1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. COMP.SYS.ACORN.MISC

  • Re: WROCC Meeting - TWimp - 7th May

    From Harriet Bazley@21:1/5 to WROCC on Fri May 2 14:24:58 2025
    On 2 May 2025 as I do recall,
    WROCC wrote:

    This product, including a demo, is available at https://www.ro32.co.uk

    Iris: "Could not connect: Connection refused"

    --
    Harriet Bazley == Loyaulte me lie ==

    Anything can happen in the next half-hour....

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris Hughes@21:1/5 to Harriet Bazley on Fri May 2 16:57:24 2025
    In message <7568b7165c.harriet@bazleyfamily.co.uk>
    Harriet Bazley <harriet@bazleyfamily.co.uk> wrote:

    On 2 May 2025 as I do recall,
    WROCC wrote:

    This product, including a demo, is available at https://www.ro32.co.uk

    Iris: "Could not connect: Connection refused"

    Try http://www.ro32.co.uk just tested and that is working.



    --
    Chris Hughes

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Harriet Bazley@21:1/5 to Chris Hughes on Fri May 2 23:12:10 2025
    On 2 May 2025 as I do recall,
    Chris Hughes wrote:

    In message <7568b7165c.harriet@bazleyfamily.co.uk>
    Harriet Bazley <harriet@bazleyfamily.co.uk> wrote:

    On 2 May 2025 as I do recall,
    WROCC wrote:

    This product, including a demo, is available at https://www.ro32.co.uk

    Iris: "Could not connect: Connection refused"

    Try http://www.ro32.co.uk just tested and that is working.

    Yes, that works! (I'm guessing that some auto-substitution erroneously assumed that http was always equivalent to a more 'modern' https....)


    --
    Harriet Bazley == Loyaulte me lie ==

    Joseph Stalin's grave was a Communist Plot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Steve Fryatt@21:1/5 to Harriet Bazley on Sat May 3 16:17:09 2025
    On 2025-05-02, Harriet Bazley <harriet@bazleyfamily.co.uk> wrote:

    (I'm guessing that some auto-substitution erroneously assumed that http
    was always equivalent to a more 'modern' https....)

    I suspect it was more that the transport wasn't specified and someone reasonably assumed that even the cheapest hosting has https as standard
    these days.

    --
    Steve Fryatt - Leeds, England

    http://www.stevefryatt.org.uk/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)