• Re: US Tipping Culture Gone Mad... to GOG

    From JAB@21:1/5 to Spalls Hurgenson on Mon Jun 23 08:02:28 2025
    On 22/06/2025 16:42, Spalls Hurgenson wrote:
    It's not that I disagree with the idea of donations. I just think that
    a) the placement is terrible, and b) I think the donations should be
    going to a non-profit rather than directly to a storefront. The way
    GOG is doing just seems like they're double-dipping. It's poorly done;
    a good idea with GOG's usual bad implementation.

    I tend to agree. There really needs to be a more direct link to what a
    donation will achieve beyond, well we were going to do this anyway but
    thanks for the cash. Even something simple like here's a list of games
    we currently aren't funding but for every X dollars we'll preserve
    another one.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From candycanearter07@21:1/5 to Spalls Hurgenson on Mon Jun 23 19:30:07 2025
    Spalls Hurgenson <spallshurgenson@gmail.com> wrote at 15:42 this Sunday (GMT):

    I like GOG. I like their no DRM policy. I like their focus on old
    games. I like their selection of new games. I like how they give you
    scans of manuals. I like how you don't have to use a client/front-end
    to install/play games. There's a lot I like about GOG.

    But some of the things they do really makes me wonder what's going on
    there.

    I've bitched about a few of them; their weird marketing strategies
    (like a botched joke about how they were going out of business and
    everybody was going to lose access to their games), or the ridiculous
    subject lines of their emails. Nothing ever very serious, but it makes
    me want to want to ask, "everything all right there, GOG?"

    Funny enough, most of the GOG email subject lines are so ridiculous that
    they get sent to the spam box. So in a way, it solved itself :D

    This new thing is a similar issue. They're now asking for donations
    "for game preservation" when you buy something from their store.*
    Sure, we just paid them for the game, and sure GOG is making several
    hundred millions in profit per year, but why not throw the corporation
    -which already reaps financial from its 'game preservation' stance-
    another tenner. Because everyone is asking for tips for doing their
    job now.

    It's not that I disagree with the idea of donations. I just think that
    a) the placement is terrible, and b) I think the donations should be
    going to a non-profit rather than directly to a storefront. The way
    GOG is doing just seems like they're double-dipping. It's poorly done;
    a good idea with GOG's usual bad implementation.

    Everything all right there, GOG?




    * https://www.pcgamer.com/gaming-industry/gog-now-accepts-donations-when-you-buy-a-game-like-its-a-charity-or-something/


    Who knows, maybe they are having financial issues due to licensing or a
    secret court battle or something.
    --
    user <candycane> is generated from /dev/urandom

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)