    <Patrick McGoohan mode on>
    "I am not a number! I am a free man!"
    <Patrick McGoohan mode off>

    I'm afraid to know how much space it would take to install all the
    games in my Steam library (much less /all/ my games). More space than
    I have available by at least two orders of magnitude, I would guess.

    But that's only for now. I remember struggling in the 90s trying to
    get space enough for games. Now, I have pretty much every DOS-era game >installed onto a single hard-disk. One day soon, I hope, I'll be able
    to say the same for games of the 2020s. ;-)

    Need those special drives from the stealth aircraft in that silly
    Scorpion show - something like 2 Petabytes per drive.
    [As soon as these become common, Windows(Current+1) will exceed a
    petabyte.]

    Just thinking - first floppy disk $10 for a SS/SD 160KB 5.25"
    Now you pay that (or not much more) for a Terabyte USB stick.

    Well ok around $130 for the Terabyte stick, still a good deal since
    13x160KB is only 2.08 MB and the stick is way easier to carry around.

    Xocyll
    --
    I don't particularly want you to FOAD, myself. You'll be more of
    a cautionary example if you'll FO And Get Chronically, Incurably,
    Painfully, Progressively, Expensively, Debilitatingly Ill. So
    FOAGCIPPEDI. -- Mike Andrews responding to an idiot in asr

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Xocyll@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jul 12 06:29:31 2025
    Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> looked up from reading the entrails of the porn spammer to utter "The Augury is good, the signs
    say:

    On Fri, 11 Jul 2025 07:30:11 -0400, Xocyll <Xocyll@gmx.com> wrote:


    Just thinking - first floppy disk $10 for a SS/SD 160KB 5.25"
    Now you pay that (or not much more) for a Terabyte USB stick.

    I don't think I ever paid that much for an individual floppy disk, but
    I do remember paying $20-30 for a five pack of disks (I don't remember
    the density, but I'm pretty sure they were double sided). I treated
    those disks like they were gold. Assuming they were single-density
    (which is likely, since they were for my Apple II) that came to around
    $19 per megabyte, the equivalent cost of a terrabyte would come to
    slightly more than $18 million USD. Yowza!

    The $10 for on single sided single density 160KB disk was back in 1981,
    in Canada, in a smallish city - options were limited.

    If ever I got my hands on a time machine, I wouldn't use it to kill
    Hitler or learn the secrets of history. No, I'd go back in time a few
    decades to flaunt how great modern technology is to us primitive
    cavemen of the 80s. "Lookit how much storage I have! Be amazed at the >graphics I can render real-time! My CPU has 32 cores! Nyahahahaha!"

    Which is probably why they don't let me have a time machine ;-)


    Well ok around $130 for the Terabyte stick, still a good deal since >>13x160KB is only 2.08 MB and the stick is way easier to carry around.

    It's amazing how quickly storage costs have dropped. I was actually
    looking into the same thing the other day and saw a 1TB SSD for <$50.

    I do all my shopping at a local computer store, although I did pick up a
    couple USB sticks from the grocery store a few years back. Some
    company I'd never heard of, but a fantastic price so I took a chance.

    Usually I refuse to buy brand-x stuff for computers - you don't know the quality and it often does not last long.

    The $130 quoted price was what they had in-stock at the local store,
    from a reliable brand (in this case Kingston.)

    Like I said earlier, I eagerly await the time in the not-so-far-future
    when I can install all my current games on a single drive, just
    because drives have gotten so large and so inexpensive that why not?

    But, like you said, once that happens, applications, games and
    operating systems will quickly expand to make use of the added space.
    You used to be able to fit a whole OS in the CORNER of a floppy disk!
    Now you need 20+GB. God knows what we'll need in ten years.

    Just looked: Win11 install 18.8GB, plus another 6.9GB in program files
    and 20.8GB in program files (x86)

    This does not include the steam directory since it is not installed
    under one of the program files.

    Which is good since steam weighs in at 687GB and I only have 21 games
    and 2 demos installed currently.

    Xocyll
    --
    I don't particularly want you to FOAD, myself. You'll be more of
    a cautionary example if you'll FO And Get Chronically, Incurably,
    Painfully, Progressively, Expensively, Debilitatingly Ill. So
    FOAGCIPPEDI. -- Mike Andrews responding to an idiot in asr

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From candycanearter07@21:1/5 to Spalls Hurgenson on Mon Jul 14 19:20:02 2025
    Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> wrote at 17:05 this Thursday (GMT):
    On Thu, 10 Jul 2025 16:10:06 -0000 (UTC), candycanearter07
    <candycanearter07@candycanearter07.nomail.afraid> wrote:

    JAB <noway@nochance.com> wrote at 07:50 this Wednesday (GMT):
    On 08/07/2025 17:11, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    As a follow up:

    PCGamesN has an article* on the very subject, pointing to the data of
    the June 2025 Steam Hardware survey** where Valve reports that storage >>>> is increasingly becoming an issue for gamers. 15% of gamers survey
    have less than 100GB free on their drives; 25% have less than 250GB
    free. That's space for one or two modern "big" games (or about half of >>>> a full install of MS Flight Sim 2020 ;-).

    Modern games do require a lot of disk space --all those high-res
    textures and sound files are storage hogs-- but developers /could/ be
    a bit less profligate with our hard-drives if they needed to be. I
    don't NEED multiple language files for every game installed on my
    computer (or, worse, multiple cinematic video files with different
    languages); the developers could give us a choice of which we want
    when we install (some developers do just that, and offer the other
    language packs as free DLC should we suddenly desire to play Call of
    Halo LXXIV in Swahili, or something).

    Maybe this survey will start making them realize the necessity.


    I've got 1.5TB SSD + 1TB HDD and find that is pretty much enough as I
    don't tend to play the bit hitters when it comes to storage so I can
    have more than enough games installed and then occasionally do some
    house cleaning if it get below 0.5TB free.

    It's one of the things that's nice about Steam, it can take some time
    but reinstalling a game is just easy and you even have cloud saves as well. >>

    Yeah, but also I have a small enough library that I can fit it on
    internal storage with a fair amount left.

    You have failed The Number. ;-)

    Oh, I just mostly play more indie games and stuff, my laptop is way underpowered for modern games and also Linux.

    I'm afraid to know how much space it would take to install all the
    games in my Steam library (much less /all/ my games). More space than
    I have available by at least two orders of magnitude, I would guess.

    But that's only for now. I remember struggling in the 90s trying to
    get space enough for games. Now, I have pretty much every DOS-era game installed onto a single hard-disk. One day soon, I hope, I'll be able
    to say the same for games of the 2020s. ;-)


    Once we get petabyte drives...
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ant@21:1/5 to Mike S. on Thu Jul 31 23:40:17 2025
    Mike S. <Mike_S@nowhere.com> wrote:
    On Sat, 21 Jun 2025 09:39:20 -0500, Praetor Mandrake <horchata12839@gmail.com> wrote:

    It's currently 150+. Why don't they just make it a terabyte and no one
    can fit it on their comp?

    20+ years of updates is going to do that.

    150 GB after 20 yrs. Wow.
    --
    "In you, O Lord, I have taken refuge; let me never be put to shame; deliver me in your righteousness." --Psalm 31:1
    Note: A fixed width font (Courier, Monospace, etc.) is required to see this signature correctly.
    /\___/\ Ant(Dude) @ http://aqfl.net & http://antfarm.home.dhs.org.
    / /\ /\ \ Please nuke ANT if replying by e-mail.
    | |o o| |
    \ _ /
    ( )

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)